Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review

Idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) research focuses on the emergence of customized work arrangements employees negotiate with their employers. This article provides a critical review and synthesis of i-deals research, combining a qualitative review of i-deals theory and research with a supplementary meta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of organizational behavior 2016-02, Vol.37 (S1), p.S9-S29
Hauptverfasser: Liao, Chenwei, Wayne, Sandy J., Rousseau, Denise M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S29
container_issue S1
container_start_page S9
container_title Journal of organizational behavior
container_volume 37
creator Liao, Chenwei
Wayne, Sandy J.
Rousseau, Denise M.
description Idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) research focuses on the emergence of customized work arrangements employees negotiate with their employers. This article provides a critical review and synthesis of i-deals research, combining a qualitative review of i-deals theory and research with a supplementary meta-analysis of 23 empirical studies (k = 27 samples, N = 8110 individuals). The qualitative review examines the conceptualization and measurement of i-deals and identifies patterns and gaps in i-deals research, while the quantitative meta-analysis tests the moderating effect of societal cultures on the predictors and consequences of ideals investigated to date. In each section, attention is given to strengths and weaknesses of current approaches to i-deals theory and research. Future research directions are identified with particular emphasis on the largely unexamined role of i-deals from a multilevel perspective.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/job.1959
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1765367341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26610513</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26610513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4849-e85867b70a7121af9b17731456e1bec71564f74a1d7cff67e81e845edf055f583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLxDAQB_AgCq4P8AsIAS9eqpltHo03XXwiKj7w4CGk7VSydps16arrpzeyoidPmTC__JkMIVvA9oCx4f7Yl3ughV4iA2BaZ5ArvUwGrNA8S6VcJWsxjhljgms5IE_ntfNx3lXB9q6iNdo2UtfRync9TqY-2DCnPjzbzn0m4bt4QA_p68y2rk_3N6S2q-kEe5vZzrbzFGJbGvDN4fsGWWlSHG7-nOvk4eT4fnSWXV6fno8OL7OKF1xnWIhCqlIxq2AIttElKJUDFxKhxEqBkLxR3EKtqqaRCgvAggusGyZEI4p8newscqfBv84w9mbsZyFNEw0oKXKpcg5J7S5UFXyMARszDW6SvmeAme_VpVel-V5dotmCvrsW5_86c3F99OO3F34cex9-_VBKYALyvzwXe_z47dvwYtJsSpjHq1Ojbu_ghN_fmJv8CyS0iPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765367341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Liao, Chenwei ; Wayne, Sandy J. ; Rousseau, Denise M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liao, Chenwei ; Wayne, Sandy J. ; Rousseau, Denise M.</creatorcontrib><description>Idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) research focuses on the emergence of customized work arrangements employees negotiate with their employers. This article provides a critical review and synthesis of i-deals research, combining a qualitative review of i-deals theory and research with a supplementary meta-analysis of 23 empirical studies (k = 27 samples, N = 8110 individuals). The qualitative review examines the conceptualization and measurement of i-deals and identifies patterns and gaps in i-deals research, while the quantitative meta-analysis tests the moderating effect of societal cultures on the predictors and consequences of ideals investigated to date. In each section, attention is given to strengths and weaknesses of current approaches to i-deals theory and research. Future research directions are identified with particular emphasis on the largely unexamined role of i-deals from a multilevel perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-3796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/job.1959</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JORBEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>idiosyncratic deals ; Measurement ; Meta-analysis ; multilevel ; Organizational behavior ; qualitative review ; Systematic review ; work arrangements ; Work environment</subject><ispartof>Journal of organizational behavior, 2016-02, Vol.37 (S1), p.S9-S29</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4849-e85867b70a7121af9b17731456e1bec71564f74a1d7cff67e81e845edf055f583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4849-e85867b70a7121af9b17731456e1bec71564f74a1d7cff67e81e845edf055f583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26610513$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26610513$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liao, Chenwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayne, Sandy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rousseau, Denise M.</creatorcontrib><title>Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review</title><title>Journal of organizational behavior</title><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><description>Idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) research focuses on the emergence of customized work arrangements employees negotiate with their employers. This article provides a critical review and synthesis of i-deals research, combining a qualitative review of i-deals theory and research with a supplementary meta-analysis of 23 empirical studies (k = 27 samples, N = 8110 individuals). The qualitative review examines the conceptualization and measurement of i-deals and identifies patterns and gaps in i-deals research, while the quantitative meta-analysis tests the moderating effect of societal cultures on the predictors and consequences of ideals investigated to date. In each section, attention is given to strengths and weaknesses of current approaches to i-deals theory and research. Future research directions are identified with particular emphasis on the largely unexamined role of i-deals from a multilevel perspective.</description><subject>idiosyncratic deals</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>multilevel</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>qualitative review</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>work arrangements</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><issn>0894-3796</issn><issn>1099-1379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtLxDAQB_AgCq4P8AsIAS9eqpltHo03XXwiKj7w4CGk7VSydps16arrpzeyoidPmTC__JkMIVvA9oCx4f7Yl3ughV4iA2BaZ5ArvUwGrNA8S6VcJWsxjhljgms5IE_ntfNx3lXB9q6iNdo2UtfRync9TqY-2DCnPjzbzn0m4bt4QA_p68y2rk_3N6S2q-kEe5vZzrbzFGJbGvDN4fsGWWlSHG7-nOvk4eT4fnSWXV6fno8OL7OKF1xnWIhCqlIxq2AIttElKJUDFxKhxEqBkLxR3EKtqqaRCgvAggusGyZEI4p8newscqfBv84w9mbsZyFNEw0oKXKpcg5J7S5UFXyMARszDW6SvmeAme_VpVel-V5dotmCvrsW5_86c3F99OO3F34cex9-_VBKYALyvzwXe_z47dvwYtJsSpjHq1Ojbu_ghN_fmJv8CyS0iPg</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Liao, Chenwei</creator><creator>Wayne, Sandy J.</creator><creator>Rousseau, Denise M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley (Variant)</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review</title><author>Liao, Chenwei ; Wayne, Sandy J. ; Rousseau, Denise M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4849-e85867b70a7121af9b17731456e1bec71564f74a1d7cff67e81e845edf055f583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>idiosyncratic deals</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>multilevel</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>qualitative review</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>work arrangements</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liao, Chenwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayne, Sandy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rousseau, Denise M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liao, Chenwei</au><au>Wayne, Sandy J.</au><au>Rousseau, Denise M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S9</spage><epage>S29</epage><pages>S9-S29</pages><issn>0894-3796</issn><eissn>1099-1379</eissn><coden>JORBEJ</coden><abstract>Idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) research focuses on the emergence of customized work arrangements employees negotiate with their employers. This article provides a critical review and synthesis of i-deals research, combining a qualitative review of i-deals theory and research with a supplementary meta-analysis of 23 empirical studies (k = 27 samples, N = 8110 individuals). The qualitative review examines the conceptualization and measurement of i-deals and identifies patterns and gaps in i-deals research, while the quantitative meta-analysis tests the moderating effect of societal cultures on the predictors and consequences of ideals investigated to date. In each section, attention is given to strengths and weaknesses of current approaches to i-deals theory and research. Future research directions are identified with particular emphasis on the largely unexamined role of i-deals from a multilevel perspective.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/job.1959</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-3796
ispartof Journal of organizational behavior, 2016-02, Vol.37 (S1), p.S9-S29
issn 0894-3796
1099-1379
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1765367341
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library; Business Source Complete
subjects idiosyncratic deals
Measurement
Meta-analysis
multilevel
Organizational behavior
qualitative review
Systematic review
work arrangements
Work environment
title Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta-analytical review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T17%3A41%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Idiosyncratic%20deals%20in%20contemporary%20organizations:%20A%20qualitative%20and%20meta-analytical%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20behavior&rft.au=Liao,%20Chenwei&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S9&rft.epage=S29&rft.pages=S9-S29&rft.issn=0894-3796&rft.eissn=1099-1379&rft.coden=JORBEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/job.1959&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26610513%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765367341&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26610513&rfr_iscdi=true