P6.037 Missed Opportunities For HIV Testing in Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review of Compliance with National 2008 Guidelines in the UK
Background In 2011 there were 6,280 new HIV diagnoses in the UK, of which 47% were diagnosed late (CD4 cell count 2/1,000 adult population. We evaluated compliance with BHIVA-guidelines on HIV testing outside of STI and antenatal settings. Methods We carried out a systematic review searching MEDLINE...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sexually transmitted infections 2013-07, Vol.89 (Suppl 1), p.A381-A381 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A381 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A381 |
container_title | Sexually transmitted infections |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Elmahdi, R Gerver, S Ward, H |
description | Background In 2011 there were 6,280 new HIV diagnoses in the UK, of which 47% were diagnosed late (CD4 cell count 2/1,000 adult population. We evaluated compliance with BHIVA-guidelines on HIV testing outside of STI and antenatal settings. Methods We carried out a systematic review searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and conference abstracts using variations of “HIV”, “testing” and “UK” to identify relevant studies, and used meta-analysis to calculate an overall HIV testing prevalence. Results Thirty-three UK studies measuring HIV testing in BHIVA-guideline recommended settings were identified. Overall, 37.9% of eligible patients had HIV tests. Thirteen studies reported levels of HIV test offer and uptake: in 10 studies < 50% of eligible patients were offered a test; of those offered, uptake ranged from 47.9%–100%, with 11 reporting > 65% uptake. Twenty-one studies reported seropositivity (range: 0.0%–11.8%). Conclusion There appears to be poor compliance with the 2008 BHIVA-guidelines for testing outside of STI and antenatal clinics. Over 60% of eligible patients remained untested. Test offer rates were lower than uptake, suggesting clinician-barriers may be stronger than patient-barriers to increasing testing. Greater clinician training in routine HIV testing and improved HIV testing surveillance in clinical settings may be required to further encourage increased HIV testing in the UK. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051184.1191 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1781697336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4026622231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2121-3bc36ef70737a2ac00da42f4cad93d3f3a3310512611c89ecae746a390c6106e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMFO3DAQhqOqSKW07-Cq51CPJ2snvaGoC6hbQLDsoRfL60yKt7tJsL0Fbr1w5CX7JPUqhXtPHnn-_5-ZL8s-AD8EQPkp0H30pgu54IA5nwCURepU8Crbh0KJHIXE16lGWeZFpfBN9jaEFedcqkm1nz1dyEOO6s_vx28uBGrY-TD0Pm47Fx0FNu09OzldsDmF6LofzHWsXrvOWbNmVxR3f-EzO2JXDyHSxkRn2SX9cnTH-pbV_WZYO9NZYncu3rCz1O-75BScl-x46xpKWWlKSo03xK6_vsv2WrMO9P7fe5BdT7_M65N8dn58Wh_N8qUAATkuLUpqFVeojDCW88YUoi2saSpssEWDCImFkAC2rMgaUoU0WHErgUvCg-zjmDv4_nabbtOrfuvTakGDKkEmTiiTqhpV1vcheGr14N3G-AcNXO_o62f6ekdfj_T1jn7y5qPXJTD3L0bjf2qZtp7os0Wtp4vFbH75vdAq6YtRv9ys_mPMX93dmqE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781697336</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P6.037 Missed Opportunities For HIV Testing in Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review of Compliance with National 2008 Guidelines in the UK</title><source>BMJ Journals Online Archive</source><creator>Elmahdi, R ; Gerver, S ; Ward, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Elmahdi, R ; Gerver, S ; Ward, H</creatorcontrib><description>Background In 2011 there were 6,280 new HIV diagnoses in the UK, of which 47% were diagnosed late (CD4 cell count 2/1,000 adult population. We evaluated compliance with BHIVA-guidelines on HIV testing outside of STI and antenatal settings. Methods We carried out a systematic review searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and conference abstracts using variations of “HIV”, “testing” and “UK” to identify relevant studies, and used meta-analysis to calculate an overall HIV testing prevalence. Results Thirty-three UK studies measuring HIV testing in BHIVA-guideline recommended settings were identified. Overall, 37.9% of eligible patients had HIV tests. Thirteen studies reported levels of HIV test offer and uptake: in 10 studies < 50% of eligible patients were offered a test; of those offered, uptake ranged from 47.9%–100%, with 11 reporting > 65% uptake. Twenty-one studies reported seropositivity (range: 0.0%–11.8%). Conclusion There appears to be poor compliance with the 2008 BHIVA-guidelines for testing outside of STI and antenatal clinics. Over 60% of eligible patients remained untested. Test offer rates were lower than uptake, suggesting clinician-barriers may be stronger than patient-barriers to increasing testing. Greater clinician training in routine HIV testing and improved HIV testing surveillance in clinical settings may be required to further encourage increased HIV testing in the UK.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-3263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051184.1191</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>HIV ; systematic review ; testing</subject><ispartof>Sexually transmitted infections, 2013-07, Vol.89 (Suppl 1), p.A381-A381</ispartof><rights>2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sti.bmj.com/content/89/Suppl_1/A381.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sti.bmj.com/content/89/Suppl_1/A381.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elmahdi, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerver, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, H</creatorcontrib><title>P6.037 Missed Opportunities For HIV Testing in Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review of Compliance with National 2008 Guidelines in the UK</title><title>Sexually transmitted infections</title><addtitle>Sex Transm Infect</addtitle><description>Background In 2011 there were 6,280 new HIV diagnoses in the UK, of which 47% were diagnosed late (CD4 cell count 2/1,000 adult population. We evaluated compliance with BHIVA-guidelines on HIV testing outside of STI and antenatal settings. Methods We carried out a systematic review searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and conference abstracts using variations of “HIV”, “testing” and “UK” to identify relevant studies, and used meta-analysis to calculate an overall HIV testing prevalence. Results Thirty-three UK studies measuring HIV testing in BHIVA-guideline recommended settings were identified. Overall, 37.9% of eligible patients had HIV tests. Thirteen studies reported levels of HIV test offer and uptake: in 10 studies < 50% of eligible patients were offered a test; of those offered, uptake ranged from 47.9%–100%, with 11 reporting > 65% uptake. Twenty-one studies reported seropositivity (range: 0.0%–11.8%). Conclusion There appears to be poor compliance with the 2008 BHIVA-guidelines for testing outside of STI and antenatal clinics. Over 60% of eligible patients remained untested. Test offer rates were lower than uptake, suggesting clinician-barriers may be stronger than patient-barriers to increasing testing. Greater clinician training in routine HIV testing and improved HIV testing surveillance in clinical settings may be required to further encourage increased HIV testing in the UK.</description><subject>HIV</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>testing</subject><issn>1368-4973</issn><issn>1472-3263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMFO3DAQhqOqSKW07-Cq51CPJ2snvaGoC6hbQLDsoRfL60yKt7tJsL0Fbr1w5CX7JPUqhXtPHnn-_5-ZL8s-AD8EQPkp0H30pgu54IA5nwCURepU8Crbh0KJHIXE16lGWeZFpfBN9jaEFedcqkm1nz1dyEOO6s_vx28uBGrY-TD0Pm47Fx0FNu09OzldsDmF6LofzHWsXrvOWbNmVxR3f-EzO2JXDyHSxkRn2SX9cnTH-pbV_WZYO9NZYncu3rCz1O-75BScl-x46xpKWWlKSo03xK6_vsv2WrMO9P7fe5BdT7_M65N8dn58Wh_N8qUAATkuLUpqFVeojDCW88YUoi2saSpssEWDCImFkAC2rMgaUoU0WHErgUvCg-zjmDv4_nabbtOrfuvTakGDKkEmTiiTqhpV1vcheGr14N3G-AcNXO_o62f6ekdfj_T1jn7y5qPXJTD3L0bjf2qZtp7os0Wtp4vFbH75vdAq6YtRv9ys_mPMX93dmqE</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Elmahdi, R</creator><creator>Gerver, S</creator><creator>Ward, H</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>P6.037 Missed Opportunities For HIV Testing in Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review of Compliance with National 2008 Guidelines in the UK</title><author>Elmahdi, R ; Gerver, S ; Ward, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2121-3bc36ef70737a2ac00da42f4cad93d3f3a3310512611c89ecae746a390c6106e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>HIV</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elmahdi, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerver, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Sexually transmitted infections</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elmahdi, R</au><au>Gerver, S</au><au>Ward, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P6.037 Missed Opportunities For HIV Testing in Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review of Compliance with National 2008 Guidelines in the UK</atitle><jtitle>Sexually transmitted infections</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Transm Infect</addtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A381</spage><epage>A381</epage><pages>A381-A381</pages><issn>1368-4973</issn><eissn>1472-3263</eissn><abstract>Background In 2011 there were 6,280 new HIV diagnoses in the UK, of which 47% were diagnosed late (CD4 cell count 2/1,000 adult population. We evaluated compliance with BHIVA-guidelines on HIV testing outside of STI and antenatal settings. Methods We carried out a systematic review searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and conference abstracts using variations of “HIV”, “testing” and “UK” to identify relevant studies, and used meta-analysis to calculate an overall HIV testing prevalence. Results Thirty-three UK studies measuring HIV testing in BHIVA-guideline recommended settings were identified. Overall, 37.9% of eligible patients had HIV tests. Thirteen studies reported levels of HIV test offer and uptake: in 10 studies < 50% of eligible patients were offered a test; of those offered, uptake ranged from 47.9%–100%, with 11 reporting > 65% uptake. Twenty-one studies reported seropositivity (range: 0.0%–11.8%). Conclusion There appears to be poor compliance with the 2008 BHIVA-guidelines for testing outside of STI and antenatal clinics. Over 60% of eligible patients remained untested. Test offer rates were lower than uptake, suggesting clinician-barriers may be stronger than patient-barriers to increasing testing. Greater clinician training in routine HIV testing and improved HIV testing surveillance in clinical settings may be required to further encourage increased HIV testing in the UK.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><doi>10.1136/sextrans-2013-051184.1191</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-4973 |
ispartof | Sexually transmitted infections, 2013-07, Vol.89 (Suppl 1), p.A381-A381 |
issn | 1368-4973 1472-3263 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1781697336 |
source | BMJ Journals Online Archive |
subjects | HIV systematic review testing |
title | P6.037 Missed Opportunities For HIV Testing in Clinical Settings: A Systematic Review of Compliance with National 2008 Guidelines in the UK |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A35%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P6.037%E2%80%85Missed%20Opportunities%20For%20HIV%20Testing%20in%20Clinical%20Settings:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Compliance%20with%20National%202008%20Guidelines%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=Sexually%20transmitted%20infections&rft.au=Elmahdi,%20R&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A381&rft.epage=A381&rft.pages=A381-A381&rft.issn=1368-4973&rft.eissn=1472-3263&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/sextrans-2013-051184.1191&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4026622231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781697336&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |