Risk of recurrent adverse pregnancy outcome in women with diabetes
Background Women with pre-gestational diabetes experience an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome, but there are limited data on recurrence of adverse outcome. This study examined recurrence of adverse outcome in a cohort of women with pre-gestational diabetes from Northern England. Methods 2...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition 2011-06, Vol.96 (Suppl 1), p.Fa129-Fa129 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | Fa129 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | Fa129 |
container_title | Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Bell, R Tennant, P W G Prathapan, S Bilous, R |
description | Background Women with pre-gestational diabetes experience an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome, but there are limited data on recurrence of adverse outcome. This study examined recurrence of adverse outcome in a cohort of women with pre-gestational diabetes from Northern England. Methods 221 women with pre-gestational diabetes and with a first and second pregnancy during 1996–2008 were identified from the Northern Diabetes in Pregnancy Survey. Rates of adverse outcome (fetal loss at any gestation, major congenital anomaly, or infant death) for each pregnancy and recurrence rates were determined using descriptive approaches. Predictors of adverse outcome were examined by logistic regression. Results 69 (31%) first pregnancies ended in adverse outcome, including 14 (6%) with congenital anomalies, 52 (24%) additional fetal losses and 3 (1%) additional infant deaths. 41 (19%) second pregnancies ended in adverse outcome, significantly less than the rate among first pregnancies (p=0.002), including 21 (10%) with congenital anomaly, 19 (9%) additional fetal losses, and 1 ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/archdischild.2011.300157.22 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1780448504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4019781871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1654-65bc5cddf4b329e5770a9a242f7890791ee0cf56f7b8e6c65f5f55e94f36d7913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkFtLxDAQhYsouK7-h8A-d03SXBp80sUrRVFUfAtpOnG767Zr0qr7781SEV9lYGZgvjMHTpJMCJ4Skolj4-28qoOd12_VlGJCphnGhMsppTvJiDCRpxRzuhv3jKuUKpXvJwchLHDEpJSj5OyhDkvUOuTB9t5D0yFTfYAPgNYeXhvT2A1q-862K0B1gz7jjL3u5qiqTQkdhMNkz5m3AEc_c5w8XZw_zq7S4u7yenZapCURnKWCl5bbqnKszKgCLiU2ylBGncwVlooAYOu4cLLMQVjBXSwOirlMVPGcjZPJ8Hft2_ceQqcXbe-baKmJzDFjOccsUicDZX0bggen175eGb_RBOttaPpvaHobmh5C05RGdTqo69DB16_U-KUWMpNc3z7PdJHzl_y-uNFZ5MXAl6vFv4y-AXbMhF4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780448504</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk of recurrent adverse pregnancy outcome in women with diabetes</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Bell, R ; Tennant, P W G ; Prathapan, S ; Bilous, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Bell, R ; Tennant, P W G ; Prathapan, S ; Bilous, R</creatorcontrib><description>Background Women with pre-gestational diabetes experience an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome, but there are limited data on recurrence of adverse outcome. This study examined recurrence of adverse outcome in a cohort of women with pre-gestational diabetes from Northern England. Methods 221 women with pre-gestational diabetes and with a first and second pregnancy during 1996–2008 were identified from the Northern Diabetes in Pregnancy Survey. Rates of adverse outcome (fetal loss at any gestation, major congenital anomaly, or infant death) for each pregnancy and recurrence rates were determined using descriptive approaches. Predictors of adverse outcome were examined by logistic regression. Results 69 (31%) first pregnancies ended in adverse outcome, including 14 (6%) with congenital anomalies, 52 (24%) additional fetal losses and 3 (1%) additional infant deaths. 41 (19%) second pregnancies ended in adverse outcome, significantly less than the rate among first pregnancies (p=0.002), including 21 (10%) with congenital anomaly, 19 (9%) additional fetal losses, and 1 (<1%) additional infant death. 21 (10%) women experienced an adverse outcome in both pregnancies. Adverse outcome in the first pregnancy was associated with more than double the risk of an adverse outcome in the second pregnancy (RR=2.3 (95% CI 1.3 to 3.9)). Compared to those with no history of adverse outcome, women with recurrent adverse outcomes were more likely to be from an ethnic minority background (p=0.01). Conclusion The overall risk of adverse pregnancy outcome is lower in second pregnancies than first, but history of an adverse outcome increases the risk in the second pregnancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-2998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild.2011.300157.22</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</publisher><subject>Congenital defects ; Infants ; Pregnancy</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2011-06, Vol.96 (Suppl 1), p.Fa129-Fa129</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2011 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://fn.bmj.com/content/96/Suppl_1/Fa129.2.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://fn.bmj.com/content/96/Suppl_1/Fa129.2.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bell, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tennant, P W G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prathapan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilous, R</creatorcontrib><title>Risk of recurrent adverse pregnancy outcome in women with diabetes</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed</addtitle><description>Background Women with pre-gestational diabetes experience an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome, but there are limited data on recurrence of adverse outcome. This study examined recurrence of adverse outcome in a cohort of women with pre-gestational diabetes from Northern England. Methods 221 women with pre-gestational diabetes and with a first and second pregnancy during 1996–2008 were identified from the Northern Diabetes in Pregnancy Survey. Rates of adverse outcome (fetal loss at any gestation, major congenital anomaly, or infant death) for each pregnancy and recurrence rates were determined using descriptive approaches. Predictors of adverse outcome were examined by logistic regression. Results 69 (31%) first pregnancies ended in adverse outcome, including 14 (6%) with congenital anomalies, 52 (24%) additional fetal losses and 3 (1%) additional infant deaths. 41 (19%) second pregnancies ended in adverse outcome, significantly less than the rate among first pregnancies (p=0.002), including 21 (10%) with congenital anomaly, 19 (9%) additional fetal losses, and 1 (<1%) additional infant death. 21 (10%) women experienced an adverse outcome in both pregnancies. Adverse outcome in the first pregnancy was associated with more than double the risk of an adverse outcome in the second pregnancy (RR=2.3 (95% CI 1.3 to 3.9)). Compared to those with no history of adverse outcome, women with recurrent adverse outcomes were more likely to be from an ethnic minority background (p=0.01). Conclusion The overall risk of adverse pregnancy outcome is lower in second pregnancies than first, but history of an adverse outcome increases the risk in the second pregnancy.</description><subject>Congenital defects</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><issn>1359-2998</issn><issn>1468-2052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkFtLxDAQhYsouK7-h8A-d03SXBp80sUrRVFUfAtpOnG767Zr0qr7781SEV9lYGZgvjMHTpJMCJ4Skolj4-28qoOd12_VlGJCphnGhMsppTvJiDCRpxRzuhv3jKuUKpXvJwchLHDEpJSj5OyhDkvUOuTB9t5D0yFTfYAPgNYeXhvT2A1q-862K0B1gz7jjL3u5qiqTQkdhMNkz5m3AEc_c5w8XZw_zq7S4u7yenZapCURnKWCl5bbqnKszKgCLiU2ylBGncwVlooAYOu4cLLMQVjBXSwOirlMVPGcjZPJ8Hft2_ceQqcXbe-baKmJzDFjOccsUicDZX0bggen175eGb_RBOttaPpvaHobmh5C05RGdTqo69DB16_U-KUWMpNc3z7PdJHzl_y-uNFZ5MXAl6vFv4y-AXbMhF4</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>Bell, R</creator><creator>Tennant, P W G</creator><creator>Prathapan, S</creator><creator>Bilous, R</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Risk of recurrent adverse pregnancy outcome in women with diabetes</title><author>Bell, R ; Tennant, P W G ; Prathapan, S ; Bilous, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1654-65bc5cddf4b329e5770a9a242f7890791ee0cf56f7b8e6c65f5f55e94f36d7913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Congenital defects</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bell, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tennant, P W G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prathapan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilous, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bell, R</au><au>Tennant, P W G</au><au>Prathapan, S</au><au>Bilous, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk of recurrent adverse pregnancy outcome in women with diabetes</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed</addtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>Fa129</spage><epage>Fa129</epage><pages>Fa129-Fa129</pages><issn>1359-2998</issn><eissn>1468-2052</eissn><abstract>Background Women with pre-gestational diabetes experience an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome, but there are limited data on recurrence of adverse outcome. This study examined recurrence of adverse outcome in a cohort of women with pre-gestational diabetes from Northern England. Methods 221 women with pre-gestational diabetes and with a first and second pregnancy during 1996–2008 were identified from the Northern Diabetes in Pregnancy Survey. Rates of adverse outcome (fetal loss at any gestation, major congenital anomaly, or infant death) for each pregnancy and recurrence rates were determined using descriptive approaches. Predictors of adverse outcome were examined by logistic regression. Results 69 (31%) first pregnancies ended in adverse outcome, including 14 (6%) with congenital anomalies, 52 (24%) additional fetal losses and 3 (1%) additional infant deaths. 41 (19%) second pregnancies ended in adverse outcome, significantly less than the rate among first pregnancies (p=0.002), including 21 (10%) with congenital anomaly, 19 (9%) additional fetal losses, and 1 (<1%) additional infant death. 21 (10%) women experienced an adverse outcome in both pregnancies. Adverse outcome in the first pregnancy was associated with more than double the risk of an adverse outcome in the second pregnancy (RR=2.3 (95% CI 1.3 to 3.9)). Compared to those with no history of adverse outcome, women with recurrent adverse outcomes were more likely to be from an ethnic minority background (p=0.01). Conclusion The overall risk of adverse pregnancy outcome is lower in second pregnancies than first, but history of an adverse outcome increases the risk in the second pregnancy.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</pub><doi>10.1136/archdischild.2011.300157.22</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1359-2998 |
ispartof | Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2011-06, Vol.96 (Suppl 1), p.Fa129-Fa129 |
issn | 1359-2998 1468-2052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1780448504 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
subjects | Congenital defects Infants Pregnancy |
title | Risk of recurrent adverse pregnancy outcome in women with diabetes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A14%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20of%20recurrent%20adverse%20pregnancy%20outcome%20in%20women%20with%20diabetes&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood.%20Fetal%20and%20neonatal%20edition&rft.au=Bell,%20R&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=Fa129&rft.epage=Fa129&rft.pages=Fa129-Fa129&rft.issn=1359-2998&rft.eissn=1468-2052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild.2011.300157.22&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4019781871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780448504&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |