Vitamin D deficiency
Freaney and McKenna raise the central issue of defining hypovitaminosis D. As they state, the current threshold may be too low and potential beneficiaries of vitamin D supplementation may include those who were previously believed to be replete with vitamin D. In addition to supplementation of group...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ 1999-05, Vol.318 (7193), p.1284-1285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Freaney and McKenna raise the central issue of defining hypovitaminosis D. As they state, the current threshold may be too low and potential beneficiaries of vitamin D supplementation may include those who were previously believed to be replete with vitamin D. In addition to supplementation of groups at risk, fortification of milk would be a step forward, but experience in the United States and Canada has shown wide variations in the vitamin D content of fortified milk so the benefits of this approach would be limited to those who drink sufficient quantities of milk. 2 Nashef and Lamb raise several questions. Anticonvulsant treatment is a risk factor for osteomalacia and osteoporosis and is associated with an increased prevalence of hypovitaminosis D. The amount of vitamin D required to achieve normal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in patients receiving anticonvulsants varies, in one study ranging between 400 IU and 4000 IU daily. 3 The use of enzyme inducing drugs, particularly in high doses and with other drugs, and lack of exposure to sunlight as a result of being housebound or living in an institution are major risk factors for hypovitaminosis D. A strong case can be made for routine supplementation in such subjects, with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations being measured to monitor treatment. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-8138 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1284a |