Literature Review of Research and Practice in Collaborative Assessment
In contrast to traditional approaches, collaborative approaches to psychological assessment either engage the client throughout the assessment or ask for clients' feedback on the assessor's integrated impressions. The findings are thereby tailored to the clients' worlds. Many collabor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Humanistic psychologist 2002, Vol.30 (1-2), p.33-48 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 48 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 33 |
container_title | The Humanistic psychologist |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Riddle, Bethany C Byers, Cindy C Grimesey, Jackie L |
description | In contrast to traditional approaches, collaborative approaches to psychological assessment either engage the client throughout the assessment or ask for clients' feedback on the assessor's integrated impressions. The findings are thereby tailored to the clients' worlds. Many collaborative assessors regard the assessment process as transformative or therapeutic in its own right. In this article, we review early and recent literature advocating similar practices, related validity studies, and forms of providing impressions and feedback to clients. We present a brief excerpt of a report from a collaborative assessment and discuss literature on engaging in collaborative assessment within ongoing therapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08873267.2002.9977021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1770507011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1770507011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a233t-59b655de00d4e1f52dc31f89ade3f5e5bdcce67762696935fbbb24ef3a65a5ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_ghDwauL-6Wazx1KsCgVF9LxMNrM0JU3iblLpt3dD61xmDu-94f0IuWc0Y7SgT7QolOC5yjilPNNaKcrZBZkxuVCpiHNJZpMmnUTX5CaEHaVCKq1mZL2pB_QwjB6TTzzU-Jt0Ll4BwdttAm2VfHiwQ20xqdtk1TUNlF001AdMliFgCHtsh1ty5aAJeHfec_K9fv5avaab95e31XKTAhdiSKUucykrpLRaIHOSV1YwV2ioUDiJsqysxVypnOc610K6siz5Ap2AXIIEK-bk4ZTb--5nxDCYXTf6Nr40LNaWVFHGokqeVNZ3IXh0pvf1HvzRMGomZOYfmZmQmTOy6Hs8-aAH04ejBR-LNxjs6H1sabbj3ogYYbiJWP8AYORu7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770507011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Literature Review of Research and Practice in Collaborative Assessment</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Riddle, Bethany C ; Byers, Cindy C ; Grimesey, Jackie L</creator><creatorcontrib>Riddle, Bethany C ; Byers, Cindy C ; Grimesey, Jackie L</creatorcontrib><description>In contrast to traditional approaches, collaborative approaches to psychological assessment either engage the client throughout the assessment or ask for clients' feedback on the assessor's integrated impressions. The findings are thereby tailored to the clients' worlds. Many collaborative assessors regard the assessment process as transformative or therapeutic in its own right. In this article, we review early and recent literature advocating similar practices, related validity studies, and forms of providing impressions and feedback to clients. We present a brief excerpt of a report from a collaborative assessment and discuss literature on engaging in collaborative assessment within ongoing therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-3267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-3333</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08873267.2002.9977021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence Erlbaum</publisher><subject>Cooperation ; Experimentation ; Human ; Humanistic Psychology ; Psychological Assessment ; Statistical Validity</subject><ispartof>The Humanistic psychologist, 2002, Vol.30 (1-2), p.33-48</ispartof><rights>2002 American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a233t-59b655de00d4e1f52dc31f89ade3f5e5bdcce67762696935fbbb24ef3a65a5ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a233t-59b655de00d4e1f52dc31f89ade3f5e5bdcce67762696935fbbb24ef3a65a5ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riddle, Bethany C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byers, Cindy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimesey, Jackie L</creatorcontrib><title>Literature Review of Research and Practice in Collaborative Assessment</title><title>The Humanistic psychologist</title><description>In contrast to traditional approaches, collaborative approaches to psychological assessment either engage the client throughout the assessment or ask for clients' feedback on the assessor's integrated impressions. The findings are thereby tailored to the clients' worlds. Many collaborative assessors regard the assessment process as transformative or therapeutic in its own right. In this article, we review early and recent literature advocating similar practices, related validity studies, and forms of providing impressions and feedback to clients. We present a brief excerpt of a report from a collaborative assessment and discuss literature on engaging in collaborative assessment within ongoing therapy.</description><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humanistic Psychology</subject><subject>Psychological Assessment</subject><subject>Statistical Validity</subject><issn>0887-3267</issn><issn>1547-3333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_ghDwauL-6Wazx1KsCgVF9LxMNrM0JU3iblLpt3dD61xmDu-94f0IuWc0Y7SgT7QolOC5yjilPNNaKcrZBZkxuVCpiHNJZpMmnUTX5CaEHaVCKq1mZL2pB_QwjB6TTzzU-Jt0Ll4BwdttAm2VfHiwQ20xqdtk1TUNlF001AdMliFgCHtsh1ty5aAJeHfec_K9fv5avaab95e31XKTAhdiSKUucykrpLRaIHOSV1YwV2ioUDiJsqysxVypnOc610K6siz5Ap2AXIIEK-bk4ZTb--5nxDCYXTf6Nr40LNaWVFHGokqeVNZ3IXh0pvf1HvzRMGomZOYfmZmQmTOy6Hs8-aAH04ejBR-LNxjs6H1sabbj3ogYYbiJWP8AYORu7w</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Riddle, Bethany C</creator><creator>Byers, Cindy C</creator><creator>Grimesey, Jackie L</creator><general>Lawrence Erlbaum</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>Literature Review of Research and Practice in Collaborative Assessment</title><author>Riddle, Bethany C ; Byers, Cindy C ; Grimesey, Jackie L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a233t-59b655de00d4e1f52dc31f89ade3f5e5bdcce67762696935fbbb24ef3a65a5ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humanistic Psychology</topic><topic>Psychological Assessment</topic><topic>Statistical Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riddle, Bethany C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byers, Cindy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimesey, Jackie L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>The Humanistic psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riddle, Bethany C</au><au>Byers, Cindy C</au><au>Grimesey, Jackie L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Literature Review of Research and Practice in Collaborative Assessment</atitle><jtitle>The Humanistic psychologist</jtitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>33-48</pages><issn>0887-3267</issn><eissn>1547-3333</eissn><abstract>In contrast to traditional approaches, collaborative approaches to psychological assessment either engage the client throughout the assessment or ask for clients' feedback on the assessor's integrated impressions. The findings are thereby tailored to the clients' worlds. Many collaborative assessors regard the assessment process as transformative or therapeutic in its own right. In this article, we review early and recent literature advocating similar practices, related validity studies, and forms of providing impressions and feedback to clients. We present a brief excerpt of a report from a collaborative assessment and discuss literature on engaging in collaborative assessment within ongoing therapy.</abstract><pub>Lawrence Erlbaum</pub><doi>10.1080/08873267.2002.9977021</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0887-3267 |
ispartof | The Humanistic psychologist, 2002, Vol.30 (1-2), p.33-48 |
issn | 0887-3267 1547-3333 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1770507011 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Cooperation Experimentation Human Humanistic Psychology Psychological Assessment Statistical Validity |
title | Literature Review of Research and Practice in Collaborative Assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A24%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Literature%20Review%20of%20Research%20and%20Practice%20in%20Collaborative%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=The%20Humanistic%20psychologist&rft.au=Riddle,%20Bethany%20C&rft.date=2002&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=33-48&rft.issn=0887-3267&rft.eissn=1547-3333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08873267.2002.9977021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770507011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770507011&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |