PFM.47 Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the fetal brain improve the accuracy of diagnosis for mild and severe ventriculomegaly?
Aim Pilot data from our unit suggested that MRI did not add information in isolated ventriculomegaly.1 Therefore we aimed (i) to assess this in a larger series, and (ii) to examine the ability of modern ultrasound technologies to assess corpus callosum (CC) anomalies. Setting A large UK tertiary ref...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition 2014-06, Vol.99 (Suppl 1), p.A97 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A97 |
container_title | Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Lightly, K Simms, R Leibling, R Overton, T Denbow, M |
description | Aim Pilot data from our unit suggested that MRI did not add information in isolated ventriculomegaly.1 Therefore we aimed (i) to assess this in a larger series, and (ii) to examine the ability of modern ultrasound technologies to assess corpus callosum (CC) anomalies. Setting A large UK tertiary referral unit. Methods A retrospective review of all MRIs between 2008–2013 was carried out. In cases of ventriculomegaly (mild 10–15mm; severe 15mm+) ultrasound and MRI findings were compared. Results In this period 121 MRIs were carried out, of these 65 had ventriculomegaly (full information in 64). Other common indications for MRI included multiples post IUD/TTTS and complex intracranial abnormalities. In 95% cases of ventriculomegaly (61/64), MRI confirmed ultrasound findings and did not add any further information. Abstract PFM.47 Table Ultrasound findings Confirmed on MRI Additional MRI findings Isolated mild ventriculomegaly n = 29 29 (100%) 0 (0%) Unisolated mild ventriculomegaly n = 17 16 (94%) 1 (6%) Isolated severe ventriculomegaly n = 8(5/8 were progressive ventriculomegaly) 7 (88%) 1 (12%) Unisolated severe ventriculomegaly n = 1 9 (90%) 1 (10%) Agenesis of the corpus callosum was suspected in six cases with ventriculomegaly, and confirmed by MRI in four. There were no cases of agenesis of CC found unexpectedly at MRI where the indication was mild ventriculomegaly. Conclusion Where ultrasound reveals isolated ventriculomegaly, MRI did not add any further information. When agenesis of the CC is suspected on ultrasound, an MRI is useful in confirming the diagnosis. Reference Platt et al. Clinical value of fetal brain MRI; Indications and limitations. PF 18. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94(Suppl):Fa11–Fa25 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306576.277 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1780451051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4019809831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b761-fd1d5394a6ee67efd0b4eacea7ff027e32a0c5820b79ea144536e77057ed4303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtPwzAQhCMEEuXxHyzBAQ4pdmxnmxNCPCtRgQp3a-NsWld5gJ1W6o0LB_4mv4SUcuC0o9FodvRF0angQyFkeoHezgsX7NxVRZxwoWLJUw3pMAHYiQZCpaPe1slur6XO4iTLRvvRQQgLzrkAgEH09Xw3GSr4_vi8aSmwCc4a6pxlUwptg40lNq5x5poZO5tMx-esLVk3J1ZShxXLPbqGufrNtyv69dHapUe73uQK15e1wQVWtp7V_UaGTcECrcgTW1HTeWeXVVvTDKv15VG0V2IV6PjvHkYvd7ev1w_x49P9-PrqMc4hFXFZiELLTGFKlAKVBc8VoSWEsuQJkEyQWz1KeA4ZoVBKy5QAuAYqlOTyMDrZtvab35cUOrNol77pHxoBI6604Fr0Kdim8nph3ryr0a-N4GZD3fynbjbUzZa66anLH_Xhe1o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780451051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PFM.47 Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the fetal brain improve the accuracy of diagnosis for mild and severe ventriculomegaly?</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Lightly, K ; Simms, R ; Leibling, R ; Overton, T ; Denbow, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Lightly, K ; Simms, R ; Leibling, R ; Overton, T ; Denbow, M</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Pilot data from our unit suggested that MRI did not add information in isolated ventriculomegaly.1 Therefore we aimed (i) to assess this in a larger series, and (ii) to examine the ability of modern ultrasound technologies to assess corpus callosum (CC) anomalies. Setting A large UK tertiary referral unit. Methods A retrospective review of all MRIs between 2008–2013 was carried out. In cases of ventriculomegaly (mild 10–15mm; severe 15mm+) ultrasound and MRI findings were compared. Results In this period 121 MRIs were carried out, of these 65 had ventriculomegaly (full information in 64). Other common indications for MRI included multiples post IUD/TTTS and complex intracranial abnormalities. In 95% cases of ventriculomegaly (61/64), MRI confirmed ultrasound findings and did not add any further information. Abstract PFM.47 Table Ultrasound findings Confirmed on MRI Additional MRI findings Isolated mild ventriculomegaly n = 29 29 (100%) 0 (0%) Unisolated mild ventriculomegaly n = 17 16 (94%) 1 (6%) Isolated severe ventriculomegaly n = 8(5/8 were progressive ventriculomegaly) 7 (88%) 1 (12%) Unisolated severe ventriculomegaly n = 1 9 (90%) 1 (10%) Agenesis of the corpus callosum was suspected in six cases with ventriculomegaly, and confirmed by MRI in four. There were no cases of agenesis of CC found unexpectedly at MRI where the indication was mild ventriculomegaly. Conclusion Where ultrasound reveals isolated ventriculomegaly, MRI did not add any further information. When agenesis of the CC is suspected on ultrasound, an MRI is useful in confirming the diagnosis. Reference Platt et al. Clinical value of fetal brain MRI; Indications and limitations. PF 18. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94(Suppl):Fa11–Fa25</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-2998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306576.277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2014-06, Vol.99 (Suppl 1), p.A97</ispartof><rights>2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 (c) 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://fn.bmj.com/content/99/Suppl_1/A97.2.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://fn.bmj.com/content/99/Suppl_1/A97.2.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,23550,27901,27902,77343,77374</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lightly, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simms, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leibling, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overton, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denbow, M</creatorcontrib><title>PFM.47 Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the fetal brain improve the accuracy of diagnosis for mild and severe ventriculomegaly?</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition</title><description>Aim Pilot data from our unit suggested that MRI did not add information in isolated ventriculomegaly.1 Therefore we aimed (i) to assess this in a larger series, and (ii) to examine the ability of modern ultrasound technologies to assess corpus callosum (CC) anomalies. Setting A large UK tertiary referral unit. Methods A retrospective review of all MRIs between 2008–2013 was carried out. In cases of ventriculomegaly (mild 10–15mm; severe 15mm+) ultrasound and MRI findings were compared. Results In this period 121 MRIs were carried out, of these 65 had ventriculomegaly (full information in 64). Other common indications for MRI included multiples post IUD/TTTS and complex intracranial abnormalities. In 95% cases of ventriculomegaly (61/64), MRI confirmed ultrasound findings and did not add any further information. Abstract PFM.47 Table Ultrasound findings Confirmed on MRI Additional MRI findings Isolated mild ventriculomegaly n = 29 29 (100%) 0 (0%) Unisolated mild ventriculomegaly n = 17 16 (94%) 1 (6%) Isolated severe ventriculomegaly n = 8(5/8 were progressive ventriculomegaly) 7 (88%) 1 (12%) Unisolated severe ventriculomegaly n = 1 9 (90%) 1 (10%) Agenesis of the corpus callosum was suspected in six cases with ventriculomegaly, and confirmed by MRI in four. There were no cases of agenesis of CC found unexpectedly at MRI where the indication was mild ventriculomegaly. Conclusion Where ultrasound reveals isolated ventriculomegaly, MRI did not add any further information. When agenesis of the CC is suspected on ultrasound, an MRI is useful in confirming the diagnosis. Reference Platt et al. Clinical value of fetal brain MRI; Indications and limitations. PF 18. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94(Suppl):Fa11–Fa25</description><issn>1359-2998</issn><issn>1468-2052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtPwzAQhCMEEuXxHyzBAQ4pdmxnmxNCPCtRgQp3a-NsWld5gJ1W6o0LB_4mv4SUcuC0o9FodvRF0angQyFkeoHezgsX7NxVRZxwoWLJUw3pMAHYiQZCpaPe1slur6XO4iTLRvvRQQgLzrkAgEH09Xw3GSr4_vi8aSmwCc4a6pxlUwptg40lNq5x5poZO5tMx-esLVk3J1ZShxXLPbqGufrNtyv69dHapUe73uQK15e1wQVWtp7V_UaGTcECrcgTW1HTeWeXVVvTDKv15VG0V2IV6PjvHkYvd7ev1w_x49P9-PrqMc4hFXFZiELLTGFKlAKVBc8VoSWEsuQJkEyQWz1KeA4ZoVBKy5QAuAYqlOTyMDrZtvab35cUOrNol77pHxoBI6604Fr0Kdim8nph3ryr0a-N4GZD3fynbjbUzZa66anLH_Xhe1o</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Lightly, K</creator><creator>Simms, R</creator><creator>Leibling, R</creator><creator>Overton, T</creator><creator>Denbow, M</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>PFM.47 Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the fetal brain improve the accuracy of diagnosis for mild and severe ventriculomegaly?</title><author>Lightly, K ; Simms, R ; Leibling, R ; Overton, T ; Denbow, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b761-fd1d5394a6ee67efd0b4eacea7ff027e32a0c5820b79ea144536e77057ed4303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lightly, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simms, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leibling, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overton, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denbow, M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lightly, K</au><au>Simms, R</au><au>Leibling, R</au><au>Overton, T</au><au>Denbow, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PFM.47 Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the fetal brain improve the accuracy of diagnosis for mild and severe ventriculomegaly?</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition</jtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A97</spage><pages>A97-</pages><issn>1359-2998</issn><eissn>1468-2052</eissn><abstract>Aim Pilot data from our unit suggested that MRI did not add information in isolated ventriculomegaly.1 Therefore we aimed (i) to assess this in a larger series, and (ii) to examine the ability of modern ultrasound technologies to assess corpus callosum (CC) anomalies. Setting A large UK tertiary referral unit. Methods A retrospective review of all MRIs between 2008–2013 was carried out. In cases of ventriculomegaly (mild 10–15mm; severe 15mm+) ultrasound and MRI findings were compared. Results In this period 121 MRIs were carried out, of these 65 had ventriculomegaly (full information in 64). Other common indications for MRI included multiples post IUD/TTTS and complex intracranial abnormalities. In 95% cases of ventriculomegaly (61/64), MRI confirmed ultrasound findings and did not add any further information. Abstract PFM.47 Table Ultrasound findings Confirmed on MRI Additional MRI findings Isolated mild ventriculomegaly n = 29 29 (100%) 0 (0%) Unisolated mild ventriculomegaly n = 17 16 (94%) 1 (6%) Isolated severe ventriculomegaly n = 8(5/8 were progressive ventriculomegaly) 7 (88%) 1 (12%) Unisolated severe ventriculomegaly n = 1 9 (90%) 1 (10%) Agenesis of the corpus callosum was suspected in six cases with ventriculomegaly, and confirmed by MRI in four. There were no cases of agenesis of CC found unexpectedly at MRI where the indication was mild ventriculomegaly. Conclusion Where ultrasound reveals isolated ventriculomegaly, MRI did not add any further information. When agenesis of the CC is suspected on ultrasound, an MRI is useful in confirming the diagnosis. Reference Platt et al. Clinical value of fetal brain MRI; Indications and limitations. PF 18. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94(Suppl):Fa11–Fa25</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2014-306576.277</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1359-2998 |
ispartof | Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2014-06, Vol.99 (Suppl 1), p.A97 |
issn | 1359-2998 1468-2052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1780451051 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
title | PFM.47 Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the fetal brain improve the accuracy of diagnosis for mild and severe ventriculomegaly? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A49%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PFM.47%E2%80%85Does%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging%20(MRI)%20of%20the%20fetal%20brain%20improve%20the%20accuracy%20of%20diagnosis%20for%20mild%20and%20severe%20ventriculomegaly?&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood.%20Fetal%20and%20neonatal%20edition&rft.au=Lightly,%20K&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A97&rft.pages=A97-&rft.issn=1359-2998&rft.eissn=1468-2052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306576.277&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E4019809831%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780451051&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |