AB0461 The burden of behçet’s disease in the south thames and, se coast regions – a regional review
Background Behcet’s disease(BD) is a rare inflammatory disorder of unknown aetiology, with estimated prevalence of 1- 2 per 100,000 in the UK. In routine clinical practice patients with BD present challenges given the lack of a specific diagnostic test and the complexity of potential organ and life...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A929 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 3 |
container_start_page | A929 |
container_title | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Yalakki Jagadeesh, L. Hepburn, A. Hughes, R. Bourke, B. Garood, T. Horwood, N. Ewence, A. Lloyd, M. Makanjuola, D. Reilly, P. Moss, K. Hajela, V. Higgens, C. Sandhu, V. Stuart, B. Kiely, P. |
description | Background Behcet’s disease(BD) is a rare inflammatory disorder of unknown aetiology, with estimated prevalence of 1- 2 per 100,000 in the UK. In routine clinical practice patients with BD present challenges given the lack of a specific diagnostic test and the complexity of potential organ and life threatening complications. Objectives To perform a multicentre survey of patients with BD, focussing on diagnostic delay, use of HLA B51, prevalent clinical manifestations and range of therapies utilised. Methods A standardised data collection proforma was circulated to rheumatology consultants in London South, Surrey and West Sussex regions. Information collected included demographic details, time from first symptom to diagnosis, HLA B51 status, the spectrum of phenotypic manifestations and range of treatments used. Results Fourteen consultants from 8 hospitals returned completed proformas on 46 patients. 54.3% were female, median age 40 years (range 17 – 72), 56.5% Caucasian, 15% Afro-caribbean and 53% non smokers. The median age of symptom onset was 28 years (range 10 – 60) and the median diagnostic delay was 2 years (range 0 – 20). The pathergy reaction was recorded as positive in 24%(11/45).HLA B51 had been measured in 45.5%(21/46) and was positive in 24%(5/21). The prevalence of clinical phenotypes was: mouth ulcers 98%, genital ulcers 80%, cutaneous lesions 78%, joints 74%, central nervous system 65%, ocular 37%, vascular 28% (arterial 30.7% venous 69.2%), gastrointestinal 20% and peripheral nervous system 17%. In addition to oral and genital ulceration a median of 3(range 1 – 6) additional systems were involved in each patient. The commonest treatments used were oral/parenteral steroids 91%, azathioprine 54% and colchicine 52%. Less frequently used were methotrexate 25%, mycophenolate mofetil 15% and Ciclosprin A 10%. Joint involvement was significantly more frequent in females than males(68% vs 32%, p 0.002) and non significantly higher in Caucasians vs non-Caucasians (65% vs 35%). There was a trend for a higher prevalence of erythema nodosum in females 73% vs 27%. Conclusions This work shows the value of collaborative regional review in rare conditions like BD. In S. Thames/SE coast the disease impacts young people and many experience a worrying delay of up to 20 years(2 cases), median 2 years, to diagnosis and treatment. HLA B51 testing was utilised as a diagnostic aid in less than half, and the pathergy reaction was infrequent. In this mixed racial, |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.2783 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777913375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008733741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1655-794ea4582e8c74c259e7d1036d38ff56f433618aeedfa0b251392d715140f11e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1OwzAQhS0EEuXnDpbYkuKJHdsRK6hoi4RgA2wtp5nQlDYpdsLPrhtOwIoTcBBu0pPgUoTYspoZz_feWI-QA2BdAC6PbFW5MbazvPRRzIBH2E6t68ZK8w3SASF1eJZsk3QYYzwSqVTbZMf7SRiZBt0hk5NTJiQsF6_XY6RZ63KsaF3QDMefH9gsF--eBne0HmlZ0SZAvm6bcejsDD21VX5Iw25UW99Qh3dlXXm6XLxR-zPZaWgeS3zaI1uFnXrc_6m75KZ_dt0bRhdXg_PeyUWUgUySSKUCrUh0jHqkxChOUlQ5MC5zrosikYXgXIK2iHlhWRYnwNM4V5CAYAUA8l1ysPadu_qhRd-YSd268A9vQCmVAucqCdTxmhq52nuHhZm7cmbdiwFmVuGaP-GaVbjmO1yzCjeoo7W69A0-_0qtuzdSBXtzedszvX48GAo9NHHg5ZrPZpN_HfoCADCWeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777913375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AB0461 The burden of behçet’s disease in the south thames and, se coast regions – a regional review</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Yalakki Jagadeesh, L. ; Hepburn, A. ; Hughes, R. ; Bourke, B. ; Garood, T. ; Horwood, N. ; Ewence, A. ; Lloyd, M. ; Makanjuola, D. ; Reilly, P. ; Moss, K. ; Hajela, V. ; Higgens, C. ; Sandhu, V. ; Stuart, B. ; Kiely, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yalakki Jagadeesh, L. ; Hepburn, A. ; Hughes, R. ; Bourke, B. ; Garood, T. ; Horwood, N. ; Ewence, A. ; Lloyd, M. ; Makanjuola, D. ; Reilly, P. ; Moss, K. ; Hajela, V. ; Higgens, C. ; Sandhu, V. ; Stuart, B. ; Kiely, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Behcet’s disease(BD) is a rare inflammatory disorder of unknown aetiology, with estimated prevalence of 1- 2 per 100,000 in the UK. In routine clinical practice patients with BD present challenges given the lack of a specific diagnostic test and the complexity of potential organ and life threatening complications. Objectives To perform a multicentre survey of patients with BD, focussing on diagnostic delay, use of HLA B51, prevalent clinical manifestations and range of therapies utilised. Methods A standardised data collection proforma was circulated to rheumatology consultants in London South, Surrey and West Sussex regions. Information collected included demographic details, time from first symptom to diagnosis, HLA B51 status, the spectrum of phenotypic manifestations and range of treatments used. Results Fourteen consultants from 8 hospitals returned completed proformas on 46 patients. 54.3% were female, median age 40 years (range 17 – 72), 56.5% Caucasian, 15% Afro-caribbean and 53% non smokers. The median age of symptom onset was 28 years (range 10 – 60) and the median diagnostic delay was 2 years (range 0 – 20). The pathergy reaction was recorded as positive in 24%(11/45).HLA B51 had been measured in 45.5%(21/46) and was positive in 24%(5/21). The prevalence of clinical phenotypes was: mouth ulcers 98%, genital ulcers 80%, cutaneous lesions 78%, joints 74%, central nervous system 65%, ocular 37%, vascular 28% (arterial 30.7% venous 69.2%), gastrointestinal 20% and peripheral nervous system 17%. In addition to oral and genital ulceration a median of 3(range 1 – 6) additional systems were involved in each patient. The commonest treatments used were oral/parenteral steroids 91%, azathioprine 54% and colchicine 52%. Less frequently used were methotrexate 25%, mycophenolate mofetil 15% and Ciclosprin A 10%. Joint involvement was significantly more frequent in females than males(68% vs 32%, p 0.002) and non significantly higher in Caucasians vs non-Caucasians (65% vs 35%). There was a trend for a higher prevalence of erythema nodosum in females 73% vs 27%. Conclusions This work shows the value of collaborative regional review in rare conditions like BD. In S. Thames/SE coast the disease impacts young people and many experience a worrying delay of up to 20 years(2 cases), median 2 years, to diagnosis and treatment. HLA B51 testing was utilised as a diagnostic aid in less than half, and the pathergy reaction was infrequent. In this mixed racial, urban and rural population, Afro Caribbean cases made up 15% of the cohort suggesting vigilance in all racial groups is important. In addition to mucosal disease, involvement of a median of 3 additional systems was recorded, indicating the complexity of disease management. The wide range of treatments used reflects the thin evidence base for BD; however it is encouraging that funding for anti-TNF therapy was secured in 17%, in an era before the current National commissioning arrangements were commenced. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.2783</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A929</ispartof><rights>2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/72/Suppl_3/A929.3.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/72/Suppl_3/A929.3.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23550,27901,27902,77569,77600</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yalakki Jagadeesh, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hepburn, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourke, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garood, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwood, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewence, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makanjuola, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reilly, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hajela, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgens, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuart, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiely, P.</creatorcontrib><title>AB0461 The burden of behçet’s disease in the south thames and, se coast regions – a regional review</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><description>Background Behcet’s disease(BD) is a rare inflammatory disorder of unknown aetiology, with estimated prevalence of 1- 2 per 100,000 in the UK. In routine clinical practice patients with BD present challenges given the lack of a specific diagnostic test and the complexity of potential organ and life threatening complications. Objectives To perform a multicentre survey of patients with BD, focussing on diagnostic delay, use of HLA B51, prevalent clinical manifestations and range of therapies utilised. Methods A standardised data collection proforma was circulated to rheumatology consultants in London South, Surrey and West Sussex regions. Information collected included demographic details, time from first symptom to diagnosis, HLA B51 status, the spectrum of phenotypic manifestations and range of treatments used. Results Fourteen consultants from 8 hospitals returned completed proformas on 46 patients. 54.3% were female, median age 40 years (range 17 – 72), 56.5% Caucasian, 15% Afro-caribbean and 53% non smokers. The median age of symptom onset was 28 years (range 10 – 60) and the median diagnostic delay was 2 years (range 0 – 20). The pathergy reaction was recorded as positive in 24%(11/45).HLA B51 had been measured in 45.5%(21/46) and was positive in 24%(5/21). The prevalence of clinical phenotypes was: mouth ulcers 98%, genital ulcers 80%, cutaneous lesions 78%, joints 74%, central nervous system 65%, ocular 37%, vascular 28% (arterial 30.7% venous 69.2%), gastrointestinal 20% and peripheral nervous system 17%. In addition to oral and genital ulceration a median of 3(range 1 – 6) additional systems were involved in each patient. The commonest treatments used were oral/parenteral steroids 91%, azathioprine 54% and colchicine 52%. Less frequently used were methotrexate 25%, mycophenolate mofetil 15% and Ciclosprin A 10%. Joint involvement was significantly more frequent in females than males(68% vs 32%, p 0.002) and non significantly higher in Caucasians vs non-Caucasians (65% vs 35%). There was a trend for a higher prevalence of erythema nodosum in females 73% vs 27%. Conclusions This work shows the value of collaborative regional review in rare conditions like BD. In S. Thames/SE coast the disease impacts young people and many experience a worrying delay of up to 20 years(2 cases), median 2 years, to diagnosis and treatment. HLA B51 testing was utilised as a diagnostic aid in less than half, and the pathergy reaction was infrequent. In this mixed racial, urban and rural population, Afro Caribbean cases made up 15% of the cohort suggesting vigilance in all racial groups is important. In addition to mucosal disease, involvement of a median of 3 additional systems was recorded, indicating the complexity of disease management. The wide range of treatments used reflects the thin evidence base for BD; however it is encouraging that funding for anti-TNF therapy was secured in 17%, in an era before the current National commissioning arrangements were commenced. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1OwzAQhS0EEuXnDpbYkuKJHdsRK6hoi4RgA2wtp5nQlDYpdsLPrhtOwIoTcBBu0pPgUoTYspoZz_feWI-QA2BdAC6PbFW5MbazvPRRzIBH2E6t68ZK8w3SASF1eJZsk3QYYzwSqVTbZMf7SRiZBt0hk5NTJiQsF6_XY6RZ63KsaF3QDMefH9gsF--eBne0HmlZ0SZAvm6bcejsDD21VX5Iw25UW99Qh3dlXXm6XLxR-zPZaWgeS3zaI1uFnXrc_6m75KZ_dt0bRhdXg_PeyUWUgUySSKUCrUh0jHqkxChOUlQ5MC5zrosikYXgXIK2iHlhWRYnwNM4V5CAYAUA8l1ysPadu_qhRd-YSd268A9vQCmVAucqCdTxmhq52nuHhZm7cmbdiwFmVuGaP-GaVbjmO1yzCjeoo7W69A0-_0qtuzdSBXtzedszvX48GAo9NHHg5ZrPZpN_HfoCADCWeQ</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Yalakki Jagadeesh, L.</creator><creator>Hepburn, A.</creator><creator>Hughes, R.</creator><creator>Bourke, B.</creator><creator>Garood, T.</creator><creator>Horwood, N.</creator><creator>Ewence, A.</creator><creator>Lloyd, M.</creator><creator>Makanjuola, D.</creator><creator>Reilly, P.</creator><creator>Moss, K.</creator><creator>Hajela, V.</creator><creator>Higgens, C.</creator><creator>Sandhu, V.</creator><creator>Stuart, B.</creator><creator>Kiely, P.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>AB0461 The burden of behçet’s disease in the south thames and, se coast regions – a regional review</title><author>Yalakki Jagadeesh, L. ; Hepburn, A. ; Hughes, R. ; Bourke, B. ; Garood, T. ; Horwood, N. ; Ewence, A. ; Lloyd, M. ; Makanjuola, D. ; Reilly, P. ; Moss, K. ; Hajela, V. ; Higgens, C. ; Sandhu, V. ; Stuart, B. ; Kiely, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1655-794ea4582e8c74c259e7d1036d38ff56f433618aeedfa0b251392d715140f11e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yalakki Jagadeesh, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hepburn, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourke, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garood, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwood, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewence, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makanjuola, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reilly, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hajela, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgens, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandhu, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuart, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiely, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yalakki Jagadeesh, L.</au><au>Hepburn, A.</au><au>Hughes, R.</au><au>Bourke, B.</au><au>Garood, T.</au><au>Horwood, N.</au><au>Ewence, A.</au><au>Lloyd, M.</au><au>Makanjuola, D.</au><au>Reilly, P.</au><au>Moss, K.</au><au>Hajela, V.</au><au>Higgens, C.</au><au>Sandhu, V.</au><au>Stuart, B.</au><au>Kiely, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AB0461 The burden of behçet’s disease in the south thames and, se coast regions – a regional review</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>A929</spage><pages>A929-</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background Behcet’s disease(BD) is a rare inflammatory disorder of unknown aetiology, with estimated prevalence of 1- 2 per 100,000 in the UK. In routine clinical practice patients with BD present challenges given the lack of a specific diagnostic test and the complexity of potential organ and life threatening complications. Objectives To perform a multicentre survey of patients with BD, focussing on diagnostic delay, use of HLA B51, prevalent clinical manifestations and range of therapies utilised. Methods A standardised data collection proforma was circulated to rheumatology consultants in London South, Surrey and West Sussex regions. Information collected included demographic details, time from first symptom to diagnosis, HLA B51 status, the spectrum of phenotypic manifestations and range of treatments used. Results Fourteen consultants from 8 hospitals returned completed proformas on 46 patients. 54.3% were female, median age 40 years (range 17 – 72), 56.5% Caucasian, 15% Afro-caribbean and 53% non smokers. The median age of symptom onset was 28 years (range 10 – 60) and the median diagnostic delay was 2 years (range 0 – 20). The pathergy reaction was recorded as positive in 24%(11/45).HLA B51 had been measured in 45.5%(21/46) and was positive in 24%(5/21). The prevalence of clinical phenotypes was: mouth ulcers 98%, genital ulcers 80%, cutaneous lesions 78%, joints 74%, central nervous system 65%, ocular 37%, vascular 28% (arterial 30.7% venous 69.2%), gastrointestinal 20% and peripheral nervous system 17%. In addition to oral and genital ulceration a median of 3(range 1 – 6) additional systems were involved in each patient. The commonest treatments used were oral/parenteral steroids 91%, azathioprine 54% and colchicine 52%. Less frequently used were methotrexate 25%, mycophenolate mofetil 15% and Ciclosprin A 10%. Joint involvement was significantly more frequent in females than males(68% vs 32%, p 0.002) and non significantly higher in Caucasians vs non-Caucasians (65% vs 35%). There was a trend for a higher prevalence of erythema nodosum in females 73% vs 27%. Conclusions This work shows the value of collaborative regional review in rare conditions like BD. In S. Thames/SE coast the disease impacts young people and many experience a worrying delay of up to 20 years(2 cases), median 2 years, to diagnosis and treatment. HLA B51 testing was utilised as a diagnostic aid in less than half, and the pathergy reaction was infrequent. In this mixed racial, urban and rural population, Afro Caribbean cases made up 15% of the cohort suggesting vigilance in all racial groups is important. In addition to mucosal disease, involvement of a median of 3 additional systems was recorded, indicating the complexity of disease management. The wide range of treatments used reflects the thin evidence base for BD; however it is encouraging that funding for anti-TNF therapy was secured in 17%, in an era before the current National commissioning arrangements were commenced. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.2783</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4967 |
ispartof | Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A929 |
issn | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1777913375 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
title | AB0461 The burden of behçet’s disease in the south thames and, se coast regions – a regional review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T10%3A32%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AB0461%E2%80%85The%20burden%20of%20beh%C3%A7et%E2%80%99s%20disease%20in%20the%20south%20thames%20and,%20se%20coast%20regions%20%E2%80%93%20a%20regional%20review&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Yalakki%20Jagadeesh,%20L.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=A929&rft.pages=A929-&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.2783&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008733741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777913375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |