National guidance and allocation of resources
EDITOR-I think that Cookson et al in their criticisms of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) show a lack of understanding of the role of this organisation and the methods it uses to develop its guidelines. 1 Evidence based guidelines will not resolve all healthcare issues, just as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ 2002-02, Vol.324 (7334), p.427-428 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 428 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7334 |
container_start_page | 427 |
container_title | BMJ |
container_volume | 324 |
creator | Howard, G. C. W. Davey, Peter |
description | EDITOR-I think that Cookson et al in their criticisms of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) show a lack of understanding of the role of this organisation and the methods it uses to develop its guidelines. 1 Evidence based guidelines will not resolve all healthcare issues, just as randomised controlled trials are not appropriate to resolve all therapeutic controversies. Feb 1, 2002 EDITOR-One of the greatest strengths of economists lies in drawing inferences from imperfect data, and, as Maynard knows, the data about the value of reducing risk of hospital acquired infection are certainly imperfect. 1 2 Cookson et al dismissed guideline 45 from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) as a calculation done on the back of the envelope, about the budgetary impact of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery. 3 The guideline provides two decision rules that challenge policymakers to identify a point at which antibiotic prophylaxis may be effective but not cost effective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.324.7334.427/b |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1777603968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25227501</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25227501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b313b-84a77699a39ec273a472dcbf53aeb2817e4e49b370ebc24a7314d307d47cb10c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEURYMottT-AUEYcJ1pkpdMkqUUv6DoRtchyWSkw7SpyXThvzd1xLWrt7j3XB4HoWtKakqhWbldXwPjtQTgNWdy5c7QnPJGYaEAztGcaKGxoqBmaJlzTwhhIJVuxCWaUaoEAdXMEX6x4zbu7VB9HLet3ftQ2X1b2WGI_iepYlelkOMx-ZCv0EVnhxyWv3eB3h_u39ZPePP6-Ly-22AHFBxW3ErZaG1BB88kWC5Z610nwAbHFJWBB64dSBKcZ6UMlLdAZMuld5R4WKDbafeQ4ucx5NH05YHyZTZUlmkCulGlxaaWTzHnFDpzSNudTV-GEnOSZIokUySZkyRTJBlXoJsJ6vMY0x_BBGNSEFpyPOUn9h9739EYbz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777603968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>National guidance and allocation of resources</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Howard, G. C. W. ; Davey, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Howard, G. C. W. ; Davey, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>EDITOR-I think that Cookson et al in their criticisms of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) show a lack of understanding of the role of this organisation and the methods it uses to develop its guidelines. 1 Evidence based guidelines will not resolve all healthcare issues, just as randomised controlled trials are not appropriate to resolve all therapeutic controversies. Feb 1, 2002 EDITOR-One of the greatest strengths of economists lies in drawing inferences from imperfect data, and, as Maynard knows, the data about the value of reducing risk of hospital acquired infection are certainly imperfect. 1 2 Cookson et al dismissed guideline 45 from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) as a calculation done on the back of the envelope, about the budgetary impact of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery. 3 The guideline provides two decision rules that challenge policymakers to identify a point at which antibiotic prophylaxis may be effective but not cost effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7334.427/b</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11850386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Association</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Decision making ; Letters</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 2002-02, Vol.324 (7334), p.427-428</ispartof><rights>2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 BMJ</rights><rights>Copyright: 2002 (c) 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25227501$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25227501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howard, G. C. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>National guidance and allocation of resources</title><title>BMJ</title><description>EDITOR-I think that Cookson et al in their criticisms of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) show a lack of understanding of the role of this organisation and the methods it uses to develop its guidelines. 1 Evidence based guidelines will not resolve all healthcare issues, just as randomised controlled trials are not appropriate to resolve all therapeutic controversies. Feb 1, 2002 EDITOR-One of the greatest strengths of economists lies in drawing inferences from imperfect data, and, as Maynard knows, the data about the value of reducing risk of hospital acquired infection are certainly imperfect. 1 2 Cookson et al dismissed guideline 45 from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) as a calculation done on the back of the envelope, about the budgetary impact of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery. 3 The guideline provides two decision rules that challenge policymakers to identify a point at which antibiotic prophylaxis may be effective but not cost effective.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Letters</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEURYMottT-AUEYcJ1pkpdMkqUUv6DoRtchyWSkw7SpyXThvzd1xLWrt7j3XB4HoWtKakqhWbldXwPjtQTgNWdy5c7QnPJGYaEAztGcaKGxoqBmaJlzTwhhIJVuxCWaUaoEAdXMEX6x4zbu7VB9HLet3ftQ2X1b2WGI_iepYlelkOMx-ZCv0EVnhxyWv3eB3h_u39ZPePP6-Ly-22AHFBxW3ErZaG1BB88kWC5Z610nwAbHFJWBB64dSBKcZ6UMlLdAZMuld5R4WKDbafeQ4ucx5NH05YHyZTZUlmkCulGlxaaWTzHnFDpzSNudTV-GEnOSZIokUySZkyRTJBlXoJsJ6vMY0x_BBGNSEFpyPOUn9h9739EYbz4</recordid><startdate>20020216</startdate><enddate>20020216</enddate><creator>Howard, G. C. W.</creator><creator>Davey, Peter</creator><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020216</creationdate><title>National guidance and allocation of resources</title><author>Howard, G. C. W. ; Davey, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b313b-84a77699a39ec273a472dcbf53aeb2817e4e49b370ebc24a7314d307d47cb10c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Letters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howard, G. C. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howard, G. C. W.</au><au>Davey, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>National guidance and allocation of resources</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><date>2002-02-16</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>324</volume><issue>7334</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>428</epage><pages>427-428</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>EDITOR-I think that Cookson et al in their criticisms of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) show a lack of understanding of the role of this organisation and the methods it uses to develop its guidelines. 1 Evidence based guidelines will not resolve all healthcare issues, just as randomised controlled trials are not appropriate to resolve all therapeutic controversies. Feb 1, 2002 EDITOR-One of the greatest strengths of economists lies in drawing inferences from imperfect data, and, as Maynard knows, the data about the value of reducing risk of hospital acquired infection are certainly imperfect. 1 2 Cookson et al dismissed guideline 45 from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) as a calculation done on the back of the envelope, about the budgetary impact of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery. 3 The guideline provides two decision rules that challenge policymakers to identify a point at which antibiotic prophylaxis may be effective but not cost effective.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Association</pub><pmid>11850386</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.324.7334.427/b</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
ispartof | BMJ, 2002-02, Vol.324 (7334), p.427-428 |
issn | 0959-8138 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1777603968 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Antibiotics Decision making Letters |
title | National guidance and allocation of resources |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A47%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=National%20guidance%20and%20allocation%20of%20resources&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Howard,%20G.%20C.%20W.&rft.date=2002-02-16&rft.volume=324&rft.issue=7334&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=428&rft.pages=427-428&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.324.7334.427/b&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25227501%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777603968&rft_id=info:pmid/11850386&rft_jstor_id=25227501&rfr_iscdi=true |