Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review
Idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) research focuses on the emergence of customized work arrangements employees negotiate with their employers. This article provides a critical review and synthesis of i-deals research, combining a qualitative review of i-deals theory and research with a supplementary meta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of organizational behavior 2016-02, Vol.37 (S1), p.S9-S29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S29 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | S9 |
container_title | Journal of organizational behavior |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Liao, Chenwei Wayne, Sandy J. Rousseau, Denise M. |
description | Idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) research focuses on the emergence of customized work arrangements employees negotiate with their employers. This article provides a critical review and synthesis of i-deals research, combining a qualitative review of i-deals theory and research with a supplementary meta-analysis of 23 empirical studies (k = 27 samples, N = 8110 individuals). The qualitative review examines the conceptualization and measurement of i-deals and identifies patterns and gaps in i-deals research, while the quantitative meta-analysis tests the moderating effect of societal cultures on the predictors and consequences of ideals investigated to date. In each section, attention is given to strengths and weaknesses of current approaches to i-deals theory and research. Future research directions are identified with particular emphasis on the largely unexamined role of i-deals from a multilevel perspective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/job.1959 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1765367341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26610513</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26610513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4849-e85867b70a7121af9b17731456e1bec71564f74a1d7cff67e81e845edf055f583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLxDAQB_AgCq4P8AsIAS9eqpltHo03XXwiKj7w4CGk7VSydps16arrpzeyoidPmTC__JkMIVvA9oCx4f7Yl3ughV4iA2BaZ5ArvUwGrNA8S6VcJWsxjhljgms5IE_ntfNx3lXB9q6iNdo2UtfRync9TqY-2DCnPjzbzn0m4bt4QA_p68y2rk_3N6S2q-kEe5vZzrbzFGJbGvDN4fsGWWlSHG7-nOvk4eT4fnSWXV6fno8OL7OKF1xnWIhCqlIxq2AIttElKJUDFxKhxEqBkLxR3EKtqqaRCgvAggusGyZEI4p8newscqfBv84w9mbsZyFNEw0oKXKpcg5J7S5UFXyMARszDW6SvmeAme_VpVel-V5dotmCvrsW5_86c3F99OO3F34cex9-_VBKYALyvzwXe_z47dvwYtJsSpjHq1Ojbu_ghN_fmJv8CyS0iPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765367341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Liao, Chenwei ; Wayne, Sandy J. ; Rousseau, Denise M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liao, Chenwei ; Wayne, Sandy J. ; Rousseau, Denise M.</creatorcontrib><description>Idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) research focuses on the emergence of customized work arrangements employees negotiate with their employers. This article provides a critical review and synthesis of i-deals research, combining a qualitative review of i-deals theory and research with a supplementary meta-analysis of 23 empirical studies (k = 27 samples, N = 8110 individuals). The qualitative review examines the conceptualization and measurement of i-deals and identifies patterns and gaps in i-deals research, while the quantitative meta-analysis tests the moderating effect of societal cultures on the predictors and consequences of ideals investigated to date. In each section, attention is given to strengths and weaknesses of current approaches to i-deals theory and research. Future research directions are identified with particular emphasis on the largely unexamined role of i-deals from a multilevel perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-3796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/job.1959</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JORBEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>idiosyncratic deals ; Measurement ; Meta-analysis ; multilevel ; Organizational behavior ; qualitative review ; Systematic review ; work arrangements ; Work environment</subject><ispartof>Journal of organizational behavior, 2016-02, Vol.37 (S1), p.S9-S29</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4849-e85867b70a7121af9b17731456e1bec71564f74a1d7cff67e81e845edf055f583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4849-e85867b70a7121af9b17731456e1bec71564f74a1d7cff67e81e845edf055f583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26610513$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26610513$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liao, Chenwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayne, Sandy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rousseau, Denise M.</creatorcontrib><title>Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review</title><title>Journal of organizational behavior</title><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><description>Idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) research focuses on the emergence of customized work arrangements employees negotiate with their employers. This article provides a critical review and synthesis of i-deals research, combining a qualitative review of i-deals theory and research with a supplementary meta-analysis of 23 empirical studies (k = 27 samples, N = 8110 individuals). The qualitative review examines the conceptualization and measurement of i-deals and identifies patterns and gaps in i-deals research, while the quantitative meta-analysis tests the moderating effect of societal cultures on the predictors and consequences of ideals investigated to date. In each section, attention is given to strengths and weaknesses of current approaches to i-deals theory and research. Future research directions are identified with particular emphasis on the largely unexamined role of i-deals from a multilevel perspective.</description><subject>idiosyncratic deals</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>multilevel</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>qualitative review</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>work arrangements</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><issn>0894-3796</issn><issn>1099-1379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtLxDAQB_AgCq4P8AsIAS9eqpltHo03XXwiKj7w4CGk7VSydps16arrpzeyoidPmTC__JkMIVvA9oCx4f7Yl3ughV4iA2BaZ5ArvUwGrNA8S6VcJWsxjhljgms5IE_ntfNx3lXB9q6iNdo2UtfRync9TqY-2DCnPjzbzn0m4bt4QA_p68y2rk_3N6S2q-kEe5vZzrbzFGJbGvDN4fsGWWlSHG7-nOvk4eT4fnSWXV6fno8OL7OKF1xnWIhCqlIxq2AIttElKJUDFxKhxEqBkLxR3EKtqqaRCgvAggusGyZEI4p8newscqfBv84w9mbsZyFNEw0oKXKpcg5J7S5UFXyMARszDW6SvmeAme_VpVel-V5dotmCvrsW5_86c3F99OO3F34cex9-_VBKYALyvzwXe_z47dvwYtJsSpjHq1Ojbu_ghN_fmJv8CyS0iPg</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Liao, Chenwei</creator><creator>Wayne, Sandy J.</creator><creator>Rousseau, Denise M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley (Variant)</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review</title><author>Liao, Chenwei ; Wayne, Sandy J. ; Rousseau, Denise M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4849-e85867b70a7121af9b17731456e1bec71564f74a1d7cff67e81e845edf055f583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>idiosyncratic deals</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>multilevel</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>qualitative review</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>work arrangements</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liao, Chenwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayne, Sandy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rousseau, Denise M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liao, Chenwei</au><au>Wayne, Sandy J.</au><au>Rousseau, Denise M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S9</spage><epage>S29</epage><pages>S9-S29</pages><issn>0894-3796</issn><eissn>1099-1379</eissn><coden>JORBEJ</coden><abstract>Idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) research focuses on the emergence of customized work arrangements employees negotiate with their employers. This article provides a critical review and synthesis of i-deals research, combining a qualitative review of i-deals theory and research with a supplementary meta-analysis of 23 empirical studies (k = 27 samples, N = 8110 individuals). The qualitative review examines the conceptualization and measurement of i-deals and identifies patterns and gaps in i-deals research, while the quantitative meta-analysis tests the moderating effect of societal cultures on the predictors and consequences of ideals investigated to date. In each section, attention is given to strengths and weaknesses of current approaches to i-deals theory and research. Future research directions are identified with particular emphasis on the largely unexamined role of i-deals from a multilevel perspective.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/job.1959</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-3796 |
ispartof | Journal of organizational behavior, 2016-02, Vol.37 (S1), p.S9-S29 |
issn | 0894-3796 1099-1379 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1765367341 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library; Business Source Complete |
subjects | idiosyncratic deals Measurement Meta-analysis multilevel Organizational behavior qualitative review Systematic review work arrangements Work environment |
title | Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T17%3A41%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Idiosyncratic%20deals%20in%20contemporary%20organizations:%20A%20qualitative%20and%20meta-analytical%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20behavior&rft.au=Liao,%20Chenwei&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S9&rft.epage=S29&rft.pages=S9-S29&rft.issn=0894-3796&rft.eissn=1099-1379&rft.coden=JORBEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/job.1959&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26610513%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765367341&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26610513&rfr_iscdi=true |