AB0403 Dose Optimization of Biological Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Practice

Background Biological therapies (BT) have resulted in a remarkable improvement in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). One of the limiting factors for its use is cost. For this reason, the development of optimization strategies is becoming increasingly frequent. Objectives To analyze the opti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2014-06, Vol.73 (Suppl 2), p.940
Hauptverfasser: Arredondo, M., Sala, L., Cañamares, I., Ramírez-Herráiz, E., González-Άlvaro, I., Lόpez-Bote, J.P., Morell, A., García-Vicuña, R., Alvaro-Gracia, J.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page 940
container_title Annals of the rheumatic diseases
container_volume 73
creator Arredondo, M.
Sala, L.
Cañamares, I.
Ramírez-Herráiz, E.
González-Άlvaro, I.
Lόpez-Bote, J.P.
Morell, A.
García-Vicuña, R.
Alvaro-Gracia, J.M.
description Background Biological therapies (BT) have resulted in a remarkable improvement in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). One of the limiting factors for its use is cost. For this reason, the development of optimization strategies is becoming increasingly frequent. Objectives To analyze the optimization of BT in RA in daily clinical practice. Methods We conducted an observational cross-sectional study including all patients with RA under BT (except anakinra and rituximab) in a tertiary referral hospital. Data from the first three months of 2013 were analyzed and extrapolated to one year. The analyzed parameters included: dose, administration intervals and cost. In addition, in order to have an estimate of the tendency of this practice, data from the first three months of 2011 were taken for comparison. Patients were considered as down-titrated/optimized when the quarterly dose of BT was ≤83% of the approved dose. Effectiveness was measured by DAS28. Statistical comparison of both periods was performed by T-test. Results 265 patients were studied in 2013. Percentage of down-titrated patients, total mean dose and mean dose in the titrated group are displayed in Table. Our data showed an average decrease of 16.10% in total mean dose of BT. This represented an additional 5% reduction in total mean dose compared to 2011. Data ranged from 0 to 25.80% with the different BT. This reduction in quarterly dose was not associated to loss of efficacy as measured by average DAS 28 between 2011 and 2013 [DAS 28 =2.94 (2.05-3.84) vs 2.88 (1.80-3.96) (p=0.742)]. Table 1. Down-titration of biologics in 2013 n % pdt* Total mean dose (%) Mean dose in down-titrated (%) TOTAL 265 41.06 83.90 59.01 Adalimumab 91 47.20 83.10 64.30 Etanercept 80 53.70 74.20 52.06 Certolizumab 35 17.10 93.40 61.48 Infliximab 18 5.16 107.39 82.35 Golimumab 3 0 100 – Tocilizumab 20 55.00 77.28 56.70 Abatacept 18 11.10 96.30 66.67 *% pdt = percentage of patients down-titrated. Conclusions Optimization of BT in RA is increasingly frequent in clinical practice. This strategy contributes to cost containment in this and other conditions. Disclosure of Interest None declared DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4952
doi_str_mv 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4952
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777975989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008691621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b759-282215988a8f7b16b4ae33ef1c59fd1e23095b7dd72fe3f6ce2b39eeea6029fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtKw0AUhgdRsFbfIdB16lySuSzbeoVCRbIfJsmJnZJk4kyy0JUbX9QnMWlduDqcn4__hw-hBcFLQhi_NW3r9zA0pQ0xxSSJYaiNXyYqpWdoRhIux5jjczTDGLM4UVxcoqsQDuOLJZEzpFdrnGD28_V95wJEu663jf00vXVt5KpobV3t3mxh6ijbgzedhRDZNnqdVk3vbBmtfL_3trfHfFPb9ki_eFP0toBrdFGZOsDN352j7OE-2zzF293j82a1jXORqphKSkmqpDSyEjnheWKAMahIkaqqJEAZVmkuylLQCljFC6A5UwBgOKYjweZocartvHsfIPT64AbfjouaCCHUOCLVSPETlTcH3XnbGP-hCdaTS_3PpZ5c6qNLPblkv-MibqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777975989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AB0403 Dose Optimization of Biological Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Practice</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Arredondo, M. ; Sala, L. ; Cañamares, I. ; Ramírez-Herráiz, E. ; González-Άlvaro, I. ; Lόpez-Bote, J.P. ; Morell, A. ; García-Vicuña, R. ; Alvaro-Gracia, J.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Arredondo, M. ; Sala, L. ; Cañamares, I. ; Ramírez-Herráiz, E. ; González-Άlvaro, I. ; Lόpez-Bote, J.P. ; Morell, A. ; García-Vicuña, R. ; Alvaro-Gracia, J.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Biological therapies (BT) have resulted in a remarkable improvement in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). One of the limiting factors for its use is cost. For this reason, the development of optimization strategies is becoming increasingly frequent. Objectives To analyze the optimization of BT in RA in daily clinical practice. Methods We conducted an observational cross-sectional study including all patients with RA under BT (except anakinra and rituximab) in a tertiary referral hospital. Data from the first three months of 2013 were analyzed and extrapolated to one year. The analyzed parameters included: dose, administration intervals and cost. In addition, in order to have an estimate of the tendency of this practice, data from the first three months of 2011 were taken for comparison. Patients were considered as down-titrated/optimized when the quarterly dose of BT was ≤83% of the approved dose. Effectiveness was measured by DAS28. Statistical comparison of both periods was performed by T-test. Results 265 patients were studied in 2013. Percentage of down-titrated patients, total mean dose and mean dose in the titrated group are displayed in Table. Our data showed an average decrease of 16.10% in total mean dose of BT. This represented an additional 5% reduction in total mean dose compared to 2011. Data ranged from 0 to 25.80% with the different BT. This reduction in quarterly dose was not associated to loss of efficacy as measured by average DAS 28 between 2011 and 2013 [DAS 28 =2.94 (2.05-3.84) vs 2.88 (1.80-3.96) (p=0.742)]. Table 1. Down-titration of biologics in 2013 n % pdt* Total mean dose (%) Mean dose in down-titrated (%) TOTAL 265 41.06 83.90 59.01 Adalimumab 91 47.20 83.10 64.30 Etanercept 80 53.70 74.20 52.06 Certolizumab 35 17.10 93.40 61.48 Infliximab 18 5.16 107.39 82.35 Golimumab 3 0 100 – Tocilizumab 20 55.00 77.28 56.70 Abatacept 18 11.10 96.30 66.67 *% pdt = percentage of patients down-titrated. Conclusions Optimization of BT in RA is increasingly frequent in clinical practice. This strategy contributes to cost containment in this and other conditions. Disclosure of Interest None declared DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4952</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4952</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014-06, Vol.73 (Suppl 2), p.940</ispartof><rights>2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 (c) 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/73/Suppl_2/940.2.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/73/Suppl_2/940.2.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,315,781,785,23575,27928,27929,77604,77635</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arredondo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sala, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cañamares, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Herráiz, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Άlvaro, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lόpez-Bote, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morell, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Vicuña, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvaro-Gracia, J.M.</creatorcontrib><title>AB0403 Dose Optimization of Biological Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Practice</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><description>Background Biological therapies (BT) have resulted in a remarkable improvement in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). One of the limiting factors for its use is cost. For this reason, the development of optimization strategies is becoming increasingly frequent. Objectives To analyze the optimization of BT in RA in daily clinical practice. Methods We conducted an observational cross-sectional study including all patients with RA under BT (except anakinra and rituximab) in a tertiary referral hospital. Data from the first three months of 2013 were analyzed and extrapolated to one year. The analyzed parameters included: dose, administration intervals and cost. In addition, in order to have an estimate of the tendency of this practice, data from the first three months of 2011 were taken for comparison. Patients were considered as down-titrated/optimized when the quarterly dose of BT was ≤83% of the approved dose. Effectiveness was measured by DAS28. Statistical comparison of both periods was performed by T-test. Results 265 patients were studied in 2013. Percentage of down-titrated patients, total mean dose and mean dose in the titrated group are displayed in Table. Our data showed an average decrease of 16.10% in total mean dose of BT. This represented an additional 5% reduction in total mean dose compared to 2011. Data ranged from 0 to 25.80% with the different BT. This reduction in quarterly dose was not associated to loss of efficacy as measured by average DAS 28 between 2011 and 2013 [DAS 28 =2.94 (2.05-3.84) vs 2.88 (1.80-3.96) (p=0.742)]. Table 1. Down-titration of biologics in 2013 n % pdt* Total mean dose (%) Mean dose in down-titrated (%) TOTAL 265 41.06 83.90 59.01 Adalimumab 91 47.20 83.10 64.30 Etanercept 80 53.70 74.20 52.06 Certolizumab 35 17.10 93.40 61.48 Infliximab 18 5.16 107.39 82.35 Golimumab 3 0 100 – Tocilizumab 20 55.00 77.28 56.70 Abatacept 18 11.10 96.30 66.67 *% pdt = percentage of patients down-titrated. Conclusions Optimization of BT in RA is increasingly frequent in clinical practice. This strategy contributes to cost containment in this and other conditions. Disclosure of Interest None declared DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4952</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtKw0AUhgdRsFbfIdB16lySuSzbeoVCRbIfJsmJnZJk4kyy0JUbX9QnMWlduDqcn4__hw-hBcFLQhi_NW3r9zA0pQ0xxSSJYaiNXyYqpWdoRhIux5jjczTDGLM4UVxcoqsQDuOLJZEzpFdrnGD28_V95wJEu663jf00vXVt5KpobV3t3mxh6ijbgzedhRDZNnqdVk3vbBmtfL_3trfHfFPb9ki_eFP0toBrdFGZOsDN352j7OE-2zzF293j82a1jXORqphKSkmqpDSyEjnheWKAMahIkaqqJEAZVmkuylLQCljFC6A5UwBgOKYjweZocartvHsfIPT64AbfjouaCCHUOCLVSPETlTcH3XnbGP-hCdaTS_3PpZ5c6qNLPblkv-MibqA</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Arredondo, M.</creator><creator>Sala, L.</creator><creator>Cañamares, I.</creator><creator>Ramírez-Herráiz, E.</creator><creator>González-Άlvaro, I.</creator><creator>Lόpez-Bote, J.P.</creator><creator>Morell, A.</creator><creator>García-Vicuña, R.</creator><creator>Alvaro-Gracia, J.M.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>AB0403 Dose Optimization of Biological Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Practice</title><author>Arredondo, M. ; Sala, L. ; Cañamares, I. ; Ramírez-Herráiz, E. ; González-Άlvaro, I. ; Lόpez-Bote, J.P. ; Morell, A. ; García-Vicuña, R. ; Alvaro-Gracia, J.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b759-282215988a8f7b16b4ae33ef1c59fd1e23095b7dd72fe3f6ce2b39eeea6029fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arredondo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sala, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cañamares, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Herráiz, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Άlvaro, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lόpez-Bote, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morell, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Vicuña, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvaro-Gracia, J.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arredondo, M.</au><au>Sala, L.</au><au>Cañamares, I.</au><au>Ramírez-Herráiz, E.</au><au>González-Άlvaro, I.</au><au>Lόpez-Bote, J.P.</au><au>Morell, A.</au><au>García-Vicuña, R.</au><au>Alvaro-Gracia, J.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AB0403 Dose Optimization of Biological Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Practice</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>940</spage><pages>940-</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background Biological therapies (BT) have resulted in a remarkable improvement in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). One of the limiting factors for its use is cost. For this reason, the development of optimization strategies is becoming increasingly frequent. Objectives To analyze the optimization of BT in RA in daily clinical practice. Methods We conducted an observational cross-sectional study including all patients with RA under BT (except anakinra and rituximab) in a tertiary referral hospital. Data from the first three months of 2013 were analyzed and extrapolated to one year. The analyzed parameters included: dose, administration intervals and cost. In addition, in order to have an estimate of the tendency of this practice, data from the first three months of 2011 were taken for comparison. Patients were considered as down-titrated/optimized when the quarterly dose of BT was ≤83% of the approved dose. Effectiveness was measured by DAS28. Statistical comparison of both periods was performed by T-test. Results 265 patients were studied in 2013. Percentage of down-titrated patients, total mean dose and mean dose in the titrated group are displayed in Table. Our data showed an average decrease of 16.10% in total mean dose of BT. This represented an additional 5% reduction in total mean dose compared to 2011. Data ranged from 0 to 25.80% with the different BT. This reduction in quarterly dose was not associated to loss of efficacy as measured by average DAS 28 between 2011 and 2013 [DAS 28 =2.94 (2.05-3.84) vs 2.88 (1.80-3.96) (p=0.742)]. Table 1. Down-titration of biologics in 2013 n % pdt* Total mean dose (%) Mean dose in down-titrated (%) TOTAL 265 41.06 83.90 59.01 Adalimumab 91 47.20 83.10 64.30 Etanercept 80 53.70 74.20 52.06 Certolizumab 35 17.10 93.40 61.48 Infliximab 18 5.16 107.39 82.35 Golimumab 3 0 100 – Tocilizumab 20 55.00 77.28 56.70 Abatacept 18 11.10 96.30 66.67 *% pdt = percentage of patients down-titrated. Conclusions Optimization of BT in RA is increasingly frequent in clinical practice. This strategy contributes to cost containment in this and other conditions. Disclosure of Interest None declared DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4952</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4952</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4967
ispartof Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014-06, Vol.73 (Suppl 2), p.940
issn 0003-4967
1468-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1777975989
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
title AB0403 Dose Optimization of Biological Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T02%3A10%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AB0403%E2%80%85Dose%20Optimization%20of%20Biological%20Therapies%20in%20Rheumatoid%20Arthritis%20in%20Clinical%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Arredondo,%20M.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=940&rft.pages=940-&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4952&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E4008691621%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777975989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true