SAT0375 Chronic low back pain in osteoporotic females with rheumatoid arthritis a randomized clinical trial
Background Chronic low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common symptom in osteoporosis rheumatoid arthritis patients leading to complex disability (1). Various therapeutic approaches (range-of-motion exercises and exercise programs) have been proposed for chronic low back pain in patients with rhe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.598-599 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 599 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 3 |
container_start_page | 598 |
container_title | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Traistaru, R.M. Rogoveanu, O. Matei, D. Popescu, R. |
description | Background Chronic low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common symptom in osteoporosis rheumatoid arthritis patients leading to complex disability (1). Various therapeutic approaches (range-of-motion exercises and exercise programs) have been proposed for chronic low back pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis and can delay the loss of joint function and help keep muscles strong (2) Objectives The aim of our study is to compare the effects of three therapeutic approaches in these patients in terms of pain, disability (severity of rheumatoid arthritis) and self-control of the complex disorders. We take into consideration the literature data about the evidence-based primary care options for chronic LBP. Methods 67 females (mean age 42.8 years) with rheumatoid arthritis (mean disease duration 6.8 years) and osteoporosis (mean disease duration 3,4 years) were randomized to the three groups in accordance to the type of treatment: I (23% of patients) - only medication, II (40% of patients) - medication + physiotherapy (TENS, interferential current, ultrasound), III (37% of patients) medication + aerobic training. The rehabilitation program was represented by 12 physiotherapy sessions and 18 aerobic training sessions (3 sessions/week). Outcome measures were VAS pain, DAS 28, BMD (T-Score), HAQ score and Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES). All assessments were performed pre-post intervention and at six month follow-up. Results All the groups showed similar decrease in pain on the third assessment and there was no significant difference between the groups. In the first and group the second there was a significant improvement in DAS28 values (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.3321 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777976656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008637791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1656-44e34bf2a54e41de94e06d730dbf7df2fd6ebd25bf657011f6d4c66156c0821b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMFKAzEQhoMoWKvvEOh5NdlkkxZPddWqFAWtegzZTULT7m5qsqXqyYsv6pOYtiJehYFhZv5_fvgA6GF0jDFhJ7Jp_FQva2VDkiKcJnpZSX9MSIp3QAdT1o9rhnZBByFEEjpgfB8chDCLI-rjfgfUD8MJIjz7-vjMp941toSVW8FClnO4kLaBsVxotVs479p4NbqWlQ5wZdsp3ITL1lkFpW-n3rY2QAm9bJSr7btWsKxs_Ckr2Horq0OwZ2QV9NFP74LHy4tJfpWM70bX-XCcFJhlLKFUE1qYVGZUU6z0gGrEFCdIFYYrkxrFdKHSrDAs4whjwxQtGcMZK1E_xQXpgt7278K7l6UOrZi5pW9ipMCc8wFnMSaqTreq0rsQvDZi4W0t_ZvASKz5ij98xZqv2PAVa77RnWzdNuJ5_bVKPxeMR6Li9ikXA3I-ys_ub8Rz1LOtvqhn_wr6Bsn7l-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777976656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SAT0375 Chronic low back pain in osteoporotic females with rheumatoid arthritis a randomized clinical trial</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Traistaru, R.M. ; Rogoveanu, O. ; Matei, D. ; Popescu, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Traistaru, R.M. ; Rogoveanu, O. ; Matei, D. ; Popescu, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Chronic low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common symptom in osteoporosis rheumatoid arthritis patients leading to complex disability (1). Various therapeutic approaches (range-of-motion exercises and exercise programs) have been proposed for chronic low back pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis and can delay the loss of joint function and help keep muscles strong (2) Objectives The aim of our study is to compare the effects of three therapeutic approaches in these patients in terms of pain, disability (severity of rheumatoid arthritis) and self-control of the complex disorders. We take into consideration the literature data about the evidence-based primary care options for chronic LBP. Methods 67 females (mean age 42.8 years) with rheumatoid arthritis (mean disease duration 6.8 years) and osteoporosis (mean disease duration 3,4 years) were randomized to the three groups in accordance to the type of treatment: I (23% of patients) - only medication, II (40% of patients) - medication + physiotherapy (TENS, interferential current, ultrasound), III (37% of patients) medication + aerobic training. The rehabilitation program was represented by 12 physiotherapy sessions and 18 aerobic training sessions (3 sessions/week). Outcome measures were VAS pain, DAS 28, BMD (T-Score), HAQ score and Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES). All assessments were performed pre-post intervention and at six month follow-up. Results All the groups showed similar decrease in pain on the third assessment and there was no significant difference between the groups. In the first and group the second there was a significant improvement in DAS28 values (p<0,05) as well as HAQ (p<0,05) after treatment. The third group also showed significant improvement in DAS28 value as well as ASES and T Score at six month follow-up (p<0,01). Conclusions All of the three therapeutic approaches were found to be effective in diminishing pain and disability in osteoporosis rheumatoid arthritis patients with chronic low back pain, but aerobic training was found to be more effective in improving bone mineral density (T-Score) and psychological status. Our results confirm the literature data - physical activity is an interesting therapy for the prevention and treatment of bone loss and osteoporosis because it has no adverse side effects, it is low cost, and it confers additional benefits such as postural stability and fall prevention. Type and duration of physical training must be individualized to each patient, in accordance with severity of rheumatoid arthritis. References Cutolo M, Otsa K, Uprus M, Paolino S, Seriolo B. (Aug 2007). Vitamin D in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev 7(1):59–64. Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TW. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1094-108. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.3321</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.598-599</ispartof><rights>2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_3/598.4.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_3/598.4.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Traistaru, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogoveanu, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matei, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popescu, R.</creatorcontrib><title>SAT0375 Chronic low back pain in osteoporotic females with rheumatoid arthritis a randomized clinical trial</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><description>Background Chronic low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common symptom in osteoporosis rheumatoid arthritis patients leading to complex disability (1). Various therapeutic approaches (range-of-motion exercises and exercise programs) have been proposed for chronic low back pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis and can delay the loss of joint function and help keep muscles strong (2) Objectives The aim of our study is to compare the effects of three therapeutic approaches in these patients in terms of pain, disability (severity of rheumatoid arthritis) and self-control of the complex disorders. We take into consideration the literature data about the evidence-based primary care options for chronic LBP. Methods 67 females (mean age 42.8 years) with rheumatoid arthritis (mean disease duration 6.8 years) and osteoporosis (mean disease duration 3,4 years) were randomized to the three groups in accordance to the type of treatment: I (23% of patients) - only medication, II (40% of patients) - medication + physiotherapy (TENS, interferential current, ultrasound), III (37% of patients) medication + aerobic training. The rehabilitation program was represented by 12 physiotherapy sessions and 18 aerobic training sessions (3 sessions/week). Outcome measures were VAS pain, DAS 28, BMD (T-Score), HAQ score and Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES). All assessments were performed pre-post intervention and at six month follow-up. Results All the groups showed similar decrease in pain on the third assessment and there was no significant difference between the groups. In the first and group the second there was a significant improvement in DAS28 values (p<0,05) as well as HAQ (p<0,05) after treatment. The third group also showed significant improvement in DAS28 value as well as ASES and T Score at six month follow-up (p<0,01). Conclusions All of the three therapeutic approaches were found to be effective in diminishing pain and disability in osteoporosis rheumatoid arthritis patients with chronic low back pain, but aerobic training was found to be more effective in improving bone mineral density (T-Score) and psychological status. Our results confirm the literature data - physical activity is an interesting therapy for the prevention and treatment of bone loss and osteoporosis because it has no adverse side effects, it is low cost, and it confers additional benefits such as postural stability and fall prevention. Type and duration of physical training must be individualized to each patient, in accordance with severity of rheumatoid arthritis. References Cutolo M, Otsa K, Uprus M, Paolino S, Seriolo B. (Aug 2007). Vitamin D in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev 7(1):59–64. Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TW. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1094-108. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMFKAzEQhoMoWKvvEOh5NdlkkxZPddWqFAWtegzZTULT7m5qsqXqyYsv6pOYtiJehYFhZv5_fvgA6GF0jDFhJ7Jp_FQva2VDkiKcJnpZSX9MSIp3QAdT1o9rhnZBByFEEjpgfB8chDCLI-rjfgfUD8MJIjz7-vjMp941toSVW8FClnO4kLaBsVxotVs479p4NbqWlQ5wZdsp3ITL1lkFpW-n3rY2QAm9bJSr7btWsKxs_Ckr2Horq0OwZ2QV9NFP74LHy4tJfpWM70bX-XCcFJhlLKFUE1qYVGZUU6z0gGrEFCdIFYYrkxrFdKHSrDAs4whjwxQtGcMZK1E_xQXpgt7278K7l6UOrZi5pW9ipMCc8wFnMSaqTreq0rsQvDZi4W0t_ZvASKz5ij98xZqv2PAVa77RnWzdNuJ5_bVKPxeMR6Li9ikXA3I-ys_ub8Rz1LOtvqhn_wr6Bsn7l-w</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Traistaru, R.M.</creator><creator>Rogoveanu, O.</creator><creator>Matei, D.</creator><creator>Popescu, R.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>SAT0375 Chronic low back pain in osteoporotic females with rheumatoid arthritis a randomized clinical trial</title><author>Traistaru, R.M. ; Rogoveanu, O. ; Matei, D. ; Popescu, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1656-44e34bf2a54e41de94e06d730dbf7df2fd6ebd25bf657011f6d4c66156c0821b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Traistaru, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogoveanu, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matei, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popescu, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Traistaru, R.M.</au><au>Rogoveanu, O.</au><au>Matei, D.</au><au>Popescu, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SAT0375 Chronic low back pain in osteoporotic females with rheumatoid arthritis a randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>598</spage><epage>599</epage><pages>598-599</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background Chronic low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common symptom in osteoporosis rheumatoid arthritis patients leading to complex disability (1). Various therapeutic approaches (range-of-motion exercises and exercise programs) have been proposed for chronic low back pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis and can delay the loss of joint function and help keep muscles strong (2) Objectives The aim of our study is to compare the effects of three therapeutic approaches in these patients in terms of pain, disability (severity of rheumatoid arthritis) and self-control of the complex disorders. We take into consideration the literature data about the evidence-based primary care options for chronic LBP. Methods 67 females (mean age 42.8 years) with rheumatoid arthritis (mean disease duration 6.8 years) and osteoporosis (mean disease duration 3,4 years) were randomized to the three groups in accordance to the type of treatment: I (23% of patients) - only medication, II (40% of patients) - medication + physiotherapy (TENS, interferential current, ultrasound), III (37% of patients) medication + aerobic training. The rehabilitation program was represented by 12 physiotherapy sessions and 18 aerobic training sessions (3 sessions/week). Outcome measures were VAS pain, DAS 28, BMD (T-Score), HAQ score and Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES). All assessments were performed pre-post intervention and at six month follow-up. Results All the groups showed similar decrease in pain on the third assessment and there was no significant difference between the groups. In the first and group the second there was a significant improvement in DAS28 values (p<0,05) as well as HAQ (p<0,05) after treatment. The third group also showed significant improvement in DAS28 value as well as ASES and T Score at six month follow-up (p<0,01). Conclusions All of the three therapeutic approaches were found to be effective in diminishing pain and disability in osteoporosis rheumatoid arthritis patients with chronic low back pain, but aerobic training was found to be more effective in improving bone mineral density (T-Score) and psychological status. Our results confirm the literature data - physical activity is an interesting therapy for the prevention and treatment of bone loss and osteoporosis because it has no adverse side effects, it is low cost, and it confers additional benefits such as postural stability and fall prevention. Type and duration of physical training must be individualized to each patient, in accordance with severity of rheumatoid arthritis. References Cutolo M, Otsa K, Uprus M, Paolino S, Seriolo B. (Aug 2007). Vitamin D in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev 7(1):59–64. Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TW. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1094-108. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.3321</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4967 |
ispartof | Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.598-599 |
issn | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1777976656 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
title | SAT0375 Chronic low back pain in osteoporotic females with rheumatoid arthritis a randomized clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A56%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SAT0375%E2%80%85Chronic%20low%20back%20pain%20in%20osteoporotic%20females%20with%20rheumatoid%20arthritis%20a%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Traistaru,%20R.M.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=598&rft.epage=599&rft.pages=598-599&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.3321&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008637791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777976656&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |