Differential selection processes in opportunistic chlamydia screening

Differential selection processes in opportunistic chlamydia screening

[...]Riha et al's study was carried out during a period when NCSP coverage was low (9% of all 16-24-year-olds in England).

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sexually transmitted infections 2011-10, Vol.87 (6), p.454-455
Hauptverfasser: Heijne, Janneke C M, Low, Nicola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Behavior
Cervical cancer
Chlamydia
Chlamydia Infections - prevention & control
Data collection
Female
Humans
Infections
Male
Mass Screening - utilization
Medical screening
Patient Selection
Population
Qualitative research
Studies
Womens health
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 455
container_issue 6
container_start_page 454
container_title Sexually transmitted infections
container_volume 87
creator Heijne, Janneke C M
Low, Nicola
description [...]Riha et al's study was carried out during a period when NCSP coverage was low (9% of all 16-24-year-olds in England).
doi_str_mv 10.1136/sti.2011.049783
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1781679885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4026555361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b327t-c45a0d209637cd06783651d5d754ccb9ec29465c6a8a8d067b46d0f61621c20e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtPwzAQxi0EoqUws6FIbEhp_YgfGVFbHlIlFpgtx3bAVeIEOxn63-MqhZXpTrrffffdB8AtgkuECFvFwS0xRGgJi5ILcgbmqOA4J5iR89QTJvI0IDNwFeMeQsg4LS_BDCMOKeF8DrYbV9c2WD841WTRNlYPrvNZHzptY7Qxcz7r-r4Lw-hdOqcz_dWo9mCcyqIO1nrnP6_BRa2aaG9OdQE-nrbv65d89_b8un7c5RXBfMh1QRU0GJaMcG2SGUEYRYYaTgutq9JqXBaMaqaEEsd5VTADa4YYRhpDSxbgftJN9r5HGwe578bg00mJuECMl0LQRK0mSocuxmBr2QfXqnCQCMpjbDL9IY-xySm2tHF30h2r1po__jenBDxMQNXu_1X7AULhda4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781679885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential selection processes in opportunistic chlamydia screening</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Heijne, Janneke C M ; Low, Nicola</creator><creatorcontrib>Heijne, Janneke C M ; Low, Nicola</creatorcontrib><description>[...]Riha et al's study was carried out during a period when NCSP coverage was low (9% of all 16-24-year-olds in England).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-3263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/sti.2011.049783</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21705377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Cervical cancer ; Chlamydia ; Chlamydia Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Data collection ; Female ; Humans ; Infections ; Male ; Mass Screening - utilization ; Medical screening ; Patient Selection ; Population ; Qualitative research ; Studies ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Sexually transmitted infections, 2011-10, Vol.87 (6), p.454-455</ispartof><rights>2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2011 (c) 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b327t-c45a0d209637cd06783651d5d754ccb9ec29465c6a8a8d067b46d0f61621c20e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://sti.bmj.com/content/87/6/454.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://sti.bmj.com/content/87/6/454.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21705377$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heijne, Janneke C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Low, Nicola</creatorcontrib><title>Differential selection processes in opportunistic chlamydia screening</title><title>Sexually transmitted infections</title><addtitle>Sex Transm Infect</addtitle><description>[...]Riha et al's study was carried out during a period when NCSP coverage was low (9% of all 16-24-year-olds in England).</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Chlamydia</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - utilization</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1368-4973</issn><issn>1472-3263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLtPwzAQxi0EoqUws6FIbEhp_YgfGVFbHlIlFpgtx3bAVeIEOxn63-MqhZXpTrrffffdB8AtgkuECFvFwS0xRGgJi5ILcgbmqOA4J5iR89QTJvI0IDNwFeMeQsg4LS_BDCMOKeF8DrYbV9c2WD841WTRNlYPrvNZHzptY7Qxcz7r-r4Lw-hdOqcz_dWo9mCcyqIO1nrnP6_BRa2aaG9OdQE-nrbv65d89_b8un7c5RXBfMh1QRU0GJaMcG2SGUEYRYYaTgutq9JqXBaMaqaEEsd5VTADa4YYRhpDSxbgftJN9r5HGwe578bg00mJuECMl0LQRK0mSocuxmBr2QfXqnCQCMpjbDL9IY-xySm2tHF30h2r1po__jenBDxMQNXu_1X7AULhda4</recordid><startdate>201110</startdate><enddate>201110</enddate><creator>Heijne, Janneke C M</creator><creator>Low, Nicola</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201110</creationdate><title>Differential selection processes in opportunistic chlamydia screening</title><author>Heijne, Janneke C M ; Low, Nicola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b327t-c45a0d209637cd06783651d5d754ccb9ec29465c6a8a8d067b46d0f61621c20e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Chlamydia</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - utilization</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heijne, Janneke C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Low, Nicola</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Sexually transmitted infections</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heijne, Janneke C M</au><au>Low, Nicola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential selection processes in opportunistic chlamydia screening</atitle><jtitle>Sexually transmitted infections</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Transm Infect</addtitle><date>2011-10</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>454</spage><epage>455</epage><pages>454-455</pages><issn>1368-4973</issn><eissn>1472-3263</eissn><abstract>[...]Riha et al's study was carried out during a period when NCSP coverage was low (9% of all 16-24-year-olds in England).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>21705377</pmid><doi>10.1136/sti.2011.049783</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-4973
ispartof Sexually transmitted infections, 2011-10, Vol.87 (6), p.454-455
issn 1368-4973
1472-3263
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1781679885
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Behavior
Cervical cancer
Chlamydia
Chlamydia Infections - prevention & control
Data collection
Female
Humans
Infections
Male
Mass Screening - utilization
Medical screening
Patient Selection
Population
Qualitative research
Studies
Womens health
title Differential selection processes in opportunistic chlamydia screening
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T08%3A47%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20selection%20processes%20in%20opportunistic%20chlamydia%20screening&rft.jtitle=Sexually%20transmitted%20infections&rft.au=Heijne,%20Janneke%20C%20M&rft.date=2011-10&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=454&rft.epage=455&rft.pages=454-455&rft.issn=1368-4973&rft.eissn=1472-3263&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/sti.2011.049783&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4026555361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781679885&rft_id=info:pmid/21705377&rfr_iscdi=true