Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?

The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multipl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality & quantity 2016-05, Vol.50 (3), p.1299-1315
1. Verfasser: Di Franco, Giovanni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1315
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1299
container_title Quality & quantity
container_volume 50
creator Di Franco, Giovanni
description The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multiple correspondence analysis systems provided by two main schools: the French and the Dutch.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1781313030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A739911577</galeid><sourcerecordid>A739911577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-318c5c23e8697dd2d35f949fcd33a4992cc6d52848db7444cd5b954a46977ef83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouFZ_gLeC566ZJtk0XmRZ_IIVL3oO2WS6duk2NekK--9NqQcvMgyB8D6ZyUPINdA5UCpvIwAwUVBIXdJFQU_IDIRkhay4OCUzShkrBEh5Ti5i3FGaKC5nZPl6aIembzG3PgSMve8cdhZz05n2GJt4l_sOU7fH3Ic84jcG0-YD2s-u-TpgvL8kZ7VpI179nhn5eHx4Xz0X67enl9VyXVgmxFAwqKywJcNqoaRzpWOiVlzV1jFmuFKltQsnyopXbiM559aJjRLc8BSXWFcsIzfTu33w4-BB7_whpC2jBlkBA0ZTZWQ-pbamRd10tR-Csakc7hubvlI36X4pmVKQ_MgEwATY4GMMWOs-NHsTjhqoHtXqSa1OavWoVo9DyomJKdttMfxZ5V_oBxMBep0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781313030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Di Franco, Giovanni</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Franco, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><description>The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multiple correspondence analysis systems provided by two main schools: the French and the Dutch.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-5177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analysis ; Contingency tables ; Data analysis ; Data processing ; Methodology of the Social Sciences ; Multivariate analysis ; Parameter estimation ; Principal components analysis ; Quantitative analysis ; Research methodology ; Schools ; Social Sciences ; Software ; Studies ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Quality &amp; quantity, 2016-05, Vol.50 (3), p.1299-1315</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-318c5c23e8697dd2d35f949fcd33a4992cc6d52848db7444cd5b954a46977ef83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-318c5c23e8697dd2d35f949fcd33a4992cc6d52848db7444cd5b954a46977ef83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27323,27903,27904,33753,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Franco, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><title>Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?</title><title>Quality &amp; quantity</title><addtitle>Qual Quant</addtitle><description>The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multiple correspondence analysis systems provided by two main schools: the French and the Dutch.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Contingency tables</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Methodology of the Social Sciences</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0033-5177</issn><issn>1573-7845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouFZ_gLeC566ZJtk0XmRZ_IIVL3oO2WS6duk2NekK--9NqQcvMgyB8D6ZyUPINdA5UCpvIwAwUVBIXdJFQU_IDIRkhay4OCUzShkrBEh5Ti5i3FGaKC5nZPl6aIembzG3PgSMve8cdhZz05n2GJt4l_sOU7fH3Ic84jcG0-YD2s-u-TpgvL8kZ7VpI179nhn5eHx4Xz0X67enl9VyXVgmxFAwqKywJcNqoaRzpWOiVlzV1jFmuFKltQsnyopXbiM559aJjRLc8BSXWFcsIzfTu33w4-BB7_whpC2jBlkBA0ZTZWQ-pbamRd10tR-Csakc7hubvlI36X4pmVKQ_MgEwATY4GMMWOs-NHsTjhqoHtXqSa1OavWoVo9DyomJKdttMfxZ5V_oBxMBep0</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Di Franco, Giovanni</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?</title><author>Di Franco, Giovanni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-318c5c23e8697dd2d35f949fcd33a4992cc6d52848db7444cd5b954a46977ef83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Contingency tables</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Methodology of the Social Sciences</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Franco, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Quality &amp; quantity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Franco, Giovanni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?</atitle><jtitle>Quality &amp; quantity</jtitle><stitle>Qual Quant</stitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1299</spage><epage>1315</epage><pages>1299-1315</pages><issn>0033-5177</issn><eissn>1573-7845</eissn><abstract>The history of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a curious one: in about 80 years, it has been invented and re-invented by different authors independently of each other. After a brief historical account of MCA, the present article intends comparing the various techniques based on the multiple correspondence analysis systems provided by two main schools: the French and the Dutch.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-5177
ispartof Quality & quantity, 2016-05, Vol.50 (3), p.1299-1315
issn 0033-5177
1573-7845
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1781313030
source Sociological Abstracts; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Algorithms
Analysis
Contingency tables
Data analysis
Data processing
Methodology of the Social Sciences
Multivariate analysis
Parameter estimation
Principal components analysis
Quantitative analysis
Research methodology
Schools
Social Sciences
Software
Studies
Variables
title Multiple correspondence analysis: one only or several techniques?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A21%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple%20correspondence%20analysis:%20one%20only%20or%20several%20techniques?&rft.jtitle=Quality%20&%20quantity&rft.au=Di%20Franco,%20Giovanni&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1299&rft.epage=1315&rft.pages=1299-1315&rft.issn=0033-5177&rft.eissn=1573-7845&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11135-015-0206-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA739911577%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781313030&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A739911577&rfr_iscdi=true