Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?
The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multipl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quality & quantity 2016-05, Vol.50 (3), p.1299-1315 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1315 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1299 |
container_title | Quality & quantity |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Di Franco, Giovanni |
description | The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multiple correspondence analysis systems provided by two main schools: the French and the Dutch. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1781313030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A739911577</galeid><sourcerecordid>A739911577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-318c5c23e8697dd2d35f949fcd33a4992cc6d52848db7444cd5b954a46977ef83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouFZ_gLeC566ZJtk0XmRZ_IIVL3oO2WS6duk2NekK--9NqQcvMgyB8D6ZyUPINdA5UCpvIwAwUVBIXdJFQU_IDIRkhay4OCUzShkrBEh5Ti5i3FGaKC5nZPl6aIembzG3PgSMve8cdhZz05n2GJt4l_sOU7fH3Ic84jcG0-YD2s-u-TpgvL8kZ7VpI179nhn5eHx4Xz0X67enl9VyXVgmxFAwqKywJcNqoaRzpWOiVlzV1jFmuFKltQsnyopXbiM559aJjRLc8BSXWFcsIzfTu33w4-BB7_whpC2jBlkBA0ZTZWQ-pbamRd10tR-Csakc7hubvlI36X4pmVKQ_MgEwATY4GMMWOs-NHsTjhqoHtXqSa1OavWoVo9DyomJKdttMfxZ5V_oBxMBep0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781313030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Di Franco, Giovanni</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Franco, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><description>The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multiple correspondence analysis systems provided by two main schools: the French and the Dutch.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-5177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analysis ; Contingency tables ; Data analysis ; Data processing ; Methodology of the Social Sciences ; Multivariate analysis ; Parameter estimation ; Principal components analysis ; Quantitative analysis ; Research methodology ; Schools ; Social Sciences ; Software ; Studies ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Quality & quantity, 2016-05, Vol.50 (3), p.1299-1315</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-318c5c23e8697dd2d35f949fcd33a4992cc6d52848db7444cd5b954a46977ef83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-318c5c23e8697dd2d35f949fcd33a4992cc6d52848db7444cd5b954a46977ef83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27323,27903,27904,33753,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Franco, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?</title><title>Quality & quantity</title><addtitle>Qual Quant</addtitle><description>The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multiple correspondence analysis systems provided by two main schools: the French and the Dutch.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Contingency tables</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Methodology of the Social Sciences</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0033-5177</issn><issn>1573-7845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouFZ_gLeC566ZJtk0XmRZ_IIVL3oO2WS6duk2NekK--9NqQcvMgyB8D6ZyUPINdA5UCpvIwAwUVBIXdJFQU_IDIRkhay4OCUzShkrBEh5Ti5i3FGaKC5nZPl6aIembzG3PgSMve8cdhZz05n2GJt4l_sOU7fH3Ic84jcG0-YD2s-u-TpgvL8kZ7VpI179nhn5eHx4Xz0X67enl9VyXVgmxFAwqKywJcNqoaRzpWOiVlzV1jFmuFKltQsnyopXbiM559aJjRLc8BSXWFcsIzfTu33w4-BB7_whpC2jBlkBA0ZTZWQ-pbamRd10tR-Csakc7hubvlI36X4pmVKQ_MgEwATY4GMMWOs-NHsTjhqoHtXqSa1OavWoVo9DyomJKdttMfxZ5V_oBxMBep0</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Di Franco, Giovanni</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?</title><author>Di Franco, Giovanni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-318c5c23e8697dd2d35f949fcd33a4992cc6d52848db7444cd5b954a46977ef83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Contingency tables</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Methodology of the Social Sciences</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Franco, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Quality & quantity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Franco, Giovanni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?</atitle><jtitle>Quality & quantity</jtitle><stitle>Qual Quant</stitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1299</spage><epage>1315</epage><pages>1299-1315</pages><issn>0033-5177</issn><eissn>1573-7845</eissn><abstract>The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multiple correspondence analysis systems provided by two main schools: the French and the Dutch.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-5177 |
ispartof | Quality & quantity, 2016-05, Vol.50 (3), p.1299-1315 |
issn | 0033-5177 1573-7845 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1781313030 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Analysis Contingency tables Data analysis Data processing Methodology of the Social Sciences Multivariate analysis Parameter estimation Principal components analysis Quantitative analysis Research methodology Schools Social Sciences Software Studies Variables |
title | Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple%20correspondence%20analysis:%20one%20only%20or%20several%20techniques?&rft.jtitle=Quality%20&%20quantity&rft.au=Di%20Franco,%20Giovanni&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1299&rft.epage=1315&rft.pages=1299-1315&rft.issn=0033-5177&rft.eissn=1573-7845&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA739911577%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781313030&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A739911577&rfr_iscdi=true |