AB0708 Differences in Localization and Activity of the Entheseal Involvement between Non-Radiographic and Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis by the Ultrasound Assessment

Background Peripheral entheseal involvement seems to be an important sign of spondyloarthritis (SpA). It may occur in patients with long-term as well as newly diagnosed disease and in those with definite ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and without radiological sacroiliitis, non-radiographic axial SpA (n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the rheumatic diseases 2014-06, Vol.73 (Suppl 2), p.1038-1038
Hauptverfasser: Fojtikova, M., Pavelka, K., Horinkova, J., Forejtová, S., Gatterova, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1038
container_issue Suppl 2
container_start_page 1038
container_title Annals of the rheumatic diseases
container_volume 73
creator Fojtikova, M.
Pavelka, K.
Horinkova, J.
Forejtová, S.
Gatterova, J.
description Background Peripheral entheseal involvement seems to be an important sign of spondyloarthritis (SpA). It may occur in patients with long-term as well as newly diagnosed disease and in those with definite ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and without radiological sacroiliitis, non-radiographic axial SpA (nr-ax-SpA). The clinical severity may not correlate with local tendon changes and ultrasound detection should be a useful tool for active changes assessment. Objectives To search for active and non-active entheseal changes by an ultrasound detection in four localization: Achilles tendon, patellar ligament, plantar aponeurosis and quadriceps insertion in patients suffering from newly diagnosed SpA: nr-ax-SpA and definite AS. Methods The total of 34 patients suffering from newly diagnosed SpA (with established diagnosis maximally within 2 years) underwent the clinical and ultrasound examination. Disease activity was determined by ASDAS CRP and BASDAI. Conventional two-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography was performed by one radiologist/musculoskeletal ultrasound specialist. Six ultrasound changes like tendon structural changes and thickening of tendon insertion, calcifications, bone erosions, bursitis, and Doppler signal was determined in four locations and Naredo et al. classification (1) for active/non active lesions was used. The χ2 test for comparison each group, Fisher exact test and correlation for activity a tendon changes was used. Results Altogether, 26 nr-ax-SpA patients (average age: 35.44±8.64) and 8 AS patients (average age: 31.63±6.12); BASDAI 3.27±0.56 and 1.95±0.2 respectively, ASDAS CRP 1.88±0.63 and 2.07±0.29 respectively, underwent the ultrasound detection for entheseal changes. 5 (19.20%) nr-ax-SpA and 3 (37.5%) AS patients have Doppler positive changes in any locations (p=ns), whereas the non-active changes were found in 21 (80.77%) nr-ax-SpA a 8 (100%) AS patients (p=ns). The Achilles tendon and the patellar ligament were the most common involved sites in both patients groups, nr-ax-SpA (32.70 and 26.92%, respectively) and AS (50.0 and 25.0% respectively), all p=ns. Interestingly, when we look for every changes in all tested tendons there were non-active changes in only 37.90% nr-ax-SpA compared to 71.88% AS (p
doi_str_mv 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2832
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777911843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4008753511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1273-c604490119174e3e41e7183ad2351771206b6fc7eb30ea0554cc614ab181dea93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkcFuEzEQhq0KpIbSd7DU8xbP2lnvilMoLVSKQAJ6trze2cbRxk5tb9pw4sLj8FI8Cd6kBzhy8cij-f6R5iPkAtglAK_eaOfCCsdNZ2NRMhAFjoMOl2XNyxMyA1HVuV2xF2TGGOOFaCp5Sl7FuM5fVkM9I78W75hk9e8fP9_bvseAzmCk1tGlN3qw33Wy3lHtOrowye5s2lPf07RCeu3yG1EP9Nbt_LDDDbpEW0yPiI5-8q74ojvr74Perqw5RPzTWDzZzH7detftB69DWgWbbKTt_hB_N6Sgox-nzTFijFP8a_Ky10PE8-d6Ru5urr9dfSyWnz_cXi2WRQul5IWpmBANA2hACuQoACXUXHcln4OUkG_SVr2R2HKGms3nwpgKhG6hhg51w8_IxTF3G_zDiDGptR-DyytV5mUDUAuep94ep0zwMQbs1TbYjQ57BUxNftRfftTkRx38qMlPpqsj3W7W_wX-Afkjn9M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777911843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AB0708 Differences in Localization and Activity of the Entheseal Involvement between Non-Radiographic and Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis by the Ultrasound Assessment</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Fojtikova, M. ; Pavelka, K. ; Horinkova, J. ; Forejtová, S. ; Gatterova, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fojtikova, M. ; Pavelka, K. ; Horinkova, J. ; Forejtová, S. ; Gatterova, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Peripheral entheseal involvement seems to be an important sign of spondyloarthritis (SpA). It may occur in patients with long-term as well as newly diagnosed disease and in those with definite ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and without radiological sacroiliitis, non-radiographic axial SpA (nr-ax-SpA). The clinical severity may not correlate with local tendon changes and ultrasound detection should be a useful tool for active changes assessment. Objectives To search for active and non-active entheseal changes by an ultrasound detection in four localization: Achilles tendon, patellar ligament, plantar aponeurosis and quadriceps insertion in patients suffering from newly diagnosed SpA: nr-ax-SpA and definite AS. Methods The total of 34 patients suffering from newly diagnosed SpA (with established diagnosis maximally within 2 years) underwent the clinical and ultrasound examination. Disease activity was determined by ASDAS CRP and BASDAI. Conventional two-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography was performed by one radiologist/musculoskeletal ultrasound specialist. Six ultrasound changes like tendon structural changes and thickening of tendon insertion, calcifications, bone erosions, bursitis, and Doppler signal was determined in four locations and Naredo et al. classification (1) for active/non active lesions was used. The χ2 test for comparison each group, Fisher exact test and correlation for activity a tendon changes was used. Results Altogether, 26 nr-ax-SpA patients (average age: 35.44±8.64) and 8 AS patients (average age: 31.63±6.12); BASDAI 3.27±0.56 and 1.95±0.2 respectively, ASDAS CRP 1.88±0.63 and 2.07±0.29 respectively, underwent the ultrasound detection for entheseal changes. 5 (19.20%) nr-ax-SpA and 3 (37.5%) AS patients have Doppler positive changes in any locations (p=ns), whereas the non-active changes were found in 21 (80.77%) nr-ax-SpA a 8 (100%) AS patients (p=ns). The Achilles tendon and the patellar ligament were the most common involved sites in both patients groups, nr-ax-SpA (32.70 and 26.92%, respectively) and AS (50.0 and 25.0% respectively), all p=ns. Interestingly, when we look for every changes in all tested tendons there were non-active changes in only 37.90% nr-ax-SpA compared to 71.88% AS (p&lt;0.0001). However the active changes were distributed evenly in nr-ax-SpA and AS, 4.80% and 7.81%, respectively. We did not find any correlation between ASDAS CRP and/ro BASDAI and prevalence of active and non-active lesions in both group. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the usefulness of entheseal ultrasound for active and non-active tendon changes in newly diagnosed SpA. Interestingly, both patients with nr-ax-SpA and those with definite AS develop the same number of active entheseal changes. However, non-active entheseal changes are more common AS than nr-ax-SpA patients. On the other hand, the presence of active and non-active entheseal changes do not correlate with disease activity. This study was supported by the project (MH CR) for conceptual development of research organization 023728 References Gandjbakhch F, et al. Ultrasound in the evaluation of enthesitis: status and perspectives. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(6):R188 Acknowledgements This study was supported by the project (Ministry of Health Czech Republic) for conceptual development of research organization 023728 Disclosure of Interest None declared DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2832</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2832</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARDIAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><ispartof>Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014-06, Vol.73 (Suppl 2), p.1038-1038</ispartof><rights>2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>Copyright: 2014 (c) 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/73/Suppl_2/1038.2.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ard.bmj.com/content/73/Suppl_2/1038.2.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fojtikova, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavelka, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horinkova, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forejtová, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatterova, J.</creatorcontrib><title>AB0708 Differences in Localization and Activity of the Entheseal Involvement between Non-Radiographic and Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis by the Ultrasound Assessment</title><title>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</title><description>Background Peripheral entheseal involvement seems to be an important sign of spondyloarthritis (SpA). It may occur in patients with long-term as well as newly diagnosed disease and in those with definite ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and without radiological sacroiliitis, non-radiographic axial SpA (nr-ax-SpA). The clinical severity may not correlate with local tendon changes and ultrasound detection should be a useful tool for active changes assessment. Objectives To search for active and non-active entheseal changes by an ultrasound detection in four localization: Achilles tendon, patellar ligament, plantar aponeurosis and quadriceps insertion in patients suffering from newly diagnosed SpA: nr-ax-SpA and definite AS. Methods The total of 34 patients suffering from newly diagnosed SpA (with established diagnosis maximally within 2 years) underwent the clinical and ultrasound examination. Disease activity was determined by ASDAS CRP and BASDAI. Conventional two-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography was performed by one radiologist/musculoskeletal ultrasound specialist. Six ultrasound changes like tendon structural changes and thickening of tendon insertion, calcifications, bone erosions, bursitis, and Doppler signal was determined in four locations and Naredo et al. classification (1) for active/non active lesions was used. The χ2 test for comparison each group, Fisher exact test and correlation for activity a tendon changes was used. Results Altogether, 26 nr-ax-SpA patients (average age: 35.44±8.64) and 8 AS patients (average age: 31.63±6.12); BASDAI 3.27±0.56 and 1.95±0.2 respectively, ASDAS CRP 1.88±0.63 and 2.07±0.29 respectively, underwent the ultrasound detection for entheseal changes. 5 (19.20%) nr-ax-SpA and 3 (37.5%) AS patients have Doppler positive changes in any locations (p=ns), whereas the non-active changes were found in 21 (80.77%) nr-ax-SpA a 8 (100%) AS patients (p=ns). The Achilles tendon and the patellar ligament were the most common involved sites in both patients groups, nr-ax-SpA (32.70 and 26.92%, respectively) and AS (50.0 and 25.0% respectively), all p=ns. Interestingly, when we look for every changes in all tested tendons there were non-active changes in only 37.90% nr-ax-SpA compared to 71.88% AS (p&lt;0.0001). However the active changes were distributed evenly in nr-ax-SpA and AS, 4.80% and 7.81%, respectively. We did not find any correlation between ASDAS CRP and/ro BASDAI and prevalence of active and non-active lesions in both group. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the usefulness of entheseal ultrasound for active and non-active tendon changes in newly diagnosed SpA. Interestingly, both patients with nr-ax-SpA and those with definite AS develop the same number of active entheseal changes. However, non-active entheseal changes are more common AS than nr-ax-SpA patients. On the other hand, the presence of active and non-active entheseal changes do not correlate with disease activity. This study was supported by the project (MH CR) for conceptual development of research organization 023728 References Gandjbakhch F, et al. Ultrasound in the evaluation of enthesitis: status and perspectives. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(6):R188 Acknowledgements This study was supported by the project (Ministry of Health Czech Republic) for conceptual development of research organization 023728 Disclosure of Interest None declared DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2832</description><issn>0003-4967</issn><issn>1468-2060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkcFuEzEQhq0KpIbSd7DU8xbP2lnvilMoLVSKQAJ6trze2cbRxk5tb9pw4sLj8FI8Cd6kBzhy8cij-f6R5iPkAtglAK_eaOfCCsdNZ2NRMhAFjoMOl2XNyxMyA1HVuV2xF2TGGOOFaCp5Sl7FuM5fVkM9I78W75hk9e8fP9_bvseAzmCk1tGlN3qw33Wy3lHtOrowye5s2lPf07RCeu3yG1EP9Nbt_LDDDbpEW0yPiI5-8q74ojvr74Perqw5RPzTWDzZzH7detftB69DWgWbbKTt_hB_N6Sgox-nzTFijFP8a_Ky10PE8-d6Ru5urr9dfSyWnz_cXi2WRQul5IWpmBANA2hACuQoACXUXHcln4OUkG_SVr2R2HKGms3nwpgKhG6hhg51w8_IxTF3G_zDiDGptR-DyytV5mUDUAuep94ep0zwMQbs1TbYjQ57BUxNftRfftTkRx38qMlPpqsj3W7W_wX-Afkjn9M</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Fojtikova, M.</creator><creator>Pavelka, K.</creator><creator>Horinkova, J.</creator><creator>Forejtová, S.</creator><creator>Gatterova, J.</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>AB0708 Differences in Localization and Activity of the Entheseal Involvement between Non-Radiographic and Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis by the Ultrasound Assessment</title><author>Fojtikova, M. ; Pavelka, K. ; Horinkova, J. ; Forejtová, S. ; Gatterova, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1273-c604490119174e3e41e7183ad2351771206b6fc7eb30ea0554cc614ab181dea93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fojtikova, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavelka, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horinkova, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forejtová, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatterova, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fojtikova, M.</au><au>Pavelka, K.</au><au>Horinkova, J.</au><au>Forejtová, S.</au><au>Gatterova, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AB0708 Differences in Localization and Activity of the Entheseal Involvement between Non-Radiographic and Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis by the Ultrasound Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the rheumatic diseases</jtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>1038</spage><epage>1038</epage><pages>1038-1038</pages><issn>0003-4967</issn><eissn>1468-2060</eissn><coden>ARDIAO</coden><abstract>Background Peripheral entheseal involvement seems to be an important sign of spondyloarthritis (SpA). It may occur in patients with long-term as well as newly diagnosed disease and in those with definite ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and without radiological sacroiliitis, non-radiographic axial SpA (nr-ax-SpA). The clinical severity may not correlate with local tendon changes and ultrasound detection should be a useful tool for active changes assessment. Objectives To search for active and non-active entheseal changes by an ultrasound detection in four localization: Achilles tendon, patellar ligament, plantar aponeurosis and quadriceps insertion in patients suffering from newly diagnosed SpA: nr-ax-SpA and definite AS. Methods The total of 34 patients suffering from newly diagnosed SpA (with established diagnosis maximally within 2 years) underwent the clinical and ultrasound examination. Disease activity was determined by ASDAS CRP and BASDAI. Conventional two-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography was performed by one radiologist/musculoskeletal ultrasound specialist. Six ultrasound changes like tendon structural changes and thickening of tendon insertion, calcifications, bone erosions, bursitis, and Doppler signal was determined in four locations and Naredo et al. classification (1) for active/non active lesions was used. The χ2 test for comparison each group, Fisher exact test and correlation for activity a tendon changes was used. Results Altogether, 26 nr-ax-SpA patients (average age: 35.44±8.64) and 8 AS patients (average age: 31.63±6.12); BASDAI 3.27±0.56 and 1.95±0.2 respectively, ASDAS CRP 1.88±0.63 and 2.07±0.29 respectively, underwent the ultrasound detection for entheseal changes. 5 (19.20%) nr-ax-SpA and 3 (37.5%) AS patients have Doppler positive changes in any locations (p=ns), whereas the non-active changes were found in 21 (80.77%) nr-ax-SpA a 8 (100%) AS patients (p=ns). The Achilles tendon and the patellar ligament were the most common involved sites in both patients groups, nr-ax-SpA (32.70 and 26.92%, respectively) and AS (50.0 and 25.0% respectively), all p=ns. Interestingly, when we look for every changes in all tested tendons there were non-active changes in only 37.90% nr-ax-SpA compared to 71.88% AS (p&lt;0.0001). However the active changes were distributed evenly in nr-ax-SpA and AS, 4.80% and 7.81%, respectively. We did not find any correlation between ASDAS CRP and/ro BASDAI and prevalence of active and non-active lesions in both group. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the usefulness of entheseal ultrasound for active and non-active tendon changes in newly diagnosed SpA. Interestingly, both patients with nr-ax-SpA and those with definite AS develop the same number of active entheseal changes. However, non-active entheseal changes are more common AS than nr-ax-SpA patients. On the other hand, the presence of active and non-active entheseal changes do not correlate with disease activity. This study was supported by the project (MH CR) for conceptual development of research organization 023728 References Gandjbakhch F, et al. Ultrasound in the evaluation of enthesitis: status and perspectives. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(6):R188 Acknowledgements This study was supported by the project (Ministry of Health Czech Republic) for conceptual development of research organization 023728 Disclosure of Interest None declared DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2832</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2832</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4967
ispartof Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2014-06, Vol.73 (Suppl 2), p.1038-1038
issn 0003-4967
1468-2060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1777911843
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
title AB0708 Differences in Localization and Activity of the Entheseal Involvement between Non-Radiographic and Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis by the Ultrasound Assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A12%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AB0708%E2%80%85Differences%20in%20Localization%20and%20Activity%20of%20the%20Entheseal%20Involvement%20between%20Non-Radiographic%20and%20Radiographic%20Axial%20Spondyloarthritis%20by%20the%20Ultrasound%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20rheumatic%20diseases&rft.au=Fojtikova,%20M.&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=1038&rft.epage=1038&rft.pages=1038-1038&rft.issn=0003-4967&rft.eissn=1468-2060&rft.coden=ARDIAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2832&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4008753511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777911843&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true