Scotland v England deal on prescribed drugs

Scotland v England deal on prescribed drugs

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) use similar approaches in their assessment of medicines. 2 What we don't use is any measure of the overall NHS budget or the budgets of individual NHS boards (affordability) in making ou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ 2006-11, Vol.333 (7577), p.1073-1073
Hauptverfasser: Webb, David J, Paterson, Kenneth R, Timoney, Angela, Walker, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Disappointment
Letters
Prescription drugs
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1073
container_issue 7577
container_start_page 1073
container_title BMJ
container_volume 333
creator Webb, David J
Paterson, Kenneth R
Timoney, Angela
Walker, Andrew
description The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) use similar approaches in their assessment of medicines. 2 What we don't use is any measure of the overall NHS budget or the budgets of individual NHS boards (affordability) in making our recommendations on new medicines so the Barnett formula is irrelevant.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmj.39030.729954.3A
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777754203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40700944</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40700944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b172a-d5f1d533cb539a1834e3d3d5e03580a62efd0777d718f111abaec7654187a9df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFFLwzAQx4Mobsx9AhEGPkprrpc0yeMYToWh4OZ8DGmTjtWtnUkn-u3tVtnTHff_3R38CLkGGgNgep9tyxgVRRqLRCnOYhyfkT6wVEZcIp6TPlVcRRJQ9sgwhJJSmqCQKuWXpAcCgApkfXI3z-tmYyo7-h49VKtjZ53ZjOpqtPMu5H6duXbk96twRS4Kswlu-F8H5H36sJg8RbPXx-fJeBZlIBITWV6A5Yh5xlEZkMgcWrTcUeSSmjRxhaVCCCtAFgBgMuNykXIGUhhlCxyQ2-7uztdfexcaXdZ7X7UvNbR7grOEYkvddFQZmtrrnV9vjf_VjApKFWNtHnX5OjTu55Qb_6lTgYLrl-VEvy2myw--YHre8nHHt2pPNFB90K0Ps6Nu3enWOMY_rK5tFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777754203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scotland v England deal on prescribed drugs</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Webb, David J ; Paterson, Kenneth R ; Timoney, Angela ; Walker, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Webb, David J ; Paterson, Kenneth R ; Timoney, Angela ; Walker, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) use similar approaches in their assessment of medicines. 2 What we don't use is any measure of the overall NHS budget or the budgets of individual NHS boards (affordability) in making our recommendations on new medicines so the Barnett formula is irrelevant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39030.729954.3A</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17110734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Disappointment ; Letters ; Prescription drugs</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 2006-11, Vol.333 (7577), p.1073-1073</ispartof><rights>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2006</rights><rights>2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright: 2006 (c) BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/333/7577/1073.2.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/333/7577/1073.2.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,777,781,800,23552,27905,27906,57998,58231,77349,77380</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Webb, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Kenneth R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timoney, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Scotland v England deal on prescribed drugs</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) use similar approaches in their assessment of medicines. 2 What we don't use is any measure of the overall NHS budget or the budgets of individual NHS boards (affordability) in making our recommendations on new medicines so the Barnett formula is irrelevant.</description><subject>Disappointment</subject><subject>Letters</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kFFLwzAQx4Mobsx9AhEGPkprrpc0yeMYToWh4OZ8DGmTjtWtnUkn-u3tVtnTHff_3R38CLkGGgNgep9tyxgVRRqLRCnOYhyfkT6wVEZcIp6TPlVcRRJQ9sgwhJJSmqCQKuWXpAcCgApkfXI3z-tmYyo7-h49VKtjZ53ZjOpqtPMu5H6duXbk96twRS4Kswlu-F8H5H36sJg8RbPXx-fJeBZlIBITWV6A5Yh5xlEZkMgcWrTcUeSSmjRxhaVCCCtAFgBgMuNykXIGUhhlCxyQ2-7uztdfexcaXdZ7X7UvNbR7grOEYkvddFQZmtrrnV9vjf_VjApKFWNtHnX5OjTu55Qb_6lTgYLrl-VEvy2myw--YHre8nHHt2pPNFB90K0Ps6Nu3enWOMY_rK5tFA</recordid><startdate>20061118</startdate><enddate>20061118</enddate><creator>Webb, David J</creator><creator>Paterson, Kenneth R</creator><creator>Timoney, Angela</creator><creator>Walker, Andrew</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061118</creationdate><title>Scotland v England deal on prescribed drugs</title><author>Webb, David J ; Paterson, Kenneth R ; Timoney, Angela ; Walker, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b172a-d5f1d533cb539a1834e3d3d5e03580a62efd0777d718f111abaec7654187a9df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Disappointment</topic><topic>Letters</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Webb, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Kenneth R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timoney, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Webb, David J</au><au>Paterson, Kenneth R</au><au>Timoney, Angela</au><au>Walker, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scotland v England deal on prescribed drugs</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2006-11-18</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>333</volume><issue>7577</issue><spage>1073</spage><epage>1073</epage><pages>1073-1073</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) use similar approaches in their assessment of medicines. 2 What we don't use is any measure of the overall NHS budget or the budgets of individual NHS boards (affordability) in making our recommendations on new medicines so the Barnett formula is irrelevant.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>17110734</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.39030.729954.3A</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8138
ispartof BMJ, 2006-11, Vol.333 (7577), p.1073-1073
issn 0959-8138
1468-5833
1756-1833
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1777754203
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Disappointment
Letters
Prescription drugs
title Scotland v England deal on prescribed drugs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A30%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scotland%20v%20England%20deal%20on%20prescribed%20drugs&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Webb,%20David%20J&rft.date=2006-11-18&rft.volume=333&rft.issue=7577&rft.spage=1073&rft.epage=1073&rft.pages=1073-1073&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.39030.729954.3A&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40700944%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777754203&rft_id=info:pmid/17110734&rft_jstor_id=40700944&rfr_iscdi=true