Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment”

Rudebusch and Williams (2015) conclude “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment” with the policy prescription “Optimal policy should trade off a transitory period of excessive inflation in order to bring the broader measure of underemployment to normal levels more qui...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of macroeconomics 2016-03, Vol.47, p.19-25
1. Verfasser: Lothian, James R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue
container_start_page 19
container_title Journal of macroeconomics
container_volume 47
creator Lothian, James R.
description Rudebusch and Williams (2015) conclude “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment” with the policy prescription “Optimal policy should trade off a transitory period of excessive inflation in order to bring the broader measure of underemployment to normal levels more quickly." The question that I address is whether our knowledge of the dynamics linking monetary policy, inflation and real growth is sufficiently well-developed that policy recommendations of the sort that Rudebusch and Williams proffer can be effective. I present two bodies of empirical evidence pertinent to this issue. The first has to do with the Phillips Curve itself; the second with the class of models now used to analyze the economic effects of monetary policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.08.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1779364880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0164070415001032</els_id><sourcerecordid>4014422251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3b8d278b3fe52a14995df7dfc20692556266a611729dee03a0d9c08a47bafef43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1u1DAUha0KJIbCG7Cw1G0TrhPHcVhUqkblRypCQlRlZ3nsm9ZRYgc7oZpdHwRerk-Ch2HN6m6-c47uR8gbBiUDJt4O5TBpE0NZAWtKkCWAOCEbJtu6YE31_RnZZIwX0AJ_QV6mNACAFA3fkHkbpgn9QoOnX1eLuzWZe6q9pbduHJ2e0jl9evx1SR_Q3iF1ni73SO2qRzplSi_4jn4OHhcd93QOozP7v-kx-LtiwTjR1eM0j2F_WHl6_P2KPO_1mPD1v3tKbt5ffdt-LK6_fPi0vbwuTM34UtQ7aatW7uoem0oz3nWN7VvbmwpEVzWNqITQgrG26iwi1BpsZ0Bq3u50jz2vT8nZsXeO4ceKaVFDWKPPk4q1bVcLLiVkih-pbC-liL2ao5vyL4qBOrhVgzq6VQe3CqTKbnPs4hjD_MFPh1El49AbtC6iWZQN7v8FfwCsyIa7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779364880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment”</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lothian, James R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lothian, James R.</creatorcontrib><description>Rudebusch and Williams (2015) conclude “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment” with the policy prescription “Optimal policy should trade off a transitory period of excessive inflation in order to bring the broader measure of underemployment to normal levels more quickly." The question that I address is whether our knowledge of the dynamics linking monetary policy, inflation and real growth is sufficiently well-developed that policy recommendations of the sort that Rudebusch and Williams proffer can be effective. I present two bodies of empirical evidence pertinent to this issue. The first has to do with the Phillips Curve itself; the second with the class of models now used to analyze the economic effects of monetary policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0164-0704</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-152X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.08.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Economic growth ; Economic models ; Inflation ; Monetary policy ; Phillips curve ; Studies ; Taylor curve ; Underemployment ; Unemployment</subject><ispartof>Journal of macroeconomics, 2016-03, Vol.47, p.19-25</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3b8d278b3fe52a14995df7dfc20692556266a611729dee03a0d9c08a47bafef43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.08.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lothian, James R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment”</title><title>Journal of macroeconomics</title><description>Rudebusch and Williams (2015) conclude “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment” with the policy prescription “Optimal policy should trade off a transitory period of excessive inflation in order to bring the broader measure of underemployment to normal levels more quickly." The question that I address is whether our knowledge of the dynamics linking monetary policy, inflation and real growth is sufficiently well-developed that policy recommendations of the sort that Rudebusch and Williams proffer can be effective. I present two bodies of empirical evidence pertinent to this issue. The first has to do with the Phillips Curve itself; the second with the class of models now used to analyze the economic effects of monetary policy.</description><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Inflation</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Phillips curve</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taylor curve</subject><subject>Underemployment</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><issn>0164-0704</issn><issn>1873-152X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1u1DAUha0KJIbCG7Cw1G0TrhPHcVhUqkblRypCQlRlZ3nsm9ZRYgc7oZpdHwRerk-Ch2HN6m6-c47uR8gbBiUDJt4O5TBpE0NZAWtKkCWAOCEbJtu6YE31_RnZZIwX0AJ_QV6mNACAFA3fkHkbpgn9QoOnX1eLuzWZe6q9pbduHJ2e0jl9evx1SR_Q3iF1ni73SO2qRzplSi_4jn4OHhcd93QOozP7v-kx-LtiwTjR1eM0j2F_WHl6_P2KPO_1mPD1v3tKbt5ffdt-LK6_fPi0vbwuTM34UtQ7aatW7uoem0oz3nWN7VvbmwpEVzWNqITQgrG26iwi1BpsZ0Bq3u50jz2vT8nZsXeO4ceKaVFDWKPPk4q1bVcLLiVkih-pbC-liL2ao5vyL4qBOrhVgzq6VQe3CqTKbnPs4hjD_MFPh1El49AbtC6iWZQN7v8FfwCsyIa7</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Lothian, James R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment”</title><author>Lothian, James R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3b8d278b3fe52a14995df7dfc20692556266a611729dee03a0d9c08a47bafef43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Inflation</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Phillips curve</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taylor curve</topic><topic>Underemployment</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lothian, James R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of macroeconomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lothian, James R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment”</atitle><jtitle>Journal of macroeconomics</jtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>47</volume><spage>19</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>19-25</pages><issn>0164-0704</issn><eissn>1873-152X</eissn><abstract>Rudebusch and Williams (2015) conclude “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment” with the policy prescription “Optimal policy should trade off a transitory period of excessive inflation in order to bring the broader measure of underemployment to normal levels more quickly." The question that I address is whether our knowledge of the dynamics linking monetary policy, inflation and real growth is sufficiently well-developed that policy recommendations of the sort that Rudebusch and Williams proffer can be effective. I present two bodies of empirical evidence pertinent to this issue. The first has to do with the Phillips Curve itself; the second with the class of models now used to analyze the economic effects of monetary policy.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.08.006</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0164-0704
ispartof Journal of macroeconomics, 2016-03, Vol.47, p.19-25
issn 0164-0704
1873-152X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1779364880
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Economic growth
Economic models
Inflation
Monetary policy
Phillips curve
Studies
Taylor curve
Underemployment
Unemployment
title Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A53%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20on%20Rudebusch%20and%20Williams,%20%E2%80%9CA%20wedge%20in%20the%20dual%20mandate:%20Monetary%20policy%20and%20long-term%20unemployment%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20macroeconomics&rft.au=Lothian,%20James%20R.&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=47&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=19-25&rft.issn=0164-0704&rft.eissn=1873-152X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.08.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4014422251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779364880&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0164070415001032&rfr_iscdi=true