Religious harassment in the workplace: An examination of observer intervention

Religious harassment claims in the United States have risen sharply over the past decade. However, victims of religious harassment may not always report harassment, and true rates may be higher. Hence, actions taken by third parties present (observers) are important in combating harassment in the wo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of organizational behavior 2016-02, Vol.37 (2), p.279-306
Hauptverfasser: Ghumman, Sonia, Ryan, Ann Marie, Park, Jin Suk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 306
container_issue 2
container_start_page 279
container_title Journal of organizational behavior
container_volume 37
creator Ghumman, Sonia
Ryan, Ann Marie
Park, Jin Suk
description Religious harassment claims in the United States have risen sharply over the past decade. However, victims of religious harassment may not always report harassment, and true rates may be higher. Hence, actions taken by third parties present (observers) are important in combating harassment in the workplace. The purpose of this paper is to extend a previous model of observer intervention and related research by testing it empirically in the context of religious harassment and identify factors that influence observers’ decision to intervene (intervention), when they intervene (level of immediacy), and how much they intervene (level of involvement). Across two studies, we find evidence that verbal harassment, ambiguity of intent, relationship to target/harasser, recurrence belief, religious commitment, pro-social orientation, and the interactive effect of shared religion and religious commitment predict intervention. Furthermore, individuals show higher levels of involvement and immediacy in intervention when costs are low and emotional reactions are high. Implications of these findings for engaging observers in combatting harassment are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/job.2044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1765366958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26610528</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26610528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-b545b403b8e2bd6db089907a585284c2779a7e0c5c866947e3381e7349544bd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtPAjEQAODGaCKiiX_AZBMvXhbb7WvrDYmiBMH4iImXpl2K7LJssV0E_r0lEDx56iTzzXRmADhHsIUgTK4Lq1sJJOQANBAUIkaYi0PQgKkgcQjZMTjxvoAQUiJYAwxeTJl_5Xbho4lyyvuZqeoor6J6YqKlddN5qTJzE7WryKzULK9UndsqsuPIam_cj3EB15ug2iROwdFYld6c7d4meL-_e-s8xP1h97HT7scZTgmJNSVUE4h1ahI9YiMdxhOQK5rSJCVZwrlQ3MCMZiljgnCDcYoMx0RQQvQI4Sa43PadO_u9ML6WhV24KnwpEWcUhyqaBnW1VZmz3jszlnOXz5RbSwTl5lqhSsvNtQKNt3SZl2b9r5O94e3OX2x94Wvr9j5hDMGww1-_3Ndmtc8rN5WMY07lx6Aru6-3-PO59yQx_gXUMIL3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765366958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Religious harassment in the workplace: An examination of observer intervention</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Ghumman, Sonia ; Ryan, Ann Marie ; Park, Jin Suk</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghumman, Sonia ; Ryan, Ann Marie ; Park, Jin Suk</creatorcontrib><description>Religious harassment claims in the United States have risen sharply over the past decade. However, victims of religious harassment may not always report harassment, and true rates may be higher. Hence, actions taken by third parties present (observers) are important in combating harassment in the workplace. The purpose of this paper is to extend a previous model of observer intervention and related research by testing it empirically in the context of religious harassment and identify factors that influence observers’ decision to intervene (intervention), when they intervene (level of immediacy), and how much they intervene (level of involvement). Across two studies, we find evidence that verbal harassment, ambiguity of intent, relationship to target/harasser, recurrence belief, religious commitment, pro-social orientation, and the interactive effect of shared religion and religious commitment predict intervention. Furthermore, individuals show higher levels of involvement and immediacy in intervention when costs are low and emotional reactions are high. Implications of these findings for engaging observers in combatting harassment are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-3796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/job.2044</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JORBEJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Emotional responses ; Harassment ; Intervention ; observer intervention ; Organizational behavior ; Recurrence ; Religion ; Religious beliefs ; Religious commitment ; religious discrimination ; Religious persecution ; Research Article ; Social orientation ; Third parties ; Victims ; Work environment ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Journal of organizational behavior, 2016-02, Vol.37 (2), p.279-306</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-b545b403b8e2bd6db089907a585284c2779a7e0c5c866947e3381e7349544bd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-b545b403b8e2bd6db089907a585284c2779a7e0c5c866947e3381e7349544bd13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26610528$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26610528$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghumman, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Ann Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jin Suk</creatorcontrib><title>Religious harassment in the workplace: An examination of observer intervention</title><title>Journal of organizational behavior</title><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><description>Religious harassment claims in the United States have risen sharply over the past decade. However, victims of religious harassment may not always report harassment, and true rates may be higher. Hence, actions taken by third parties present (observers) are important in combating harassment in the workplace. The purpose of this paper is to extend a previous model of observer intervention and related research by testing it empirically in the context of religious harassment and identify factors that influence observers’ decision to intervene (intervention), when they intervene (level of immediacy), and how much they intervene (level of involvement). Across two studies, we find evidence that verbal harassment, ambiguity of intent, relationship to target/harasser, recurrence belief, religious commitment, pro-social orientation, and the interactive effect of shared religion and religious commitment predict intervention. Furthermore, individuals show higher levels of involvement and immediacy in intervention when costs are low and emotional reactions are high. Implications of these findings for engaging observers in combatting harassment are discussed.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Emotional responses</subject><subject>Harassment</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>observer intervention</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religious beliefs</subject><subject>Religious commitment</subject><subject>religious discrimination</subject><subject>Religious persecution</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Social orientation</subject><subject>Third parties</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0894-3796</issn><issn>1099-1379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtPAjEQAODGaCKiiX_AZBMvXhbb7WvrDYmiBMH4iImXpl2K7LJssV0E_r0lEDx56iTzzXRmADhHsIUgTK4Lq1sJJOQANBAUIkaYi0PQgKkgcQjZMTjxvoAQUiJYAwxeTJl_5Xbho4lyyvuZqeoor6J6YqKlddN5qTJzE7WryKzULK9UndsqsuPIam_cj3EB15ug2iROwdFYld6c7d4meL-_e-s8xP1h97HT7scZTgmJNSVUE4h1ahI9YiMdxhOQK5rSJCVZwrlQ3MCMZiljgnCDcYoMx0RQQvQI4Sa43PadO_u9ML6WhV24KnwpEWcUhyqaBnW1VZmz3jszlnOXz5RbSwTl5lqhSsvNtQKNt3SZl2b9r5O94e3OX2x94Wvr9j5hDMGww1-_3Ndmtc8rN5WMY07lx6Aru6-3-PO59yQx_gXUMIL3</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Ghumman, Sonia</creator><creator>Ryan, Ann Marie</creator><creator>Park, Jin Suk</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley (Variant)</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Religious harassment in the workplace: An examination of observer intervention</title><author>Ghumman, Sonia ; Ryan, Ann Marie ; Park, Jin Suk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-b545b403b8e2bd6db089907a585284c2779a7e0c5c866947e3381e7349544bd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Emotional responses</topic><topic>Harassment</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>observer intervention</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religious beliefs</topic><topic>Religious commitment</topic><topic>religious discrimination</topic><topic>Religious persecution</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Social orientation</topic><topic>Third parties</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghumman, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Ann Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jin Suk</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghumman, Sonia</au><au>Ryan, Ann Marie</au><au>Park, Jin Suk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Religious harassment in the workplace: An examination of observer intervention</atitle><jtitle>Journal of organizational behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J. Organiz. Behav</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>279-306</pages><issn>0894-3796</issn><eissn>1099-1379</eissn><coden>JORBEJ</coden><abstract>Religious harassment claims in the United States have risen sharply over the past decade. However, victims of religious harassment may not always report harassment, and true rates may be higher. Hence, actions taken by third parties present (observers) are important in combating harassment in the workplace. The purpose of this paper is to extend a previous model of observer intervention and related research by testing it empirically in the context of religious harassment and identify factors that influence observers’ decision to intervene (intervention), when they intervene (level of immediacy), and how much they intervene (level of involvement). Across two studies, we find evidence that verbal harassment, ambiguity of intent, relationship to target/harasser, recurrence belief, religious commitment, pro-social orientation, and the interactive effect of shared religion and religious commitment predict intervention. Furthermore, individuals show higher levels of involvement and immediacy in intervention when costs are low and emotional reactions are high. Implications of these findings for engaging observers in combatting harassment are discussed.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/job.2044</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-3796
ispartof Journal of organizational behavior, 2016-02, Vol.37 (2), p.279-306
issn 0894-3796
1099-1379
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1765366958
source Wiley Journals; Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Ambiguity
Emotional responses
Harassment
Intervention
observer intervention
Organizational behavior
Recurrence
Religion
Religious beliefs
Religious commitment
religious discrimination
Religious persecution
Research Article
Social orientation
Third parties
Victims
Work environment
Workplaces
title Religious harassment in the workplace: An examination of observer intervention
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A34%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Religious%20harassment%20in%20the%20workplace:%20An%20examination%20of%20observer%20intervention&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20organizational%20behavior&rft.au=Ghumman,%20Sonia&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=279-306&rft.issn=0894-3796&rft.eissn=1099-1379&rft.coden=JORBEJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/job.2044&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26610528%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765366958&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26610528&rfr_iscdi=true