The Role of Socioeconomic Status in SAT-Freshman Grade Relationships Across Gender and Racial Subgroups

Recent research has shown that admissions tests retain the vast majority of their predictive power after controlling for socioeconomic status (SES), and that SES provides only a slight increment over SAT and high school grades (high school grade point average [HSGPA]) in predicting academic performa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational measurement, issues and practice issues and practice, 2016-03, Vol.35 (1), p.21-28
Hauptverfasser: Higdem, Jana L., Kostal, Jack W., Kuncel, Nathan R., Sackett, Paul R., Shen, Winny, Beatty, Adam S., Kiger, Thomas B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
container_title Educational measurement, issues and practice
container_volume 35
creator Higdem, Jana L.
Kostal, Jack W.
Kuncel, Nathan R.
Sackett, Paul R.
Shen, Winny
Beatty, Adam S.
Kiger, Thomas B.
description Recent research has shown that admissions tests retain the vast majority of their predictive power after controlling for socioeconomic status (SES), and that SES provides only a slight increment over SAT and high school grades (high school grade point average [HSGPA]) in predicting academic performance. To address the possibility that these overall analyses obscure differences by race/ethnicity or gender, we examine the role of SES in the test‒grade relationship for men and women as well as for various racial/ethnic subgroups within the United States. For each subgroup, the test‒grade relationship is only slightly diminished when controlling for SES. Further, SES is a substantially less powerful predictor of academic performance than both SAT and HSGPA. Among the indicators of SES (i.e., father's education, mother's education, and parental income), father's education appears to be strongest predictor of freshman grades across subgroups, with the exception of the Asian subgroup. In general, SES appears to behave similarly across subgroups in the prediction of freshman grades with SAT scores and HSGPA.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/emip.12103
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1772838052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1093281</ericid><sourcerecordid>3983682551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4313-be2b54b82db1c7fd2a7e00df2c596e9bd3f0dd2a7afb42803a963d37f181d9553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1r20AQxZeSQh03l94LC7kF5O6HpJWOJthugtsEy6XQy7LaHcXryFplV6LJfx85an3MXAZmfu_N8BD6QsmMDvUNDradUUYJ_4AmVMRJxPOcnaEJEZxGx8EndB7CnhCapLmYoIftDvDG1YBdhQunrQPtGnewGhed6vqAbYOL-TZaegi7g2rwyiszSKBWnXVN2Nk24Ln2LgS8gsaAx6oxeKO0VTUu-vLBu74Nn9HHStUBLv71Kfq1XGyvv0fru9XN9Xwd6ZhTHpXAyiQuM2ZKqkVlmBJAiKmYTvIU8tLwipjjVFVlzDLCVZ5yw0VFM2ryJOFTdDn6tt499RA6uXe9b4aTkgrBMp6RhA3U1Ui9_e2hkq23B-VfJCXyGKQ8BinfghzgryMM3uoTuLilJOcso8Oejvu_toaXd5zk4sfN_X_PaNTY0MHzSaP8o0wFF4n8_XMl0z-buOCMyyV_BS_zjjE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772838052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Socioeconomic Status in SAT-Freshman Grade Relationships Across Gender and Racial Subgroups</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Higdem, Jana L. ; Kostal, Jack W. ; Kuncel, Nathan R. ; Sackett, Paul R. ; Shen, Winny ; Beatty, Adam S. ; Kiger, Thomas B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Higdem, Jana L. ; Kostal, Jack W. ; Kuncel, Nathan R. ; Sackett, Paul R. ; Shen, Winny ; Beatty, Adam S. ; Kiger, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research has shown that admissions tests retain the vast majority of their predictive power after controlling for socioeconomic status (SES), and that SES provides only a slight increment over SAT and high school grades (high school grade point average [HSGPA]) in predicting academic performance. To address the possibility that these overall analyses obscure differences by race/ethnicity or gender, we examine the role of SES in the test‒grade relationship for men and women as well as for various racial/ethnic subgroups within the United States. For each subgroup, the test‒grade relationship is only slightly diminished when controlling for SES. Further, SES is a substantially less powerful predictor of academic performance than both SAT and HSGPA. Among the indicators of SES (i.e., father's education, mother's education, and parental income), father's education appears to be strongest predictor of freshman grades across subgroups, with the exception of the Asian subgroup. In general, SES appears to behave similarly across subgroups in the prediction of freshman grades with SAT scores and HSGPA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/emip.12103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; academic performance ; Admission Criteria ; admissions testing ; College Entrance Examinations ; College Freshmen ; Correlation ; Ethnic Groups ; ethnicity ; Family Income ; gender ; Gender Differences ; Grade Point Average ; Grades (Scholastic) ; Parent Background ; Predictive Validity ; Predictor Variables ; race ; Racial Differences ; Secondary school students ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomic Influences ; Socioeconomic Status</subject><ispartof>Educational measurement, issues and practice, 2016-03, Vol.35 (1), p.21-28</ispartof><rights>2016 by the National Council on Measurement in Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4313-be2b54b82db1c7fd2a7e00df2c596e9bd3f0dd2a7afb42803a963d37f181d9553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4313-be2b54b82db1c7fd2a7e00df2c596e9bd3f0dd2a7afb42803a963d37f181d9553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Femip.12103$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Femip.12103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1093281$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Higdem, Jana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kostal, Jack W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuncel, Nathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sackett, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Winny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beatty, Adam S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiger, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Socioeconomic Status in SAT-Freshman Grade Relationships Across Gender and Racial Subgroups</title><title>Educational measurement, issues and practice</title><addtitle>Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice</addtitle><description>Recent research has shown that admissions tests retain the vast majority of their predictive power after controlling for socioeconomic status (SES), and that SES provides only a slight increment over SAT and high school grades (high school grade point average [HSGPA]) in predicting academic performance. To address the possibility that these overall analyses obscure differences by race/ethnicity or gender, we examine the role of SES in the test‒grade relationship for men and women as well as for various racial/ethnic subgroups within the United States. For each subgroup, the test‒grade relationship is only slightly diminished when controlling for SES. Further, SES is a substantially less powerful predictor of academic performance than both SAT and HSGPA. Among the indicators of SES (i.e., father's education, mother's education, and parental income), father's education appears to be strongest predictor of freshman grades across subgroups, with the exception of the Asian subgroup. In general, SES appears to behave similarly across subgroups in the prediction of freshman grades with SAT scores and HSGPA.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>academic performance</subject><subject>Admission Criteria</subject><subject>admissions testing</subject><subject>College Entrance Examinations</subject><subject>College Freshmen</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>ethnicity</subject><subject>Family Income</subject><subject>gender</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Grade Point Average</subject><subject>Grades (Scholastic)</subject><subject>Parent Background</subject><subject>Predictive Validity</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>race</subject><subject>Racial Differences</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Influences</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Status</subject><issn>0731-1745</issn><issn>1745-3992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1r20AQxZeSQh03l94LC7kF5O6HpJWOJthugtsEy6XQy7LaHcXryFplV6LJfx85an3MXAZmfu_N8BD6QsmMDvUNDradUUYJ_4AmVMRJxPOcnaEJEZxGx8EndB7CnhCapLmYoIftDvDG1YBdhQunrQPtGnewGhed6vqAbYOL-TZaegi7g2rwyiszSKBWnXVN2Nk24Ln2LgS8gsaAx6oxeKO0VTUu-vLBu74Nn9HHStUBLv71Kfq1XGyvv0fru9XN9Xwd6ZhTHpXAyiQuM2ZKqkVlmBJAiKmYTvIU8tLwipjjVFVlzDLCVZ5yw0VFM2ryJOFTdDn6tt499RA6uXe9b4aTkgrBMp6RhA3U1Ui9_e2hkq23B-VfJCXyGKQ8BinfghzgryMM3uoTuLilJOcso8Oejvu_toaXd5zk4sfN_X_PaNTY0MHzSaP8o0wFF4n8_XMl0z-buOCMyyV_BS_zjjE</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Higdem, Jana L.</creator><creator>Kostal, Jack W.</creator><creator>Kuncel, Nathan R.</creator><creator>Sackett, Paul R.</creator><creator>Shen, Winny</creator><creator>Beatty, Adam S.</creator><creator>Kiger, Thomas B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>The Role of Socioeconomic Status in SAT-Freshman Grade Relationships Across Gender and Racial Subgroups</title><author>Higdem, Jana L. ; Kostal, Jack W. ; Kuncel, Nathan R. ; Sackett, Paul R. ; Shen, Winny ; Beatty, Adam S. ; Kiger, Thomas B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4313-be2b54b82db1c7fd2a7e00df2c596e9bd3f0dd2a7afb42803a963d37f181d9553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>academic performance</topic><topic>Admission Criteria</topic><topic>admissions testing</topic><topic>College Entrance Examinations</topic><topic>College Freshmen</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>ethnicity</topic><topic>Family Income</topic><topic>gender</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Grade Point Average</topic><topic>Grades (Scholastic)</topic><topic>Parent Background</topic><topic>Predictive Validity</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>race</topic><topic>Racial Differences</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Influences</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Status</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Higdem, Jana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kostal, Jack W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuncel, Nathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sackett, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Winny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beatty, Adam S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiger, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational measurement, issues and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Higdem, Jana L.</au><au>Kostal, Jack W.</au><au>Kuncel, Nathan R.</au><au>Sackett, Paul R.</au><au>Shen, Winny</au><au>Beatty, Adam S.</au><au>Kiger, Thomas B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1093281</ericid><atitle>The Role of Socioeconomic Status in SAT-Freshman Grade Relationships Across Gender and Racial Subgroups</atitle><jtitle>Educational measurement, issues and practice</jtitle><addtitle>Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>21-28</pages><issn>0731-1745</issn><eissn>1745-3992</eissn><abstract>Recent research has shown that admissions tests retain the vast majority of their predictive power after controlling for socioeconomic status (SES), and that SES provides only a slight increment over SAT and high school grades (high school grade point average [HSGPA]) in predicting academic performance. To address the possibility that these overall analyses obscure differences by race/ethnicity or gender, we examine the role of SES in the test‒grade relationship for men and women as well as for various racial/ethnic subgroups within the United States. For each subgroup, the test‒grade relationship is only slightly diminished when controlling for SES. Further, SES is a substantially less powerful predictor of academic performance than both SAT and HSGPA. Among the indicators of SES (i.e., father's education, mother's education, and parental income), father's education appears to be strongest predictor of freshman grades across subgroups, with the exception of the Asian subgroup. In general, SES appears to behave similarly across subgroups in the prediction of freshman grades with SAT scores and HSGPA.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/emip.12103</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0731-1745
ispartof Educational measurement, issues and practice, 2016-03, Vol.35 (1), p.21-28
issn 0731-1745
1745-3992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1772838052
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Academic Achievement
academic performance
Admission Criteria
admissions testing
College Entrance Examinations
College Freshmen
Correlation
Ethnic Groups
ethnicity
Family Income
gender
Gender Differences
Grade Point Average
Grades (Scholastic)
Parent Background
Predictive Validity
Predictor Variables
race
Racial Differences
Secondary school students
Socioeconomic factors
Socioeconomic Influences
Socioeconomic Status
title The Role of Socioeconomic Status in SAT-Freshman Grade Relationships Across Gender and Racial Subgroups
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A21%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Socioeconomic%20Status%20in%20SAT-Freshman%20Grade%20Relationships%20Across%20Gender%20and%20Racial%20Subgroups&rft.jtitle=Educational%20measurement,%20issues%20and%20practice&rft.au=Higdem,%20Jana%20L.&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=21-28&rft.issn=0731-1745&rft.eissn=1745-3992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/emip.12103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3983682551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772838052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1093281&rfr_iscdi=true