FRI0589-HPR Investigating the Publication Rates of Physiotherapy Abstracts Presented in Eular Congresses

Background Annual EULAR Congress is one of the biggest events in the field of Rheumatology and every year lots of participants from different professional backgrounds, including physiotherapists, participate in it. Last year, 3889 abstracts were submitted, 3050 abstracts were accepted and 2142 abstr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2014-06, Vol.73 (Suppl 2), p.1208
Hauptverfasser: Koçak, U.Z., Bayraktar, D., Unver, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page 1208
container_title Annals of the rheumatic diseases
container_volume 73
creator Koçak, U.Z.
Bayraktar, D.
Unver, B.
description Background Annual EULAR Congress is one of the biggest events in the field of Rheumatology and every year lots of participants from different professional backgrounds, including physiotherapists, participate in it. Last year, 3889 abstracts were submitted, 3050 abstracts were accepted and 2142 abstracts were presented. It was reported that full text publication rates after congresses indicate the scientific success of congresses. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the publication rates of accepted abstracts about physiotherapy in EULAR Congresses. Methods The European League Against Rheumatism Abstracts2View™ site was screened and the abstracts, archived under the section of physiotherapy between 2004 and 2012, were included in this study. Neither the abstracts, belonging to 2002-2003 years, were included as there was no physiotherapy section, nor 2013 abstracts were investigated because of inadequate time between 2013 EULAR congress and the present study. Titles and authors of the abstracts were searched in Pubmed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Results Totally 188 abstracts were detected. Forty-seven (25%) abstracts were found as full-text articles. Two abstracts noticed as their full-text publication time was prior to the EULAR Congresses. The time between presentation time in EULAR and full text publication time was determined as mean 18.78 months (1 - 64 months). Countries sending highest number of abstracts were Turkey with 43 abstracts (22.9%), Brazil with 41 abstracts (21.8%), and the United Kingdom with 19 abstracts (10.1%). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (7 abstracts), Disability and Rehabilitation (5 abstracts), Clinical Rheumatology (4 abstracts) and Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (4 abstracts) were the journals in which most abstracts were published as full-text articles. Conclusions As far as we know, this study is the first study that investigates the publication rates of physiotherapy abstracts in the rheumatology field. In the literature, the publication rates of the physiotherapy abstracts of Orthopedics and Sports Physical Therapy Congresses were reported as 25.4%. A recent study of Kalyoncu et al. was reported that publication rates for the all abstracts presented in EULAR Congress in 2008 were around 35%. It was seen that the full text publication rates of the physiotherapy abstracts which were presented in annual EULAR Congresses were similar to ones which were presented in Orthopedic and Sports Physi
doi_str_mv 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2109
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777974453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008689351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1853-27a2f2efffea986dcd84244437cf5016fbe123e1603e4f8b93f1ffa0db3e177c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkL9OwzAQxi0EEqXwDpY6p9ix4zhiqqpCK1UiqmC2nOTcJmqdYidI3Vh4UZ4EhzKwMp3uu_vuzw-hCSVTSpm419a6HfSHqvZRTCiPoN9rN40pyS7QiHIhgyzIJRoRQljEM5Feoxvvm5ASSeUINY-bFUlkFi3zzdfH58q-g-_qre5qu8XdDnDeF_u6DHlr8UZ34HFrcL47-boNZaePJzwrfOd02XmcO_BgO6hwbfFiuAXPW7sNqgd_i66M3nu4-41j9Pq4eJkvo_Xz02o-W0cFlQmL4lTHJgZjDOhMiqqsJI855ywtTUKoMAXQmAEVhAE3ssiYocZoUhVBTNOSjdHkPPfo2rc-vKOatnc2rFShnmYp5wkLXQ_nrtK13jsw6ujqg3YnRYka4Ko_cNUAV_3AVQPc4BZnd3Fo_mX8BrWhh8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777974453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FRI0589-HPR Investigating the Publication Rates of Physiotherapy Abstracts Presented in Eular Congresses</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Koçak, U.Z. ; Bayraktar, D. ; Unver, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koçak, U.Z. ; Bayraktar, D. ; Unver, B.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Annual EULAR Congress is one of the biggest events in the field of Rheumatology and every year lots of participants from different professional backgrounds, including physiotherapists, participate in it. Last year, 3889 abstracts were submitted, 3050 abstracts were accepted and 2142 abstracts were presented. It was reported that full text publication rates after congresses indicate the scientific success of congresses. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the publication rates of accepted abstracts about physiotherapy in EULAR Congresses. Methods The European League Against Rheumatism Abstracts2View™ site was screened and the abstracts, archived under the section of physiotherapy between 2004 and 2012, were included in this study. Neither the abstracts, belonging to 2002-2003 years, were included as there was no physiotherapy section, nor 2013 abstracts were investigated because of inadequate time between 2013 EULAR congress and the present study. Titles and authors of the abstracts were searched in Pubmed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Results Totally 188 abstracts were detected. Forty-seven (25%) abstracts were found as full-text articles. Two abstracts noticed as their full-text publication time was prior to the EULAR Congresses. The time between presentation time in EULAR and full text publication time was determined as mean 18.78 months (1 - 64 months). Countries sending highest number of abstracts were Turkey with 43 abstracts (22.9%), Brazil with 41 abstracts (21.8%), and the United Kingdom with 19 abstracts (10.1%). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (7 abstracts), Disability and Rehabilitation (5 abstracts), Clinical Rheumatology (4 abstracts) and Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (4 abstracts) were the journals in which most abstracts were published as full-text articles. Conclusions As far as we know, this study is the first study that investigates the publication rates of physiotherapy abstracts in the rheumatology field. In the literature, the publication rates of the physiotherapy abstracts of Orthopedics and Sports Physical Therapy Congresses were reported as 25.4%. A recent study of Kalyoncu et al. was reported that publication rates for the all abstracts presented in EULAR Congress in 2008 were around 35%. It was seen that the full text publication rates of the physiotherapy abstracts which were presented in annual EULAR Congresses were similar to ones which were presented in Orthopedic and Sports Physiotherapy congresses, but lower than EULAR 2008. There could be many reasons for those results as there might be abstracts in the publication process or full texts that we could not find due to several reasons (publication in other languages or local journals etc.). Regarding the publications of these studies, we think that the rates will get higher. According to our results, EULAR congresses might be scientifically valuable for physiotherapists especially working in the field of Rheumatology, but physiotherapist should be encouraged for full text publication after the EULAR meetings. References Smith HD, Bogenschutz ED, Bayliss AJ, et al. Full-text publication of abstract-presented work in physical therapy: do therapists publish what they preach? PhysTher. 2011;91(2):234-245. Kalyoncu U, Yilmaz S, Cinar M, et al. Features and publication rates of scientific abstracts presented at a rheumatology congress: EULAR 2008. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70 (Suppl 3):438. Disclosure of Interest None declared DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2109</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2109</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Limited</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014-06, Vol.73 (Suppl 2), p.1208</ispartof><rights>2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 (c) 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1853-27a2f2efffea986dcd84244437cf5016fbe123e1603e4f8b93f1ffa0db3e177c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/73/Suppl_2/1208.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/73/Suppl_2/1208.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koçak, U.Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayraktar, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unver, B.</creatorcontrib><title>FRI0589-HPR Investigating the Publication Rates of Physiotherapy Abstracts Presented in Eular Congresses</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><description>Background Annual EULAR Congress is one of the biggest events in the field of Rheumatology and every year lots of participants from different professional backgrounds, including physiotherapists, participate in it. Last year, 3889 abstracts were submitted, 3050 abstracts were accepted and 2142 abstracts were presented. It was reported that full text publication rates after congresses indicate the scientific success of congresses. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the publication rates of accepted abstracts about physiotherapy in EULAR Congresses. Methods The European League Against Rheumatism Abstracts2View™ site was screened and the abstracts, archived under the section of physiotherapy between 2004 and 2012, were included in this study. Neither the abstracts, belonging to 2002-2003 years, were included as there was no physiotherapy section, nor 2013 abstracts were investigated because of inadequate time between 2013 EULAR congress and the present study. Titles and authors of the abstracts were searched in Pubmed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Results Totally 188 abstracts were detected. Forty-seven (25%) abstracts were found as full-text articles. Two abstracts noticed as their full-text publication time was prior to the EULAR Congresses. The time between presentation time in EULAR and full text publication time was determined as mean 18.78 months (1 - 64 months). Countries sending highest number of abstracts were Turkey with 43 abstracts (22.9%), Brazil with 41 abstracts (21.8%), and the United Kingdom with 19 abstracts (10.1%). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (7 abstracts), Disability and Rehabilitation (5 abstracts), Clinical Rheumatology (4 abstracts) and Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (4 abstracts) were the journals in which most abstracts were published as full-text articles. Conclusions As far as we know, this study is the first study that investigates the publication rates of physiotherapy abstracts in the rheumatology field. In the literature, the publication rates of the physiotherapy abstracts of Orthopedics and Sports Physical Therapy Congresses were reported as 25.4%. A recent study of Kalyoncu et al. was reported that publication rates for the all abstracts presented in EULAR Congress in 2008 were around 35%. It was seen that the full text publication rates of the physiotherapy abstracts which were presented in annual EULAR Congresses were similar to ones which were presented in Orthopedic and Sports Physiotherapy congresses, but lower than EULAR 2008. There could be many reasons for those results as there might be abstracts in the publication process or full texts that we could not find due to several reasons (publication in other languages or local journals etc.). Regarding the publications of these studies, we think that the rates will get higher. According to our results, EULAR congresses might be scientifically valuable for physiotherapists especially working in the field of Rheumatology, but physiotherapist should be encouraged for full text publication after the EULAR meetings. References Smith HD, Bogenschutz ED, Bayliss AJ, et al. Full-text publication of abstract-presented work in physical therapy: do therapists publish what they preach? PhysTher. 2011;91(2):234-245. Kalyoncu U, Yilmaz S, Cinar M, et al. Features and publication rates of scientific abstracts presented at a rheumatology congress: EULAR 2008. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70 (Suppl 3):438. Disclosure of Interest None declared DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2109</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkL9OwzAQxi0EEqXwDpY6p9ix4zhiqqpCK1UiqmC2nOTcJmqdYidI3Vh4UZ4EhzKwMp3uu_vuzw-hCSVTSpm419a6HfSHqvZRTCiPoN9rN40pyS7QiHIhgyzIJRoRQljEM5Feoxvvm5ASSeUINY-bFUlkFi3zzdfH58q-g-_qre5qu8XdDnDeF_u6DHlr8UZ34HFrcL47-boNZaePJzwrfOd02XmcO_BgO6hwbfFiuAXPW7sNqgd_i66M3nu4-41j9Pq4eJkvo_Xz02o-W0cFlQmL4lTHJgZjDOhMiqqsJI855ywtTUKoMAXQmAEVhAE3ssiYocZoUhVBTNOSjdHkPPfo2rc-vKOatnc2rFShnmYp5wkLXQ_nrtK13jsw6ujqg3YnRYka4Ko_cNUAV_3AVQPc4BZnd3Fo_mX8BrWhh8U</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Koçak, U.Z.</creator><creator>Bayraktar, D.</creator><creator>Unver, B.</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>FRI0589-HPR Investigating the Publication Rates of Physiotherapy Abstracts Presented in Eular Congresses</title><author>Koçak, U.Z. ; Bayraktar, D. ; Unver, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1853-27a2f2efffea986dcd84244437cf5016fbe123e1603e4f8b93f1ffa0db3e177c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koçak, U.Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayraktar, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unver, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koçak, U.Z.</au><au>Bayraktar, D.</au><au>Unver, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FRI0589-HPR Investigating the Publication Rates of Physiotherapy Abstracts Presented in Eular Congresses</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>1208</spage><pages>1208-</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background Annual EULAR Congress is one of the biggest events in the field of Rheumatology and every year lots of participants from different professional backgrounds, including physiotherapists, participate in it. Last year, 3889 abstracts were submitted, 3050 abstracts were accepted and 2142 abstracts were presented. It was reported that full text publication rates after congresses indicate the scientific success of congresses. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the publication rates of accepted abstracts about physiotherapy in EULAR Congresses. Methods The European League Against Rheumatism Abstracts2View™ site was screened and the abstracts, archived under the section of physiotherapy between 2004 and 2012, were included in this study. Neither the abstracts, belonging to 2002-2003 years, were included as there was no physiotherapy section, nor 2013 abstracts were investigated because of inadequate time between 2013 EULAR congress and the present study. Titles and authors of the abstracts were searched in Pubmed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. Results Totally 188 abstracts were detected. Forty-seven (25%) abstracts were found as full-text articles. Two abstracts noticed as their full-text publication time was prior to the EULAR Congresses. The time between presentation time in EULAR and full text publication time was determined as mean 18.78 months (1 - 64 months). Countries sending highest number of abstracts were Turkey with 43 abstracts (22.9%), Brazil with 41 abstracts (21.8%), and the United Kingdom with 19 abstracts (10.1%). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (7 abstracts), Disability and Rehabilitation (5 abstracts), Clinical Rheumatology (4 abstracts) and Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (4 abstracts) were the journals in which most abstracts were published as full-text articles. Conclusions As far as we know, this study is the first study that investigates the publication rates of physiotherapy abstracts in the rheumatology field. In the literature, the publication rates of the physiotherapy abstracts of Orthopedics and Sports Physical Therapy Congresses were reported as 25.4%. A recent study of Kalyoncu et al. was reported that publication rates for the all abstracts presented in EULAR Congress in 2008 were around 35%. It was seen that the full text publication rates of the physiotherapy abstracts which were presented in annual EULAR Congresses were similar to ones which were presented in Orthopedic and Sports Physiotherapy congresses, but lower than EULAR 2008. There could be many reasons for those results as there might be abstracts in the publication process or full texts that we could not find due to several reasons (publication in other languages or local journals etc.). Regarding the publications of these studies, we think that the rates will get higher. According to our results, EULAR congresses might be scientifically valuable for physiotherapists especially working in the field of Rheumatology, but physiotherapist should be encouraged for full text publication after the EULAR meetings. References Smith HD, Bogenschutz ED, Bayliss AJ, et al. Full-text publication of abstract-presented work in physical therapy: do therapists publish what they preach? PhysTher. 2011;91(2):234-245. Kalyoncu U, Yilmaz S, Cinar M, et al. Features and publication rates of scientific abstracts presented at a rheumatology congress: EULAR 2008. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70 (Suppl 3):438. Disclosure of Interest None declared DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2109</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2109</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4967
ispartof Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014-06, Vol.73 (Suppl 2), p.1208
issn 0003-4967
1468-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1777974453
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
title FRI0589-HPR Investigating the Publication Rates of Physiotherapy Abstracts Presented in Eular Congresses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T00%3A11%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FRI0589-HPR%E2%80%85Investigating%20the%20Publication%20Rates%20of%20Physiotherapy%20Abstracts%20Presented%20in%20Eular%20Congresses&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Ko%C3%A7ak,%20U.Z.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=1208&rft.pages=1208-&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008689351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777974453&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true