SAT0350 Bone mineral density in lupus erythematosus women 1 year after rituximab therapy

Background Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have a higher prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mineral density (BMD) compared with the general population. Rituximab, a CD20 depleting antibody, has been administrated in patients with refractory SLE. However, to date, its influence...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.590-591
Hauptverfasser: Garcia-Carrasco, M., Mendoza-Pinto, C., Etchegaray-Morales, I., Jimenez-Hernandez, C., Rodriguez-Gallego, A.B., Briones-Rojas, R., Ordoñez-Andrade, E., Mendez-Martinez, S., Aguilar-Cuenca, J.E., Cervera, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 591
container_issue Suppl 3
container_start_page 590
container_title Annals of the rheumatic diseases
container_volume 71
creator Garcia-Carrasco, M.
Mendoza-Pinto, C.
Etchegaray-Morales, I.
Jimenez-Hernandez, C.
Rodriguez-Gallego, A.B.
Briones-Rojas, R.
Ordoñez-Andrade, E.
Mendez-Martinez, S.
Aguilar-Cuenca, J.E.
Cervera, R.
description Background Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have a higher prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mineral density (BMD) compared with the general population. Rituximab, a CD20 depleting antibody, has been administrated in patients with refractory SLE. However, to date, its influence on bone mineral density (BMD) in women with SLE is unknown. Objectives The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effects of rituximab treatment on BMD of the lumbar and femoral neck in women with SLE. Methods Thirty active female SLE patients treated with rituximab were compared with control SLE women not treated with rituximab. BMD of the femoral neck and lumbar spine was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (Hologic, Inc.) before initiating biologic therapy and after one year. The Student’s t test was used to detect differences in BMD in the rituximab and control groups. Analysis of covariance was used to examine for confounders including disease duration, disease activity and age. Results 76 patients were studied. 30 patients received rituximab and 46 controls received conventional treatment. In the rituximab group, the mexSLEDAI score was 3.4±1.8 at baseline and 0.8±1.5 (p=0.001) after one year of rituximab. There were 5 non-responders. Patients receiving rituximab were significantly younger and had significantly higher activity scores (mexSLEDAI) than controls. Baseline BMD measurements were higher in the rituximab group but the only significant difference was at the lumbar spine. BMD was reduced from 0.980±0.130 g/cm2to 0.809±0.139 g/cm2 (-17.4%; p=0.001) at the femoral neck and from 1.062±0.137g/cm2 to 0.893±0.194 g/cm2 (-15.8%; p=0.001) at the lumbar spine in the rituximab group after 12 months of rituximab. BMD was reduced from 0.914±0.193 g/cm2 to 0.790±0.135 g/cm2 (-13.6%; p=0.001) at the femoral neck and 0.926±0.128 g/cm2 to 0.867±0.139 g/cm2 (-6.2%; p=0.09) at the lumbar spine in controls after 12 months of treatment. Variables associated with a low BMD included age, menopausal status and steroid dose. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the specific effect of rituximab within the context of these possible confounding factors and showed that only postmenopausal status was associated with BMD loss (p=0.03). However, BMD loss was higher in postmenopausal rituximab patients than in postmenopausal controls (0.324±0.128 g/cm2 vs 0.138±0.099 g/cm2). Conclusions After one year of follow up, patients had lower BMD at both th
doi_str_mv 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.3296
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777977273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008641961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1653-611c9238868a1b51044877d2ed6cad5b4e4435eaf483f890744440767044954f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD5a6TrHjZ8SqVLyk8pAoLLqxnGaipjRJsRPR7Njwo3wJLkWILd6MZnSuZ3QQGlAypJTJU1tVbgFtmRU-igmNI2hX1g1ZnMg91KNc6jCWZB_1CCEs4olUh-jI-2Voiaa6h2aPoylhgny-f5zXFeCyqMDZFc6g8kXT4aLCq3bdegyuaxZQ2qb2oXurS6gwxR1Yh23egMOuaNpNUdoUB87ZdXeMDnK78nDyU_vo6fJiOr6OJvdXN-PRJEqpFCySlM6TmGkttaWpoIRzrVQWQybnNhMpB86ZAJtzzXKdEMXDI0qqACaC56yPBrt_165-bcE3Zlm3rgorDVVKJUrFigXqbEfNXe29g9ysXbjWdYYSs5Vp_sg0W5nmW6bZygzpaJcufAOb36h1L0YqpoS5ex6b2eWDuBUiNpPAyx2flst_LfoCZU-O-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777977273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SAT0350 Bone mineral density in lupus erythematosus women 1 year after rituximab therapy</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Garcia-Carrasco, M. ; Mendoza-Pinto, C. ; Etchegaray-Morales, I. ; Jimenez-Hernandez, C. ; Rodriguez-Gallego, A.B. ; Briones-Rojas, R. ; Ordoñez-Andrade, E. ; Mendez-Martinez, S. ; Aguilar-Cuenca, J.E. ; Cervera, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Carrasco, M. ; Mendoza-Pinto, C. ; Etchegaray-Morales, I. ; Jimenez-Hernandez, C. ; Rodriguez-Gallego, A.B. ; Briones-Rojas, R. ; Ordoñez-Andrade, E. ; Mendez-Martinez, S. ; Aguilar-Cuenca, J.E. ; Cervera, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have a higher prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mineral density (BMD) compared with the general population. Rituximab, a CD20 depleting antibody, has been administrated in patients with refractory SLE. However, to date, its influence on bone mineral density (BMD) in women with SLE is unknown. Objectives The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effects of rituximab treatment on BMD of the lumbar and femoral neck in women with SLE. Methods Thirty active female SLE patients treated with rituximab were compared with control SLE women not treated with rituximab. BMD of the femoral neck and lumbar spine was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (Hologic, Inc.) before initiating biologic therapy and after one year. The Student’s t test was used to detect differences in BMD in the rituximab and control groups. Analysis of covariance was used to examine for confounders including disease duration, disease activity and age. Results 76 patients were studied. 30 patients received rituximab and 46 controls received conventional treatment. In the rituximab group, the mexSLEDAI score was 3.4±1.8 at baseline and 0.8±1.5 (p=0.001) after one year of rituximab. There were 5 non-responders. Patients receiving rituximab were significantly younger and had significantly higher activity scores (mexSLEDAI) than controls. Baseline BMD measurements were higher in the rituximab group but the only significant difference was at the lumbar spine. BMD was reduced from 0.980±0.130 g/cm2to 0.809±0.139 g/cm2 (-17.4%; p=0.001) at the femoral neck and from 1.062±0.137g/cm2 to 0.893±0.194 g/cm2 (-15.8%; p=0.001) at the lumbar spine in the rituximab group after 12 months of rituximab. BMD was reduced from 0.914±0.193 g/cm2 to 0.790±0.135 g/cm2 (-13.6%; p=0.001) at the femoral neck and 0.926±0.128 g/cm2 to 0.867±0.139 g/cm2 (-6.2%; p=0.09) at the lumbar spine in controls after 12 months of treatment. Variables associated with a low BMD included age, menopausal status and steroid dose. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the specific effect of rituximab within the context of these possible confounding factors and showed that only postmenopausal status was associated with BMD loss (p=0.03). However, BMD loss was higher in postmenopausal rituximab patients than in postmenopausal controls (0.324±0.128 g/cm2 vs 0.138±0.099 g/cm2). Conclusions After one year of follow up, patients had lower BMD at both the femoral neck and lumbar spine, but the loss was greater in patients receiving rituximab than in patients receiving conventional treatment, and in postmenopausal women. Although further studies are required to confirm this relationship, postmenopausal candidates for rituximab should be evaluated closely to prevent further BMD loss. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.3296</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.590-591</ispartof><rights>2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_3/590.3.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_3/590.3.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Carrasco, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Pinto, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etchegaray-Morales, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez-Hernandez, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Gallego, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briones-Rojas, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ordoñez-Andrade, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendez-Martinez, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar-Cuenca, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cervera, R.</creatorcontrib><title>SAT0350 Bone mineral density in lupus erythematosus women 1 year after rituximab therapy</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><description>Background Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have a higher prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mineral density (BMD) compared with the general population. Rituximab, a CD20 depleting antibody, has been administrated in patients with refractory SLE. However, to date, its influence on bone mineral density (BMD) in women with SLE is unknown. Objectives The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effects of rituximab treatment on BMD of the lumbar and femoral neck in women with SLE. Methods Thirty active female SLE patients treated with rituximab were compared with control SLE women not treated with rituximab. BMD of the femoral neck and lumbar spine was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (Hologic, Inc.) before initiating biologic therapy and after one year. The Student’s t test was used to detect differences in BMD in the rituximab and control groups. Analysis of covariance was used to examine for confounders including disease duration, disease activity and age. Results 76 patients were studied. 30 patients received rituximab and 46 controls received conventional treatment. In the rituximab group, the mexSLEDAI score was 3.4±1.8 at baseline and 0.8±1.5 (p=0.001) after one year of rituximab. There were 5 non-responders. Patients receiving rituximab were significantly younger and had significantly higher activity scores (mexSLEDAI) than controls. Baseline BMD measurements were higher in the rituximab group but the only significant difference was at the lumbar spine. BMD was reduced from 0.980±0.130 g/cm2to 0.809±0.139 g/cm2 (-17.4%; p=0.001) at the femoral neck and from 1.062±0.137g/cm2 to 0.893±0.194 g/cm2 (-15.8%; p=0.001) at the lumbar spine in the rituximab group after 12 months of rituximab. BMD was reduced from 0.914±0.193 g/cm2 to 0.790±0.135 g/cm2 (-13.6%; p=0.001) at the femoral neck and 0.926±0.128 g/cm2 to 0.867±0.139 g/cm2 (-6.2%; p=0.09) at the lumbar spine in controls after 12 months of treatment. Variables associated with a low BMD included age, menopausal status and steroid dose. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the specific effect of rituximab within the context of these possible confounding factors and showed that only postmenopausal status was associated with BMD loss (p=0.03). However, BMD loss was higher in postmenopausal rituximab patients than in postmenopausal controls (0.324±0.128 g/cm2 vs 0.138±0.099 g/cm2). Conclusions After one year of follow up, patients had lower BMD at both the femoral neck and lumbar spine, but the loss was greater in patients receiving rituximab than in patients receiving conventional treatment, and in postmenopausal women. Although further studies are required to confirm this relationship, postmenopausal candidates for rituximab should be evaluated closely to prevent further BMD loss. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD5a6TrHjZ8SqVLyk8pAoLLqxnGaipjRJsRPR7Njwo3wJLkWILd6MZnSuZ3QQGlAypJTJU1tVbgFtmRU-igmNI2hX1g1ZnMg91KNc6jCWZB_1CCEs4olUh-jI-2Voiaa6h2aPoylhgny-f5zXFeCyqMDZFc6g8kXT4aLCq3bdegyuaxZQ2qb2oXurS6gwxR1Yh23egMOuaNpNUdoUB87ZdXeMDnK78nDyU_vo6fJiOr6OJvdXN-PRJEqpFCySlM6TmGkttaWpoIRzrVQWQybnNhMpB86ZAJtzzXKdEMXDI0qqACaC56yPBrt_165-bcE3Zlm3rgorDVVKJUrFigXqbEfNXe29g9ysXbjWdYYSs5Vp_sg0W5nmW6bZygzpaJcufAOb36h1L0YqpoS5ex6b2eWDuBUiNpPAyx2flst_LfoCZU-O-A</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Garcia-Carrasco, M.</creator><creator>Mendoza-Pinto, C.</creator><creator>Etchegaray-Morales, I.</creator><creator>Jimenez-Hernandez, C.</creator><creator>Rodriguez-Gallego, A.B.</creator><creator>Briones-Rojas, R.</creator><creator>Ordoñez-Andrade, E.</creator><creator>Mendez-Martinez, S.</creator><creator>Aguilar-Cuenca, J.E.</creator><creator>Cervera, R.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>SAT0350 Bone mineral density in lupus erythematosus women 1 year after rituximab therapy</title><author>Garcia-Carrasco, M. ; Mendoza-Pinto, C. ; Etchegaray-Morales, I. ; Jimenez-Hernandez, C. ; Rodriguez-Gallego, A.B. ; Briones-Rojas, R. ; Ordoñez-Andrade, E. ; Mendez-Martinez, S. ; Aguilar-Cuenca, J.E. ; Cervera, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1653-611c9238868a1b51044877d2ed6cad5b4e4435eaf483f890744440767044954f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Carrasco, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Pinto, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etchegaray-Morales, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez-Hernandez, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Gallego, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briones-Rojas, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ordoñez-Andrade, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendez-Martinez, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar-Cuenca, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cervera, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia-Carrasco, M.</au><au>Mendoza-Pinto, C.</au><au>Etchegaray-Morales, I.</au><au>Jimenez-Hernandez, C.</au><au>Rodriguez-Gallego, A.B.</au><au>Briones-Rojas, R.</au><au>Ordoñez-Andrade, E.</au><au>Mendez-Martinez, S.</au><au>Aguilar-Cuenca, J.E.</au><au>Cervera, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SAT0350 Bone mineral density in lupus erythematosus women 1 year after rituximab therapy</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>590</spage><epage>591</epage><pages>590-591</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have a higher prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mineral density (BMD) compared with the general population. Rituximab, a CD20 depleting antibody, has been administrated in patients with refractory SLE. However, to date, its influence on bone mineral density (BMD) in women with SLE is unknown. Objectives The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effects of rituximab treatment on BMD of the lumbar and femoral neck in women with SLE. Methods Thirty active female SLE patients treated with rituximab were compared with control SLE women not treated with rituximab. BMD of the femoral neck and lumbar spine was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (Hologic, Inc.) before initiating biologic therapy and after one year. The Student’s t test was used to detect differences in BMD in the rituximab and control groups. Analysis of covariance was used to examine for confounders including disease duration, disease activity and age. Results 76 patients were studied. 30 patients received rituximab and 46 controls received conventional treatment. In the rituximab group, the mexSLEDAI score was 3.4±1.8 at baseline and 0.8±1.5 (p=0.001) after one year of rituximab. There were 5 non-responders. Patients receiving rituximab were significantly younger and had significantly higher activity scores (mexSLEDAI) than controls. Baseline BMD measurements were higher in the rituximab group but the only significant difference was at the lumbar spine. BMD was reduced from 0.980±0.130 g/cm2to 0.809±0.139 g/cm2 (-17.4%; p=0.001) at the femoral neck and from 1.062±0.137g/cm2 to 0.893±0.194 g/cm2 (-15.8%; p=0.001) at the lumbar spine in the rituximab group after 12 months of rituximab. BMD was reduced from 0.914±0.193 g/cm2 to 0.790±0.135 g/cm2 (-13.6%; p=0.001) at the femoral neck and 0.926±0.128 g/cm2 to 0.867±0.139 g/cm2 (-6.2%; p=0.09) at the lumbar spine in controls after 12 months of treatment. Variables associated with a low BMD included age, menopausal status and steroid dose. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the specific effect of rituximab within the context of these possible confounding factors and showed that only postmenopausal status was associated with BMD loss (p=0.03). However, BMD loss was higher in postmenopausal rituximab patients than in postmenopausal controls (0.324±0.128 g/cm2 vs 0.138±0.099 g/cm2). Conclusions After one year of follow up, patients had lower BMD at both the femoral neck and lumbar spine, but the loss was greater in patients receiving rituximab than in patients receiving conventional treatment, and in postmenopausal women. Although further studies are required to confirm this relationship, postmenopausal candidates for rituximab should be evaluated closely to prevent further BMD loss. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.3296</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4967
ispartof Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.590-591
issn 0003-4967
1468-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1777977273
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
title SAT0350 Bone mineral density in lupus erythematosus women 1 year after rituximab therapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A47%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SAT0350%E2%80%85Bone%20mineral%20density%20in%20lupus%20erythematosus%20women%201%20year%20after%20rituximab%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Garcia-Carrasco,%20M.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=590&rft.epage=591&rft.pages=590-591&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.3296&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008641961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777977273&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true