SAT0254 Performance of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Spondyloarthritis Classification Criteria in a Clinical Cohort of Patients
Background ASAS classification criteria have been developed and validated to make an early classification of patients presenting with symptoms of spondyloarthritis (SpA), and to better distinguish between patients with predominantly axial SpA (axSpA) and predominantly peripheral SpA (pSpA). Objectiv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A668 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 3 |
container_start_page | A668 |
container_title | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Bautista-Molano, W. Landewé, R. Londoño, J. Romero-Sánchez, C. Valle-Oñate, R. van der Heijde, D. |
description | Background ASAS classification criteria have been developed and validated to make an early classification of patients presenting with symptoms of spondyloarthritis (SpA), and to better distinguish between patients with predominantly axial SpA (axSpA) and predominantly peripheral SpA (pSpA). Objectives To investigate the performance of the criteria sets for SpA in a clinical cohort, according to the different available criteria sets (ASAS, ESSG, and Amor) and to assess how the ASAS classification criteria perform in daily clinical practice. Methods The cohort was established before the development of the ASAS SpA classification criteria, implying that there could not be selection towards the application of these criteria Patients with a clinical diagnosis of SpA attending a specialized rheumatology outpatient clinic were retrospectively classified. The group of patients who met all three criteria sets was compared to the group of patients who met neither. Results In total, 83.3% of the patients in the cohort (n=581) could be classified as SpA according to the ASAS criteria, 74.1% according to ESSG criteria and 53.1% according to Amor criteria (figure 1). Thirty four percent of patients had predominantly peripheral SpA. A high level of overlap between criteria sets was found and 46.8% (n= 272) of the patients fulfilled all three criteria sets. Those fulfilling the three criteria sets were older (p=0.047), had more SpA features (p= |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1979 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777913796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008724731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1656-765e724ff2aabe47d93566052e27b766729a8dbf535fe31f67eed6555cc59a6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkcFu1DAURS1EJYaWf7DUDSxS7Di2J2IVhUIrjaBSCgs2lpM8azwk9mB7JGbHhj_hy_gSPDMIseimqyffd-67si5Cl5RcUcrEa-1cWMNuHm0sSkJZAbtJhytay_oJWtBKLLMsyFO0IISwoqqFfIaex7jJT7KkywX61TX3pOTV7x8_7yAYH2btBsDe4LQG3MQIMc7g0kHptt6N-8nrkNbBJhvxrUsQnE7WOz3hzg8W0h6_bLqme_UA3k46RmvscHTgNqsQrMbWYZ2X1uXNhFu_9uEYeJe5nB0v0JnRU4QXf-c5-vTu-r69KVYf39-2zaroqeCikIKDLCtjSq17qORYMy4E4SWUspdCyLLWy7E3nHEDjBohAUbBOR8GXmsxsHN0ebq7Df7bDmJSG7_L_5uiolLKmjJZi0y9OVFD8DEGMGob7KzDXlGiDrWo_2pRh1rUsRZ1qCW7i5PbxgTf_1l1-KqEZJKrD59bdfOlXRHZEfU28-LE9_PmUUF_AO-brAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777913796</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SAT0254 Performance of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Spondyloarthritis Classification Criteria in a Clinical Cohort of Patients</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Bautista-Molano, W. ; Landewé, R. ; Londoño, J. ; Romero-Sánchez, C. ; Valle-Oñate, R. ; van der Heijde, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bautista-Molano, W. ; Landewé, R. ; Londoño, J. ; Romero-Sánchez, C. ; Valle-Oñate, R. ; van der Heijde, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background ASAS classification criteria have been developed and validated to make an early classification of patients presenting with symptoms of spondyloarthritis (SpA), and to better distinguish between patients with predominantly axial SpA (axSpA) and predominantly peripheral SpA (pSpA). Objectives To investigate the performance of the criteria sets for SpA in a clinical cohort, according to the different available criteria sets (ASAS, ESSG, and Amor) and to assess how the ASAS classification criteria perform in daily clinical practice. Methods The cohort was established before the development of the ASAS SpA classification criteria, implying that there could not be selection towards the application of these criteria Patients with a clinical diagnosis of SpA attending a specialized rheumatology outpatient clinic were retrospectively classified. The group of patients who met all three criteria sets was compared to the group of patients who met neither. Results In total, 83.3% of the patients in the cohort (n=581) could be classified as SpA according to the ASAS criteria, 74.1% according to ESSG criteria and 53.1% according to Amor criteria (figure 1). Thirty four percent of patients had predominantly peripheral SpA. A high level of overlap between criteria sets was found and 46.8% (n= 272) of the patients fulfilled all three criteria sets. Those fulfilling the three criteria sets were older (p=0.047), had more SpA features (p=<0.001) and had more frequently a history and presence of back pain, inflammatory back pain, enthesitis, and buttock pain (p=<0.001). Characteristics such as the presence of inflammatory back pain, more SpA features and lower levels of C reactive protein (CRP), lead rheumatologist request an MRI of the SI joints and/or HLA-B27 testing. Image/graph Conclusions ASAS criteria are more sensitive classifying patients as having SpA and perform better than the ESSG or Amor criteria with the rheumatologists’ diagnosis as external standard. ASAS criteria perform well in clinical practice allowing physicians to make an early classification. References Rudwaleit M, Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:777-83 Rudwaleit M, Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:25-31 Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1979</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A668</ispartof><rights>2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/72/Suppl_3/A668.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/72/Suppl_3/A668.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77342,77373</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bautista-Molano, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landewé, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Londoño, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero-Sánchez, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle-Oñate, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Heijde, D.</creatorcontrib><title>SAT0254 Performance of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Spondyloarthritis Classification Criteria in a Clinical Cohort of Patients</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><description>Background ASAS classification criteria have been developed and validated to make an early classification of patients presenting with symptoms of spondyloarthritis (SpA), and to better distinguish between patients with predominantly axial SpA (axSpA) and predominantly peripheral SpA (pSpA). Objectives To investigate the performance of the criteria sets for SpA in a clinical cohort, according to the different available criteria sets (ASAS, ESSG, and Amor) and to assess how the ASAS classification criteria perform in daily clinical practice. Methods The cohort was established before the development of the ASAS SpA classification criteria, implying that there could not be selection towards the application of these criteria Patients with a clinical diagnosis of SpA attending a specialized rheumatology outpatient clinic were retrospectively classified. The group of patients who met all three criteria sets was compared to the group of patients who met neither. Results In total, 83.3% of the patients in the cohort (n=581) could be classified as SpA according to the ASAS criteria, 74.1% according to ESSG criteria and 53.1% according to Amor criteria (figure 1). Thirty four percent of patients had predominantly peripheral SpA. A high level of overlap between criteria sets was found and 46.8% (n= 272) of the patients fulfilled all three criteria sets. Those fulfilling the three criteria sets were older (p=0.047), had more SpA features (p=<0.001) and had more frequently a history and presence of back pain, inflammatory back pain, enthesitis, and buttock pain (p=<0.001). Characteristics such as the presence of inflammatory back pain, more SpA features and lower levels of C reactive protein (CRP), lead rheumatologist request an MRI of the SI joints and/or HLA-B27 testing. Image/graph Conclusions ASAS criteria are more sensitive classifying patients as having SpA and perform better than the ESSG or Amor criteria with the rheumatologists’ diagnosis as external standard. ASAS criteria perform well in clinical practice allowing physicians to make an early classification. References Rudwaleit M, Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:777-83 Rudwaleit M, Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:25-31 Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkcFu1DAURS1EJYaWf7DUDSxS7Di2J2IVhUIrjaBSCgs2lpM8azwk9mB7JGbHhj_hy_gSPDMIseimqyffd-67si5Cl5RcUcrEa-1cWMNuHm0sSkJZAbtJhytay_oJWtBKLLMsyFO0IISwoqqFfIaex7jJT7KkywX61TX3pOTV7x8_7yAYH2btBsDe4LQG3MQIMc7g0kHptt6N-8nrkNbBJhvxrUsQnE7WOz3hzg8W0h6_bLqme_UA3k46RmvscHTgNqsQrMbWYZ2X1uXNhFu_9uEYeJe5nB0v0JnRU4QXf-c5-vTu-r69KVYf39-2zaroqeCikIKDLCtjSq17qORYMy4E4SWUspdCyLLWy7E3nHEDjBohAUbBOR8GXmsxsHN0ebq7Df7bDmJSG7_L_5uiolLKmjJZi0y9OVFD8DEGMGob7KzDXlGiDrWo_2pRh1rUsRZ1qCW7i5PbxgTf_1l1-KqEZJKrD59bdfOlXRHZEfU28-LE9_PmUUF_AO-brAY</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Bautista-Molano, W.</creator><creator>Landewé, R.</creator><creator>Londoño, J.</creator><creator>Romero-Sánchez, C.</creator><creator>Valle-Oñate, R.</creator><creator>van der Heijde, D.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>SAT0254 Performance of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Spondyloarthritis Classification Criteria in a Clinical Cohort of Patients</title><author>Bautista-Molano, W. ; Landewé, R. ; Londoño, J. ; Romero-Sánchez, C. ; Valle-Oñate, R. ; van der Heijde, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1656-765e724ff2aabe47d93566052e27b766729a8dbf535fe31f67eed6555cc59a6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bautista-Molano, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landewé, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Londoño, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero-Sánchez, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle-Oñate, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Heijde, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bautista-Molano, W.</au><au>Landewé, R.</au><au>Londoño, J.</au><au>Romero-Sánchez, C.</au><au>Valle-Oñate, R.</au><au>van der Heijde, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SAT0254 Performance of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Spondyloarthritis Classification Criteria in a Clinical Cohort of Patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>A668</spage><pages>A668-</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background ASAS classification criteria have been developed and validated to make an early classification of patients presenting with symptoms of spondyloarthritis (SpA), and to better distinguish between patients with predominantly axial SpA (axSpA) and predominantly peripheral SpA (pSpA). Objectives To investigate the performance of the criteria sets for SpA in a clinical cohort, according to the different available criteria sets (ASAS, ESSG, and Amor) and to assess how the ASAS classification criteria perform in daily clinical practice. Methods The cohort was established before the development of the ASAS SpA classification criteria, implying that there could not be selection towards the application of these criteria Patients with a clinical diagnosis of SpA attending a specialized rheumatology outpatient clinic were retrospectively classified. The group of patients who met all three criteria sets was compared to the group of patients who met neither. Results In total, 83.3% of the patients in the cohort (n=581) could be classified as SpA according to the ASAS criteria, 74.1% according to ESSG criteria and 53.1% according to Amor criteria (figure 1). Thirty four percent of patients had predominantly peripheral SpA. A high level of overlap between criteria sets was found and 46.8% (n= 272) of the patients fulfilled all three criteria sets. Those fulfilling the three criteria sets were older (p=0.047), had more SpA features (p=<0.001) and had more frequently a history and presence of back pain, inflammatory back pain, enthesitis, and buttock pain (p=<0.001). Characteristics such as the presence of inflammatory back pain, more SpA features and lower levels of C reactive protein (CRP), lead rheumatologist request an MRI of the SI joints and/or HLA-B27 testing. Image/graph Conclusions ASAS criteria are more sensitive classifying patients as having SpA and perform better than the ESSG or Amor criteria with the rheumatologists’ diagnosis as external standard. ASAS criteria perform well in clinical practice allowing physicians to make an early classification. References Rudwaleit M, Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:777-83 Rudwaleit M, Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:25-31 Disclosure of Interest None Declared</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1979</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4967 |
ispartof | Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A668 |
issn | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1777913796 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
title | SAT0254 Performance of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Spondyloarthritis Classification Criteria in a Clinical Cohort of Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A48%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SAT0254%E2%80%85Performance%20of%20the%20Assessment%20of%20Spondyloarthritis%20International%20Society%20(ASAS)%20Spondyloarthritis%20Classification%20Criteria%20in%20a%20Clinical%20Cohort%20of%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Bautista-Molano,%20W.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=A668&rft.pages=A668-&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1979&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008724731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777913796&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |