Literature Review of Research and Practice in Collaborative Assessment

In contrast to traditional approaches, collaborative approaches to psychological assessment either engage the client throughout the assessment or ask for clients' feedback on the assessor's integrated impressions. The findings are thereby tailored to the clients' worlds. Many collabor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Humanistic psychologist 2002, Vol.30 (1-2), p.33-48
Hauptverfasser: Riddle, Bethany C, Byers, Cindy C, Grimesey, Jackie L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 48
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 33
container_title The Humanistic psychologist
container_volume 30
creator Riddle, Bethany C
Byers, Cindy C
Grimesey, Jackie L
description In contrast to traditional approaches, collaborative approaches to psychological assessment either engage the client throughout the assessment or ask for clients' feedback on the assessor's integrated impressions. The findings are thereby tailored to the clients' worlds. Many collaborative assessors regard the assessment process as transformative or therapeutic in its own right. In this article, we review early and recent literature advocating similar practices, related validity studies, and forms of providing impressions and feedback to clients. We present a brief excerpt of a report from a collaborative assessment and discuss literature on engaging in collaborative assessment within ongoing therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/08873267.2002.9977021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1770507011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1770507011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a233t-59b655de00d4e1f52dc31f89ade3f5e5bdcce67762696935fbbb24ef3a65a5ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_ghDwauL-6Wazx1KsCgVF9LxMNrM0JU3iblLpt3dD61xmDu-94f0IuWc0Y7SgT7QolOC5yjilPNNaKcrZBZkxuVCpiHNJZpMmnUTX5CaEHaVCKq1mZL2pB_QwjB6TTzzU-Jt0Ll4BwdttAm2VfHiwQ20xqdtk1TUNlF001AdMliFgCHtsh1ty5aAJeHfec_K9fv5avaab95e31XKTAhdiSKUucykrpLRaIHOSV1YwV2ioUDiJsqysxVypnOc610K6siz5Ap2AXIIEK-bk4ZTb--5nxDCYXTf6Nr40LNaWVFHGokqeVNZ3IXh0pvf1HvzRMGomZOYfmZmQmTOy6Hs8-aAH04ejBR-LNxjs6H1sabbj3ogYYbiJWP8AYORu7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770507011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Literature Review of Research and Practice in Collaborative Assessment</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Riddle, Bethany C ; Byers, Cindy C ; Grimesey, Jackie L</creator><creatorcontrib>Riddle, Bethany C ; Byers, Cindy C ; Grimesey, Jackie L</creatorcontrib><description>In contrast to traditional approaches, collaborative approaches to psychological assessment either engage the client throughout the assessment or ask for clients' feedback on the assessor's integrated impressions. The findings are thereby tailored to the clients' worlds. Many collaborative assessors regard the assessment process as transformative or therapeutic in its own right. In this article, we review early and recent literature advocating similar practices, related validity studies, and forms of providing impressions and feedback to clients. We present a brief excerpt of a report from a collaborative assessment and discuss literature on engaging in collaborative assessment within ongoing therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-3267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-3333</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08873267.2002.9977021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence Erlbaum</publisher><subject>Cooperation ; Experimentation ; Human ; Humanistic Psychology ; Psychological Assessment ; Statistical Validity</subject><ispartof>The Humanistic psychologist, 2002, Vol.30 (1-2), p.33-48</ispartof><rights>2002 American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a233t-59b655de00d4e1f52dc31f89ade3f5e5bdcce67762696935fbbb24ef3a65a5ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a233t-59b655de00d4e1f52dc31f89ade3f5e5bdcce67762696935fbbb24ef3a65a5ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riddle, Bethany C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byers, Cindy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimesey, Jackie L</creatorcontrib><title>Literature Review of Research and Practice in Collaborative Assessment</title><title>The Humanistic psychologist</title><description>In contrast to traditional approaches, collaborative approaches to psychological assessment either engage the client throughout the assessment or ask for clients' feedback on the assessor's integrated impressions. The findings are thereby tailored to the clients' worlds. Many collaborative assessors regard the assessment process as transformative or therapeutic in its own right. In this article, we review early and recent literature advocating similar practices, related validity studies, and forms of providing impressions and feedback to clients. We present a brief excerpt of a report from a collaborative assessment and discuss literature on engaging in collaborative assessment within ongoing therapy.</description><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humanistic Psychology</subject><subject>Psychological Assessment</subject><subject>Statistical Validity</subject><issn>0887-3267</issn><issn>1547-3333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_ghDwauL-6Wazx1KsCgVF9LxMNrM0JU3iblLpt3dD61xmDu-94f0IuWc0Y7SgT7QolOC5yjilPNNaKcrZBZkxuVCpiHNJZpMmnUTX5CaEHaVCKq1mZL2pB_QwjB6TTzzU-Jt0Ll4BwdttAm2VfHiwQ20xqdtk1TUNlF001AdMliFgCHtsh1ty5aAJeHfec_K9fv5avaab95e31XKTAhdiSKUucykrpLRaIHOSV1YwV2ioUDiJsqysxVypnOc610K6siz5Ap2AXIIEK-bk4ZTb--5nxDCYXTf6Nr40LNaWVFHGokqeVNZ3IXh0pvf1HvzRMGomZOYfmZmQmTOy6Hs8-aAH04ejBR-LNxjs6H1sabbj3ogYYbiJWP8AYORu7w</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Riddle, Bethany C</creator><creator>Byers, Cindy C</creator><creator>Grimesey, Jackie L</creator><general>Lawrence Erlbaum</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>Literature Review of Research and Practice in Collaborative Assessment</title><author>Riddle, Bethany C ; Byers, Cindy C ; Grimesey, Jackie L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a233t-59b655de00d4e1f52dc31f89ade3f5e5bdcce67762696935fbbb24ef3a65a5ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humanistic Psychology</topic><topic>Psychological Assessment</topic><topic>Statistical Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riddle, Bethany C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byers, Cindy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimesey, Jackie L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>The Humanistic psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riddle, Bethany C</au><au>Byers, Cindy C</au><au>Grimesey, Jackie L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Literature Review of Research and Practice in Collaborative Assessment</atitle><jtitle>The Humanistic psychologist</jtitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>33-48</pages><issn>0887-3267</issn><eissn>1547-3333</eissn><abstract>In contrast to traditional approaches, collaborative approaches to psychological assessment either engage the client throughout the assessment or ask for clients' feedback on the assessor's integrated impressions. The findings are thereby tailored to the clients' worlds. Many collaborative assessors regard the assessment process as transformative or therapeutic in its own right. In this article, we review early and recent literature advocating similar practices, related validity studies, and forms of providing impressions and feedback to clients. We present a brief excerpt of a report from a collaborative assessment and discuss literature on engaging in collaborative assessment within ongoing therapy.</abstract><pub>Lawrence Erlbaum</pub><doi>10.1080/08873267.2002.9977021</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-3267
ispartof The Humanistic psychologist, 2002, Vol.30 (1-2), p.33-48
issn 0887-3267
1547-3333
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1770507011
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Cooperation
Experimentation
Human
Humanistic Psychology
Psychological Assessment
Statistical Validity
title Literature Review of Research and Practice in Collaborative Assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A24%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Literature%20Review%20of%20Research%20and%20Practice%20in%20Collaborative%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=The%20Humanistic%20psychologist&rft.au=Riddle,%20Bethany%20C&rft.date=2002&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=33-48&rft.issn=0887-3267&rft.eissn=1547-3333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08873267.2002.9977021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770507011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770507011&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true