AB1296 Reliability of the different ultrasonographic features in knee osteoarthritis
Background Previous studies on ultrasonography in the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis have described different features seen in painful osteoarthritic knees. We statistically evaluated the diagnostic values of these features as compared to healthy controls. Methods We prospectively performed ultras...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.711 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 3 |
container_start_page | 711 |
container_title | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Slimani, S. Haddouche, A. Ladjouze-Rezig, A. |
description | Background Previous studies on ultrasonography in the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis have described different features seen in painful osteoarthritic knees. We statistically evaluated the diagnostic values of these features as compared to healthy controls. Methods We prospectively performed ultrasonography on 43 painful osteoarthritic knees of 25 subjects, comparing them with 40 knees of 20 sex and gender-matched healthy subjects, using a linear probe (Shimadzu SDU 1200; 10-5 MHz). Comparisons between the two groups were carried-out using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Chi-square test or Fisher exact test for relevant categorical variables. Relative risks were also calculated. Results The mean age of patients was 52.1±5.3 years, 60% women. Abnormal features were found in 100% cases and 27% controls (p2mm (79% Vs 12%; p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.1292 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777973867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008645601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1657-1ceb79f1abcc0ecd4a81c8b7489e91a73e88fc09ee383bd4a52aa8f2af45e5583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_YaHnrcl-JcFTLX7hoiBajyG7ndi0201NsmBvXvyj_hJTV8SrpzCZ551hHoRGBI8JSYtT2bZ2Ad16rl2cYJLE0DXSjknCkz00IFnBwneB99EAY5zGGS_oITpybhlKzAgboNnkPNDF5_vHAzRaVrrRfhsZFfkFRHOtFFhofdQ13kpnWvNi5Wah60iB9J0FF-k2WrUAkXEejLR-YbXX7hgdKNk4OPl5h-jp8uJxeh2X91c300kZV6TIaUxqqChXRFZ1jaGeZ5KRmlU0Yxw4kTQFxlSNOUDK0iq080RKphKpshzynKVDNOrnbqx57cB5sTSdbcNKQSilnKasoIE666naGucsKLGxei3tVhAsdiLFH5FiJ1J8ixQ7kSEd92kdTnz7jUq7EmE2zcXdbCrwbZk_lxyLMvBFz1fr5b8WfQETd5Cn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777973867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AB1296 Reliability of the different ultrasonographic features in knee osteoarthritis</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Slimani, S. ; Haddouche, A. ; Ladjouze-Rezig, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Slimani, S. ; Haddouche, A. ; Ladjouze-Rezig, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Previous studies on ultrasonography in the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis have described different features seen in painful osteoarthritic knees. We statistically evaluated the diagnostic values of these features as compared to healthy controls. Methods We prospectively performed ultrasonography on 43 painful osteoarthritic knees of 25 subjects, comparing them with 40 knees of 20 sex and gender-matched healthy subjects, using a linear probe (Shimadzu SDU 1200; 10-5 MHz). Comparisons between the two groups were carried-out using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Chi-square test or Fisher exact test for relevant categorical variables. Relative risks were also calculated. Results The mean age of patients was 52.1±5.3 years, 60% women. Abnormal features were found in 100% cases and 27% controls (p<0.0001; RR=3.6, 95% CI: 2.2-6.0). The most relevant features were the presence of joint effusion >2mm (79% Vs 12%; p<0.0001; RR=6.3, 95% CI: 2.7-14.5), joint effusion’s height (10.4 mm Vs 0.8 mm; p<0.0001), the presence of synovial thickening (46.5% Vs 10%; p<0.0001; RR=4.6, 95% CI: 1.7-12.5) and the presence of at least one femoro-tibial osteophyte (100% Vs 12%; p<0.0001; RR=8; 95% CI: 3.5-18.2). Cartilage thickness (inter-condylar: 2.3mm Vs 2.2mm; p=0.233), as well as the presence of a Power Doppler signal (4.6% Vs 0%; p=0.265) did not statistically differ between groups. Conclusions Joint effusion, synovial thickness and femoro-tibial osteophytes are the most useful features for an ultrasonographic diagnosis for knee osteoarthritis. There is a need to develop an ultrasonographic scoring system for diagnosing knee osteoarthritis and assessing its severity and prognosis. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.1292</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.711</ispartof><rights>2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_3/711.16.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_3/711.16.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,778,782,3185,23558,27911,27912,77355,77386</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Slimani, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddouche, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladjouze-Rezig, A.</creatorcontrib><title>AB1296 Reliability of the different ultrasonographic features in knee osteoarthritis</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><description>Background Previous studies on ultrasonography in the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis have described different features seen in painful osteoarthritic knees. We statistically evaluated the diagnostic values of these features as compared to healthy controls. Methods We prospectively performed ultrasonography on 43 painful osteoarthritic knees of 25 subjects, comparing them with 40 knees of 20 sex and gender-matched healthy subjects, using a linear probe (Shimadzu SDU 1200; 10-5 MHz). Comparisons between the two groups were carried-out using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Chi-square test or Fisher exact test for relevant categorical variables. Relative risks were also calculated. Results The mean age of patients was 52.1±5.3 years, 60% women. Abnormal features were found in 100% cases and 27% controls (p<0.0001; RR=3.6, 95% CI: 2.2-6.0). The most relevant features were the presence of joint effusion >2mm (79% Vs 12%; p<0.0001; RR=6.3, 95% CI: 2.7-14.5), joint effusion’s height (10.4 mm Vs 0.8 mm; p<0.0001), the presence of synovial thickening (46.5% Vs 10%; p<0.0001; RR=4.6, 95% CI: 1.7-12.5) and the presence of at least one femoro-tibial osteophyte (100% Vs 12%; p<0.0001; RR=8; 95% CI: 3.5-18.2). Cartilage thickness (inter-condylar: 2.3mm Vs 2.2mm; p=0.233), as well as the presence of a Power Doppler signal (4.6% Vs 0%; p=0.265) did not statistically differ between groups. Conclusions Joint effusion, synovial thickness and femoro-tibial osteophytes are the most useful features for an ultrasonographic diagnosis for knee osteoarthritis. There is a need to develop an ultrasonographic scoring system for diagnosing knee osteoarthritis and assessing its severity and prognosis. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv_YaHnrcl-JcFTLX7hoiBajyG7ndi0201NsmBvXvyj_hJTV8SrpzCZ551hHoRGBI8JSYtT2bZ2Ad16rl2cYJLE0DXSjknCkz00IFnBwneB99EAY5zGGS_oITpybhlKzAgboNnkPNDF5_vHAzRaVrrRfhsZFfkFRHOtFFhofdQ13kpnWvNi5Wah60iB9J0FF-k2WrUAkXEejLR-YbXX7hgdKNk4OPl5h-jp8uJxeh2X91c300kZV6TIaUxqqChXRFZ1jaGeZ5KRmlU0Yxw4kTQFxlSNOUDK0iq080RKphKpshzynKVDNOrnbqx57cB5sTSdbcNKQSilnKasoIE666naGucsKLGxei3tVhAsdiLFH5FiJ1J8ixQ7kSEd92kdTnz7jUq7EmE2zcXdbCrwbZk_lxyLMvBFz1fr5b8WfQETd5Cn</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Slimani, S.</creator><creator>Haddouche, A.</creator><creator>Ladjouze-Rezig, A.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>AB1296 Reliability of the different ultrasonographic features in knee osteoarthritis</title><author>Slimani, S. ; Haddouche, A. ; Ladjouze-Rezig, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1657-1ceb79f1abcc0ecd4a81c8b7489e91a73e88fc09ee383bd4a52aa8f2af45e5583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Slimani, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddouche, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladjouze-Rezig, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Slimani, S.</au><au>Haddouche, A.</au><au>Ladjouze-Rezig, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AB1296 Reliability of the different ultrasonographic features in knee osteoarthritis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>711</spage><pages>711-</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background Previous studies on ultrasonography in the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis have described different features seen in painful osteoarthritic knees. We statistically evaluated the diagnostic values of these features as compared to healthy controls. Methods We prospectively performed ultrasonography on 43 painful osteoarthritic knees of 25 subjects, comparing them with 40 knees of 20 sex and gender-matched healthy subjects, using a linear probe (Shimadzu SDU 1200; 10-5 MHz). Comparisons between the two groups were carried-out using Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Chi-square test or Fisher exact test for relevant categorical variables. Relative risks were also calculated. Results The mean age of patients was 52.1±5.3 years, 60% women. Abnormal features were found in 100% cases and 27% controls (p<0.0001; RR=3.6, 95% CI: 2.2-6.0). The most relevant features were the presence of joint effusion >2mm (79% Vs 12%; p<0.0001; RR=6.3, 95% CI: 2.7-14.5), joint effusion’s height (10.4 mm Vs 0.8 mm; p<0.0001), the presence of synovial thickening (46.5% Vs 10%; p<0.0001; RR=4.6, 95% CI: 1.7-12.5) and the presence of at least one femoro-tibial osteophyte (100% Vs 12%; p<0.0001; RR=8; 95% CI: 3.5-18.2). Cartilage thickness (inter-condylar: 2.3mm Vs 2.2mm; p=0.233), as well as the presence of a Power Doppler signal (4.6% Vs 0%; p=0.265) did not statistically differ between groups. Conclusions Joint effusion, synovial thickness and femoro-tibial osteophytes are the most useful features for an ultrasonographic diagnosis for knee osteoarthritis. There is a need to develop an ultrasonographic scoring system for diagnosing knee osteoarthritis and assessing its severity and prognosis. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.1292</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4967 |
ispartof | Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.711 |
issn | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1777973867 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
title | AB1296 Reliability of the different ultrasonographic features in knee osteoarthritis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T03%3A25%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AB1296%E2%80%85Reliability%20of%20the%20different%20ultrasonographic%20features%20in%20knee%20osteoarthritis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Slimani,%20S.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=711&rft.pages=711-&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.1292&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008645601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777973867&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |