Does Parent–Child Interaction Therapy Reduce Future Physical Abuse? A Meta-Analysis
Objective: To use meta-analytic techniques to evaluating the effectiveness of parent–child interaction therapy (PCIT) at reducing future physical abuse among physically abusive families. Methods: A systematic search identified six eligible studies. Outcomes of interest were physical abuse recurrence...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research on social work practice 2016-03, Vol.26 (2), p.147-156 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 156 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 147 |
container_title | Research on social work practice |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Kennedy, Stephanie C. Kim, Johnny S. Tripodi, Stephen J. Brown, Samantha M. Gowdy, Grace |
description | Objective:
To use meta-analytic techniques to evaluating the effectiveness of parent–child interaction therapy (PCIT) at reducing future physical abuse among physically abusive families.
Methods:
A systematic search identified six eligible studies. Outcomes of interest were physical abuse recurrence, child abuse potential, and parenting stress.
Results:
Parents receiving PCIT had significantly fewer physical abuse recurrences and significantly greater reductions on the Parenting Stress Index than parents in comparison groups. Reductions in child abuse potential were nonsignificant, although 95% confidence intervals suggest clinically meaningful treatment effects. The studies examining physical abuse recurrence had a medium treatment effect (g = 0.52), while results from pooled effect size estimates for child abuse potential (g = 0.31) and parenting stress (g = 0.35) were small.
Conclusions:
PCIT appears to be effective at reducing physical abuse recurrence and parenting stress for physically abusive families, with the largest treatment effects seen on long-term physical abuse recurrence. Applications to social work practice are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1049731514543024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1768185802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1089995</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1049731514543024</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3964309351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-91df096f28f1db009b2e0f957d094c5fac0973a1237d26df5aa6923f8acdedfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFbvXoQFz9Gd3WySPUmorVYqFmnPYbt_bEpM6m5y6M138A19ErdERARPM_D75puZD6FzIFcAaXoNJBYpAw4xjxmh8QEaAOc0SnkGh6EPONrzY3Ti_YYQYDQRA7S8bYzHc-lM3X6-f4zWZaXxtG6Nk6otmxov1qHd7vCz0Z0yeNK1nTN4vt75UskK56vOmxuc40fTyiivZRWAP0VHVlbenH3XIVpOxovRfTR7upuO8lmkGIM2EqAtEYmlmQW9IkSsqCFW8FQTEStupSLhJwmUpZom2nIpE0GZzaTSRlvFhuiy99265q0zvi02TefCEb6ANMkg4xmhQUV6lXKN987YYuvKV-l2BZBiH17xN7wwctGPGFeqH_n4AUgmhOCBRz338sX8Wvqf3xcuhHg-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768185802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Parent–Child Interaction Therapy Reduce Future Physical Abuse? A Meta-Analysis</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Kennedy, Stephanie C. ; Kim, Johnny S. ; Tripodi, Stephen J. ; Brown, Samantha M. ; Gowdy, Grace</creator><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Stephanie C. ; Kim, Johnny S. ; Tripodi, Stephen J. ; Brown, Samantha M. ; Gowdy, Grace</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:
To use meta-analytic techniques to evaluating the effectiveness of parent–child interaction therapy (PCIT) at reducing future physical abuse among physically abusive families.
Methods:
A systematic search identified six eligible studies. Outcomes of interest were physical abuse recurrence, child abuse potential, and parenting stress.
Results:
Parents receiving PCIT had significantly fewer physical abuse recurrences and significantly greater reductions on the Parenting Stress Index than parents in comparison groups. Reductions in child abuse potential were nonsignificant, although 95% confidence intervals suggest clinically meaningful treatment effects. The studies examining physical abuse recurrence had a medium treatment effect (g = 0.52), while results from pooled effect size estimates for child abuse potential (g = 0.31) and parenting stress (g = 0.35) were small.
Conclusions:
PCIT appears to be effective at reducing physical abuse recurrence and parenting stress for physically abusive families, with the largest treatment effects seen on long-term physical abuse recurrence. Applications to social work practice are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049731514543024</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSWPEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Behavior modification ; Child Abuse ; Child abuse & neglect ; Child Abuse Potential Inventory ; Child Welfare ; Classification ; Counseling Techniques ; Effect Size ; Family Violence ; Intervention ; Literature Reviews ; Meta Analysis ; Outcomes of Treatment ; Parent Child Relationship ; Parent-child relations ; Parenting Stress Index ; Social interaction ; Social Work ; Statistical Analysis ; Stress Variables ; Systematic review ; Therapy</subject><ispartof>Research on social work practice, 2016-03, Vol.26 (2), p.147-156</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Mar 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-91df096f28f1db009b2e0f957d094c5fac0973a1237d26df5aa6923f8acdedfc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-91df096f28f1db009b2e0f957d094c5fac0973a1237d26df5aa6923f8acdedfc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049731514543024$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049731514543024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,21828,27933,27934,31008,33783,43630,43631</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1089995$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Johnny S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripodi, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Samantha M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gowdy, Grace</creatorcontrib><title>Does Parent–Child Interaction Therapy Reduce Future Physical Abuse? A Meta-Analysis</title><title>Research on social work practice</title><description>Objective:
To use meta-analytic techniques to evaluating the effectiveness of parent–child interaction therapy (PCIT) at reducing future physical abuse among physically abusive families.
Methods:
A systematic search identified six eligible studies. Outcomes of interest were physical abuse recurrence, child abuse potential, and parenting stress.
Results:
Parents receiving PCIT had significantly fewer physical abuse recurrences and significantly greater reductions on the Parenting Stress Index than parents in comparison groups. Reductions in child abuse potential were nonsignificant, although 95% confidence intervals suggest clinically meaningful treatment effects. The studies examining physical abuse recurrence had a medium treatment effect (g = 0.52), while results from pooled effect size estimates for child abuse potential (g = 0.31) and parenting stress (g = 0.35) were small.
Conclusions:
PCIT appears to be effective at reducing physical abuse recurrence and parenting stress for physically abusive families, with the largest treatment effects seen on long-term physical abuse recurrence. Applications to social work practice are discussed.</description><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Child abuse & neglect</subject><subject>Child Abuse Potential Inventory</subject><subject>Child Welfare</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Counseling Techniques</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Family Violence</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Outcomes of Treatment</subject><subject>Parent Child Relationship</subject><subject>Parent-child relations</subject><subject>Parenting Stress Index</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Work</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Stress Variables</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><issn>1049-7315</issn><issn>1552-7581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFbvXoQFz9Gd3WySPUmorVYqFmnPYbt_bEpM6m5y6M138A19ErdERARPM_D75puZD6FzIFcAaXoNJBYpAw4xjxmh8QEaAOc0SnkGh6EPONrzY3Ti_YYQYDQRA7S8bYzHc-lM3X6-f4zWZaXxtG6Nk6otmxov1qHd7vCz0Z0yeNK1nTN4vt75UskK56vOmxuc40fTyiivZRWAP0VHVlbenH3XIVpOxovRfTR7upuO8lmkGIM2EqAtEYmlmQW9IkSsqCFW8FQTEStupSLhJwmUpZom2nIpE0GZzaTSRlvFhuiy99265q0zvi02TefCEb6ANMkg4xmhQUV6lXKN987YYuvKV-l2BZBiH17xN7wwctGPGFeqH_n4AUgmhOCBRz338sX8Wvqf3xcuhHg-</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Kennedy, Stephanie C.</creator><creator>Kim, Johnny S.</creator><creator>Tripodi, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Brown, Samantha M.</creator><creator>Gowdy, Grace</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Does Parent–Child Interaction Therapy Reduce Future Physical Abuse? A Meta-Analysis</title><author>Kennedy, Stephanie C. ; Kim, Johnny S. ; Tripodi, Stephen J. ; Brown, Samantha M. ; Gowdy, Grace</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-91df096f28f1db009b2e0f957d094c5fac0973a1237d26df5aa6923f8acdedfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Child abuse & neglect</topic><topic>Child Abuse Potential Inventory</topic><topic>Child Welfare</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Counseling Techniques</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Family Violence</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Outcomes of Treatment</topic><topic>Parent Child Relationship</topic><topic>Parent-child relations</topic><topic>Parenting Stress Index</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Work</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Stress Variables</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Johnny S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripodi, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Samantha M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gowdy, Grace</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kennedy, Stephanie C.</au><au>Kim, Johnny S.</au><au>Tripodi, Stephen J.</au><au>Brown, Samantha M.</au><au>Gowdy, Grace</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1089995</ericid><atitle>Does Parent–Child Interaction Therapy Reduce Future Physical Abuse? A Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>147-156</pages><issn>1049-7315</issn><eissn>1552-7581</eissn><coden>RSWPEW</coden><abstract>Objective:
To use meta-analytic techniques to evaluating the effectiveness of parent–child interaction therapy (PCIT) at reducing future physical abuse among physically abusive families.
Methods:
A systematic search identified six eligible studies. Outcomes of interest were physical abuse recurrence, child abuse potential, and parenting stress.
Results:
Parents receiving PCIT had significantly fewer physical abuse recurrences and significantly greater reductions on the Parenting Stress Index than parents in comparison groups. Reductions in child abuse potential were nonsignificant, although 95% confidence intervals suggest clinically meaningful treatment effects. The studies examining physical abuse recurrence had a medium treatment effect (g = 0.52), while results from pooled effect size estimates for child abuse potential (g = 0.31) and parenting stress (g = 0.35) were small.
Conclusions:
PCIT appears to be effective at reducing physical abuse recurrence and parenting stress for physically abusive families, with the largest treatment effects seen on long-term physical abuse recurrence. Applications to social work practice are discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1049731514543024</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-7315 |
ispartof | Research on social work practice, 2016-03, Vol.26 (2), p.147-156 |
issn | 1049-7315 1552-7581 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1768185802 |
source | Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Behavior modification Child Abuse Child abuse & neglect Child Abuse Potential Inventory Child Welfare Classification Counseling Techniques Effect Size Family Violence Intervention Literature Reviews Meta Analysis Outcomes of Treatment Parent Child Relationship Parent-child relations Parenting Stress Index Social interaction Social Work Statistical Analysis Stress Variables Systematic review Therapy |
title | Does Parent–Child Interaction Therapy Reduce Future Physical Abuse? A Meta-Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T06%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Parent%E2%80%93Child%20Interaction%20Therapy%20Reduce%20Future%20Physical%20Abuse?%20A%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Research%20on%20social%20work%20practice&rft.au=Kennedy,%20Stephanie%20C.&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=147-156&rft.issn=1049-7315&rft.eissn=1552-7581&rft.coden=RSWPEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049731514543024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3964309351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768185802&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1089995&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049731514543024&rfr_iscdi=true |