AB1280 Diurnal variation of power doppler signal in metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background In a preliminary study on 10 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) we could show for the first time that Power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) signal of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints has a clear diurnal variation, being higher in the morning vs. early afternoon and evening. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.710-710
Hauptverfasser: Semerano, L., Gutierrez, M., Ariani, A., Falgarone, G., Filippucci, E., Saidenberg-Kermanac’h, N., Boissier, M.-C., Grassi, W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 710
container_issue Suppl 3
container_start_page 710
container_title Annals of the rheumatic diseases
container_volume 71
creator Semerano, L.
Gutierrez, M.
Ariani, A.
Falgarone, G.
Filippucci, E.
Saidenberg-Kermanac’h, N.
Boissier, M.-C.
Grassi, W.
description Background In a preliminary study on 10 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) we could show for the first time that Power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) signal of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints has a clear diurnal variation, being higher in the morning vs. early afternoon and evening. We extended our study and involved a total of 36 patients with active RA in order to confirm our preliminary results Objectives To test, in a larger series, whether PDUS signal of MCP joints in RA patients varies according to the time of day Methods A total of 360 MCP joints from 36 patients with active RA (DAS28>3,2) were evaluated for both presence-absence of PDUS signal and according to a semiquantitative score at three different times of day T0: between 7 and 10 a.m.; T1: 4-6 hours after T0; T2: 4-6 hours after T1. The scores at T0, T1 and T2 were compared for each joint. Before each PDUS examination the patient filled out a 100 mm visual scale of pain (VAS). The day of PDUS assessment, factors that could potentially influence PDUS signal or VAS results were minimized. All patients seated in a temperature-controlled room for at least 30 minutes before PDUS examination to stabilize the blood flow. They avoided smoke, alcohol, corticosteroids, NSAIDs, analgesics and vasoactive drugs intake. Room temperature was kept stable. For PDUS examination patients put their hands inside a silhouette drawn on the paper sheet lying on the bench to avoid any change in hands’ position across the three examinations. Results PDUS presence/absence: there was a significant variation in the number of positive MCP joints during the day (p=0.01). There were more PDUS positive MCP joints at T0 (109) vs. T1 (97) (p
doi_str_mv 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.1276
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777973625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008639511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1655-272fbefa6bdab173b3b81af1d972edb1e728c066c3304b1a00eba21219c0f39f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxD5FYBzx2aydiBeUpIZBQYWuNE4e6pHGw3QI7NvwoX0LSIsSW1YxH59qeQ8gB0EMALo6wafzULOalDSmjwFKzqNEfApNigwxgKLJuLOgmGVBKeTrMhdwmOyHMuiPNIBuQ5ckpsIx-fXye2YVvsE6W6C1G65rEVUnrXo1PSte2dVeDfeoJ2yRzE7FA37p2ijU2T6Ybz5xtYlilurzp-1cbp8nqhxidLRP0cepttGGPbFVYB7P_U3fJw8X5ZHyV3txdXo9PblINYjRKmWSVNhUKXaIGyTXXGWAFZS6ZKTUYybKCClFwTocakFKjkQGDvKAVzyu-Sw7W97bevSxMiGrmVmsGBVLKXHLBRh11vKYK70LwplKtt3P07wqo6kWrP6JVL1qtRKtedJdO12kbonn7jaJ_VkJyOVK3j2PF788mk-yWqqzjxZrX89m_HvoGNnecNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777973625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AB1280 Diurnal variation of power doppler signal in metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Semerano, L. ; Gutierrez, M. ; Ariani, A. ; Falgarone, G. ; Filippucci, E. ; Saidenberg-Kermanac’h, N. ; Boissier, M.-C. ; Grassi, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Semerano, L. ; Gutierrez, M. ; Ariani, A. ; Falgarone, G. ; Filippucci, E. ; Saidenberg-Kermanac’h, N. ; Boissier, M.-C. ; Grassi, W.</creatorcontrib><description>Background In a preliminary study on 10 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) we could show for the first time that Power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) signal of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints has a clear diurnal variation, being higher in the morning vs. early afternoon and evening. We extended our study and involved a total of 36 patients with active RA in order to confirm our preliminary results Objectives To test, in a larger series, whether PDUS signal of MCP joints in RA patients varies according to the time of day Methods A total of 360 MCP joints from 36 patients with active RA (DAS28&gt;3,2) were evaluated for both presence-absence of PDUS signal and according to a semiquantitative score at three different times of day T0: between 7 and 10 a.m.; T1: 4-6 hours after T0; T2: 4-6 hours after T1. The scores at T0, T1 and T2 were compared for each joint. Before each PDUS examination the patient filled out a 100 mm visual scale of pain (VAS). The day of PDUS assessment, factors that could potentially influence PDUS signal or VAS results were minimized. All patients seated in a temperature-controlled room for at least 30 minutes before PDUS examination to stabilize the blood flow. They avoided smoke, alcohol, corticosteroids, NSAIDs, analgesics and vasoactive drugs intake. Room temperature was kept stable. For PDUS examination patients put their hands inside a silhouette drawn on the paper sheet lying on the bench to avoid any change in hands’ position across the three examinations. Results PDUS presence/absence: there was a significant variation in the number of positive MCP joints during the day (p=0.01). There were more PDUS positive MCP joints at T0 (109) vs. T1 (97) (p&lt;0.05) and vs.T2 (93) (p&lt;0.05). Semiquantitative PDUS scores were significantly higher at T1 (mean rank 2.19) with a subsequent reduction at T2 (mean rank 1.93) (p&lt;0,05) and at T3 (mean rank 1.88) (p&lt;0,05). PDUS scores correlated with pain visual scale values at T0, T1 and T2 (rho 0,54; p&lt;0,001). All patients displayed some sort of circadian variation, and the vast majority had higher scores at T1, nevertheless some patients (3) had higher scores at T2 or T3. Conclusions Diurnal variation of PDUS signal of MCP joints is a feature of patients with active RA and correlates with joint pain. The vast majority of patients displays higher PDUS signal in the morning compared to afternoon and evening, but some selected patients may have a different circadian variation, with higher signal later during the day. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.1276</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.710-710</ispartof><rights>2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_3/710.18.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_3/710.18.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Semerano, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falgarone, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filippucci, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saidenberg-Kermanac’h, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boissier, M.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grassi, W.</creatorcontrib><title>AB1280 Diurnal variation of power doppler signal in metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><description>Background In a preliminary study on 10 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) we could show for the first time that Power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) signal of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints has a clear diurnal variation, being higher in the morning vs. early afternoon and evening. We extended our study and involved a total of 36 patients with active RA in order to confirm our preliminary results Objectives To test, in a larger series, whether PDUS signal of MCP joints in RA patients varies according to the time of day Methods A total of 360 MCP joints from 36 patients with active RA (DAS28&gt;3,2) were evaluated for both presence-absence of PDUS signal and according to a semiquantitative score at three different times of day T0: between 7 and 10 a.m.; T1: 4-6 hours after T0; T2: 4-6 hours after T1. The scores at T0, T1 and T2 were compared for each joint. Before each PDUS examination the patient filled out a 100 mm visual scale of pain (VAS). The day of PDUS assessment, factors that could potentially influence PDUS signal or VAS results were minimized. All patients seated in a temperature-controlled room for at least 30 minutes before PDUS examination to stabilize the blood flow. They avoided smoke, alcohol, corticosteroids, NSAIDs, analgesics and vasoactive drugs intake. Room temperature was kept stable. For PDUS examination patients put their hands inside a silhouette drawn on the paper sheet lying on the bench to avoid any change in hands’ position across the three examinations. Results PDUS presence/absence: there was a significant variation in the number of positive MCP joints during the day (p=0.01). There were more PDUS positive MCP joints at T0 (109) vs. T1 (97) (p&lt;0.05) and vs.T2 (93) (p&lt;0.05). Semiquantitative PDUS scores were significantly higher at T1 (mean rank 2.19) with a subsequent reduction at T2 (mean rank 1.93) (p&lt;0,05) and at T3 (mean rank 1.88) (p&lt;0,05). PDUS scores correlated with pain visual scale values at T0, T1 and T2 (rho 0,54; p&lt;0,001). All patients displayed some sort of circadian variation, and the vast majority had higher scores at T1, nevertheless some patients (3) had higher scores at T2 or T3. Conclusions Diurnal variation of PDUS signal of MCP joints is a feature of patients with active RA and correlates with joint pain. The vast majority of patients displays higher PDUS signal in the morning compared to afternoon and evening, but some selected patients may have a different circadian variation, with higher signal later during the day. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEuXxD5FYBzx2aydiBeUpIZBQYWuNE4e6pHGw3QI7NvwoX0LSIsSW1YxH59qeQ8gB0EMALo6wafzULOalDSmjwFKzqNEfApNigwxgKLJuLOgmGVBKeTrMhdwmOyHMuiPNIBuQ5ckpsIx-fXye2YVvsE6W6C1G65rEVUnrXo1PSte2dVeDfeoJ2yRzE7FA37p2ijU2T6Ybz5xtYlilurzp-1cbp8nqhxidLRP0cepttGGPbFVYB7P_U3fJw8X5ZHyV3txdXo9PblINYjRKmWSVNhUKXaIGyTXXGWAFZS6ZKTUYybKCClFwTocakFKjkQGDvKAVzyu-Sw7W97bevSxMiGrmVmsGBVLKXHLBRh11vKYK70LwplKtt3P07wqo6kWrP6JVL1qtRKtedJdO12kbonn7jaJ_VkJyOVK3j2PF788mk-yWqqzjxZrX89m_HvoGNnecNQ</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Semerano, L.</creator><creator>Gutierrez, M.</creator><creator>Ariani, A.</creator><creator>Falgarone, G.</creator><creator>Filippucci, E.</creator><creator>Saidenberg-Kermanac’h, N.</creator><creator>Boissier, M.-C.</creator><creator>Grassi, W.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>AB1280 Diurnal variation of power doppler signal in metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis</title><author>Semerano, L. ; Gutierrez, M. ; Ariani, A. ; Falgarone, G. ; Filippucci, E. ; Saidenberg-Kermanac’h, N. ; Boissier, M.-C. ; Grassi, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1655-272fbefa6bdab173b3b81af1d972edb1e728c066c3304b1a00eba21219c0f39f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Semerano, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falgarone, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filippucci, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saidenberg-Kermanac’h, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boissier, M.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grassi, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Semerano, L.</au><au>Gutierrez, M.</au><au>Ariani, A.</au><au>Falgarone, G.</au><au>Filippucci, E.</au><au>Saidenberg-Kermanac’h, N.</au><au>Boissier, M.-C.</au><au>Grassi, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AB1280 Diurnal variation of power doppler signal in metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>710</spage><epage>710</epage><pages>710-710</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background In a preliminary study on 10 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) we could show for the first time that Power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) signal of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints has a clear diurnal variation, being higher in the morning vs. early afternoon and evening. We extended our study and involved a total of 36 patients with active RA in order to confirm our preliminary results Objectives To test, in a larger series, whether PDUS signal of MCP joints in RA patients varies according to the time of day Methods A total of 360 MCP joints from 36 patients with active RA (DAS28&gt;3,2) were evaluated for both presence-absence of PDUS signal and according to a semiquantitative score at three different times of day T0: between 7 and 10 a.m.; T1: 4-6 hours after T0; T2: 4-6 hours after T1. The scores at T0, T1 and T2 were compared for each joint. Before each PDUS examination the patient filled out a 100 mm visual scale of pain (VAS). The day of PDUS assessment, factors that could potentially influence PDUS signal or VAS results were minimized. All patients seated in a temperature-controlled room for at least 30 minutes before PDUS examination to stabilize the blood flow. They avoided smoke, alcohol, corticosteroids, NSAIDs, analgesics and vasoactive drugs intake. Room temperature was kept stable. For PDUS examination patients put their hands inside a silhouette drawn on the paper sheet lying on the bench to avoid any change in hands’ position across the three examinations. Results PDUS presence/absence: there was a significant variation in the number of positive MCP joints during the day (p=0.01). There were more PDUS positive MCP joints at T0 (109) vs. T1 (97) (p&lt;0.05) and vs.T2 (93) (p&lt;0.05). Semiquantitative PDUS scores were significantly higher at T1 (mean rank 2.19) with a subsequent reduction at T2 (mean rank 1.93) (p&lt;0,05) and at T3 (mean rank 1.88) (p&lt;0,05). PDUS scores correlated with pain visual scale values at T0, T1 and T2 (rho 0,54; p&lt;0,001). All patients displayed some sort of circadian variation, and the vast majority had higher scores at T1, nevertheless some patients (3) had higher scores at T2 or T3. Conclusions Diurnal variation of PDUS signal of MCP joints is a feature of patients with active RA and correlates with joint pain. The vast majority of patients displays higher PDUS signal in the morning compared to afternoon and evening, but some selected patients may have a different circadian variation, with higher signal later during the day. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.1276</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4967
ispartof Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.710-710
issn 0003-4967
1468-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1777973625
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
title AB1280 Diurnal variation of power doppler signal in metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A16%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AB1280%E2%80%85Diurnal%20variation%20of%20power%20doppler%20signal%20in%20metacarpophalangeal%20joints%20of%20patients%20with%20rheumatoid%20arthritis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Semerano,%20L.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=710&rft.epage=710&rft.pages=710-710&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.1276&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008639511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777973625&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true