Detection of Strabismus by Non-Health Care Professionals in an Ethnically Diverse Set of Images

Understanding the criteria for when strabismus becomes detectable by non-health care professionals could influence the goals for determining the success of surgical intervention and how patients with such misalignments are counseled. To examine the magnitude at which strabismus is detectable by lay...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of ophthalmology (1960) 2016-01, Vol.134 (1), p.30
Hauptverfasser: Chan, Kimberley W, Deng, Li, Weissberg, Erik M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 30
container_title Archives of ophthalmology (1960)
container_volume 134
creator Chan, Kimberley W
Deng, Li
Weissberg, Erik M
description Understanding the criteria for when strabismus becomes detectable by non-health care professionals could influence the goals for determining the success of surgical intervention and how patients with such misalignments are counseled. To examine the magnitude at which strabismus is detectable by lay observers in an ethnically diverse set of images. Photographs of 12 ethnically diverse models (black, white, and Asian) were simulated to have strabismus from esotropia of 21 prism diopters (...) to exotropia of 21... From July 1, 2007, to October, 1, 2008, images were presented to 120 non-health care professionals aged 21 years or older from the general community in Boston, Massachusetts, who were asked whether strabismus was present. Analysis was conducted from November 1, 2008, to March 31, 2009. The threshold angle for detecting strabismus to enable 70% of lay observers to make a positive determination whether strabismus is present. In white and black models, the threshold allowing a 70% positive detection rate was higher for esotropia than for exotropia (P < .001 for both). For white models, the threshold was 23.2... (95% CI, 21.0... to 26.5...) for esotropia and 13.5... (95% CI, 12.5... to 14.6...) for exotropia. For black models, the threshold was 20.8... (95% CI, 19.2... to 22.2...) for esotropia and 16.3... (95% CI, 15.5... to 17.2...) for exotropia. Asian models showed an opposite trend, with the threshold allowing a 70% positive detection rate for esotropia (14.3...; 95% CI, 13.2... to 15.7...) being lower than that for exotropia (20.9...; 95% CI, 18.0... to 24.6...) (P < .001). Esotropia was easier for lay observers to detect than exotropia in Asian models, and exotropia was easier to detect than esotropia in white and black models. This information should be considered when managing patients who have concerns about the social significance of their strabismus. Future studies should include diverse individuals and make an effort to account for individual factors that may alter the perception of strabismus. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1761256662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3937399221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_17612566623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzE0LgkAUheEhCrKP_3ChteAojbVOwzYR2F5GudaIzdTcMfDfpxCtW52zeHgnzAu52PmCx9H098V2zhZETRAEggd7jxUJOqycMhpMDbmzslT06AjKHs5G-xnK1t3hIC3CxZoaiQYrWwKlQWpI3V2rSrZtD4l6oyWEHN3YOj3kDWnFZvWgcf3dJdsc0-sh85_WvDokVzSms2Ow4LHg4VYIEUb_qQ9cfkUG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761256662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of Strabismus by Non-Health Care Professionals in an Ethnically Diverse Set of Images</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chan, Kimberley W ; Deng, Li ; Weissberg, Erik M</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kimberley W ; Deng, Li ; Weissberg, Erik M</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the criteria for when strabismus becomes detectable by non-health care professionals could influence the goals for determining the success of surgical intervention and how patients with such misalignments are counseled. To examine the magnitude at which strabismus is detectable by lay observers in an ethnically diverse set of images. Photographs of 12 ethnically diverse models (black, white, and Asian) were simulated to have strabismus from esotropia of 21 prism diopters (...) to exotropia of 21... From July 1, 2007, to October, 1, 2008, images were presented to 120 non-health care professionals aged 21 years or older from the general community in Boston, Massachusetts, who were asked whether strabismus was present. Analysis was conducted from November 1, 2008, to March 31, 2009. The threshold angle for detecting strabismus to enable 70% of lay observers to make a positive determination whether strabismus is present. In white and black models, the threshold allowing a 70% positive detection rate was higher for esotropia than for exotropia (P &lt; .001 for both). For white models, the threshold was 23.2... (95% CI, 21.0... to 26.5...) for esotropia and 13.5... (95% CI, 12.5... to 14.6...) for exotropia. For black models, the threshold was 20.8... (95% CI, 19.2... to 22.2...) for esotropia and 16.3... (95% CI, 15.5... to 17.2...) for exotropia. Asian models showed an opposite trend, with the threshold allowing a 70% positive detection rate for esotropia (14.3...; 95% CI, 13.2... to 15.7...) being lower than that for exotropia (20.9...; 95% CI, 18.0... to 24.6...) (P &lt; .001). Esotropia was easier for lay observers to detect than exotropia in Asian models, and exotropia was easier to detect than esotropia in white and black models. This information should be considered when managing patients who have concerns about the social significance of their strabismus. Future studies should include diverse individuals and make an effort to account for individual factors that may alter the perception of strabismus. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Eye diseases ; Eye surgery ; Ophthalmology ; Optometry</subject><ispartof>Archives of ophthalmology (1960), 2016-01, Vol.134 (1), p.30</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Jan 2016</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kimberley W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weissberg, Erik M</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of Strabismus by Non-Health Care Professionals in an Ethnically Diverse Set of Images</title><title>Archives of ophthalmology (1960)</title><description>Understanding the criteria for when strabismus becomes detectable by non-health care professionals could influence the goals for determining the success of surgical intervention and how patients with such misalignments are counseled. To examine the magnitude at which strabismus is detectable by lay observers in an ethnically diverse set of images. Photographs of 12 ethnically diverse models (black, white, and Asian) were simulated to have strabismus from esotropia of 21 prism diopters (...) to exotropia of 21... From July 1, 2007, to October, 1, 2008, images were presented to 120 non-health care professionals aged 21 years or older from the general community in Boston, Massachusetts, who were asked whether strabismus was present. Analysis was conducted from November 1, 2008, to March 31, 2009. The threshold angle for detecting strabismus to enable 70% of lay observers to make a positive determination whether strabismus is present. In white and black models, the threshold allowing a 70% positive detection rate was higher for esotropia than for exotropia (P &lt; .001 for both). For white models, the threshold was 23.2... (95% CI, 21.0... to 26.5...) for esotropia and 13.5... (95% CI, 12.5... to 14.6...) for exotropia. For black models, the threshold was 20.8... (95% CI, 19.2... to 22.2...) for esotropia and 16.3... (95% CI, 15.5... to 17.2...) for exotropia. Asian models showed an opposite trend, with the threshold allowing a 70% positive detection rate for esotropia (14.3...; 95% CI, 13.2... to 15.7...) being lower than that for exotropia (20.9...; 95% CI, 18.0... to 24.6...) (P &lt; .001). Esotropia was easier for lay observers to detect than exotropia in Asian models, and exotropia was easier to detect than esotropia in white and black models. This information should be considered when managing patients who have concerns about the social significance of their strabismus. Future studies should include diverse individuals and make an effort to account for individual factors that may alter the perception of strabismus. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</description><subject>Eye diseases</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Optometry</subject><issn>2168-6165</issn><issn>2168-6173</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNzE0LgkAUheEhCrKP_3ChteAojbVOwzYR2F5GudaIzdTcMfDfpxCtW52zeHgnzAu52PmCx9H098V2zhZETRAEggd7jxUJOqycMhpMDbmzslT06AjKHs5G-xnK1t3hIC3CxZoaiQYrWwKlQWpI3V2rSrZtD4l6oyWEHN3YOj3kDWnFZvWgcf3dJdsc0-sh85_WvDokVzSms2Ow4LHg4VYIEUb_qQ9cfkUG</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Chan, Kimberley W</creator><creator>Deng, Li</creator><creator>Weissberg, Erik M</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Detection of Strabismus by Non-Health Care Professionals in an Ethnically Diverse Set of Images</title><author>Chan, Kimberley W ; Deng, Li ; Weissberg, Erik M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_17612566623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Eye diseases</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Optometry</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kimberley W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weissberg, Erik M</creatorcontrib><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Archives of ophthalmology (1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Kimberley W</au><au>Deng, Li</au><au>Weissberg, Erik M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of Strabismus by Non-Health Care Professionals in an Ethnically Diverse Set of Images</atitle><jtitle>Archives of ophthalmology (1960)</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><pages>30-</pages><issn>2168-6165</issn><eissn>2168-6173</eissn><abstract>Understanding the criteria for when strabismus becomes detectable by non-health care professionals could influence the goals for determining the success of surgical intervention and how patients with such misalignments are counseled. To examine the magnitude at which strabismus is detectable by lay observers in an ethnically diverse set of images. Photographs of 12 ethnically diverse models (black, white, and Asian) were simulated to have strabismus from esotropia of 21 prism diopters (...) to exotropia of 21... From July 1, 2007, to October, 1, 2008, images were presented to 120 non-health care professionals aged 21 years or older from the general community in Boston, Massachusetts, who were asked whether strabismus was present. Analysis was conducted from November 1, 2008, to March 31, 2009. The threshold angle for detecting strabismus to enable 70% of lay observers to make a positive determination whether strabismus is present. In white and black models, the threshold allowing a 70% positive detection rate was higher for esotropia than for exotropia (P &lt; .001 for both). For white models, the threshold was 23.2... (95% CI, 21.0... to 26.5...) for esotropia and 13.5... (95% CI, 12.5... to 14.6...) for exotropia. For black models, the threshold was 20.8... (95% CI, 19.2... to 22.2...) for esotropia and 16.3... (95% CI, 15.5... to 17.2...) for exotropia. Asian models showed an opposite trend, with the threshold allowing a 70% positive detection rate for esotropia (14.3...; 95% CI, 13.2... to 15.7...) being lower than that for exotropia (20.9...; 95% CI, 18.0... to 24.6...) (P &lt; .001). Esotropia was easier for lay observers to detect than exotropia in Asian models, and exotropia was easier to detect than esotropia in white and black models. This information should be considered when managing patients who have concerns about the social significance of their strabismus. Future studies should include diverse individuals and make an effort to account for individual factors that may alter the perception of strabismus. (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae/symbols omitted.)</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6165
ispartof Archives of ophthalmology (1960), 2016-01, Vol.134 (1), p.30
issn 2168-6165
2168-6173
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1761256662
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Eye diseases
Eye surgery
Ophthalmology
Optometry
title Detection of Strabismus by Non-Health Care Professionals in an Ethnically Diverse Set of Images
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A03%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20Strabismus%20by%20Non-Health%20Care%20Professionals%20in%20an%20Ethnically%20Diverse%20Set%20of%20Images&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20ophthalmology%20(1960)&rft.au=Chan,%20Kimberley%20W&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.pages=30-&rft.issn=2168-6165&rft.eissn=2168-6173&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3937399221%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761256662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true