FRI0058 14-3-3 eta marks radiographic progression in an early arthritis cohort
Background Diagnosis of RA in its early stages enables the initiation of appropriate therapies that can alter the disease course and improve patient outcomes. ACPAs are useful for RA diagnosis and prognosis, yet a subset of patients are sero-negative in early disease and many remain so, even with es...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A387-A388 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A388 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 3 |
container_start_page | A387 |
container_title | Annals of the rheumatic diseases |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Britsemmer, K. Marotta, A. Maksymowych, W. P. van Schaardenburg, D. |
description | Background Diagnosis of RA in its early stages enables the initiation of appropriate therapies that can alter the disease course and improve patient outcomes. ACPAs are useful for RA diagnosis and prognosis, yet a subset of patients are sero-negative in early disease and many remain so, even with established disease. It is recognized that current clinical/serological measures account for only 32% of the total variance in predicting joint damage.1 Therefore, there is a need for new complementary diagnostic markers that can assist clinicians in better identifying higher risk patients. 14-3-3eta is a soluble diagnostic RA marker involved in the pathophysiology of the disease and marks joint damage in both RA and PsA. Objectives We investigated whether 14-3-3eta plasma expression marks joint damage progression in ACPA+ve and ACPA-ve RA patients. Methods Baseline (BL) and Year 1 14-3-3eta levels were quantified in 62 early RA patients using banked plasma samples from the Reade cohort. 38 (61%) were ACPA+ve and 24 (39%) ACPA-ve. Mean age was 54 years, 79% were female, median duration of symptoms was 4 months (IQR 3-7) and patients were DMARD naïve at baseline. Joint damage progression from BL to Year 5 according to a ΔSHS of >0.5 was categorized as progression “1” and ΔSHS≤0.5 as no progression “0”. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine which variables predicted joint damage progression with the probability (p) for a variable to enter the model p0.1. Those assessed were RF-IgM titres, CRP, ESR, TJC28 and SJC28 as well as baseline and Year 1 14-3-3eta titres and positivity (cut-off of 0.19ng/ml). Results 38 of the 62 patients (61%) were +ve for 14-3-3eta; 33 of the 38 ACPA+ve patients (87%) as well as 5 of the 24 ACPA-ve (21%) were 14-3-3eta+ve. This, taken together with the Pearson correlation between ACPA and BL 14-3-3eta titres being r=0.076 (p=0.61), agrees with earlier reports of 14-3-3eta being independent of and complementary to ACPA.2 In the ACPA+ve group, 18 of the 38 (47%) patients progressed at year 5. Mean (SD) and median (range) SHS scores at year 5 were 16.8 (29.0) and 2.0 (0.0-145). Independent predictors of joint damage progression that emerged from the analysis were BL 14-3-3eta (Chi-Sq 4.2, p=0.04), CRP (Chi-Sq 12.0, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1185 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777912767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008747581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1657-e223e63591dd552e267db08668f55e88a46169473719f6c500f7c8b0c74a709b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD5a6Nthx_IhYoYpCpfKqoLCznMQhLm1S7ESiOzb8KF-CQxBiy8r2-N47MweAEcHHhFB-oqvKlaZd59ajCBOKTLvSLvxJtgMGJOYylDneBQOMMUVxwsU-OPB-GZ5YEjkAt5P5FGMmP98_SIwootA0Gq61e_HQ6dzWz05vSpvBjQtX472tK2grqCtotFttoXZN6WxjPczqsnbNIdgr9Mqbo59zCB4m5_fjSzS7uZiOz2YoJZwJZKKIGk5ZQvKcschEXOQplpzLgjEjpY454UksqCBJwTOGcSEymeJMxFrgJKVDMOpzw2CvrfGNWtatq0JLRYQQCYkEF0F12qsyV3vvTKE2zobttopg1SFUfxCqDqH6Rqg6hMGNerf1jXn7tQY4KmQLpq4XY7WYT8jV4-JOPQU97_XpevmvRl-Ak4q9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777912767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FRI0058 14-3-3 eta marks radiographic progression in an early arthritis cohort</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Britsemmer, K. ; Marotta, A. ; Maksymowych, W. P. ; van Schaardenburg, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Britsemmer, K. ; Marotta, A. ; Maksymowych, W. P. ; van Schaardenburg, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Diagnosis of RA in its early stages enables the initiation of appropriate therapies that can alter the disease course and improve patient outcomes. ACPAs are useful for RA diagnosis and prognosis, yet a subset of patients are sero-negative in early disease and many remain so, even with established disease. It is recognized that current clinical/serological measures account for only 32% of the total variance in predicting joint damage.1 Therefore, there is a need for new complementary diagnostic markers that can assist clinicians in better identifying higher risk patients. 14-3-3eta is a soluble diagnostic RA marker involved in the pathophysiology of the disease and marks joint damage in both RA and PsA. Objectives We investigated whether 14-3-3eta plasma expression marks joint damage progression in ACPA+ve and ACPA-ve RA patients. Methods Baseline (BL) and Year 1 14-3-3eta levels were quantified in 62 early RA patients using banked plasma samples from the Reade cohort. 38 (61%) were ACPA+ve and 24 (39%) ACPA-ve. Mean age was 54 years, 79% were female, median duration of symptoms was 4 months (IQR 3-7) and patients were DMARD naïve at baseline. Joint damage progression from BL to Year 5 according to a ΔSHS of >0.5 was categorized as progression “1” and ΔSHS≤0.5 as no progression “0”. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine which variables predicted joint damage progression with the probability (p) for a variable to enter the model p<0.25 and to leave being p>0.1. Those assessed were RF-IgM titres, CRP, ESR, TJC28 and SJC28 as well as baseline and Year 1 14-3-3eta titres and positivity (cut-off of 0.19ng/ml). Results 38 of the 62 patients (61%) were +ve for 14-3-3eta; 33 of the 38 ACPA+ve patients (87%) as well as 5 of the 24 ACPA-ve (21%) were 14-3-3eta+ve. This, taken together with the Pearson correlation between ACPA and BL 14-3-3eta titres being r=0.076 (p=0.61), agrees with earlier reports of 14-3-3eta being independent of and complementary to ACPA.2 In the ACPA+ve group, 18 of the 38 (47%) patients progressed at year 5. Mean (SD) and median (range) SHS scores at year 5 were 16.8 (29.0) and 2.0 (0.0-145). Independent predictors of joint damage progression that emerged from the analysis were BL 14-3-3eta (Chi-Sq 4.2, p=0.04), CRP (Chi-Sq 12.0, p<0.001), ESR (Chi-Sq 8.5, p<0.004), and TJC28 (Chi-Sq 5.1, p=0.02). The R2 for the combination of these variables with and without 14-3-3eta were 0.52 and 0.39, respectively. Importantly, in the ACPA-ve group, 13 of 24 (54%) progressed and had mean (SD) and median (range) SHS scores at year 5 of 9.7 (23.4) and 2.0 (0.0-108). Of all the clinical/serological measures assessed in the regression analysis, in the ACPA-ve group only BL 14-3-3eta positivity (Chi-Sq 7.8, p=0.005) and BL 14-3-3eta titres (Chi-Sq 6.5, p=0.01) were independent predictors of joint damage progression, together delivering an R2 of 0.49. Conclusions Plasma 14-3-3eta is a complementary marker to ACPA in early RA. In ACPA+ves, 14-3-3eta as well as ESR, CRP and TJC independently predict joint damage progression; while in ACPA-ves, the only predictor was 14-3-3eta. This novel marker should be further examined for clinical insights into early RA diagnosis and patient management, in both ACPA+ves and -ves. References de Rooy DPC et al. Rheum. 2011. 50:93. 2) Marotta A et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2011.63 Suppl 10:378. Disclosure of Interest K. Britsemmer: None Declared, A. Marotta Employee of: Augurex Life Sciences Corp, W. P. Maksymowych: None Declared, D. van Schaardenburg: None Declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1185</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A387-A388</ispartof><rights>2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/72/Suppl_3/A387.4.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/72/Suppl_3/A387.4.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,3183,23552,27903,27904,77346,77377</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Britsemmer, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marotta, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maksymowych, W. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schaardenburg, D.</creatorcontrib><title>FRI0058 14-3-3 eta marks radiographic progression in an early arthritis cohort</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><description>Background Diagnosis of RA in its early stages enables the initiation of appropriate therapies that can alter the disease course and improve patient outcomes. ACPAs are useful for RA diagnosis and prognosis, yet a subset of patients are sero-negative in early disease and many remain so, even with established disease. It is recognized that current clinical/serological measures account for only 32% of the total variance in predicting joint damage.1 Therefore, there is a need for new complementary diagnostic markers that can assist clinicians in better identifying higher risk patients. 14-3-3eta is a soluble diagnostic RA marker involved in the pathophysiology of the disease and marks joint damage in both RA and PsA. Objectives We investigated whether 14-3-3eta plasma expression marks joint damage progression in ACPA+ve and ACPA-ve RA patients. Methods Baseline (BL) and Year 1 14-3-3eta levels were quantified in 62 early RA patients using banked plasma samples from the Reade cohort. 38 (61%) were ACPA+ve and 24 (39%) ACPA-ve. Mean age was 54 years, 79% were female, median duration of symptoms was 4 months (IQR 3-7) and patients were DMARD naïve at baseline. Joint damage progression from BL to Year 5 according to a ΔSHS of >0.5 was categorized as progression “1” and ΔSHS≤0.5 as no progression “0”. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine which variables predicted joint damage progression with the probability (p) for a variable to enter the model p<0.25 and to leave being p>0.1. Those assessed were RF-IgM titres, CRP, ESR, TJC28 and SJC28 as well as baseline and Year 1 14-3-3eta titres and positivity (cut-off of 0.19ng/ml). Results 38 of the 62 patients (61%) were +ve for 14-3-3eta; 33 of the 38 ACPA+ve patients (87%) as well as 5 of the 24 ACPA-ve (21%) were 14-3-3eta+ve. This, taken together with the Pearson correlation between ACPA and BL 14-3-3eta titres being r=0.076 (p=0.61), agrees with earlier reports of 14-3-3eta being independent of and complementary to ACPA.2 In the ACPA+ve group, 18 of the 38 (47%) patients progressed at year 5. Mean (SD) and median (range) SHS scores at year 5 were 16.8 (29.0) and 2.0 (0.0-145). Independent predictors of joint damage progression that emerged from the analysis were BL 14-3-3eta (Chi-Sq 4.2, p=0.04), CRP (Chi-Sq 12.0, p<0.001), ESR (Chi-Sq 8.5, p<0.004), and TJC28 (Chi-Sq 5.1, p=0.02). The R2 for the combination of these variables with and without 14-3-3eta were 0.52 and 0.39, respectively. Importantly, in the ACPA-ve group, 13 of 24 (54%) progressed and had mean (SD) and median (range) SHS scores at year 5 of 9.7 (23.4) and 2.0 (0.0-108). Of all the clinical/serological measures assessed in the regression analysis, in the ACPA-ve group only BL 14-3-3eta positivity (Chi-Sq 7.8, p=0.005) and BL 14-3-3eta titres (Chi-Sq 6.5, p=0.01) were independent predictors of joint damage progression, together delivering an R2 of 0.49. Conclusions Plasma 14-3-3eta is a complementary marker to ACPA in early RA. In ACPA+ves, 14-3-3eta as well as ESR, CRP and TJC independently predict joint damage progression; while in ACPA-ves, the only predictor was 14-3-3eta. This novel marker should be further examined for clinical insights into early RA diagnosis and patient management, in both ACPA+ves and -ves. References de Rooy DPC et al. Rheum. 2011. 50:93. 2) Marotta A et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2011.63 Suppl 10:378. Disclosure of Interest K. Britsemmer: None Declared, A. Marotta Employee of: Augurex Life Sciences Corp, W. P. Maksymowych: None Declared, D. van Schaardenburg: None Declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD5a6Nthx_IhYoYpCpfKqoLCznMQhLm1S7ESiOzb8KF-CQxBiy8r2-N47MweAEcHHhFB-oqvKlaZd59ajCBOKTLvSLvxJtgMGJOYylDneBQOMMUVxwsU-OPB-GZ5YEjkAt5P5FGMmP98_SIwootA0Gq61e_HQ6dzWz05vSpvBjQtX472tK2grqCtotFttoXZN6WxjPczqsnbNIdgr9Mqbo59zCB4m5_fjSzS7uZiOz2YoJZwJZKKIGk5ZQvKcschEXOQplpzLgjEjpY454UksqCBJwTOGcSEymeJMxFrgJKVDMOpzw2CvrfGNWtatq0JLRYQQCYkEF0F12qsyV3vvTKE2zobttopg1SFUfxCqDqH6Rqg6hMGNerf1jXn7tQY4KmQLpq4XY7WYT8jV4-JOPQU97_XpevmvRl-Ak4q9</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Britsemmer, K.</creator><creator>Marotta, A.</creator><creator>Maksymowych, W. P.</creator><creator>van Schaardenburg, D.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>FRI0058 14-3-3 eta marks radiographic progression in an early arthritis cohort</title><author>Britsemmer, K. ; Marotta, A. ; Maksymowych, W. P. ; van Schaardenburg, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1657-e223e63591dd552e267db08668f55e88a46169473719f6c500f7c8b0c74a709b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Britsemmer, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marotta, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maksymowych, W. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schaardenburg, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Britsemmer, K.</au><au>Marotta, A.</au><au>Maksymowych, W. P.</au><au>van Schaardenburg, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FRI0058 14-3-3 eta marks radiographic progression in an early arthritis cohort</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>A387</spage><epage>A388</epage><pages>A387-A388</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background Diagnosis of RA in its early stages enables the initiation of appropriate therapies that can alter the disease course and improve patient outcomes. ACPAs are useful for RA diagnosis and prognosis, yet a subset of patients are sero-negative in early disease and many remain so, even with established disease. It is recognized that current clinical/serological measures account for only 32% of the total variance in predicting joint damage.1 Therefore, there is a need for new complementary diagnostic markers that can assist clinicians in better identifying higher risk patients. 14-3-3eta is a soluble diagnostic RA marker involved in the pathophysiology of the disease and marks joint damage in both RA and PsA. Objectives We investigated whether 14-3-3eta plasma expression marks joint damage progression in ACPA+ve and ACPA-ve RA patients. Methods Baseline (BL) and Year 1 14-3-3eta levels were quantified in 62 early RA patients using banked plasma samples from the Reade cohort. 38 (61%) were ACPA+ve and 24 (39%) ACPA-ve. Mean age was 54 years, 79% were female, median duration of symptoms was 4 months (IQR 3-7) and patients were DMARD naïve at baseline. Joint damage progression from BL to Year 5 according to a ΔSHS of >0.5 was categorized as progression “1” and ΔSHS≤0.5 as no progression “0”. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine which variables predicted joint damage progression with the probability (p) for a variable to enter the model p<0.25 and to leave being p>0.1. Those assessed were RF-IgM titres, CRP, ESR, TJC28 and SJC28 as well as baseline and Year 1 14-3-3eta titres and positivity (cut-off of 0.19ng/ml). Results 38 of the 62 patients (61%) were +ve for 14-3-3eta; 33 of the 38 ACPA+ve patients (87%) as well as 5 of the 24 ACPA-ve (21%) were 14-3-3eta+ve. This, taken together with the Pearson correlation between ACPA and BL 14-3-3eta titres being r=0.076 (p=0.61), agrees with earlier reports of 14-3-3eta being independent of and complementary to ACPA.2 In the ACPA+ve group, 18 of the 38 (47%) patients progressed at year 5. Mean (SD) and median (range) SHS scores at year 5 were 16.8 (29.0) and 2.0 (0.0-145). Independent predictors of joint damage progression that emerged from the analysis were BL 14-3-3eta (Chi-Sq 4.2, p=0.04), CRP (Chi-Sq 12.0, p<0.001), ESR (Chi-Sq 8.5, p<0.004), and TJC28 (Chi-Sq 5.1, p=0.02). The R2 for the combination of these variables with and without 14-3-3eta were 0.52 and 0.39, respectively. Importantly, in the ACPA-ve group, 13 of 24 (54%) progressed and had mean (SD) and median (range) SHS scores at year 5 of 9.7 (23.4) and 2.0 (0.0-108). Of all the clinical/serological measures assessed in the regression analysis, in the ACPA-ve group only BL 14-3-3eta positivity (Chi-Sq 7.8, p=0.005) and BL 14-3-3eta titres (Chi-Sq 6.5, p=0.01) were independent predictors of joint damage progression, together delivering an R2 of 0.49. Conclusions Plasma 14-3-3eta is a complementary marker to ACPA in early RA. In ACPA+ves, 14-3-3eta as well as ESR, CRP and TJC independently predict joint damage progression; while in ACPA-ves, the only predictor was 14-3-3eta. This novel marker should be further examined for clinical insights into early RA diagnosis and patient management, in both ACPA+ves and -ves. References de Rooy DPC et al. Rheum. 2011. 50:93. 2) Marotta A et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2011.63 Suppl 10:378. Disclosure of Interest K. Britsemmer: None Declared, A. Marotta Employee of: Augurex Life Sciences Corp, W. P. Maksymowych: None Declared, D. van Schaardenburg: None Declared</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1185</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4967 |
ispartof | Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A387-A388 |
issn | 0003-4967 1468-2060 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1777912767 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
title | FRI0058 14-3-3 eta marks radiographic progression in an early arthritis cohort |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T02%3A09%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FRI0058%E2%80%8514-3-3%20eta%20marks%20radiographic%20progression%20in%20an%20early%20arthritis%20cohort&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Britsemmer,%20K.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=A387&rft.epage=A388&rft.pages=A387-A388&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1185&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008747581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777912767&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |