THU0096 Mavrilimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a phase 2 double-blind, placebo controlled study

Background Preclinical and animal models have identified GM-CSF as a key cytokine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Mavrilimumab (CAM-3001), a human mAb targeting GM-CSFRα, is being evaluated for the treatment of RA. Objectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of 3-month treatment with ascending d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.186-186
Hauptverfasser: Burmester, G., Weinblatt, M., McInnes, I., Barbarash, O., Esfandieri, E., Sleeman, M., Godwood, A., Magrini, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 186
container_issue Suppl 3
container_start_page 186
container_title Annals of the rheumatic diseases
container_volume 71
creator Burmester, G.
Weinblatt, M.
McInnes, I.
Barbarash, O.
Esfandieri, E.
Sleeman, M.
Godwood, A.
Magrini, F.
description Background Preclinical and animal models have identified GM-CSF as a key cytokine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Mavrilimumab (CAM-3001), a human mAb targeting GM-CSFRα, is being evaluated for the treatment of RA. Objectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of 3-month treatment with ascending doses (10–100 mg q2w) of mavrilimumab in adult subjects with RA in combination with methotrexate. Methods Eligible subjects had moderate–severe disease activity (DAS28-CRP ≥3.2) of ≥3 mos disease duration, were receiving stable doses of MTX (7.5–25 mg/week), and were positive for ACPA and/or RF. A total of 233 subjects (mavrilimumab 158; placebo (PBO) 75) with active RA were randomised 2:1 to subcutaneous mavrilimumab (10, 30, 50, or 100 mg) or PBO. Subjects received the study drug every other wk for 12 wks, followed by a 12-wk follow-up (f/u) period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of mavrilimumab-treated subjects achieving a DAS28-CRP decrease ≥1.2 from baseline vs PBO at wk 12. Secondary endpoints included DAS28-CRP remission, ACR20/50/70, and HAQ-DI over time. All responder analyses were conducted using nonresponder imputation. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events (AEs and SAEs), and laboratory parameters. Results Of the 233 subjects, 216 (93%) (mavrilimumab 149 [94%]; PBO 67 [89%]) completed the study; 1 (0.4%) mavrilimumab and 2 (0.9%) PBO discontinued due to AEs. By wk 12, 55.7% of mavrilimumab-treated subjects met the primary endpoint (DAS28-CRP reduction of ≥1.2) vs 34.7% PBO subjects (p=0.003). Onset of response generally occurred within 2 wks. The 100 mg group showed significant improvement compared with PBO in the primary endpoint (66.7 vs 34.7%; p=0.001) and ACR20 (69.2 vs 40.0%; p=0.005) that was sustained over the 12-wk f/u period (59.0 vs 33.3%; p=0.010 and 56.4 vs 30.7%; p=0.009, respectively); similarly, the proportion of subjects achieving a HAQ-DI improvement of ≥0.25 (74.4 vs 48.0%; p=0.009) was sustained over the 12-wk f/u (66.7 vs 46.7%; p=0.049). DAS28-CRP remission rates at 12 wks were significantly improved compared to PBO in the 100-mg group (23.1 vs 6.7%; p=0.016) but the effect was not sustained throughout the end of the f/u period (7.7 vs 9.3%; p=1.000). AEs were generally mild or moderate in intensity; the most common events included decrease in CO diffusing capacity (mavrilimumab 19 [11.9%]; PBO 5 [6.3%]), nasopharyngitis (mavrilimumab 10 [6.3%]; PBO 2 [2.5%]) and upper respiratory tract infections (m
doi_str_mv 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.2061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777973788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008641221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1658-6d636185ce1244e51703a04cee455036c086667e9fe7eb4eaa93e9e23213b6083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1P3DAQhi0EEsvHf7DEtaHjOBkn7YmuunwIqIqgPVpOMqv14sSLnSC4ceGP9peQZSvUa0-jGT3vO9LD2JGAYyEkfjZdFxY0tI2NSQoiTWhwJhyngGKLTUSGxXhG2GYTAJBJVqLaZXsxLscVClFM2P3t2R1AiX9eXq_MY7DOtkNrKm47_t5sem8bbkK_CLa38Qu_oTi4PnI_54avFiYST3njh8pRUjnbNZ_4ypmaKs9r3_XBO0cNj_3QPB-wnblxkQ7_zn12N_t-Oz1LLn-cnk9PLpNKYF4k2KBEUeQ1iTTLKBcKpIGsJsryHCTWUCCionJOiqqMjCkllZTKVMgKoZD77GjTuwr-YaDY66UfQje-1EIpVSqpijX1dUPVwccYaK5XwbYmPGsBem1X_2NXr-3qd7t6bXdMJ5u0jT09fURNuNc49uf6-tdUI0y_zS5mP_XvkccNX7XL_3r0Bob-lW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777973788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THU0096 Mavrilimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a phase 2 double-blind, placebo controlled study</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Burmester, G. ; Weinblatt, M. ; McInnes, I. ; Barbarash, O. ; Esfandieri, E. ; Sleeman, M. ; Godwood, A. ; Magrini, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burmester, G. ; Weinblatt, M. ; McInnes, I. ; Barbarash, O. ; Esfandieri, E. ; Sleeman, M. ; Godwood, A. ; Magrini, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Preclinical and animal models have identified GM-CSF as a key cytokine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Mavrilimumab (CAM-3001), a human mAb targeting GM-CSFRα, is being evaluated for the treatment of RA. Objectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of 3-month treatment with ascending doses (10–100 mg q2w) of mavrilimumab in adult subjects with RA in combination with methotrexate. Methods Eligible subjects had moderate–severe disease activity (DAS28-CRP ≥3.2) of ≥3 mos disease duration, were receiving stable doses of MTX (7.5–25 mg/week), and were positive for ACPA and/or RF. A total of 233 subjects (mavrilimumab 158; placebo (PBO) 75) with active RA were randomised 2:1 to subcutaneous mavrilimumab (10, 30, 50, or 100 mg) or PBO. Subjects received the study drug every other wk for 12 wks, followed by a 12-wk follow-up (f/u) period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of mavrilimumab-treated subjects achieving a DAS28-CRP decrease ≥1.2 from baseline vs PBO at wk 12. Secondary endpoints included DAS28-CRP remission, ACR20/50/70, and HAQ-DI over time. All responder analyses were conducted using nonresponder imputation. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events (AEs and SAEs), and laboratory parameters. Results Of the 233 subjects, 216 (93%) (mavrilimumab 149 [94%]; PBO 67 [89%]) completed the study; 1 (0.4%) mavrilimumab and 2 (0.9%) PBO discontinued due to AEs. By wk 12, 55.7% of mavrilimumab-treated subjects met the primary endpoint (DAS28-CRP reduction of ≥1.2) vs 34.7% PBO subjects (p=0.003). Onset of response generally occurred within 2 wks. The 100 mg group showed significant improvement compared with PBO in the primary endpoint (66.7 vs 34.7%; p=0.001) and ACR20 (69.2 vs 40.0%; p=0.005) that was sustained over the 12-wk f/u period (59.0 vs 33.3%; p=0.010 and 56.4 vs 30.7%; p=0.009, respectively); similarly, the proportion of subjects achieving a HAQ-DI improvement of ≥0.25 (74.4 vs 48.0%; p=0.009) was sustained over the 12-wk f/u (66.7 vs 46.7%; p=0.049). DAS28-CRP remission rates at 12 wks were significantly improved compared to PBO in the 100-mg group (23.1 vs 6.7%; p=0.016) but the effect was not sustained throughout the end of the f/u period (7.7 vs 9.3%; p=1.000). AEs were generally mild or moderate in intensity; the most common events included decrease in CO diffusing capacity (mavrilimumab 19 [11.9%]; PBO 5 [6.3%]), nasopharyngitis (mavrilimumab 10 [6.3%]; PBO 2 [2.5%]) and upper respiratory tract infections (mavrilimumab 6 [3.8%]; PBO 4 [5.1%]). No significant hypersensitivity reactions, serious or opportunistic infections, or clinically significant changes in pulmonary parameters were reported. SAEs were reported in 4 (2.5%) mavrilimumab subjects and 1 (1.3%) PBO and were not treatment-related. Conclusions Mavrilimumab showed a rapid (within 2 wks) and significant clinical effect vs PBO, especially in the higher (100 mg) dose cohort. DAS28 response and ACR20 was maintained for 12 wks after cessation of mavrilimumab 100 mg. The sustained clinical activity along with an acceptable safety profile supports further clinical development of this new anti-GM-CSFRα mAb. The study was funded by MedImmune, Ltd. Disclosure of Interest G. Burmester Consultant for: MedImmune, M. Weinblatt Consultant for: Medimmune, I. McInnes: None Declared, O. Barbarash: None Declared, E. Esfandieri Employee of: Medimmune, M. Sleeman Employee of: MedImmune, A. Godwood Employee of: Medimmune, F. Magrini Employee of: Medimmune</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.2061</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.186-186</ispartof><rights>2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_3/186.2.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_3/186.2.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3195,23570,27923,27924,77471,77502</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burmester, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinblatt, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInnes, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbarash, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esfandieri, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeman, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godwood, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magrini, F.</creatorcontrib><title>THU0096 Mavrilimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a phase 2 double-blind, placebo controlled study</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><description>Background Preclinical and animal models have identified GM-CSF as a key cytokine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Mavrilimumab (CAM-3001), a human mAb targeting GM-CSFRα, is being evaluated for the treatment of RA. Objectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of 3-month treatment with ascending doses (10–100 mg q2w) of mavrilimumab in adult subjects with RA in combination with methotrexate. Methods Eligible subjects had moderate–severe disease activity (DAS28-CRP ≥3.2) of ≥3 mos disease duration, were receiving stable doses of MTX (7.5–25 mg/week), and were positive for ACPA and/or RF. A total of 233 subjects (mavrilimumab 158; placebo (PBO) 75) with active RA were randomised 2:1 to subcutaneous mavrilimumab (10, 30, 50, or 100 mg) or PBO. Subjects received the study drug every other wk for 12 wks, followed by a 12-wk follow-up (f/u) period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of mavrilimumab-treated subjects achieving a DAS28-CRP decrease ≥1.2 from baseline vs PBO at wk 12. Secondary endpoints included DAS28-CRP remission, ACR20/50/70, and HAQ-DI over time. All responder analyses were conducted using nonresponder imputation. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events (AEs and SAEs), and laboratory parameters. Results Of the 233 subjects, 216 (93%) (mavrilimumab 149 [94%]; PBO 67 [89%]) completed the study; 1 (0.4%) mavrilimumab and 2 (0.9%) PBO discontinued due to AEs. By wk 12, 55.7% of mavrilimumab-treated subjects met the primary endpoint (DAS28-CRP reduction of ≥1.2) vs 34.7% PBO subjects (p=0.003). Onset of response generally occurred within 2 wks. The 100 mg group showed significant improvement compared with PBO in the primary endpoint (66.7 vs 34.7%; p=0.001) and ACR20 (69.2 vs 40.0%; p=0.005) that was sustained over the 12-wk f/u period (59.0 vs 33.3%; p=0.010 and 56.4 vs 30.7%; p=0.009, respectively); similarly, the proportion of subjects achieving a HAQ-DI improvement of ≥0.25 (74.4 vs 48.0%; p=0.009) was sustained over the 12-wk f/u (66.7 vs 46.7%; p=0.049). DAS28-CRP remission rates at 12 wks were significantly improved compared to PBO in the 100-mg group (23.1 vs 6.7%; p=0.016) but the effect was not sustained throughout the end of the f/u period (7.7 vs 9.3%; p=1.000). AEs were generally mild or moderate in intensity; the most common events included decrease in CO diffusing capacity (mavrilimumab 19 [11.9%]; PBO 5 [6.3%]), nasopharyngitis (mavrilimumab 10 [6.3%]; PBO 2 [2.5%]) and upper respiratory tract infections (mavrilimumab 6 [3.8%]; PBO 4 [5.1%]). No significant hypersensitivity reactions, serious or opportunistic infections, or clinically significant changes in pulmonary parameters were reported. SAEs were reported in 4 (2.5%) mavrilimumab subjects and 1 (1.3%) PBO and were not treatment-related. Conclusions Mavrilimumab showed a rapid (within 2 wks) and significant clinical effect vs PBO, especially in the higher (100 mg) dose cohort. DAS28 response and ACR20 was maintained for 12 wks after cessation of mavrilimumab 100 mg. The sustained clinical activity along with an acceptable safety profile supports further clinical development of this new anti-GM-CSFRα mAb. The study was funded by MedImmune, Ltd. Disclosure of Interest G. Burmester Consultant for: MedImmune, M. Weinblatt Consultant for: Medimmune, I. McInnes: None Declared, O. Barbarash: None Declared, E. Esfandieri Employee of: Medimmune, M. Sleeman Employee of: MedImmune, A. Godwood Employee of: Medimmune, F. Magrini Employee of: Medimmune</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1P3DAQhi0EEsvHf7DEtaHjOBkn7YmuunwIqIqgPVpOMqv14sSLnSC4ceGP9peQZSvUa0-jGT3vO9LD2JGAYyEkfjZdFxY0tI2NSQoiTWhwJhyngGKLTUSGxXhG2GYTAJBJVqLaZXsxLscVClFM2P3t2R1AiX9eXq_MY7DOtkNrKm47_t5sem8bbkK_CLa38Qu_oTi4PnI_54avFiYST3njh8pRUjnbNZ_4ypmaKs9r3_XBO0cNj_3QPB-wnblxkQ7_zn12N_t-Oz1LLn-cnk9PLpNKYF4k2KBEUeQ1iTTLKBcKpIGsJsryHCTWUCCionJOiqqMjCkllZTKVMgKoZD77GjTuwr-YaDY66UfQje-1EIpVSqpijX1dUPVwccYaK5XwbYmPGsBem1X_2NXr-3qd7t6bXdMJ5u0jT09fURNuNc49uf6-tdUI0y_zS5mP_XvkccNX7XL_3r0Bob-lW0</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Burmester, G.</creator><creator>Weinblatt, M.</creator><creator>McInnes, I.</creator><creator>Barbarash, O.</creator><creator>Esfandieri, E.</creator><creator>Sleeman, M.</creator><creator>Godwood, A.</creator><creator>Magrini, F.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>THU0096 Mavrilimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a phase 2 double-blind, placebo controlled study</title><author>Burmester, G. ; Weinblatt, M. ; McInnes, I. ; Barbarash, O. ; Esfandieri, E. ; Sleeman, M. ; Godwood, A. ; Magrini, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1658-6d636185ce1244e51703a04cee455036c086667e9fe7eb4eaa93e9e23213b6083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burmester, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinblatt, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInnes, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbarash, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esfandieri, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeman, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godwood, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magrini, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burmester, G.</au><au>Weinblatt, M.</au><au>McInnes, I.</au><au>Barbarash, O.</au><au>Esfandieri, E.</au><au>Sleeman, M.</au><au>Godwood, A.</au><au>Magrini, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THU0096 Mavrilimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a phase 2 double-blind, placebo controlled study</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>186</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>186-186</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background Preclinical and animal models have identified GM-CSF as a key cytokine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Mavrilimumab (CAM-3001), a human mAb targeting GM-CSFRα, is being evaluated for the treatment of RA. Objectives To investigate the efficacy and safety of 3-month treatment with ascending doses (10–100 mg q2w) of mavrilimumab in adult subjects with RA in combination with methotrexate. Methods Eligible subjects had moderate–severe disease activity (DAS28-CRP ≥3.2) of ≥3 mos disease duration, were receiving stable doses of MTX (7.5–25 mg/week), and were positive for ACPA and/or RF. A total of 233 subjects (mavrilimumab 158; placebo (PBO) 75) with active RA were randomised 2:1 to subcutaneous mavrilimumab (10, 30, 50, or 100 mg) or PBO. Subjects received the study drug every other wk for 12 wks, followed by a 12-wk follow-up (f/u) period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of mavrilimumab-treated subjects achieving a DAS28-CRP decrease ≥1.2 from baseline vs PBO at wk 12. Secondary endpoints included DAS28-CRP remission, ACR20/50/70, and HAQ-DI over time. All responder analyses were conducted using nonresponder imputation. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events (AEs and SAEs), and laboratory parameters. Results Of the 233 subjects, 216 (93%) (mavrilimumab 149 [94%]; PBO 67 [89%]) completed the study; 1 (0.4%) mavrilimumab and 2 (0.9%) PBO discontinued due to AEs. By wk 12, 55.7% of mavrilimumab-treated subjects met the primary endpoint (DAS28-CRP reduction of ≥1.2) vs 34.7% PBO subjects (p=0.003). Onset of response generally occurred within 2 wks. The 100 mg group showed significant improvement compared with PBO in the primary endpoint (66.7 vs 34.7%; p=0.001) and ACR20 (69.2 vs 40.0%; p=0.005) that was sustained over the 12-wk f/u period (59.0 vs 33.3%; p=0.010 and 56.4 vs 30.7%; p=0.009, respectively); similarly, the proportion of subjects achieving a HAQ-DI improvement of ≥0.25 (74.4 vs 48.0%; p=0.009) was sustained over the 12-wk f/u (66.7 vs 46.7%; p=0.049). DAS28-CRP remission rates at 12 wks were significantly improved compared to PBO in the 100-mg group (23.1 vs 6.7%; p=0.016) but the effect was not sustained throughout the end of the f/u period (7.7 vs 9.3%; p=1.000). AEs were generally mild or moderate in intensity; the most common events included decrease in CO diffusing capacity (mavrilimumab 19 [11.9%]; PBO 5 [6.3%]), nasopharyngitis (mavrilimumab 10 [6.3%]; PBO 2 [2.5%]) and upper respiratory tract infections (mavrilimumab 6 [3.8%]; PBO 4 [5.1%]). No significant hypersensitivity reactions, serious or opportunistic infections, or clinically significant changes in pulmonary parameters were reported. SAEs were reported in 4 (2.5%) mavrilimumab subjects and 1 (1.3%) PBO and were not treatment-related. Conclusions Mavrilimumab showed a rapid (within 2 wks) and significant clinical effect vs PBO, especially in the higher (100 mg) dose cohort. DAS28 response and ACR20 was maintained for 12 wks after cessation of mavrilimumab 100 mg. The sustained clinical activity along with an acceptable safety profile supports further clinical development of this new anti-GM-CSFRα mAb. The study was funded by MedImmune, Ltd. Disclosure of Interest G. Burmester Consultant for: MedImmune, M. Weinblatt Consultant for: Medimmune, I. McInnes: None Declared, O. Barbarash: None Declared, E. Esfandieri Employee of: Medimmune, M. Sleeman Employee of: MedImmune, A. Godwood Employee of: Medimmune, F. Magrini Employee of: Medimmune</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.2061</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4967
ispartof Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.186-186
issn 0003-4967
1468-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1777973788
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
title THU0096 Mavrilimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a phase 2 double-blind, placebo controlled study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A45%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THU0096%E2%80%85Mavrilimumab%20in%20rheumatoid%20arthritis:%20Results%20of%20a%20phase%202%20double-blind,%20placebo%20controlled%20study&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Burmester,%20G.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=186&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=186-186&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.2061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008641221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777973788&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true