After the wrongdoing: What managers should know about whistleblowing

Most of us are likely at some point to observe wrongdoing in our organizations, and some of us will blow the whistle to someone with the authority to put a stop to the wrongdoing. Or we may be managers, inspectors, or auditors who serve as the official ‘complaint recipient’ when one of our colleague...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Business horizons 2016-01, Vol.59 (1), p.105-114
Hauptverfasser: Near, Janet P., Miceli, Marcia P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 114
container_issue 1
container_start_page 105
container_title Business horizons
container_volume 59
creator Near, Janet P.
Miceli, Marcia P.
description Most of us are likely at some point to observe wrongdoing in our organizations, and some of us will blow the whistle to someone with the authority to put a stop to the wrongdoing. Or we may be managers, inspectors, or auditors who serve as the official ‘complaint recipient’ when one of our colleagues wants to report wrongdoing in the organization. Whether we blow the whistle or are tasked with cleaning up after someone else does so, we are better off knowing in advance how the whistleblowing process usually plays out. In this article we discuss the pragmatic implications of 30 years of systematic research about whistleblowing: who does it and when, and why they choose to report the wrongdoing internally (within the organization) or externally (to outsiders). To avoid external whistleblowing, which entails all sorts of costs for the organization, we recommend that managers take clear steps: investigate the allegations, make the results of the investigation known to those affected, correct the problem if one is found, and avoid reprisal against whistleblowers. These actions can increase the chance that information about organizational wrongdoing stays inside the organization, where it may be remedied, instead of being made public.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bushor.2015.09.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1761114937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0007681315001391</els_id><sourcerecordid>3936555351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-f253740550f68931b6d1318fa27720e3d2950f1474436af192829b774ce14f1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Aw8Bz62ZJk1aD8Lif1jwongMaZtsW7vNmqQWv71Z1rOnYWbevOH9ELoEkgIBft2n1eRb69KMQJ6SMiVEHKEFFIImnPDiGC1IHCW8AHqKzrzv9y0HukD3KxO0w6HVeHZ23DS2Gzc3-KNVAW_VqDbaeRy9p6HBn6OdsarsFPDcdj4MuhrsHPXn6MSoweuLv7pE748Pb3fPyfr16eVutU5qRvOQmCyngpE8J4YXJYWKN0ChMCoTIiOaNlkZV8AEY5QrA2VWZGUlBKs1MAOKLtHVwXfn7NekfZC9ndwYX0qIcQBYSUVUsYOqdtZ7p43cuW6r3I8EIve8ZC8PvOSelySljDTi2e3hTMcE35120tedHmvddE7XQUYy_xv8AuFqdEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761114937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>After the wrongdoing: What managers should know about whistleblowing</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Near, Janet P. ; Miceli, Marcia P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Near, Janet P. ; Miceli, Marcia P.</creatorcontrib><description>Most of us are likely at some point to observe wrongdoing in our organizations, and some of us will blow the whistle to someone with the authority to put a stop to the wrongdoing. Or we may be managers, inspectors, or auditors who serve as the official ‘complaint recipient’ when one of our colleagues wants to report wrongdoing in the organization. Whether we blow the whistle or are tasked with cleaning up after someone else does so, we are better off knowing in advance how the whistleblowing process usually plays out. In this article we discuss the pragmatic implications of 30 years of systematic research about whistleblowing: who does it and when, and why they choose to report the wrongdoing internally (within the organization) or externally (to outsiders). To avoid external whistleblowing, which entails all sorts of costs for the organization, we recommend that managers take clear steps: investigate the allegations, make the results of the investigation known to those affected, correct the problem if one is found, and avoid reprisal against whistleblowers. These actions can increase the chance that information about organizational wrongdoing stays inside the organization, where it may be remedied, instead of being made public.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-6813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6068</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2015.09.007</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BHORAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greenwich: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Business ethics ; Cost reduction ; External whistleblowing ; Internal whistleblowing ; Investigations ; Management theory ; Organizational wrongdoing ; Retaliation against whistleblowers ; Studies ; Whistleblowing</subject><ispartof>Business horizons, 2016-01, Vol.59 (1), p.105-114</ispartof><rights>2015 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan-Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-f253740550f68931b6d1318fa27720e3d2950f1474436af192829b774ce14f1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-f253740550f68931b6d1318fa27720e3d2950f1474436af192829b774ce14f1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.09.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Near, Janet P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miceli, Marcia P.</creatorcontrib><title>After the wrongdoing: What managers should know about whistleblowing</title><title>Business horizons</title><description>Most of us are likely at some point to observe wrongdoing in our organizations, and some of us will blow the whistle to someone with the authority to put a stop to the wrongdoing. Or we may be managers, inspectors, or auditors who serve as the official ‘complaint recipient’ when one of our colleagues wants to report wrongdoing in the organization. Whether we blow the whistle or are tasked with cleaning up after someone else does so, we are better off knowing in advance how the whistleblowing process usually plays out. In this article we discuss the pragmatic implications of 30 years of systematic research about whistleblowing: who does it and when, and why they choose to report the wrongdoing internally (within the organization) or externally (to outsiders). To avoid external whistleblowing, which entails all sorts of costs for the organization, we recommend that managers take clear steps: investigate the allegations, make the results of the investigation known to those affected, correct the problem if one is found, and avoid reprisal against whistleblowers. These actions can increase the chance that information about organizational wrongdoing stays inside the organization, where it may be remedied, instead of being made public.</description><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Cost reduction</subject><subject>External whistleblowing</subject><subject>Internal whistleblowing</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Organizational wrongdoing</subject><subject>Retaliation against whistleblowers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Whistleblowing</subject><issn>0007-6813</issn><issn>1873-6068</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Aw8Bz62ZJk1aD8Lif1jwongMaZtsW7vNmqQWv71Z1rOnYWbevOH9ELoEkgIBft2n1eRb69KMQJ6SMiVEHKEFFIImnPDiGC1IHCW8AHqKzrzv9y0HukD3KxO0w6HVeHZ23DS2Gzc3-KNVAW_VqDbaeRy9p6HBn6OdsarsFPDcdj4MuhrsHPXn6MSoweuLv7pE748Pb3fPyfr16eVutU5qRvOQmCyngpE8J4YXJYWKN0ChMCoTIiOaNlkZV8AEY5QrA2VWZGUlBKs1MAOKLtHVwXfn7NekfZC9ndwYX0qIcQBYSUVUsYOqdtZ7p43cuW6r3I8EIve8ZC8PvOSelySljDTi2e3hTMcE35120tedHmvddE7XQUYy_xv8AuFqdEw</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Near, Janet P.</creator><creator>Miceli, Marcia P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>After the wrongdoing: What managers should know about whistleblowing</title><author>Near, Janet P. ; Miceli, Marcia P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-f253740550f68931b6d1318fa27720e3d2950f1474436af192829b774ce14f1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Cost reduction</topic><topic>External whistleblowing</topic><topic>Internal whistleblowing</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Organizational wrongdoing</topic><topic>Retaliation against whistleblowers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Whistleblowing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Near, Janet P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miceli, Marcia P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Business horizons</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Near, Janet P.</au><au>Miceli, Marcia P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>After the wrongdoing: What managers should know about whistleblowing</atitle><jtitle>Business horizons</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>105-114</pages><issn>0007-6813</issn><eissn>1873-6068</eissn><coden>BHORAD</coden><abstract>Most of us are likely at some point to observe wrongdoing in our organizations, and some of us will blow the whistle to someone with the authority to put a stop to the wrongdoing. Or we may be managers, inspectors, or auditors who serve as the official ‘complaint recipient’ when one of our colleagues wants to report wrongdoing in the organization. Whether we blow the whistle or are tasked with cleaning up after someone else does so, we are better off knowing in advance how the whistleblowing process usually plays out. In this article we discuss the pragmatic implications of 30 years of systematic research about whistleblowing: who does it and when, and why they choose to report the wrongdoing internally (within the organization) or externally (to outsiders). To avoid external whistleblowing, which entails all sorts of costs for the organization, we recommend that managers take clear steps: investigate the allegations, make the results of the investigation known to those affected, correct the problem if one is found, and avoid reprisal against whistleblowers. These actions can increase the chance that information about organizational wrongdoing stays inside the organization, where it may be remedied, instead of being made public.</abstract><cop>Greenwich</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.bushor.2015.09.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-6813
ispartof Business horizons, 2016-01, Vol.59 (1), p.105-114
issn 0007-6813
1873-6068
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1761114937
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Business ethics
Cost reduction
External whistleblowing
Internal whistleblowing
Investigations
Management theory
Organizational wrongdoing
Retaliation against whistleblowers
Studies
Whistleblowing
title After the wrongdoing: What managers should know about whistleblowing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T07%3A35%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=After%20the%20wrongdoing:%20What%20managers%20should%20know%20about%20whistleblowing&rft.jtitle=Business%20horizons&rft.au=Near,%20Janet%20P.&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=105-114&rft.issn=0007-6813&rft.eissn=1873-6068&rft.coden=BHORAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.09.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3936555351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761114937&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0007681315001391&rfr_iscdi=true