0398 Risk of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in health occupations
Objectives Several non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) risk factors are typical features of health occupations. We investigated risk of NHL and its major subtype among health workers. Method A pooled analysis of 10 case-control studies was conducted within the Interlymph Consortium. Overall, the study popula...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) England), 2014-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 1), p.A113-A114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A114 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A113 |
container_title | Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Ursi, Michela Noli, Marcello Marras, Federico Aresti, Carlo Mannetje, Andrea‘t Cocco, Pierluigi |
description | Objectives Several non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) risk factors are typical features of health occupations. We investigated risk of NHL and its major subtype among health workers. Method A pooled analysis of 10 case-control studies was conducted within the Interlymph Consortium. Overall, the study population included 10786 NHL cases and 12069 controls. Each occupation of study subjects was coded using the 1968 ISCO classification. Risk of NHL, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular Lymphoma (FL), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and T-cell Lymphoma, associated with having been working for one year or more in specific health occupations was calculated as the Odds Ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) with unconditional logistic regression, adjusting by age, gender and study area. Risk was also calculated for duration of employment > 10 years. Results Health workers employed 10 year or more showed a significant 19% excess risk of FL, which was restricted to male workers (OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.02, 2.59). FL risk was highest (OR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.17–4.26) among the medical staff, and it was consistent in both genders. Male personal care workers also showed an increase in NHL risk (OR = 2.52; 95% CI 1.18–5.36). Risk was not increased among nurses. No consistent patterns of increasing risk was observed for the other NHL subtypes. Conclusions Shift work, ethylene oxide, and viral agents are well known NHL risk factors among health workers. Our results suggest that risk might be more elevated among the medical staff and among men. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/oemed-2014-102362.358 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1781313332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4024294761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2148-a0f2e89c9da1d61e5614c861601a8d6e9edec5428b15d3bf69ac2be452409593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwCEiRmF18_Rd7RBVQpEpIqLvl2A5N2sQhToduLLwoT0JKeACme4bznSt9CN0CWQAweR9DEzymBDgGQpmkCybUGZoBzwnONZXnY2YCMMkBLtFVSjUhwHJGZ0gTptX359dblXZZLLM2tngV_fuuarP1sem2sbHZmLfB7odtFp07dHaoYpuu0UVp9ync_N052jw9bpYrvH59flk-rHFBgStsSUmD0k57C15CEBK4UxIkAau8DDr44ASnqgDhWVFKbR0tAheUEy00m6O7abbr48chpMHU8dC340cDuQIGjDE6tsTUcn1MqQ-l6fqqsf3RADEnSeZXkjlJMpMkM0oaOTJxRVP_E_kBomRpQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781313332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>0398 Risk of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in health occupations</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Ursi, Michela ; Noli, Marcello ; Marras, Federico ; Aresti, Carlo ; Mannetje, Andrea‘t ; Cocco, Pierluigi</creator><creatorcontrib>Ursi, Michela ; Noli, Marcello ; Marras, Federico ; Aresti, Carlo ; Mannetje, Andrea‘t ; Cocco, Pierluigi</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Several non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) risk factors are typical features of health occupations. We investigated risk of NHL and its major subtype among health workers. Method A pooled analysis of 10 case-control studies was conducted within the Interlymph Consortium. Overall, the study population included 10786 NHL cases and 12069 controls. Each occupation of study subjects was coded using the 1968 ISCO classification. Risk of NHL, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular Lymphoma (FL), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and T-cell Lymphoma, associated with having been working for one year or more in specific health occupations was calculated as the Odds Ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) with unconditional logistic regression, adjusting by age, gender and study area. Risk was also calculated for duration of employment > 10 years. Results Health workers employed 10 year or more showed a significant 19% excess risk of FL, which was restricted to male workers (OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.02, 2.59). FL risk was highest (OR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.17–4.26) among the medical staff, and it was consistent in both genders. Male personal care workers also showed an increase in NHL risk (OR = 2.52; 95% CI 1.18–5.36). Risk was not increased among nurses. No consistent patterns of increasing risk was observed for the other NHL subtypes. Conclusions Shift work, ethylene oxide, and viral agents are well known NHL risk factors among health workers. Our results suggest that risk might be more elevated among the medical staff and among men.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-0711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102362.358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Leukemia ; Lymphoma ; Medical personnel ; Risk factors ; Shift work ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2014-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 1), p.A113-A114</ispartof><rights>2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 (c) 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2148-a0f2e89c9da1d61e5614c861601a8d6e9edec5428b15d3bf69ac2be452409593</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_1/A113.4.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_1/A113.4.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77569,77600</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ursi, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noli, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marras, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aresti, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannetje, Andrea‘t</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cocco, Pierluigi</creatorcontrib><title>0398 Risk of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in health occupations</title><title>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</title><description>Objectives Several non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) risk factors are typical features of health occupations. We investigated risk of NHL and its major subtype among health workers. Method A pooled analysis of 10 case-control studies was conducted within the Interlymph Consortium. Overall, the study population included 10786 NHL cases and 12069 controls. Each occupation of study subjects was coded using the 1968 ISCO classification. Risk of NHL, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular Lymphoma (FL), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and T-cell Lymphoma, associated with having been working for one year or more in specific health occupations was calculated as the Odds Ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) with unconditional logistic regression, adjusting by age, gender and study area. Risk was also calculated for duration of employment > 10 years. Results Health workers employed 10 year or more showed a significant 19% excess risk of FL, which was restricted to male workers (OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.02, 2.59). FL risk was highest (OR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.17–4.26) among the medical staff, and it was consistent in both genders. Male personal care workers also showed an increase in NHL risk (OR = 2.52; 95% CI 1.18–5.36). Risk was not increased among nurses. No consistent patterns of increasing risk was observed for the other NHL subtypes. Conclusions Shift work, ethylene oxide, and viral agents are well known NHL risk factors among health workers. Our results suggest that risk might be more elevated among the medical staff and among men.</description><subject>Leukemia</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Shift work</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1351-0711</issn><issn>1470-7926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwCEiRmF18_Rd7RBVQpEpIqLvl2A5N2sQhToduLLwoT0JKeACme4bznSt9CN0CWQAweR9DEzymBDgGQpmkCybUGZoBzwnONZXnY2YCMMkBLtFVSjUhwHJGZ0gTptX359dblXZZLLM2tngV_fuuarP1sem2sbHZmLfB7odtFp07dHaoYpuu0UVp9ync_N052jw9bpYrvH59flk-rHFBgStsSUmD0k57C15CEBK4UxIkAau8DDr44ASnqgDhWVFKbR0tAheUEy00m6O7abbr48chpMHU8dC340cDuQIGjDE6tsTUcn1MqQ-l6fqqsf3RADEnSeZXkjlJMpMkM0oaOTJxRVP_E_kBomRpQg</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Ursi, Michela</creator><creator>Noli, Marcello</creator><creator>Marras, Federico</creator><creator>Aresti, Carlo</creator><creator>Mannetje, Andrea‘t</creator><creator>Cocco, Pierluigi</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>0398 Risk of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in health occupations</title><author>Ursi, Michela ; Noli, Marcello ; Marras, Federico ; Aresti, Carlo ; Mannetje, Andrea‘t ; Cocco, Pierluigi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2148-a0f2e89c9da1d61e5614c861601a8d6e9edec5428b15d3bf69ac2be452409593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Leukemia</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Shift work</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ursi, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noli, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marras, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aresti, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannetje, Andrea‘t</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cocco, Pierluigi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ursi, Michela</au><au>Noli, Marcello</au><au>Marras, Federico</au><au>Aresti, Carlo</au><au>Mannetje, Andrea‘t</au><au>Cocco, Pierluigi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>0398 Risk of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in health occupations</atitle><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A113</spage><epage>A114</epage><pages>A113-A114</pages><issn>1351-0711</issn><eissn>1470-7926</eissn><abstract>Objectives Several non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) risk factors are typical features of health occupations. We investigated risk of NHL and its major subtype among health workers. Method A pooled analysis of 10 case-control studies was conducted within the Interlymph Consortium. Overall, the study population included 10786 NHL cases and 12069 controls. Each occupation of study subjects was coded using the 1968 ISCO classification. Risk of NHL, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular Lymphoma (FL), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and T-cell Lymphoma, associated with having been working for one year or more in specific health occupations was calculated as the Odds Ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) with unconditional logistic regression, adjusting by age, gender and study area. Risk was also calculated for duration of employment > 10 years. Results Health workers employed 10 year or more showed a significant 19% excess risk of FL, which was restricted to male workers (OR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.02, 2.59). FL risk was highest (OR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.17–4.26) among the medical staff, and it was consistent in both genders. Male personal care workers also showed an increase in NHL risk (OR = 2.52; 95% CI 1.18–5.36). Risk was not increased among nurses. No consistent patterns of increasing risk was observed for the other NHL subtypes. Conclusions Shift work, ethylene oxide, and viral agents are well known NHL risk factors among health workers. Our results suggest that risk might be more elevated among the medical staff and among men.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/oemed-2014-102362.358</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1351-0711 |
ispartof | Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2014-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 1), p.A113-A114 |
issn | 1351-0711 1470-7926 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1781313332 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
subjects | Leukemia Lymphoma Medical personnel Risk factors Shift work Working conditions |
title | 0398 Risk of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in health occupations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A23%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=0398%E2%80%85Risk%20of%20non-Hodgkin%20Lymphoma%20in%20health%20occupations&rft.jtitle=Occupational%20and%20environmental%20medicine%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Ursi,%20Michela&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A113&rft.epage=A114&rft.pages=A113-A114&rft.issn=1351-0711&rft.eissn=1470-7926&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2014-102362.358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4024294761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781313332&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |