Ethics briefings
1 Key changes from the previous 2004 guidelines include, among other things, that services should identify vulnerable women, for example, women being subjected to domestic abuse, and refer them on to appropriate support services; that women should be offered screening for sexually transmitted infect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical ethics 2012-03, Vol.38 (3), p.190-192 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 192 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 190 |
container_title | Journal of medical ethics |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Davies, Martin Brannan, Sophie Chrispin, Eleanor English, Veronica Mussell, Rebecca Sheather, Julian C Sommerville, Ann |
description | 1 Key changes from the previous 2004 guidelines include, among other things, that services should identify vulnerable women, for example, women being subjected to domestic abuse, and refer them on to appropriate support services; that women should be offered screening for sexually transmitted infections and there should be a system for partner notification and referral to a sexual health service; and that all appropriate methods of contraception should be discussed with women at the initial assessment and a plan agreed for contraception after the abortion. The British Medical Association (BMA) has produced a new report documenting the changes that have taken place over the past 4 years and renewing its calls for further efforts to increase the number of donors-including consideration of an opt-out system with safeguards.\n Caesarean section: clinical guidelines In November 2011, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published updated clinical guidelines on caesarean section (CS). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/medethics-2012-100495 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1781097941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23215514</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23215514</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b260t-dfb5c650797bae042f0d557caa4184ee2e7491aac1630534a933c755cd223ef23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj01LAzEQhoMoWKvgHygInqMz-dwcpdQqlnqpFbyEbDaru9puTbag_96tKz2byxze55nMS8gI4QqRq-tVKEL7VvlEGSCjCCCMPCADFJpTwaQ-JAPgoKjKAI7JSUo1dI9lZkDOJ7_mRR6rUFbr13RKjkr3kcLZ3xySp9vJYnxHZ4_T-_HNjOZMQUuLMpdeSdBG5y6AYCUUUmrvnMBMhMCCFgad86g4SC6c4dxrKX3BGA8l40Ny2e_dxOZzG1Jr62Yb192XFnWGYLQR2FGyp3xsUoqhtJtYrVz8tgh2V97uy9tdeduX77xR79WpbeJeYpyhlCi6nPZ5ldrwtc9dfLdKcy3tfDm2zw_LTL3Mp3bR8dDz-ar-5wk_LnV1ZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781097941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics briefings</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Davies, Martin ; Brannan, Sophie ; Chrispin, Eleanor ; English, Veronica ; Mussell, Rebecca ; Sheather, Julian C ; Sommerville, Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Davies, Martin ; Brannan, Sophie ; Chrispin, Eleanor ; English, Veronica ; Mussell, Rebecca ; Sheather, Julian C ; Sommerville, Ann</creatorcontrib><description>1 Key changes from the previous 2004 guidelines include, among other things, that services should identify vulnerable women, for example, women being subjected to domestic abuse, and refer them on to appropriate support services; that women should be offered screening for sexually transmitted infections and there should be a system for partner notification and referral to a sexual health service; and that all appropriate methods of contraception should be discussed with women at the initial assessment and a plan agreed for contraception after the abortion. The British Medical Association (BMA) has produced a new report documenting the changes that have taken place over the past 4 years and renewing its calls for further efforts to increase the number of donors-including consideration of an opt-out system with safeguards.\n Caesarean section: clinical guidelines In November 2011, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published updated clinical guidelines on caesarean section (CS).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-6800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100495</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMETDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Birth control ; Cesarean section ; Childbirth & labor ; Children's rights ; consent ; decision-making capacity ; human rights ; Induced abortion ; Judicial reviews ; Medical ethics ; Medical personnel ; mental capacity ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; mental health legislation ; Organ donation ; Pregnancy ; prison medicine ; public health ethics ; Radicalism ; Terrorism ; Violence against women ; Womens health ; Womens health services</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical ethics, 2012-03, Vol.38 (3), p.190-192</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>2012 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 (c) 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b260t-dfb5c650797bae042f0d557caa4184ee2e7491aac1630534a933c755cd223ef23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jme.bmj.com/content/38/3/190.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jme.bmj.com/content/38/3/190.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,803,3196,23571,27924,27925,58017,58250,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davies, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brannan, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrispin, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>English, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussell, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheather, Julian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerville, Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics briefings</title><title>Journal of medical ethics</title><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><description>1 Key changes from the previous 2004 guidelines include, among other things, that services should identify vulnerable women, for example, women being subjected to domestic abuse, and refer them on to appropriate support services; that women should be offered screening for sexually transmitted infections and there should be a system for partner notification and referral to a sexual health service; and that all appropriate methods of contraception should be discussed with women at the initial assessment and a plan agreed for contraception after the abortion. The British Medical Association (BMA) has produced a new report documenting the changes that have taken place over the past 4 years and renewing its calls for further efforts to increase the number of donors-including consideration of an opt-out system with safeguards.\n Caesarean section: clinical guidelines In November 2011, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published updated clinical guidelines on caesarean section (CS).</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Children's rights</subject><subject>consent</subject><subject>decision-making capacity</subject><subject>human rights</subject><subject>Induced abortion</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>mental capacity</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>mental health legislation</subject><subject>Organ donation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>prison medicine</subject><subject>public health ethics</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Violence against women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Womens health services</subject><issn>0306-6800</issn><issn>1473-4257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNj01LAzEQhoMoWKvgHygInqMz-dwcpdQqlnqpFbyEbDaru9puTbag_96tKz2byxze55nMS8gI4QqRq-tVKEL7VvlEGSCjCCCMPCADFJpTwaQ-JAPgoKjKAI7JSUo1dI9lZkDOJ7_mRR6rUFbr13RKjkr3kcLZ3xySp9vJYnxHZ4_T-_HNjOZMQUuLMpdeSdBG5y6AYCUUUmrvnMBMhMCCFgad86g4SC6c4dxrKX3BGA8l40Ny2e_dxOZzG1Jr62Yb192XFnWGYLQR2FGyp3xsUoqhtJtYrVz8tgh2V97uy9tdeduX77xR79WpbeJeYpyhlCi6nPZ5ldrwtc9dfLdKcy3tfDm2zw_LTL3Mp3bR8dDz-ar-5wk_LnV1ZA</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Davies, Martin</creator><creator>Brannan, Sophie</creator><creator>Chrispin, Eleanor</creator><creator>English, Veronica</creator><creator>Mussell, Rebecca</creator><creator>Sheather, Julian C</creator><creator>Sommerville, Ann</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>Ethics briefings</title><author>Davies, Martin ; Brannan, Sophie ; Chrispin, Eleanor ; English, Veronica ; Mussell, Rebecca ; Sheather, Julian C ; Sommerville, Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b260t-dfb5c650797bae042f0d557caa4184ee2e7491aac1630534a933c755cd223ef23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Children's rights</topic><topic>consent</topic><topic>decision-making capacity</topic><topic>human rights</topic><topic>Induced abortion</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>mental capacity</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>mental health legislation</topic><topic>Organ donation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>prison medicine</topic><topic>public health ethics</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Violence against women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Womens health services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davies, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brannan, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrispin, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>English, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussell, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheather, Julian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerville, Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davies, Martin</au><au>Brannan, Sophie</au><au>Chrispin, Eleanor</au><au>English, Veronica</au><au>Mussell, Rebecca</au><au>Sheather, Julian C</au><au>Sommerville, Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics briefings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>190</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>190-192</pages><issn>0306-6800</issn><eissn>1473-4257</eissn><coden>JMETDR</coden><abstract>1 Key changes from the previous 2004 guidelines include, among other things, that services should identify vulnerable women, for example, women being subjected to domestic abuse, and refer them on to appropriate support services; that women should be offered screening for sexually transmitted infections and there should be a system for partner notification and referral to a sexual health service; and that all appropriate methods of contraception should be discussed with women at the initial assessment and a plan agreed for contraception after the abortion. The British Medical Association (BMA) has produced a new report documenting the changes that have taken place over the past 4 years and renewing its calls for further efforts to increase the number of donors-including consideration of an opt-out system with safeguards.\n Caesarean section: clinical guidelines In November 2011, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published updated clinical guidelines on caesarean section (CS).</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</pub><doi>10.1136/medethics-2012-100495</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-6800 |
ispartof | Journal of medical ethics, 2012-03, Vol.38 (3), p.190-192 |
issn | 0306-6800 1473-4257 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1781097941 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Abortion Birth control Cesarean section Childbirth & labor Children's rights consent decision-making capacity human rights Induced abortion Judicial reviews Medical ethics Medical personnel mental capacity Mental disorders Mental health mental health legislation Organ donation Pregnancy prison medicine public health ethics Radicalism Terrorism Violence against women Womens health Womens health services |
title | Ethics briefings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T04%3A05%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics%20briefings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20ethics&rft.au=Davies,%20Martin&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=190&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=190-192&rft.issn=0306-6800&rft.eissn=1473-4257&rft.coden=JMETDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/medethics-2012-100495&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23215514%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781097941&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23215514&rfr_iscdi=true |