OP0131 Prevalence and Predictors of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Systemic Sclerosis

Background Gastro-Intestinal (GI) involvement is a well-known complication of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is part of such involvement. It can compromise the patient quality of life and lead to severe outcomes (cachexia, high infectious risk). However, the p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A95-A96
Hauptverfasser: Tauber, M., Avouac, J., Benahmed, A., Barbot, L., Kahan, A., Allanore, Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A96
container_issue Suppl 3
container_start_page A95
container_title Annals of the rheumatic diseases
container_volume 72
creator Tauber, M.
Avouac, J.
Benahmed, A.
Barbot, L.
Kahan, A.
Allanore, Y.
description Background Gastro-Intestinal (GI) involvement is a well-known complication of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is part of such involvement. It can compromise the patient quality of life and lead to severe outcomes (cachexia, high infectious risk). However, the prevalence of SIBO is not established and predictors remain unexplored. Objectives To estimate the prevalence of SIBO in patients with SSc exhibiting GI symptoms and identify subsets of patients at risk of SIBO regarding clinical and biological presentations and GI symptoms measured by standardised questionnaires. Methods Between 2011 and 2012, patients with SSc exhibiting GI complaints (pain, diarrhoea, bloating) underwent glucose hydrogen/methane breath tests (BT) and blood assays (CRP, ferritin, vitamins D, B9 and B12, albumin, calcium, phosphate, prothrombin and lipid profile). At the time of the BT, patients were asked to complete two questionnaires: the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument (UCLA SCTC GTI).1 Results Among 120 consecutive SSc patients, 38 patients (30 women) were included, (median age: 59 years (30-80)). Fourteen patients (37%) had a positive BT and were diagnosed with SIBO giving a point prevalence of 12% (14/120) in SSc and 37% (14/38) in SSc patients with GI symptoms. Among the 38 patients included, 18 (48%) had the diffuse cutaneous subset. Median disease duration was 8.5 years (1-35). Patients with SIBO showed a longer disease duration (13.5 years (4-29) vs. 6.5 (1-35), p=0.007); a higher frequency of pulmonary arterial hypertension confirmed by right heart catheterization (3/14, 21% vs. 0/24, 0%, p=0.01) and a lower frequency of anti-topoisomerase-I antibodies (1/14, 7% vs. 10/24, 42%, p=0.04). Median age (60.5 vs. 59 years, p=0.5) and cutaneous subset (36% vs. 54% patients with the diffuse form, p=0.5) did not differ between patients with or without SIBO. Of the most interest, significant weight-loss within the past 6 months (>5% of total body weight) was observed in patients with BT+ (6/14, 43% vs. 2/24, 8%, p=0.03). Despite normal median values, calcium (p=0.04), phosphate (p=0.04) and triglycerid levels (p=0.04) were lower in patients with SIBO. Focusing on GI manifestations, it is of note that the total UCLA SCTC GTI score was higher in patients suffering from SIBO (0.85 (0.24-2.22) vs. 0.30 (0.04-1.24), p=0.02). The SF-36 assessme
doi_str_mv 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.336
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777913856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008722881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1636-b27ee6e8e8555a79b800edc86a58667e4e92d2b4bf569ff7a4dbcc6c63c3ebf23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEtPxCAUhYnRxPHxH4iuq1BaoO504mOSyUyTGd0SSm-VsQ-F1sfOjX_UXyI6xrh1BefmHO7hQ-iAkiNKGT_WbevuYGhK66OYUBbBUGt3xBjfQCOacBmmnGyiESGERUnGxTba8X4VJJFUjpCe5yFGP97ecwdPuobWANZtiYMsrek753FX4UWj6xpP2h58b1td4zNtenA23OZP4G5d99zfYdvixavvobEGL0wNrvPW76GtStce9n_OXXR9cb4cX0XT-eVkfDqNCsoZj4pYAHCQINM01SIrJCFQGsl1KjkXkEAWl3GRFFXKs6oSOikLY7jhzDAoqpjtosP1uw-uexxCT7XqBhe6ekWFEBllMuXBdbJ2mVDOO6jUg7ONdq-KEvWFVP1Bqr6Qqm-kKiAN4WgdtuGTL79J7e4VF0ykanYzVvnsguTLM6JE8Kdrf9Gs_rPnE3ikk0U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777913856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OP0131 Prevalence and Predictors of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Systemic Sclerosis</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Tauber, M. ; Avouac, J. ; Benahmed, A. ; Barbot, L. ; Kahan, A. ; Allanore, Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tauber, M. ; Avouac, J. ; Benahmed, A. ; Barbot, L. ; Kahan, A. ; Allanore, Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Gastro-Intestinal (GI) involvement is a well-known complication of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is part of such involvement. It can compromise the patient quality of life and lead to severe outcomes (cachexia, high infectious risk). However, the prevalence of SIBO is not established and predictors remain unexplored. Objectives To estimate the prevalence of SIBO in patients with SSc exhibiting GI symptoms and identify subsets of patients at risk of SIBO regarding clinical and biological presentations and GI symptoms measured by standardised questionnaires. Methods Between 2011 and 2012, patients with SSc exhibiting GI complaints (pain, diarrhoea, bloating) underwent glucose hydrogen/methane breath tests (BT) and blood assays (CRP, ferritin, vitamins D, B9 and B12, albumin, calcium, phosphate, prothrombin and lipid profile). At the time of the BT, patients were asked to complete two questionnaires: the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument (UCLA SCTC GTI).1 Results Among 120 consecutive SSc patients, 38 patients (30 women) were included, (median age: 59 years (30-80)). Fourteen patients (37%) had a positive BT and were diagnosed with SIBO giving a point prevalence of 12% (14/120) in SSc and 37% (14/38) in SSc patients with GI symptoms. Among the 38 patients included, 18 (48%) had the diffuse cutaneous subset. Median disease duration was 8.5 years (1-35). Patients with SIBO showed a longer disease duration (13.5 years (4-29) vs. 6.5 (1-35), p=0.007); a higher frequency of pulmonary arterial hypertension confirmed by right heart catheterization (3/14, 21% vs. 0/24, 0%, p=0.01) and a lower frequency of anti-topoisomerase-I antibodies (1/14, 7% vs. 10/24, 42%, p=0.04). Median age (60.5 vs. 59 years, p=0.5) and cutaneous subset (36% vs. 54% patients with the diffuse form, p=0.5) did not differ between patients with or without SIBO. Of the most interest, significant weight-loss within the past 6 months (&gt;5% of total body weight) was observed in patients with BT+ (6/14, 43% vs. 2/24, 8%, p=0.03). Despite normal median values, calcium (p=0.04), phosphate (p=0.04) and triglycerid levels (p=0.04) were lower in patients with SIBO. Focusing on GI manifestations, it is of note that the total UCLA SCTC GTI score was higher in patients suffering from SIBO (0.85 (0.24-2.22) vs. 0.30 (0.04-1.24), p=0.02). The SF-36 assessment was comparable between the 2 groups. Two patients died due to intestinal involvement with severe chronic malabsorption. Conclusions In our series, the prevalence of SIBO was 37% of SSc patients displaying GI symptoms. To our knowledge, this is the first study using the UCLA SCTC GTI to identify patients at risk of SIBO in SSc. Higher UCLA SCTC GTI score and weight-loss appeared to be strongly associated with SIBO. These results support the systematic use of this score, together with a regular weight evaluation in SSc patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these results on a larger scale and to assess the evolution of the UCLA SCTC GTI score after SIBO optimal treatment, which is currently ongoing in our unit. References Khanna D, et al. Reliability and validity of the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61: 1257-63. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.336</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A95-A96</ispartof><rights>2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/72/Suppl_3/A95.3.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/72/Suppl_3/A95.3.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77343,77374</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tauber, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avouac, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benahmed, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbot, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allanore, Y.</creatorcontrib><title>OP0131 Prevalence and Predictors of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Systemic Sclerosis</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><description>Background Gastro-Intestinal (GI) involvement is a well-known complication of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is part of such involvement. It can compromise the patient quality of life and lead to severe outcomes (cachexia, high infectious risk). However, the prevalence of SIBO is not established and predictors remain unexplored. Objectives To estimate the prevalence of SIBO in patients with SSc exhibiting GI symptoms and identify subsets of patients at risk of SIBO regarding clinical and biological presentations and GI symptoms measured by standardised questionnaires. Methods Between 2011 and 2012, patients with SSc exhibiting GI complaints (pain, diarrhoea, bloating) underwent glucose hydrogen/methane breath tests (BT) and blood assays (CRP, ferritin, vitamins D, B9 and B12, albumin, calcium, phosphate, prothrombin and lipid profile). At the time of the BT, patients were asked to complete two questionnaires: the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument (UCLA SCTC GTI).1 Results Among 120 consecutive SSc patients, 38 patients (30 women) were included, (median age: 59 years (30-80)). Fourteen patients (37%) had a positive BT and were diagnosed with SIBO giving a point prevalence of 12% (14/120) in SSc and 37% (14/38) in SSc patients with GI symptoms. Among the 38 patients included, 18 (48%) had the diffuse cutaneous subset. Median disease duration was 8.5 years (1-35). Patients with SIBO showed a longer disease duration (13.5 years (4-29) vs. 6.5 (1-35), p=0.007); a higher frequency of pulmonary arterial hypertension confirmed by right heart catheterization (3/14, 21% vs. 0/24, 0%, p=0.01) and a lower frequency of anti-topoisomerase-I antibodies (1/14, 7% vs. 10/24, 42%, p=0.04). Median age (60.5 vs. 59 years, p=0.5) and cutaneous subset (36% vs. 54% patients with the diffuse form, p=0.5) did not differ between patients with or without SIBO. Of the most interest, significant weight-loss within the past 6 months (&gt;5% of total body weight) was observed in patients with BT+ (6/14, 43% vs. 2/24, 8%, p=0.03). Despite normal median values, calcium (p=0.04), phosphate (p=0.04) and triglycerid levels (p=0.04) were lower in patients with SIBO. Focusing on GI manifestations, it is of note that the total UCLA SCTC GTI score was higher in patients suffering from SIBO (0.85 (0.24-2.22) vs. 0.30 (0.04-1.24), p=0.02). The SF-36 assessment was comparable between the 2 groups. Two patients died due to intestinal involvement with severe chronic malabsorption. Conclusions In our series, the prevalence of SIBO was 37% of SSc patients displaying GI symptoms. To our knowledge, this is the first study using the UCLA SCTC GTI to identify patients at risk of SIBO in SSc. Higher UCLA SCTC GTI score and weight-loss appeared to be strongly associated with SIBO. These results support the systematic use of this score, together with a regular weight evaluation in SSc patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these results on a larger scale and to assess the evolution of the UCLA SCTC GTI score after SIBO optimal treatment, which is currently ongoing in our unit. References Khanna D, et al. Reliability and validity of the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61: 1257-63. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEtPxCAUhYnRxPHxH4iuq1BaoO504mOSyUyTGd0SSm-VsQ-F1sfOjX_UXyI6xrh1BefmHO7hQ-iAkiNKGT_WbevuYGhK66OYUBbBUGt3xBjfQCOacBmmnGyiESGERUnGxTba8X4VJJFUjpCe5yFGP97ecwdPuobWANZtiYMsrek753FX4UWj6xpP2h58b1td4zNtenA23OZP4G5d99zfYdvixavvobEGL0wNrvPW76GtStce9n_OXXR9cb4cX0XT-eVkfDqNCsoZj4pYAHCQINM01SIrJCFQGsl1KjkXkEAWl3GRFFXKs6oSOikLY7jhzDAoqpjtosP1uw-uexxCT7XqBhe6ekWFEBllMuXBdbJ2mVDOO6jUg7ONdq-KEvWFVP1Bqr6Qqm-kKiAN4WgdtuGTL79J7e4VF0ykanYzVvnsguTLM6JE8Kdrf9Gs_rPnE3ikk0U</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Tauber, M.</creator><creator>Avouac, J.</creator><creator>Benahmed, A.</creator><creator>Barbot, L.</creator><creator>Kahan, A.</creator><creator>Allanore, Y.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>OP0131 Prevalence and Predictors of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Systemic Sclerosis</title><author>Tauber, M. ; Avouac, J. ; Benahmed, A. ; Barbot, L. ; Kahan, A. ; Allanore, Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1636-b27ee6e8e8555a79b800edc86a58667e4e92d2b4bf569ff7a4dbcc6c63c3ebf23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tauber, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avouac, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benahmed, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbot, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allanore, Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tauber, M.</au><au>Avouac, J.</au><au>Benahmed, A.</au><au>Barbot, L.</au><au>Kahan, A.</au><au>Allanore, Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OP0131 Prevalence and Predictors of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Systemic Sclerosis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>A95</spage><epage>A96</epage><pages>A95-A96</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background Gastro-Intestinal (GI) involvement is a well-known complication of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is part of such involvement. It can compromise the patient quality of life and lead to severe outcomes (cachexia, high infectious risk). However, the prevalence of SIBO is not established and predictors remain unexplored. Objectives To estimate the prevalence of SIBO in patients with SSc exhibiting GI symptoms and identify subsets of patients at risk of SIBO regarding clinical and biological presentations and GI symptoms measured by standardised questionnaires. Methods Between 2011 and 2012, patients with SSc exhibiting GI complaints (pain, diarrhoea, bloating) underwent glucose hydrogen/methane breath tests (BT) and blood assays (CRP, ferritin, vitamins D, B9 and B12, albumin, calcium, phosphate, prothrombin and lipid profile). At the time of the BT, patients were asked to complete two questionnaires: the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument (UCLA SCTC GTI).1 Results Among 120 consecutive SSc patients, 38 patients (30 women) were included, (median age: 59 years (30-80)). Fourteen patients (37%) had a positive BT and were diagnosed with SIBO giving a point prevalence of 12% (14/120) in SSc and 37% (14/38) in SSc patients with GI symptoms. Among the 38 patients included, 18 (48%) had the diffuse cutaneous subset. Median disease duration was 8.5 years (1-35). Patients with SIBO showed a longer disease duration (13.5 years (4-29) vs. 6.5 (1-35), p=0.007); a higher frequency of pulmonary arterial hypertension confirmed by right heart catheterization (3/14, 21% vs. 0/24, 0%, p=0.01) and a lower frequency of anti-topoisomerase-I antibodies (1/14, 7% vs. 10/24, 42%, p=0.04). Median age (60.5 vs. 59 years, p=0.5) and cutaneous subset (36% vs. 54% patients with the diffuse form, p=0.5) did not differ between patients with or without SIBO. Of the most interest, significant weight-loss within the past 6 months (&gt;5% of total body weight) was observed in patients with BT+ (6/14, 43% vs. 2/24, 8%, p=0.03). Despite normal median values, calcium (p=0.04), phosphate (p=0.04) and triglycerid levels (p=0.04) were lower in patients with SIBO. Focusing on GI manifestations, it is of note that the total UCLA SCTC GTI score was higher in patients suffering from SIBO (0.85 (0.24-2.22) vs. 0.30 (0.04-1.24), p=0.02). The SF-36 assessment was comparable between the 2 groups. Two patients died due to intestinal involvement with severe chronic malabsorption. Conclusions In our series, the prevalence of SIBO was 37% of SSc patients displaying GI symptoms. To our knowledge, this is the first study using the UCLA SCTC GTI to identify patients at risk of SIBO in SSc. Higher UCLA SCTC GTI score and weight-loss appeared to be strongly associated with SIBO. These results support the systematic use of this score, together with a regular weight evaluation in SSc patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these results on a larger scale and to assess the evolution of the UCLA SCTC GTI score after SIBO optimal treatment, which is currently ongoing in our unit. References Khanna D, et al. Reliability and validity of the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61: 1257-63. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.336</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4967
ispartof Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A95-A96
issn 0003-4967
1468-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1777913856
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
title OP0131 Prevalence and Predictors of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Systemic Sclerosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T12%3A27%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OP0131%E2%80%85Prevalence%20and%20Predictors%20of%20Small%20Intestinal%20Bacterial%20Overgrowth%20in%20Systemic%20Sclerosis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Tauber,%20M.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=A95&rft.epage=A96&rft.pages=A95-A96&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.336&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008722881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777913856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true