Religious harassment in the workplace: An examination of observer intervention
Religious harassment claims in the United States have risen sharply over the past decade. However, victims of religious harassment may not always report harassment, and true rates may be higher. Hence, actions taken by third parties present (observers) are important in combating harassment in the wo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of organizational behavior 2016-02, Vol.37 (2), p.279-306 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 306 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Journal of organizational behavior |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Ghumman, Sonia Ryan, Ann Marie Park, Jin Suk |
description | Religious harassment claims in the United States have risen sharply over the past decade. However, victims of religious harassment may not always report harassment, and true rates may be higher. Hence, actions taken by third parties present (observers) are important in combating harassment in the workplace. The purpose of this paper is to extend a previous model of observer intervention and related research by testing it empirically in the context of religious harassment and identify factors that influence observers’ decision to intervene (intervention), when they intervene (level of immediacy), and how much they intervene (level of involvement). Across two studies, we find evidence that verbal harassment, ambiguity of intent, relationship to target/harasser, recurrence belief, religious commitment, pro-social orientation, and the interactive effect of shared religion and religious commitment predict intervention. Furthermore, individuals show higher levels of involvement and immediacy in intervention when costs are low and emotional reactions are high. Implications of these findings for engaging observers in combatting harassment are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/job.2044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1765366958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26610528</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26610528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-b545b403b8e2bd6db089907a585284c2779a7e0c5c866947e3381e7349544bd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtPAjEQAODGaCKiiX_AZBMvXhbb7WvrDYmiBMH4iImXpl2K7LJssV0E_r0lEDx56iTzzXRmADhHsIUgTK4Lq1sJJOQANBAUIkaYi0PQgKkgcQjZMTjxvoAQUiJYAwxeTJl_5Xbho4lyyvuZqeoor6J6YqKlddN5qTJzE7WryKzULK9UndsqsuPIam_cj3EB15ug2iROwdFYld6c7d4meL-_e-s8xP1h97HT7scZTgmJNSVUE4h1ahI9YiMdxhOQK5rSJCVZwrlQ3MCMZiljgnCDcYoMx0RQQvQI4Sa43PadO_u9ML6WhV24KnwpEWcUhyqaBnW1VZmz3jszlnOXz5RbSwTl5lqhSsvNtQKNt3SZl2b9r5O94e3OX2x94Wvr9j5hDMGww1-_3Ndmtc8rN5WMY07lx6Aru6-3-PO59yQx_gXUMIL3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765366958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Religious harassment in the workplace: An examination of observer intervention</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Ghumman, Sonia ; Ryan, Ann Marie ; Park, Jin Suk</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghumman, Sonia ; Ryan, Ann Marie ; Park, Jin Suk</creatorcontrib><description>Religious harassment claims in the United States have risen sharply over the past decade. However, victims of religious harassment may not always report harassment, and true rates may be higher. Hence, actions taken by third parties present (observers) are important in combating harassment in the workplace. The purpose of this paper is to extend a previous model of observer intervention and related research by testing it empirically in the context of religious harassment and identify factors that influence observers’ decision to intervene (intervention), when they intervene (level of immediacy), and how much they intervene (level of involvement). Across two studies, we find evidence that verbal harassment, ambiguity of intent, relationship to target/harasser, recurrence belief, religious commitment, pro-social orientation, and the interactive effect of shared religion and religious commitment predict intervention. Furthermore, individuals show higher levels of involvement and immediacy in intervention when costs are low and emotional reactions are high. Implications of these findings for engaging observers in combatting harassment are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-3796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/job.2044</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JORBEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Emotional responses ; Harassment ; Intervention ; observer intervention ; Organizational behavior ; Recurrence ; Religion ; Religious beliefs ; Religious commitment ; religious discrimination ; Religious persecution ; Research Article ; Social orientation ; Third parties ; Victims ; Work environment ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of organizational behavior, 2016-02, Vol.37 (2), p.279-306</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-b545b403b8e2bd6db089907a585284c2779a7e0c5c866947e3381e7349544bd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-b545b403b8e2bd6db089907a585284c2779a7e0c5c866947e3381e7349544bd13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26610528$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26610528$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghumman, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Ann Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jin Suk</creatorcontrib><title>Religious harassment in the workplace: An examination of observer intervention</title><title>Journal of organizational behavior</title><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><description>Religious harassment claims in the United States have risen sharply over the past decade. However, victims of religious harassment may not always report harassment, and true rates may be higher. Hence, actions taken by third parties present (observers) are important in combating harassment in the workplace. The purpose of this paper is to extend a previous model of observer intervention and related research by testing it empirically in the context of religious harassment and identify factors that influence observers’ decision to intervene (intervention), when they intervene (level of immediacy), and how much they intervene (level of involvement). Across two studies, we find evidence that verbal harassment, ambiguity of intent, relationship to target/harasser, recurrence belief, religious commitment, pro-social orientation, and the interactive effect of shared religion and religious commitment predict intervention. Furthermore, individuals show higher levels of involvement and immediacy in intervention when costs are low and emotional reactions are high. Implications of these findings for engaging observers in combatting harassment are discussed.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Emotional responses</subject><subject>Harassment</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>observer intervention</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious beliefs</subject><subject>Religious commitment</subject><subject>religious discrimination</subject><subject>Religious persecution</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Social orientation</subject><subject>Third parties</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0894-3796</issn><issn>1099-1379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtPAjEQAODGaCKiiX_AZBMvXhbb7WvrDYmiBMH4iImXpl2K7LJssV0E_r0lEDx56iTzzXRmADhHsIUgTK4Lq1sJJOQANBAUIkaYi0PQgKkgcQjZMTjxvoAQUiJYAwxeTJl_5Xbho4lyyvuZqeoor6J6YqKlddN5qTJzE7WryKzULK9UndsqsuPIam_cj3EB15ug2iROwdFYld6c7d4meL-_e-s8xP1h97HT7scZTgmJNSVUE4h1ahI9YiMdxhOQK5rSJCVZwrlQ3MCMZiljgnCDcYoMx0RQQvQI4Sa43PadO_u9ML6WhV24KnwpEWcUhyqaBnW1VZmz3jszlnOXz5RbSwTl5lqhSsvNtQKNt3SZl2b9r5O94e3OX2x94Wvr9j5hDMGww1-_3Ndmtc8rN5WMY07lx6Aru6-3-PO59yQx_gXUMIL3</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Ghumman, Sonia</creator><creator>Ryan, Ann Marie</creator><creator>Park, Jin Suk</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley (Variant)</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Religious harassment in the workplace: An examination of observer intervention</title><author>Ghumman, Sonia ; Ryan, Ann Marie ; Park, Jin Suk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-b545b403b8e2bd6db089907a585284c2779a7e0c5c866947e3381e7349544bd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Emotional responses</topic><topic>Harassment</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>observer intervention</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious beliefs</topic><topic>Religious commitment</topic><topic>religious discrimination</topic><topic>Religious persecution</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Social orientation</topic><topic>Third parties</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghumman, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Ann Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jin Suk</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghumman, Sonia</au><au>Ryan, Ann Marie</au><au>Park, Jin Suk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Religious harassment in the workplace: An examination of observer intervention</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>279-306</pages><issn>0894-3796</issn><eissn>1099-1379</eissn><coden>JORBEJ</coden><abstract>Religious harassment claims in the United States have risen sharply over the past decade. However, victims of religious harassment may not always report harassment, and true rates may be higher. Hence, actions taken by third parties present (observers) are important in combating harassment in the workplace. The purpose of this paper is to extend a previous model of observer intervention and related research by testing it empirically in the context of religious harassment and identify factors that influence observers’ decision to intervene (intervention), when they intervene (level of immediacy), and how much they intervene (level of involvement). Across two studies, we find evidence that verbal harassment, ambiguity of intent, relationship to target/harasser, recurrence belief, religious commitment, pro-social orientation, and the interactive effect of shared religion and religious commitment predict intervention. Furthermore, individuals show higher levels of involvement and immediacy in intervention when costs are low and emotional reactions are high. Implications of these findings for engaging observers in combatting harassment are discussed.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/job.2044</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-3796 |
ispartof | Journal of organizational behavior, 2016-02, Vol.37 (2), p.279-306 |
issn | 0894-3796 1099-1379 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1765366958 |
source | Wiley Journals; Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Ambiguity Emotional responses Harassment Intervention observer intervention Organizational behavior Recurrence Religion Religious beliefs Religious commitment religious discrimination Religious persecution Research Article Social orientation Third parties Victims Work environment Workplaces |
title | Religious harassment in the workplace: An examination of observer intervention |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A34%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Religious%20harassment%20in%20the%20workplace:%20An%20examination%20of%20observer%20intervention&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20behavior&rft.au=Ghumman,%20Sonia&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=279-306&rft.issn=0894-3796&rft.eissn=1099-1379&rft.coden=JORBEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/job.2044&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26610528%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765366958&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26610528&rfr_iscdi=true |