Faculty Preferences over Unionization: Evidence from Open Letters at Two Research Universities

What determines employee preferences for unionizing their workplaces? A substantial literature addresses this question with surveys on worker attitudes and pay. Unionization drives at the Universities of Minnesota and Washington have given rise to open letters of support or opposition from over 1,00...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NBER Working Paper Series 2016-04, p.22149
1. Verfasser: Waldfogel, Joel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 22149
container_title NBER Working Paper Series
container_volume
creator Waldfogel, Joel
description What determines employee preferences for unionizing their workplaces? A substantial literature addresses this question with surveys on worker attitudes and pay. Unionization drives at the Universities of Minnesota and Washington have given rise to open letters of support or opposition from over 1,000 faculty at Washington and support from over 200 at Minnesota. Combining these expressions with publicly available data on salary, job titles, department affiliation, research productivity, teaching success, and political contributions from over 5,000 faculty, we provide new estimates of the determinants of faculty preferences for unionization at research universities. We find that faculty with higher pay and greater research productivity are less supportive of unionization, even after controlling for job title and department. Attitudes matter as well: after accounting for pay and productivity, faculty in fields documented elsewhere to have more politically liberal participants are more likely to support unionization.
doi_str_mv 10.3386/w22149
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1779934555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><nber_id>w22149</nber_id><sourcerecordid>4017387821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e1049-898ac649f67aaaaee613eba91d8794c78099c352ee296bd82c6e11c998dab22c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9PwzAMxXMAiTHgA3CKxLmQP20ac0PTNpAmDaHtSpWmrui0tSNJN41PT6YifHkH_579bELuOHuUUqunoxA8hQsyYhp0IkDmV-Ta-w1jQmvGR-RzZmy_DSf67rBGh61FT7sDOrpum65tfkyI8kynh6Y6N2ntuh1d7rGlCwwBnacm0NWxox_o0Tj7dTZGv29Cg_6GXNZm6_H2T8dkPZuuJq_JYjl_m7wsEuQshSSGM1alUKvcxEJUXGJpgFc6h9TmmgFYmQlEAaqstLAKObcAujKlEFaOycMwd--67x59KDZd79q4suB5DiDTLMsiRQcKbTzNF3vX7Iw7FTGDyrTUKYvI_YC0Jbp_YHij_AUVWmYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779934555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Faculty Preferences over Unionization: Evidence from Open Letters at Two Research Universities</title><source>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Waldfogel, Joel</creator><creatorcontrib>Waldfogel, Joel</creatorcontrib><description>What determines employee preferences for unionizing their workplaces? A substantial literature addresses this question with surveys on worker attitudes and pay. Unionization drives at the Universities of Minnesota and Washington have given rise to open letters of support or opposition from over 1,000 faculty at Washington and support from over 200 at Minnesota. Combining these expressions with publicly available data on salary, job titles, department affiliation, research productivity, teaching success, and political contributions from over 5,000 faculty, we provide new estimates of the determinants of faculty preferences for unionization at research universities. We find that faculty with higher pay and greater research productivity are less supportive of unionization, even after controlling for job title and department. Attitudes matter as well: after accounting for pay and productivity, faculty in fields documented elsewhere to have more politically liberal participants are more likely to support unionization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w22149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Author productivity ; Economic theory ; Gender ; Job titles ; Law and Economics ; Politics ; Preferences ; Studies ; Success ; Teaching ; Unionization ; University faculty ; Workers</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2016-04, p.22149</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Apr 2016</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waldfogel, Joel</creatorcontrib><title>Faculty Preferences over Unionization: Evidence from Open Letters at Two Research Universities</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>What determines employee preferences for unionizing their workplaces? A substantial literature addresses this question with surveys on worker attitudes and pay. Unionization drives at the Universities of Minnesota and Washington have given rise to open letters of support or opposition from over 1,000 faculty at Washington and support from over 200 at Minnesota. Combining these expressions with publicly available data on salary, job titles, department affiliation, research productivity, teaching success, and political contributions from over 5,000 faculty, we provide new estimates of the determinants of faculty preferences for unionization at research universities. We find that faculty with higher pay and greater research productivity are less supportive of unionization, even after controlling for job title and department. Attitudes matter as well: after accounting for pay and productivity, faculty in fields documented elsewhere to have more politically liberal participants are more likely to support unionization.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Author productivity</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Job titles</subject><subject>Law and Economics</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Unionization</subject><subject>University faculty</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>NBR</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE9PwzAMxXMAiTHgA3CKxLmQP20ac0PTNpAmDaHtSpWmrui0tSNJN41PT6YifHkH_579bELuOHuUUqunoxA8hQsyYhp0IkDmV-Ta-w1jQmvGR-RzZmy_DSf67rBGh61FT7sDOrpum65tfkyI8kynh6Y6N2ntuh1d7rGlCwwBnacm0NWxox_o0Tj7dTZGv29Cg_6GXNZm6_H2T8dkPZuuJq_JYjl_m7wsEuQshSSGM1alUKvcxEJUXGJpgFc6h9TmmgFYmQlEAaqstLAKObcAujKlEFaOycMwd--67x59KDZd79q4suB5DiDTLMsiRQcKbTzNF3vX7Iw7FTGDyrTUKYvI_YC0Jbp_YHij_AUVWmYk</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Waldfogel, Joel</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research</general><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>CZO</scope><scope>MPB</scope><scope>NBR</scope><scope>XD6</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Faculty Preferences over Unionization: Evidence from Open Letters at Two Research Universities</title><author>Waldfogel, Joel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e1049-898ac649f67aaaaee613eba91d8794c78099c352ee296bd82c6e11c998dab22c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Author productivity</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Job titles</topic><topic>Law and Economics</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Unionization</topic><topic>University faculty</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waldfogel, Joel</creatorcontrib><collection>NBER Working Papers</collection><collection>NBER</collection><collection>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</collection><collection>NBER Technical Working Papers Archive</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waldfogel, Joel</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Faculty Preferences over Unionization: Evidence from Open Letters at Two Research Universities</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><spage>22149</spage><pages>22149-</pages><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>What determines employee preferences for unionizing their workplaces? A substantial literature addresses this question with surveys on worker attitudes and pay. Unionization drives at the Universities of Minnesota and Washington have given rise to open letters of support or opposition from over 1,000 faculty at Washington and support from over 200 at Minnesota. Combining these expressions with publicly available data on salary, job titles, department affiliation, research productivity, teaching success, and political contributions from over 5,000 faculty, we provide new estimates of the determinants of faculty preferences for unionization at research universities. We find that faculty with higher pay and greater research productivity are less supportive of unionization, even after controlling for job title and department. Attitudes matter as well: after accounting for pay and productivity, faculty in fields documented elsewhere to have more politically liberal participants are more likely to support unionization.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, Mass</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research</pub><doi>10.3386/w22149</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2937
ispartof NBER Working Paper Series, 2016-04, p.22149
issn 0898-2937
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1779934555
source National Bureau of Economic Research Publications; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Attitudes
Author productivity
Economic theory
Gender
Job titles
Law and Economics
Politics
Preferences
Studies
Success
Teaching
Unionization
University faculty
Workers
title Faculty Preferences over Unionization: Evidence from Open Letters at Two Research Universities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T06%3A22%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Faculty%20Preferences%20over%20Unionization:%20Evidence%20from%20Open%20Letters%20at%20Two%20Research%20Universities&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Waldfogel,%20Joel&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.spage=22149&rft.pages=22149-&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w22149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E4017387821%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779934555&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_nber_id=w22149&rfr_iscdi=true