Ethics briefings

1 Key changes from the previous 2004 guidelines include, among other things, that services should identify vulnerable women, for example, women being subjected to domestic abuse, and refer them on to appropriate support services; that women should be offered screening for sexually transmitted infect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical ethics 2012-03, Vol.38 (3), p.190-192
Hauptverfasser: Davies, Martin, Brannan, Sophie, Chrispin, Eleanor, English, Veronica, Mussell, Rebecca, Sheather, Julian C, Sommerville, Ann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 192
container_issue 3
container_start_page 190
container_title Journal of medical ethics
container_volume 38
creator Davies, Martin
Brannan, Sophie
Chrispin, Eleanor
English, Veronica
Mussell, Rebecca
Sheather, Julian C
Sommerville, Ann
description 1 Key changes from the previous 2004 guidelines include, among other things, that services should identify vulnerable women, for example, women being subjected to domestic abuse, and refer them on to appropriate support services; that women should be offered screening for sexually transmitted infections and there should be a system for partner notification and referral to a sexual health service; and that all appropriate methods of contraception should be discussed with women at the initial assessment and a plan agreed for contraception after the abortion. The British Medical Association (BMA) has produced a new report documenting the changes that have taken place over the past 4 years and renewing its calls for further efforts to increase the number of donors-including consideration of an opt-out system with safeguards.\n Caesarean section: clinical guidelines In November 2011, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published updated clinical guidelines on caesarean section (CS).
doi_str_mv 10.1136/medethics-2012-100495
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1781097941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23215514</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23215514</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b260t-dfb5c650797bae042f0d557caa4184ee2e7491aac1630534a933c755cd223ef23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj01LAzEQhoMoWKvgHygInqMz-dwcpdQqlnqpFbyEbDaru9puTbag_96tKz2byxze55nMS8gI4QqRq-tVKEL7VvlEGSCjCCCMPCADFJpTwaQ-JAPgoKjKAI7JSUo1dI9lZkDOJ7_mRR6rUFbr13RKjkr3kcLZ3xySp9vJYnxHZ4_T-_HNjOZMQUuLMpdeSdBG5y6AYCUUUmrvnMBMhMCCFgad86g4SC6c4dxrKX3BGA8l40Ny2e_dxOZzG1Jr62Yb192XFnWGYLQR2FGyp3xsUoqhtJtYrVz8tgh2V97uy9tdeduX77xR79WpbeJeYpyhlCi6nPZ5ldrwtc9dfLdKcy3tfDm2zw_LTL3Mp3bR8dDz-ar-5wk_LnV1ZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781097941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics briefings</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Davies, Martin ; Brannan, Sophie ; Chrispin, Eleanor ; English, Veronica ; Mussell, Rebecca ; Sheather, Julian C ; Sommerville, Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Davies, Martin ; Brannan, Sophie ; Chrispin, Eleanor ; English, Veronica ; Mussell, Rebecca ; Sheather, Julian C ; Sommerville, Ann</creatorcontrib><description>1 Key changes from the previous 2004 guidelines include, among other things, that services should identify vulnerable women, for example, women being subjected to domestic abuse, and refer them on to appropriate support services; that women should be offered screening for sexually transmitted infections and there should be a system for partner notification and referral to a sexual health service; and that all appropriate methods of contraception should be discussed with women at the initial assessment and a plan agreed for contraception after the abortion. The British Medical Association (BMA) has produced a new report documenting the changes that have taken place over the past 4 years and renewing its calls for further efforts to increase the number of donors-including consideration of an opt-out system with safeguards.\n Caesarean section: clinical guidelines In November 2011, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published updated clinical guidelines on caesarean section (CS).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-6800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100495</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMETDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Birth control ; Cesarean section ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Children's rights ; consent ; decision-making capacity ; human rights ; Induced abortion ; Judicial reviews ; Medical ethics ; Medical personnel ; mental capacity ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; mental health legislation ; Organ donation ; Pregnancy ; prison medicine ; public health ethics ; Radicalism ; Terrorism ; Violence against women ; Womens health ; Womens health services</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical ethics, 2012-03, Vol.38 (3), p.190-192</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>2012 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 (c) 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b260t-dfb5c650797bae042f0d557caa4184ee2e7491aac1630534a933c755cd223ef23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jme.bmj.com/content/38/3/190.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jme.bmj.com/content/38/3/190.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,803,3196,23571,27924,27925,58017,58250,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davies, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brannan, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrispin, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>English, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussell, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheather, Julian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerville, Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics briefings</title><title>Journal of medical ethics</title><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><description>1 Key changes from the previous 2004 guidelines include, among other things, that services should identify vulnerable women, for example, women being subjected to domestic abuse, and refer them on to appropriate support services; that women should be offered screening for sexually transmitted infections and there should be a system for partner notification and referral to a sexual health service; and that all appropriate methods of contraception should be discussed with women at the initial assessment and a plan agreed for contraception after the abortion. The British Medical Association (BMA) has produced a new report documenting the changes that have taken place over the past 4 years and renewing its calls for further efforts to increase the number of donors-including consideration of an opt-out system with safeguards.\n Caesarean section: clinical guidelines In November 2011, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published updated clinical guidelines on caesarean section (CS).</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Children's rights</subject><subject>consent</subject><subject>decision-making capacity</subject><subject>human rights</subject><subject>Induced abortion</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>mental capacity</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>mental health legislation</subject><subject>Organ donation</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>prison medicine</subject><subject>public health ethics</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Violence against women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Womens health services</subject><issn>0306-6800</issn><issn>1473-4257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNj01LAzEQhoMoWKvgHygInqMz-dwcpdQqlnqpFbyEbDaru9puTbag_96tKz2byxze55nMS8gI4QqRq-tVKEL7VvlEGSCjCCCMPCADFJpTwaQ-JAPgoKjKAI7JSUo1dI9lZkDOJ7_mRR6rUFbr13RKjkr3kcLZ3xySp9vJYnxHZ4_T-_HNjOZMQUuLMpdeSdBG5y6AYCUUUmrvnMBMhMCCFgad86g4SC6c4dxrKX3BGA8l40Ny2e_dxOZzG1Jr62Yb192XFnWGYLQR2FGyp3xsUoqhtJtYrVz8tgh2V97uy9tdeduX77xR79WpbeJeYpyhlCi6nPZ5ldrwtc9dfLdKcy3tfDm2zw_LTL3Mp3bR8dDz-ar-5wk_LnV1ZA</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Davies, Martin</creator><creator>Brannan, Sophie</creator><creator>Chrispin, Eleanor</creator><creator>English, Veronica</creator><creator>Mussell, Rebecca</creator><creator>Sheather, Julian C</creator><creator>Sommerville, Ann</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>Ethics briefings</title><author>Davies, Martin ; Brannan, Sophie ; Chrispin, Eleanor ; English, Veronica ; Mussell, Rebecca ; Sheather, Julian C ; Sommerville, Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b260t-dfb5c650797bae042f0d557caa4184ee2e7491aac1630534a933c755cd223ef23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Children's rights</topic><topic>consent</topic><topic>decision-making capacity</topic><topic>human rights</topic><topic>Induced abortion</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>mental capacity</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>mental health legislation</topic><topic>Organ donation</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>prison medicine</topic><topic>public health ethics</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Violence against women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Womens health services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davies, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brannan, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chrispin, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>English, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussell, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheather, Julian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommerville, Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davies, Martin</au><au>Brannan, Sophie</au><au>Chrispin, Eleanor</au><au>English, Veronica</au><au>Mussell, Rebecca</au><au>Sheather, Julian C</au><au>Sommerville, Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics briefings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>190</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>190-192</pages><issn>0306-6800</issn><eissn>1473-4257</eissn><coden>JMETDR</coden><abstract>1 Key changes from the previous 2004 guidelines include, among other things, that services should identify vulnerable women, for example, women being subjected to domestic abuse, and refer them on to appropriate support services; that women should be offered screening for sexually transmitted infections and there should be a system for partner notification and referral to a sexual health service; and that all appropriate methods of contraception should be discussed with women at the initial assessment and a plan agreed for contraception after the abortion. The British Medical Association (BMA) has produced a new report documenting the changes that have taken place over the past 4 years and renewing its calls for further efforts to increase the number of donors-including consideration of an opt-out system with safeguards.\n Caesarean section: clinical guidelines In November 2011, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published updated clinical guidelines on caesarean section (CS).</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</pub><doi>10.1136/medethics-2012-100495</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-6800
ispartof Journal of medical ethics, 2012-03, Vol.38 (3), p.190-192
issn 0306-6800
1473-4257
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1781097941
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Abortion
Birth control
Cesarean section
Childbirth & labor
Children's rights
consent
decision-making capacity
human rights
Induced abortion
Judicial reviews
Medical ethics
Medical personnel
mental capacity
Mental disorders
Mental health
mental health legislation
Organ donation
Pregnancy
prison medicine
public health ethics
Radicalism
Terrorism
Violence against women
Womens health
Womens health services
title Ethics briefings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T04%3A05%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics%20briefings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20ethics&rft.au=Davies,%20Martin&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=190&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=190-192&rft.issn=0306-6800&rft.eissn=1473-4257&rft.coden=JMETDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/medethics-2012-100495&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23215514%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781097941&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23215514&rfr_iscdi=true