FRI0073 Diagnostic performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a cohort of early arthritis

Background Early diagnosis is a central issue in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the insufficient sensitivity of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria in this setting led ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) to develop in 2010 a ne...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.334
Hauptverfasser: Sakellariou, G., Scirè, C.A., Montecucco, C., Caporali, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Suppl 3
container_start_page 334
container_title Annals of the rheumatic diseases
container_volume 71
creator Sakellariou, G.
Scirè, C.A.
Montecucco, C.
Caporali, R.
description Background Early diagnosis is a central issue in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the insufficient sensitivity of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria in this setting led ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) to develop in 2010 a new set of classification criteria, based and validated on data from early arthritis (EA) patients. These criteria need further validation in external cohorts. Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of The ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria for RA in EA patients, with the use of methotrexate (MTX) or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) 12 months after diagnosis as reference standard. Methods Patients with RA, according to the 1987 ACR criteria, or undifferentiated polyarthritis (UPA), attending for the first time an Early Arthritis Clinic, were enrolled. Patients with RA were given methotrexate (MTX), while patients with UPA received hydroxichloroquine (HCQ). Other synthetic DMARDs (sulphasalzine, leflunomide, cyclosporine) were given in case of contraindications or intolerance to MTX. Patients were seen every two months in the first semester and every three afterwards. Patients on HCQ were switched to MTX and MTX escalated up to 20 mg/week if Disease Activity Score was ≥2.4 at subsequent visits. If disease activity was not sufficiently controlled by conventional DMARDs, biologic DMARDs were added. ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria were applied at baseline and the use of MTX or synthetic or biologic DMARDs was evaluated after 12 months of treatment. Only patients with complete data were included. Results 266 patients were included, 74% female, mean age (sd) was 57.2 (±14.3), median (IQR) disease duration was 3.07 (1.2,7.1) months, 33% of patients were rheumatoid factor positive, 66.9% patients fulfilled the 1987 RA classification criteria. ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria were fulfilled by 76.69% of patients at baseline, 1987 and 2010 criteria showed a moderate agreement (78.2%). After 12 months 211/266 (73.68%) patients were taking DMARDs other than HCQ and 202/266 (70.3%) MTX. Using 12 month MTX as the reference standard, the diagnostic performance of the criteria was moderate (area under curve, AUC (95% CI) 0.76 (0.69,0.83). Using the proposed cut-off of 6, sensitivity (95% CI) was 0.87 (0.82,0.91) and specificity 0.57 (0.44,0.70). However, if we more properly considered all DMARDs other than HCQ as reference standard, the d
doi_str_mv 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.2530
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777972940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008634401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2230-52c32682deb918c074db0e16d3a3c6947141b1cf84f0a6fcb33b276090143b6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMFOGzEQhi1EJQLtO1jivDC2N_auegoLoagRldKAuFler904Tdap7UjlxgUelCepk1SlV06jmfn_f0YfQqcEzghh_Fz1fZibzapzsaBAaGE2SxXO6JDBARqQkld5zOEQDQCAFWXNxRE6jnGRW6hINUAv4-kNgGCvT8-XTv3ofUxO47UJ1oeV6rXB3uI0NzjHAx410_Oru8loivVSxeis0yo532MdXDLBKZxtePeSSt51WIU0zysXseuxwtrPfUjbSKPC8vFt_RF9sGoZzae_9QTdja9mzZdi8u36phlNipZSBsWQakZ5RTvT1qTSIMquBUN4xxTTvC4FKUlLtK1KC4pb3TLWUsGhBlKyllt2gk73uevgf21MTHLhN6HPJyURQtSC1iVk1ee9SgcfYzBWroNbqfAoCcgtePkfeLkFL3fg5RZ8dhd7t4vJ_P5nVeGn5IKJoby9b-RXuHhovo9v5Szr-V7frhbvOvQHm7Sesw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777972940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FRI0073 Diagnostic performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a cohort of early arthritis</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Sakellariou, G. ; Scirè, C.A. ; Montecucco, C. ; Caporali, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakellariou, G. ; Scirè, C.A. ; Montecucco, C. ; Caporali, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Early diagnosis is a central issue in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the insufficient sensitivity of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria in this setting led ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) to develop in 2010 a new set of classification criteria, based and validated on data from early arthritis (EA) patients. These criteria need further validation in external cohorts. Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of The ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria for RA in EA patients, with the use of methotrexate (MTX) or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) 12 months after diagnosis as reference standard. Methods Patients with RA, according to the 1987 ACR criteria, or undifferentiated polyarthritis (UPA), attending for the first time an Early Arthritis Clinic, were enrolled. Patients with RA were given methotrexate (MTX), while patients with UPA received hydroxichloroquine (HCQ). Other synthetic DMARDs (sulphasalzine, leflunomide, cyclosporine) were given in case of contraindications or intolerance to MTX. Patients were seen every two months in the first semester and every three afterwards. Patients on HCQ were switched to MTX and MTX escalated up to 20 mg/week if Disease Activity Score was ≥2.4 at subsequent visits. If disease activity was not sufficiently controlled by conventional DMARDs, biologic DMARDs were added. ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria were applied at baseline and the use of MTX or synthetic or biologic DMARDs was evaluated after 12 months of treatment. Only patients with complete data were included. Results 266 patients were included, 74% female, mean age (sd) was 57.2 (±14.3), median (IQR) disease duration was 3.07 (1.2,7.1) months, 33% of patients were rheumatoid factor positive, 66.9% patients fulfilled the 1987 RA classification criteria. ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria were fulfilled by 76.69% of patients at baseline, 1987 and 2010 criteria showed a moderate agreement (78.2%). After 12 months 211/266 (73.68%) patients were taking DMARDs other than HCQ and 202/266 (70.3%) MTX. Using 12 month MTX as the reference standard, the diagnostic performance of the criteria was moderate (area under curve, AUC (95% CI) 0.76 (0.69,0.83). Using the proposed cut-off of 6, sensitivity (95% CI) was 0.87 (0.82,0.91) and specificity 0.57 (0.44,0.70). However, if we more properly considered all DMARDs other than HCQ as reference standard, the diagnostic performance was good, with a AUC (95% CI) of 0.80 (0.74,0.87), with a sensitivity (95%CI) of 0.87 (0.81,0.91) and a specificity of 0.63 (0.49,0.76) for the cut-off of 6. Conclusions The 2010 RA classification criteria show a moderate to good diagnostic performance in a the setting of EA, and this is in keeping with previous validation studies on external cohorts. In our population, sensitivity was very good, while specificity was slightly lower possibly due to treatment of UPA with HCQ. References Aletaha D, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;62:2569-81. Van der Linden MP, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;63:1190-9. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.2530</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.334</ispartof><rights>2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2230-52c32682deb918c074db0e16d3a3c6947141b1cf84f0a6fcb33b276090143b6f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_3/334.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/71/Suppl_3/334.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakellariou, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scirè, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montecucco, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caporali, R.</creatorcontrib><title>FRI0073 Diagnostic performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a cohort of early arthritis</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><description>Background Early diagnosis is a central issue in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the insufficient sensitivity of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria in this setting led ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) to develop in 2010 a new set of classification criteria, based and validated on data from early arthritis (EA) patients. These criteria need further validation in external cohorts. Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of The ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria for RA in EA patients, with the use of methotrexate (MTX) or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) 12 months after diagnosis as reference standard. Methods Patients with RA, according to the 1987 ACR criteria, or undifferentiated polyarthritis (UPA), attending for the first time an Early Arthritis Clinic, were enrolled. Patients with RA were given methotrexate (MTX), while patients with UPA received hydroxichloroquine (HCQ). Other synthetic DMARDs (sulphasalzine, leflunomide, cyclosporine) were given in case of contraindications or intolerance to MTX. Patients were seen every two months in the first semester and every three afterwards. Patients on HCQ were switched to MTX and MTX escalated up to 20 mg/week if Disease Activity Score was ≥2.4 at subsequent visits. If disease activity was not sufficiently controlled by conventional DMARDs, biologic DMARDs were added. ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria were applied at baseline and the use of MTX or synthetic or biologic DMARDs was evaluated after 12 months of treatment. Only patients with complete data were included. Results 266 patients were included, 74% female, mean age (sd) was 57.2 (±14.3), median (IQR) disease duration was 3.07 (1.2,7.1) months, 33% of patients were rheumatoid factor positive, 66.9% patients fulfilled the 1987 RA classification criteria. ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria were fulfilled by 76.69% of patients at baseline, 1987 and 2010 criteria showed a moderate agreement (78.2%). After 12 months 211/266 (73.68%) patients were taking DMARDs other than HCQ and 202/266 (70.3%) MTX. Using 12 month MTX as the reference standard, the diagnostic performance of the criteria was moderate (area under curve, AUC (95% CI) 0.76 (0.69,0.83). Using the proposed cut-off of 6, sensitivity (95% CI) was 0.87 (0.82,0.91) and specificity 0.57 (0.44,0.70). However, if we more properly considered all DMARDs other than HCQ as reference standard, the diagnostic performance was good, with a AUC (95% CI) of 0.80 (0.74,0.87), with a sensitivity (95%CI) of 0.87 (0.81,0.91) and a specificity of 0.63 (0.49,0.76) for the cut-off of 6. Conclusions The 2010 RA classification criteria show a moderate to good diagnostic performance in a the setting of EA, and this is in keeping with previous validation studies on external cohorts. In our population, sensitivity was very good, while specificity was slightly lower possibly due to treatment of UPA with HCQ. References Aletaha D, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;62:2569-81. Van der Linden MP, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;63:1190-9. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMFOGzEQhi1EJQLtO1jivDC2N_auegoLoagRldKAuFler904Tdap7UjlxgUelCepk1SlV06jmfn_f0YfQqcEzghh_Fz1fZibzapzsaBAaGE2SxXO6JDBARqQkld5zOEQDQCAFWXNxRE6jnGRW6hINUAv4-kNgGCvT8-XTv3ofUxO47UJ1oeV6rXB3uI0NzjHAx410_Oru8loivVSxeis0yo532MdXDLBKZxtePeSSt51WIU0zysXseuxwtrPfUjbSKPC8vFt_RF9sGoZzae_9QTdja9mzZdi8u36phlNipZSBsWQakZ5RTvT1qTSIMquBUN4xxTTvC4FKUlLtK1KC4pb3TLWUsGhBlKyllt2gk73uevgf21MTHLhN6HPJyURQtSC1iVk1ee9SgcfYzBWroNbqfAoCcgtePkfeLkFL3fg5RZ8dhd7t4vJ_P5nVeGn5IKJoby9b-RXuHhovo9v5Szr-V7frhbvOvQHm7Sesw</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Sakellariou, G.</creator><creator>Scirè, C.A.</creator><creator>Montecucco, C.</creator><creator>Caporali, R.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>FRI0073 Diagnostic performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a cohort of early arthritis</title><author>Sakellariou, G. ; Scirè, C.A. ; Montecucco, C. ; Caporali, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2230-52c32682deb918c074db0e16d3a3c6947141b1cf84f0a6fcb33b276090143b6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakellariou, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scirè, C.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montecucco, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caporali, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakellariou, G.</au><au>Scirè, C.A.</au><au>Montecucco, C.</au><au>Caporali, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FRI0073 Diagnostic performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a cohort of early arthritis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>334</spage><pages>334-</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background Early diagnosis is a central issue in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the insufficient sensitivity of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria in this setting led ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) to develop in 2010 a new set of classification criteria, based and validated on data from early arthritis (EA) patients. These criteria need further validation in external cohorts. Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of The ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria for RA in EA patients, with the use of methotrexate (MTX) or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) 12 months after diagnosis as reference standard. Methods Patients with RA, according to the 1987 ACR criteria, or undifferentiated polyarthritis (UPA), attending for the first time an Early Arthritis Clinic, were enrolled. Patients with RA were given methotrexate (MTX), while patients with UPA received hydroxichloroquine (HCQ). Other synthetic DMARDs (sulphasalzine, leflunomide, cyclosporine) were given in case of contraindications or intolerance to MTX. Patients were seen every two months in the first semester and every three afterwards. Patients on HCQ were switched to MTX and MTX escalated up to 20 mg/week if Disease Activity Score was ≥2.4 at subsequent visits. If disease activity was not sufficiently controlled by conventional DMARDs, biologic DMARDs were added. ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria were applied at baseline and the use of MTX or synthetic or biologic DMARDs was evaluated after 12 months of treatment. Only patients with complete data were included. Results 266 patients were included, 74% female, mean age (sd) was 57.2 (±14.3), median (IQR) disease duration was 3.07 (1.2,7.1) months, 33% of patients were rheumatoid factor positive, 66.9% patients fulfilled the 1987 RA classification criteria. ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria were fulfilled by 76.69% of patients at baseline, 1987 and 2010 criteria showed a moderate agreement (78.2%). After 12 months 211/266 (73.68%) patients were taking DMARDs other than HCQ and 202/266 (70.3%) MTX. Using 12 month MTX as the reference standard, the diagnostic performance of the criteria was moderate (area under curve, AUC (95% CI) 0.76 (0.69,0.83). Using the proposed cut-off of 6, sensitivity (95% CI) was 0.87 (0.82,0.91) and specificity 0.57 (0.44,0.70). However, if we more properly considered all DMARDs other than HCQ as reference standard, the diagnostic performance was good, with a AUC (95% CI) of 0.80 (0.74,0.87), with a sensitivity (95%CI) of 0.87 (0.81,0.91) and a specificity of 0.63 (0.49,0.76) for the cut-off of 6. Conclusions The 2010 RA classification criteria show a moderate to good diagnostic performance in a the setting of EA, and this is in keeping with previous validation studies on external cohorts. In our population, sensitivity was very good, while specificity was slightly lower possibly due to treatment of UPA with HCQ. References Aletaha D, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;62:2569-81. Van der Linden MP, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;63:1190-9. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.2530</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4967
ispartof Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.71 (Suppl 3), p.334
issn 0003-4967
1468-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1777972940
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
title FRI0073 Diagnostic performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a cohort of early arthritis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A48%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FRI0073%E2%80%85Diagnostic%20performance%20of%20the%202010%20ACR/EULAR%20classification%20criteria%20for%20rheumatoid%20arthritis%20in%20a%20cohort%20of%20early%20arthritis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Sakellariou,%20G.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=334&rft.pages=334-&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.2530&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008634401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777972940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true