SAT0225 Is There A Difference in the Effectiveness in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Rituximab When Using A Dose of 1 or 2 Grams per Cycle? A Systematic Review

Background Since the description of the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the use of this drug has been extended. The recommendation in fact sheet is the administration of two infusions of 1 g in each cycle but some studies have used two infusions of 50...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2014-06, Vol.73 (Suppl 2), p.671-672
Hauptverfasser: Ortiz, A.M., Rosario Lozano, M.P., Martínez Fernández, C., González-Άlvaro, I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 672
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page 671
container_title Annals of the rheumatic diseases
container_volume 73
creator Ortiz, A.M.
Rosario Lozano, M.P.
Martínez Fernández, C.
González-Άlvaro, I.
description Background Since the description of the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the use of this drug has been extended. The recommendation in fact sheet is the administration of two infusions of 1 g in each cycle but some studies have used two infusions of 500 mg. Currently the most suitable pattern for its use is not established. Objectives To systematically review the published evidence to date regarding on the difference in efficacy in the treatment of RA with RTX when used at a dose of 2 x 500 mg (1 g) or 2 x 1000 mg (2 g) per cycle. Methods A sensitive search of all published studies on the difference in the efficacy of RTX in RA patients used at a dose of 1 and 2 g per cycle was performed in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central databases since its inception until July 2013. We selected all studies involving adult patients with RA treated with RTX in which intervention was described as treatment with RTX at a dose of 1 g per cycle and comparator as the administration of RTX at a dose of 2 g per cycle. Any standardized measure of efficacy in RA was considered as outcome measure at two years of follow-up. Although meta analysis, systematic reviews, clinical trials and cohorts well designed were preferably selected, finally we also included open studies and all studies that showed a methodologically correct subanalysis related to the question even if it had not been his main objective. After removing duplicates, an initial selection by reading titles, a second selection after reading abstracts and, finally, full reading of selected studies, assessing the methodological quality by levels of the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Evidence (2001 update) where applicable, was carried out. A manual search of the references of included studies was also performed. Results A total of 451 citations about the treatment of RA patients with RTX used at a dose of 1 and 2 g per cycle were identified, which were reduced to 46 after removing duplicates and selection by reading titles and abstracts. Of the 46 articles selected, finally 14 were included in the review, 3 reviews, 2 of them systematic and one not systematic, 5 corresponding to 4 clinical trials, 3 open studies and 3 abstracts, two of them about the same retrospective cohort and, the third one, an open study previously included as a publication. Although published outside the period included in this review, an article about a systematic review and meta-analysis
doi_str_mv 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777971855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008703821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1275-458476d1f5af1974702d1c56b2c04ab97d2d5d459690736b39115b5c6b8734923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc1u1DAUhSMEEkPLO1yp6xTb8U8iFmg0lLZSJaTpVCwtJ7khHk2cwXZaZseGx-lL8SQ4TCt1y8rXR-fcH31ZdkbJOaWF_GCc8z1OQ2tDzgjlOU474885IfxVtqBclkmW5HW2IIQUOa-kepu9C2GbvqSk5SJ7vF1uCGPiz6_f1wE2PXqEJXy2XZcq1yBYB7FHuEhCE-09OgzhWdx4NHFAF2HsYD0vYuJoW1j62HsbbYAHG3tY2zj9tIOp4VuPDu6Cdd_nIWPAOUhh9MDg0pshwB49rA7NDj8lx-0hREw9bQNrvLf4cJq96cwu4Pun9yS7-3KxWV3lN18vr1fLm7ymTImci5Ir2dJOmI5WiivCWtoIWbOGcFNXqmWtaLmoZEVUIeuiolTUopF1qQpeseIkOzv23fvxx4Qh6u04eZdGaqqUqhQthUiuj0dX48cQPHZ679OZ_qAp0TMf_YKPnvnof3z0zCel5TFdD9v_Cv4FtdybYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777971855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SAT0225 Is There A Difference in the Effectiveness in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Rituximab When Using A Dose of 1 or 2 Grams per Cycle? A Systematic Review</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Ortiz, A.M. ; Rosario Lozano, M.P. ; Martínez Fernández, C. ; González-Άlvaro, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, A.M. ; Rosario Lozano, M.P. ; Martínez Fernández, C. ; González-Άlvaro, I.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Since the description of the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the use of this drug has been extended. The recommendation in fact sheet is the administration of two infusions of 1 g in each cycle but some studies have used two infusions of 500 mg. Currently the most suitable pattern for its use is not established. Objectives To systematically review the published evidence to date regarding on the difference in efficacy in the treatment of RA with RTX when used at a dose of 2 x 500 mg (1 g) or 2 x 1000 mg (2 g) per cycle. Methods A sensitive search of all published studies on the difference in the efficacy of RTX in RA patients used at a dose of 1 and 2 g per cycle was performed in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central databases since its inception until July 2013. We selected all studies involving adult patients with RA treated with RTX in which intervention was described as treatment with RTX at a dose of 1 g per cycle and comparator as the administration of RTX at a dose of 2 g per cycle. Any standardized measure of efficacy in RA was considered as outcome measure at two years of follow-up. Although meta analysis, systematic reviews, clinical trials and cohorts well designed were preferably selected, finally we also included open studies and all studies that showed a methodologically correct subanalysis related to the question even if it had not been his main objective. After removing duplicates, an initial selection by reading titles, a second selection after reading abstracts and, finally, full reading of selected studies, assessing the methodological quality by levels of the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Evidence (2001 update) where applicable, was carried out. A manual search of the references of included studies was also performed. Results A total of 451 citations about the treatment of RA patients with RTX used at a dose of 1 and 2 g per cycle were identified, which were reduced to 46 after removing duplicates and selection by reading titles and abstracts. Of the 46 articles selected, finally 14 were included in the review, 3 reviews, 2 of them systematic and one not systematic, 5 corresponding to 4 clinical trials, 3 open studies and 3 abstracts, two of them about the same retrospective cohort and, the third one, an open study previously included as a publication. Although published outside the period included in this review, an article about a systematic review and meta-analysis was included because it provides valuable information for the same. Conclusions RTX shows an equivalent overall clinical efficacy administered at doses of 1 and 2 g per cycle in the treatment of RA patients (level of evidence 1a, grade of recommendation A). However, there may be differences in extreme efficacy parameters with trend, not statistically significant, to a more ACR70 response or EULAR good response at the dose of 2 g per cycle. Acknowledgements This work has been funded by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology. Disclosure of Interest A. M. Ortiz Grant/research support: Spanish Society of Rheumatology, M. Rosario Lozano: None declared, C. Martínez Fernández: None declared, I. González-Άlvaro Grant/research support: Spanish Society of Rheumatology DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4004</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Limited</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014-06, Vol.73 (Suppl 2), p.671-672</ispartof><rights>2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 (c) 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/73/Suppl_2/671.3.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/73/Suppl_2/671.3.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosario Lozano, M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez Fernández, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Άlvaro, I.</creatorcontrib><title>SAT0225 Is There A Difference in the Effectiveness in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Rituximab When Using A Dose of 1 or 2 Grams per Cycle? A Systematic Review</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><description>Background Since the description of the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the use of this drug has been extended. The recommendation in fact sheet is the administration of two infusions of 1 g in each cycle but some studies have used two infusions of 500 mg. Currently the most suitable pattern for its use is not established. Objectives To systematically review the published evidence to date regarding on the difference in efficacy in the treatment of RA with RTX when used at a dose of 2 x 500 mg (1 g) or 2 x 1000 mg (2 g) per cycle. Methods A sensitive search of all published studies on the difference in the efficacy of RTX in RA patients used at a dose of 1 and 2 g per cycle was performed in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central databases since its inception until July 2013. We selected all studies involving adult patients with RA treated with RTX in which intervention was described as treatment with RTX at a dose of 1 g per cycle and comparator as the administration of RTX at a dose of 2 g per cycle. Any standardized measure of efficacy in RA was considered as outcome measure at two years of follow-up. Although meta analysis, systematic reviews, clinical trials and cohorts well designed were preferably selected, finally we also included open studies and all studies that showed a methodologically correct subanalysis related to the question even if it had not been his main objective. After removing duplicates, an initial selection by reading titles, a second selection after reading abstracts and, finally, full reading of selected studies, assessing the methodological quality by levels of the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Evidence (2001 update) where applicable, was carried out. A manual search of the references of included studies was also performed. Results A total of 451 citations about the treatment of RA patients with RTX used at a dose of 1 and 2 g per cycle were identified, which were reduced to 46 after removing duplicates and selection by reading titles and abstracts. Of the 46 articles selected, finally 14 were included in the review, 3 reviews, 2 of them systematic and one not systematic, 5 corresponding to 4 clinical trials, 3 open studies and 3 abstracts, two of them about the same retrospective cohort and, the third one, an open study previously included as a publication. Although published outside the period included in this review, an article about a systematic review and meta-analysis was included because it provides valuable information for the same. Conclusions RTX shows an equivalent overall clinical efficacy administered at doses of 1 and 2 g per cycle in the treatment of RA patients (level of evidence 1a, grade of recommendation A). However, there may be differences in extreme efficacy parameters with trend, not statistically significant, to a more ACR70 response or EULAR good response at the dose of 2 g per cycle. Acknowledgements This work has been funded by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology. Disclosure of Interest A. M. Ortiz Grant/research support: Spanish Society of Rheumatology, M. Rosario Lozano: None declared, C. Martínez Fernández: None declared, I. González-Άlvaro Grant/research support: Spanish Society of Rheumatology DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4004</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc1u1DAUhSMEEkPLO1yp6xTb8U8iFmg0lLZSJaTpVCwtJ7khHk2cwXZaZseGx-lL8SQ4TCt1y8rXR-fcH31ZdkbJOaWF_GCc8z1OQ2tDzgjlOU474885IfxVtqBclkmW5HW2IIQUOa-kepu9C2GbvqSk5SJ7vF1uCGPiz6_f1wE2PXqEJXy2XZcq1yBYB7FHuEhCE-09OgzhWdx4NHFAF2HsYD0vYuJoW1j62HsbbYAHG3tY2zj9tIOp4VuPDu6Cdd_nIWPAOUhh9MDg0pshwB49rA7NDj8lx-0hREw9bQNrvLf4cJq96cwu4Pun9yS7-3KxWV3lN18vr1fLm7ymTImci5Ir2dJOmI5WiivCWtoIWbOGcFNXqmWtaLmoZEVUIeuiolTUopF1qQpeseIkOzv23fvxx4Qh6u04eZdGaqqUqhQthUiuj0dX48cQPHZ679OZ_qAp0TMf_YKPnvnof3z0zCel5TFdD9v_Cv4FtdybYg</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Ortiz, A.M.</creator><creator>Rosario Lozano, M.P.</creator><creator>Martínez Fernández, C.</creator><creator>González-Άlvaro, I.</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>SAT0225 Is There A Difference in the Effectiveness in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Rituximab When Using A Dose of 1 or 2 Grams per Cycle? A Systematic Review</title><author>Ortiz, A.M. ; Rosario Lozano, M.P. ; Martínez Fernández, C. ; González-Άlvaro, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1275-458476d1f5af1974702d1c56b2c04ab97d2d5d459690736b39115b5c6b8734923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosario Lozano, M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez Fernández, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Άlvaro, I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ortiz, A.M.</au><au>Rosario Lozano, M.P.</au><au>Martínez Fernández, C.</au><au>González-Άlvaro, I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SAT0225 Is There A Difference in the Effectiveness in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Rituximab When Using A Dose of 1 or 2 Grams per Cycle? A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>671</spage><epage>672</epage><pages>671-672</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background Since the description of the efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the use of this drug has been extended. The recommendation in fact sheet is the administration of two infusions of 1 g in each cycle but some studies have used two infusions of 500 mg. Currently the most suitable pattern for its use is not established. Objectives To systematically review the published evidence to date regarding on the difference in efficacy in the treatment of RA with RTX when used at a dose of 2 x 500 mg (1 g) or 2 x 1000 mg (2 g) per cycle. Methods A sensitive search of all published studies on the difference in the efficacy of RTX in RA patients used at a dose of 1 and 2 g per cycle was performed in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central databases since its inception until July 2013. We selected all studies involving adult patients with RA treated with RTX in which intervention was described as treatment with RTX at a dose of 1 g per cycle and comparator as the administration of RTX at a dose of 2 g per cycle. Any standardized measure of efficacy in RA was considered as outcome measure at two years of follow-up. Although meta analysis, systematic reviews, clinical trials and cohorts well designed were preferably selected, finally we also included open studies and all studies that showed a methodologically correct subanalysis related to the question even if it had not been his main objective. After removing duplicates, an initial selection by reading titles, a second selection after reading abstracts and, finally, full reading of selected studies, assessing the methodological quality by levels of the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine Evidence (2001 update) where applicable, was carried out. A manual search of the references of included studies was also performed. Results A total of 451 citations about the treatment of RA patients with RTX used at a dose of 1 and 2 g per cycle were identified, which were reduced to 46 after removing duplicates and selection by reading titles and abstracts. Of the 46 articles selected, finally 14 were included in the review, 3 reviews, 2 of them systematic and one not systematic, 5 corresponding to 4 clinical trials, 3 open studies and 3 abstracts, two of them about the same retrospective cohort and, the third one, an open study previously included as a publication. Although published outside the period included in this review, an article about a systematic review and meta-analysis was included because it provides valuable information for the same. Conclusions RTX shows an equivalent overall clinical efficacy administered at doses of 1 and 2 g per cycle in the treatment of RA patients (level of evidence 1a, grade of recommendation A). However, there may be differences in extreme efficacy parameters with trend, not statistically significant, to a more ACR70 response or EULAR good response at the dose of 2 g per cycle. Acknowledgements This work has been funded by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology. Disclosure of Interest A. M. Ortiz Grant/research support: Spanish Society of Rheumatology, M. Rosario Lozano: None declared, C. Martínez Fernández: None declared, I. González-Άlvaro Grant/research support: Spanish Society of Rheumatology DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4004</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4004</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4967
ispartof Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014-06, Vol.73 (Suppl 2), p.671-672
issn 0003-4967
1468-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1777971855
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
title SAT0225 Is There A Difference in the Effectiveness in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Rituximab When Using A Dose of 1 or 2 Grams per Cycle? A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A39%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SAT0225%E2%80%85Is%20There%20A%20Difference%20in%20the%20Effectiveness%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Rheumatoid%20Arthritis%20with%20Rituximab%20When%20Using%20A%20Dose%20of%201%20or%202%20Grams%20per%20Cycle?%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Ortiz,%20A.M.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=672&rft.pages=671-672&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008703821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777971855&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true