AB0271 Beneficial effect of anti-tnf therapy in the lipoprotein atherogenic risk profile in comparison with dmard standard therapy in ra patients

Background RA patients portend a greater risk of cardio-vascular complications than general population. Although most probably diverse mechanisms are implicated, quantity and quality changes in the lipoproteins appear to have an important role. Anti-TNF therapy has shown important benefits in contro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A869-A869
Hauptverfasser: Calvo Alén, J., Baamonde, C., Agudo, M., Ruiz-Jimeno, T., Gómez-Gerique, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A869
container_issue Suppl 3
container_start_page A869
container_title Annals of the rheumatic diseases
container_volume 72
creator Calvo Alén, J.
Baamonde, C.
Agudo, M.
Ruiz-Jimeno, T.
Gómez-Gerique, J.
description Background RA patients portend a greater risk of cardio-vascular complications than general population. Although most probably diverse mechanisms are implicated, quantity and quality changes in the lipoproteins appear to have an important role. Anti-TNF therapy has shown important benefits in controlling the inflammatory prcess but conflicting results have been reported regarding to its effects on lipid profile. Objectives To study the effect of anti-TNF agents on the lipid and lipoprotein profile of RA patients using a comprehensive study protocol including novel and more specific parameters for this pourpue. Methods RA patients in stable treatment with anti-TNF therapy at least during the last six months and a matched (by age, gender and rheumatoid factor status) with stable doses of standard DMARDs (most of them using methotrexate) were clinically evaluated using DAS28, as activity marker and MHAQ to assess disability. In addition, a complete standard lipid profile, a comprehensive lipoprotein assessment was carried out including: Lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) and B ( ApoB) levels (total and lipoprotein specific), levels of paroxonase 1 (PON1), HDL, LDL, VLDL and total cholesterol, triglycerides and phospholipids levels as well as number of molecules of these lipids (mc, mt and mf respectively) in each lipoprotein, total mass (M) and number of particles (np) of the before mentioned lipoproteins, levels of PCSK9 receptor. Results of both subsets of patients were performed with standard statistical tests. Results Sixty-seven RA patients on anti-TNF and 63 matched RA patients on DMARD, mean age (58.7±12.3 and 61±12.1 years), gender distribution (81% females in both cases), disease duration (140±165 and 143±276 months) and RF status (64% in both cases) were comparable. Patients on DMARD were more active (DAS28 4.42±1.35 vs 3.57± 1.27 and hsCRP 9.4±15.2 vs 3.8±5.8 mg/l respectively. Main findings in the lipoprotein analysis are shown in table 1: Conclusions RA patients treated with anti-TNF, regardless that they show lower levels of clinical activity, they have an improvement in their atherogenic risk profile showing higher levels of ApoA1 and therefore greater antioxidant capacity as well as lower levels of total mass and number of particles of VLDL which are atherogenic risk factors. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
doi_str_mv 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.2593
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777912154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008747131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1654-64c2c032943bb599775460f3b6e29bda81a94f603be72273b4e9c03c7f2fca9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkUtuFDEQhi0EEkPgDpay7uBX222xyox4RBqBhCAsLbe7zHjS425sj0J2bHICbshJcDMIZcvK9fj-qrJ-hM4puaCUy5c2xrSD42EIuWGE8gaOo00XrNX8EVpRIbtaluQxWhFCeCO0VE_Rs5z3NSUd7Vbo5-WaMEV__bhfQwQfXLAjBu_BFTx5bGMJTYkelx0kO9_hEJcQj2Ge5jQVqLldetNXiMHhFPINrg0fRlhYNx1mW4tTxLeh7PBwsGnAudg4LMGDqcni2ZYAseTn6Im3Y4YXf98z9PnN60-bd832w9urzeW26alsRSOFY45wpgXv-1ZrpVohiee9BKb7wXbUauEl4T0oxhTvBejKO-WZd1Z7fobOT3Prwd-OkIvZT8cU60pDlVKaMtqKSr06US5NOSfwZk6hfuPOUGIWF8wDF8zigvnjgllcqOrmpA65wPd_UptujFRcteb99cZ0W3r9pfu4Nm3l5YnvD_v_WvQb8Eylgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777912154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AB0271 Beneficial effect of anti-tnf therapy in the lipoprotein atherogenic risk profile in comparison with dmard standard therapy in ra patients</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Calvo Alén, J. ; Baamonde, C. ; Agudo, M. ; Ruiz-Jimeno, T. ; Gómez-Gerique, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Calvo Alén, J. ; Baamonde, C. ; Agudo, M. ; Ruiz-Jimeno, T. ; Gómez-Gerique, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background RA patients portend a greater risk of cardio-vascular complications than general population. Although most probably diverse mechanisms are implicated, quantity and quality changes in the lipoproteins appear to have an important role. Anti-TNF therapy has shown important benefits in controlling the inflammatory prcess but conflicting results have been reported regarding to its effects on lipid profile. Objectives To study the effect of anti-TNF agents on the lipid and lipoprotein profile of RA patients using a comprehensive study protocol including novel and more specific parameters for this pourpue. Methods RA patients in stable treatment with anti-TNF therapy at least during the last six months and a matched (by age, gender and rheumatoid factor status) with stable doses of standard DMARDs (most of them using methotrexate) were clinically evaluated using DAS28, as activity marker and MHAQ to assess disability. In addition, a complete standard lipid profile, a comprehensive lipoprotein assessment was carried out including: Lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) and B ( ApoB) levels (total and lipoprotein specific), levels of paroxonase 1 (PON1), HDL, LDL, VLDL and total cholesterol, triglycerides and phospholipids levels as well as number of molecules of these lipids (mc, mt and mf respectively) in each lipoprotein, total mass (M) and number of particles (np) of the before mentioned lipoproteins, levels of PCSK9 receptor. Results of both subsets of patients were performed with standard statistical tests. Results Sixty-seven RA patients on anti-TNF and 63 matched RA patients on DMARD, mean age (58.7±12.3 and 61±12.1 years), gender distribution (81% females in both cases), disease duration (140±165 and 143±276 months) and RF status (64% in both cases) were comparable. Patients on DMARD were more active (DAS28 4.42±1.35 vs 3.57± 1.27 and hsCRP 9.4±15.2 vs 3.8±5.8 mg/l respectively. Main findings in the lipoprotein analysis are shown in table 1: Conclusions RA patients treated with anti-TNF, regardless that they show lower levels of clinical activity, they have an improvement in their atherogenic risk profile showing higher levels of ApoA1 and therefore greater antioxidant capacity as well as lower levels of total mass and number of particles of VLDL which are atherogenic risk factors. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.2593</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A869-A869</ispartof><rights>2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 (c) 2013, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/72/Suppl_3/A869.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/72/Suppl_3/A869.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calvo Alén, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baamonde, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agudo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Jimeno, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Gerique, J.</creatorcontrib><title>AB0271 Beneficial effect of anti-tnf therapy in the lipoprotein atherogenic risk profile in comparison with dmard standard therapy in ra patients</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><description>Background RA patients portend a greater risk of cardio-vascular complications than general population. Although most probably diverse mechanisms are implicated, quantity and quality changes in the lipoproteins appear to have an important role. Anti-TNF therapy has shown important benefits in controlling the inflammatory prcess but conflicting results have been reported regarding to its effects on lipid profile. Objectives To study the effect of anti-TNF agents on the lipid and lipoprotein profile of RA patients using a comprehensive study protocol including novel and more specific parameters for this pourpue. Methods RA patients in stable treatment with anti-TNF therapy at least during the last six months and a matched (by age, gender and rheumatoid factor status) with stable doses of standard DMARDs (most of them using methotrexate) were clinically evaluated using DAS28, as activity marker and MHAQ to assess disability. In addition, a complete standard lipid profile, a comprehensive lipoprotein assessment was carried out including: Lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) and B ( ApoB) levels (total and lipoprotein specific), levels of paroxonase 1 (PON1), HDL, LDL, VLDL and total cholesterol, triglycerides and phospholipids levels as well as number of molecules of these lipids (mc, mt and mf respectively) in each lipoprotein, total mass (M) and number of particles (np) of the before mentioned lipoproteins, levels of PCSK9 receptor. Results of both subsets of patients were performed with standard statistical tests. Results Sixty-seven RA patients on anti-TNF and 63 matched RA patients on DMARD, mean age (58.7±12.3 and 61±12.1 years), gender distribution (81% females in both cases), disease duration (140±165 and 143±276 months) and RF status (64% in both cases) were comparable. Patients on DMARD were more active (DAS28 4.42±1.35 vs 3.57± 1.27 and hsCRP 9.4±15.2 vs 3.8±5.8 mg/l respectively. Main findings in the lipoprotein analysis are shown in table 1: Conclusions RA patients treated with anti-TNF, regardless that they show lower levels of clinical activity, they have an improvement in their atherogenic risk profile showing higher levels of ApoA1 and therefore greater antioxidant capacity as well as lower levels of total mass and number of particles of VLDL which are atherogenic risk factors. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkUtuFDEQhi0EEkPgDpay7uBX222xyox4RBqBhCAsLbe7zHjS425sj0J2bHICbshJcDMIZcvK9fj-qrJ-hM4puaCUy5c2xrSD42EIuWGE8gaOo00XrNX8EVpRIbtaluQxWhFCeCO0VE_Rs5z3NSUd7Vbo5-WaMEV__bhfQwQfXLAjBu_BFTx5bGMJTYkelx0kO9_hEJcQj2Ge5jQVqLldetNXiMHhFPINrg0fRlhYNx1mW4tTxLeh7PBwsGnAudg4LMGDqcni2ZYAseTn6Im3Y4YXf98z9PnN60-bd832w9urzeW26alsRSOFY45wpgXv-1ZrpVohiee9BKb7wXbUauEl4T0oxhTvBejKO-WZd1Z7fobOT3Prwd-OkIvZT8cU60pDlVKaMtqKSr06US5NOSfwZk6hfuPOUGIWF8wDF8zigvnjgllcqOrmpA65wPd_UptujFRcteb99cZ0W3r9pfu4Nm3l5YnvD_v_WvQb8Eylgw</recordid><startdate>201306</startdate><enddate>201306</enddate><creator>Calvo Alén, J.</creator><creator>Baamonde, C.</creator><creator>Agudo, M.</creator><creator>Ruiz-Jimeno, T.</creator><creator>Gómez-Gerique, J.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201306</creationdate><title>AB0271 Beneficial effect of anti-tnf therapy in the lipoprotein atherogenic risk profile in comparison with dmard standard therapy in ra patients</title><author>Calvo Alén, J. ; Baamonde, C. ; Agudo, M. ; Ruiz-Jimeno, T. ; Gómez-Gerique, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1654-64c2c032943bb599775460f3b6e29bda81a94f603be72273b4e9c03c7f2fca9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calvo Alén, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baamonde, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agudo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Jimeno, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Gerique, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calvo Alén, J.</au><au>Baamonde, C.</au><au>Agudo, M.</au><au>Ruiz-Jimeno, T.</au><au>Gómez-Gerique, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AB0271 Beneficial effect of anti-tnf therapy in the lipoprotein atherogenic risk profile in comparison with dmard standard therapy in ra patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Rheum Dis</addtitle><date>2013-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>Suppl 3</issue><spage>A869</spage><epage>A869</epage><pages>A869-A869</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background RA patients portend a greater risk of cardio-vascular complications than general population. Although most probably diverse mechanisms are implicated, quantity and quality changes in the lipoproteins appear to have an important role. Anti-TNF therapy has shown important benefits in controlling the inflammatory prcess but conflicting results have been reported regarding to its effects on lipid profile. Objectives To study the effect of anti-TNF agents on the lipid and lipoprotein profile of RA patients using a comprehensive study protocol including novel and more specific parameters for this pourpue. Methods RA patients in stable treatment with anti-TNF therapy at least during the last six months and a matched (by age, gender and rheumatoid factor status) with stable doses of standard DMARDs (most of them using methotrexate) were clinically evaluated using DAS28, as activity marker and MHAQ to assess disability. In addition, a complete standard lipid profile, a comprehensive lipoprotein assessment was carried out including: Lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) and B ( ApoB) levels (total and lipoprotein specific), levels of paroxonase 1 (PON1), HDL, LDL, VLDL and total cholesterol, triglycerides and phospholipids levels as well as number of molecules of these lipids (mc, mt and mf respectively) in each lipoprotein, total mass (M) and number of particles (np) of the before mentioned lipoproteins, levels of PCSK9 receptor. Results of both subsets of patients were performed with standard statistical tests. Results Sixty-seven RA patients on anti-TNF and 63 matched RA patients on DMARD, mean age (58.7±12.3 and 61±12.1 years), gender distribution (81% females in both cases), disease duration (140±165 and 143±276 months) and RF status (64% in both cases) were comparable. Patients on DMARD were more active (DAS28 4.42±1.35 vs 3.57± 1.27 and hsCRP 9.4±15.2 vs 3.8±5.8 mg/l respectively. Main findings in the lipoprotein analysis are shown in table 1: Conclusions RA patients treated with anti-TNF, regardless that they show lower levels of clinical activity, they have an improvement in their atherogenic risk profile showing higher levels of ApoA1 and therefore greater antioxidant capacity as well as lower levels of total mass and number of particles of VLDL which are atherogenic risk factors. Disclosure of Interest None Declared</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.2593</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4967
ispartof Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2013-06, Vol.72 (Suppl 3), p.A869-A869
issn 0003-4967
1468-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1777912154
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
title AB0271 Beneficial effect of anti-tnf therapy in the lipoprotein atherogenic risk profile in comparison with dmard standard therapy in ra patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A50%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AB0271%E2%80%85Beneficial%20effect%20of%20anti-tnf%20therapy%20in%20the%20lipoprotein%20atherogenic%20risk%20profile%20in%20comparison%20with%20dmard%20standard%20therapy%20in%20ra%20patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Calvo%20Al%C3%A9n,%20J.&rft.date=2013-06&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=Suppl%203&rft.spage=A869&rft.epage=A869&rft.pages=A869-A869&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.2593&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008747131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777912154&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true