Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment”
Rudebusch and Williams (2015) conclude “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment” with the policy prescription “Optimal policy should trade off a transitory period of excessive inflation in order to bring the broader measure of underemployment to normal levels more qui...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of macroeconomics 2016-03, Vol.47, p.19-25 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 25 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Journal of macroeconomics |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Lothian, James R. |
description | Rudebusch and Williams (2015) conclude “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment” with the policy prescription “Optimal policy should trade off a transitory period of excessive inflation in order to bring the broader measure of underemployment to normal levels more quickly." The question that I address is whether our knowledge of the dynamics linking monetary policy, inflation and real growth is sufficiently well-developed that policy recommendations of the sort that Rudebusch and Williams proffer can be effective. I present two bodies of empirical evidence pertinent to this issue. The first has to do with the Phillips Curve itself; the second with the class of models now used to analyze the economic effects of monetary policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.08.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1779364880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0164070415001032</els_id><sourcerecordid>4014422251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3b8d278b3fe52a14995df7dfc20692556266a611729dee03a0d9c08a47bafef43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1u1DAUha0KJIbCG7Cw1G0TrhPHcVhUqkblRypCQlRlZ3nsm9ZRYgc7oZpdHwRerk-Ch2HN6m6-c47uR8gbBiUDJt4O5TBpE0NZAWtKkCWAOCEbJtu6YE31_RnZZIwX0AJ_QV6mNACAFA3fkHkbpgn9QoOnX1eLuzWZe6q9pbduHJ2e0jl9evx1SR_Q3iF1ni73SO2qRzplSi_4jn4OHhcd93QOozP7v-kx-LtiwTjR1eM0j2F_WHl6_P2KPO_1mPD1v3tKbt5ffdt-LK6_fPi0vbwuTM34UtQ7aatW7uoem0oz3nWN7VvbmwpEVzWNqITQgrG26iwi1BpsZ0Bq3u50jz2vT8nZsXeO4ceKaVFDWKPPk4q1bVcLLiVkih-pbC-liL2ao5vyL4qBOrhVgzq6VQe3CqTKbnPs4hjD_MFPh1El49AbtC6iWZQN7v8FfwCsyIa7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779364880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment”</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lothian, James R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lothian, James R.</creatorcontrib><description>Rudebusch and Williams (2015) conclude “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment” with the policy prescription “Optimal policy should trade off a transitory period of excessive inflation in order to bring the broader measure of underemployment to normal levels more quickly." The question that I address is whether our knowledge of the dynamics linking monetary policy, inflation and real growth is sufficiently well-developed that policy recommendations of the sort that Rudebusch and Williams proffer can be effective. I present two bodies of empirical evidence pertinent to this issue. The first has to do with the Phillips Curve itself; the second with the class of models now used to analyze the economic effects of monetary policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0164-0704</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-152X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.08.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Economic growth ; Economic models ; Inflation ; Monetary policy ; Phillips curve ; Studies ; Taylor curve ; Underemployment ; Unemployment</subject><ispartof>Journal of macroeconomics, 2016-03, Vol.47, p.19-25</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3b8d278b3fe52a14995df7dfc20692556266a611729dee03a0d9c08a47bafef43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.08.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lothian, James R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment”</title><title>Journal of macroeconomics</title><description>Rudebusch and Williams (2015) conclude “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment” with the policy prescription “Optimal policy should trade off a transitory period of excessive inflation in order to bring the broader measure of underemployment to normal levels more quickly." The question that I address is whether our knowledge of the dynamics linking monetary policy, inflation and real growth is sufficiently well-developed that policy recommendations of the sort that Rudebusch and Williams proffer can be effective. I present two bodies of empirical evidence pertinent to this issue. The first has to do with the Phillips Curve itself; the second with the class of models now used to analyze the economic effects of monetary policy.</description><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Inflation</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Phillips curve</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taylor curve</subject><subject>Underemployment</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><issn>0164-0704</issn><issn>1873-152X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1u1DAUha0KJIbCG7Cw1G0TrhPHcVhUqkblRypCQlRlZ3nsm9ZRYgc7oZpdHwRerk-Ch2HN6m6-c47uR8gbBiUDJt4O5TBpE0NZAWtKkCWAOCEbJtu6YE31_RnZZIwX0AJ_QV6mNACAFA3fkHkbpgn9QoOnX1eLuzWZe6q9pbduHJ2e0jl9evx1SR_Q3iF1ni73SO2qRzplSi_4jn4OHhcd93QOozP7v-kx-LtiwTjR1eM0j2F_WHl6_P2KPO_1mPD1v3tKbt5ffdt-LK6_fPi0vbwuTM34UtQ7aatW7uoem0oz3nWN7VvbmwpEVzWNqITQgrG26iwi1BpsZ0Bq3u50jz2vT8nZsXeO4ceKaVFDWKPPk4q1bVcLLiVkih-pbC-liL2ao5vyL4qBOrhVgzq6VQe3CqTKbnPs4hjD_MFPh1El49AbtC6iWZQN7v8FfwCsyIa7</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Lothian, James R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment”</title><author>Lothian, James R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-3b8d278b3fe52a14995df7dfc20692556266a611729dee03a0d9c08a47bafef43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Inflation</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Phillips curve</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taylor curve</topic><topic>Underemployment</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lothian, James R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of macroeconomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lothian, James R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment”</atitle><jtitle>Journal of macroeconomics</jtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>47</volume><spage>19</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>19-25</pages><issn>0164-0704</issn><eissn>1873-152X</eissn><abstract>Rudebusch and Williams (2015) conclude “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment” with the policy prescription “Optimal policy should trade off a transitory period of excessive inflation in order to bring the broader measure of underemployment to normal levels more quickly." The question that I address is whether our knowledge of the dynamics linking monetary policy, inflation and real growth is sufficiently well-developed that policy recommendations of the sort that Rudebusch and Williams proffer can be effective. I present two bodies of empirical evidence pertinent to this issue. The first has to do with the Phillips Curve itself; the second with the class of models now used to analyze the economic effects of monetary policy.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.08.006</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0164-0704 |
ispartof | Journal of macroeconomics, 2016-03, Vol.47, p.19-25 |
issn | 0164-0704 1873-152X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1779364880 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Economic growth Economic models Inflation Monetary policy Phillips curve Studies Taylor curve Underemployment Unemployment |
title | Comment on Rudebusch and Williams, “A wedge in the dual mandate: Monetary policy and long-term unemployment” |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A53%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20on%20Rudebusch%20and%20Williams,%20%E2%80%9CA%20wedge%20in%20the%20dual%20mandate:%20Monetary%20policy%20and%20long-term%20unemployment%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20macroeconomics&rft.au=Lothian,%20James%20R.&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=47&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=19-25&rft.issn=0164-0704&rft.eissn=1873-152X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.08.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4014422251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779364880&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0164070415001032&rfr_iscdi=true |