We Are Better Than This: How Government Should Spend Our Money
Having laid out the design flaws in the current federal fiscal machine, Kleinbard proposes correctives for how the nation should decide the amount to spend on infrastructure and education (human capital), for the design of its social insurance schemes (Social Security, Medicare, other health care in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Financial analysts journal 2016, Vol.72 (2), p.73-74 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Review |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 74 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 73 |
| container_title | Financial analysts journal |
| container_volume | 72 |
| creator | Gelfand, Matthew D. |
| description | Having laid out the design flaws in the current federal fiscal machine, Kleinbard proposes correctives for how the nation should decide the amount to spend on infrastructure and education (human capital), for the design of its social insurance schemes (Social Security, Medicare, other health care insurance and services, and disaster relief), and for the progressive (i.e., graduated) income tax rate schedule. [...]the broad consensus among economists is that efficient, nondistorting tax rules would tax all types of income-properly measured-at the same rate, although perhaps using progressive rates on higher incomes. |
| format | Review |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1779242136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26653193</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26653193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j135t-139c58f5843eaa2da2cbb6e002446f2b12bf93709a341983c989a820c6644ef03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUFFLwzAYDKJgnf4EIeBzIcmXpIkPwhy6CZM9bKJvJW2_spUtmUmr7N9bmC93HBx3x12QjFswOQAXlyRjjKucW_N1TW5S6kYpQKqMPH0inUakz9j3GOlm6_wIu_RIF-GXzsMPRn9A39P1Ngz7hq6P6Bu6GiJ9Dx5Pt-SqdfuEd_88IR-vL5vZIl-u5m-z6TLvOKg-52BrZVplJKBzonGiriqNjAkpdSsqLqrWQsGsAzmOhNoa64xgtdZSYstgQh7OuccYvgdMfdmFIfqxsuRFYYUUHPTouj-7utSHWB7j7uDiqRRaKxjPgD8yU00E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>review</recordtype><pqid>1779242136</pqid></control><display><type>review</type><title>We Are Better Than This: How Government Should Spend Our Money</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Gelfand, Matthew D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gelfand, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><description>Having laid out the design flaws in the current federal fiscal machine, Kleinbard proposes correctives for how the nation should decide the amount to spend on infrastructure and education (human capital), for the design of its social insurance schemes (Social Security, Medicare, other health care insurance and services, and disaster relief), and for the progressive (i.e., graduated) income tax rate schedule. [...]the broad consensus among economists is that efficient, nondistorting tax rules would tax all types of income-properly measured-at the same rate, although perhaps using progressive rates on higher incomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-198X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3312</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FIAJA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Charlottesville: CFA Institute</publisher><subject>Economic models ; Economists ; Expenditures ; Fiscal policy ; Government spending ; Income distribution ; Legal arguments ; Medicare ; Social security ; Subsidies ; Tax incentives ; Tax rates</subject><ispartof>Financial analysts journal, 2016, Vol.72 (2), p.73-74</ispartof><rights>2016 CFA Institute</rights><rights>Copyright CFA Institute Mar/Apr 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26653193$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26653193$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,776,780,788,799,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gelfand, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><title>We Are Better Than This: How Government Should Spend Our Money</title><title>Financial analysts journal</title><description>Having laid out the design flaws in the current federal fiscal machine, Kleinbard proposes correctives for how the nation should decide the amount to spend on infrastructure and education (human capital), for the design of its social insurance schemes (Social Security, Medicare, other health care insurance and services, and disaster relief), and for the progressive (i.e., graduated) income tax rate schedule. [...]the broad consensus among economists is that efficient, nondistorting tax rules would tax all types of income-properly measured-at the same rate, although perhaps using progressive rates on higher incomes.</description><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>Government spending</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Legal arguments</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Tax incentives</subject><subject>Tax rates</subject><issn>0015-198X</issn><issn>1938-3312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>review</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>review</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotUFFLwzAYDKJgnf4EIeBzIcmXpIkPwhy6CZM9bKJvJW2_spUtmUmr7N9bmC93HBx3x12QjFswOQAXlyRjjKucW_N1TW5S6kYpQKqMPH0inUakz9j3GOlm6_wIu_RIF-GXzsMPRn9A39P1Ngz7hq6P6Bu6GiJ9Dx5Pt-SqdfuEd_88IR-vL5vZIl-u5m-z6TLvOKg-52BrZVplJKBzonGiriqNjAkpdSsqLqrWQsGsAzmOhNoa64xgtdZSYstgQh7OuccYvgdMfdmFIfqxsuRFYYUUHPTouj-7utSHWB7j7uDiqRRaKxjPgD8yU00E</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Gelfand, Matthew D.</creator><general>CFA Institute</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>We Are Better Than This: How Government Should Spend Our Money</title><author>Gelfand, Matthew D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j135t-139c58f5843eaa2da2cbb6e002446f2b12bf93709a341983c989a820c6644ef03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reviews</rsrctype><prefilter>reviews</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>Government spending</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Legal arguments</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Tax incentives</topic><topic>Tax rates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gelfand, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gelfand, Matthew D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>We Are Better Than This: How Government Should Spend Our Money</atitle><jtitle>Financial analysts journal</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>73-74</pages><issn>0015-198X</issn><eissn>1938-3312</eissn><coden>FIAJA4</coden><abstract>Having laid out the design flaws in the current federal fiscal machine, Kleinbard proposes correctives for how the nation should decide the amount to spend on infrastructure and education (human capital), for the design of its social insurance schemes (Social Security, Medicare, other health care insurance and services, and disaster relief), and for the progressive (i.e., graduated) income tax rate schedule. [...]the broad consensus among economists is that efficient, nondistorting tax rules would tax all types of income-properly measured-at the same rate, although perhaps using progressive rates on higher incomes.</abstract><cop>Charlottesville</cop><pub>CFA Institute</pub><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0015-198X |
| ispartof | Financial analysts journal, 2016, Vol.72 (2), p.73-74 |
| issn | 0015-198X 1938-3312 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1779242136 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Economic models Economists Expenditures Fiscal policy Government spending Income distribution Legal arguments Medicare Social security Subsidies Tax incentives Tax rates |
| title | We Are Better Than This: How Government Should Spend Our Money |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A33%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=We%20Are%20Better%20Than%20This:%20How%20Government%20Should%20Spend%20Our%20Money&rft.jtitle=Financial%20analysts%20journal&rft.au=Gelfand,%20Matthew%20D.&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=73-74&rft.issn=0015-198X&rft.eissn=1938-3312&rft.coden=FIAJA4&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26653193%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779242136&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26653193&rfr_iscdi=true |