Relationship Between Ultrasound Estimated Amniotic Fluid Index and Fetal Weight in Healthy Pregnant African Women

Introduction: Fetal weight (FW) estimation in late pregnancy is an important guide in obstetric care. Amniotic fluid protects the fetus against traumatic and infective insults. There possibly exists a relationship between FW and amniotic fluid index (AFI) that can be estimated by ultrasonography. Ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical imaging science 2013-01, Vol.3 (1), p.2
Hauptverfasser: Adeyekun, Ademola, Awosanya, Gbolahan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2
container_title Journal of clinical imaging science
container_volume 3
creator Adeyekun, Ademola
Awosanya, Gbolahan
description Introduction: Fetal weight (FW) estimation in late pregnancy is an important guide in obstetric care. Amniotic fluid protects the fetus against traumatic and infective insults. There possibly exists a relationship between FW and amniotic fluid index (AFI) that can be estimated by ultrasonography. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and fifty-eight low-risk pregnancies were prospectively studied by means of ultrasound over a 12-month period. FW was estimated using a combination of fetal parameters; bi-parietal diameter, fetal trunk cross sectional area, and femur length. AFI was assessed using the 4-quadrant method. Spearman's correlation was used to test possible relationship between amniotic fluid indices and estimated FW pairs. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: The mean AF1 and estimated fetal weight (EFW) pairs were as follows: at 27-29 weeks the values were 172.1 mm and 1,250.2 g; at 30-32 weeks AF1 and EFW values were 170.3 mm and 1,648.0 g; at 33-35 weeks values were 162.3 mm and 2,273.5 g; at 36-38 weeks values were 144.09 mm and 2,906.1 g; at 39-40 weeks AF1 and EFW values were 125.0 mm and 3,222.6 g. Overall, there was no statistically significant relationship between AFI and EFW ( P > 0.05; r = 0.241). Conclusion: While FW calculations and amniotic index showed variations in value in late pregnancy, there does not appear to be a linear relationship between ultrasound estimate of FW and amniotic index. The implication of this is that fetal size need not be taken into cognizance when alterations in amniotic fluid values are noted.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/2156-7514.106614
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1760780835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A349643955</galeid><sourcerecordid>A349643955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g250t-cd6fbb69190b1ee24aa513ad8203fd4023a8f266a6d15df792c5ef4173dedf0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj01Lw0AQhhdRsGjvHhc8t-5mP5IcY2ltoaCIpcewyc6mW5LdNtmg_ntTLejBmcMM7zzvDIPQHSVTTgl7iKiQk1hQPqVESsov0OhbEiKNL8_9aXyNxl23J0PwlEsiRuj4CrUK1rtuZw_4EcI7gMObOrSq873TeN4F26gAGmeNsz7YEi_q3mq8cho-sBqQBQRV4y3YahewdXgJqg67T_zSQuWUCzgzrS2Vw1vfgLtFV0bVHYzP9QZtFvO32XKyfn5azbL1pIoECZNSS1MUMqUpKShAxJUSlCmdRIQZzUnEVGIiKZXUVGgTp1EpwHAaMw3akILdoPufvYfWH3voQr73feuGkzmNJYkTkjDxS1Wqhtw644fPy8Z2ZZ4xnkrOUnGipv9QQ2pobOkdGDvofwxfwVl5UA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760780835</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationship Between Ultrasound Estimated Amniotic Fluid Index and Fetal Weight in Healthy Pregnant African Women</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Adeyekun, Ademola ; Awosanya, Gbolahan</creator><creatorcontrib>Adeyekun, Ademola ; Awosanya, Gbolahan</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Fetal weight (FW) estimation in late pregnancy is an important guide in obstetric care. Amniotic fluid protects the fetus against traumatic and infective insults. There possibly exists a relationship between FW and amniotic fluid index (AFI) that can be estimated by ultrasonography. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and fifty-eight low-risk pregnancies were prospectively studied by means of ultrasound over a 12-month period. FW was estimated using a combination of fetal parameters; bi-parietal diameter, fetal trunk cross sectional area, and femur length. AFI was assessed using the 4-quadrant method. Spearman's correlation was used to test possible relationship between amniotic fluid indices and estimated FW pairs. The level of statistical significance was set at P &lt; 0.05. Results: The mean AF1 and estimated fetal weight (EFW) pairs were as follows: at 27-29 weeks the values were 172.1 mm and 1,250.2 g; at 30-32 weeks AF1 and EFW values were 170.3 mm and 1,648.0 g; at 33-35 weeks values were 162.3 mm and 2,273.5 g; at 36-38 weeks values were 144.09 mm and 2,906.1 g; at 39-40 weeks AF1 and EFW values were 125.0 mm and 3,222.6 g. Overall, there was no statistically significant relationship between AFI and EFW ( P &gt; 0.05; r = 0.241). Conclusion: While FW calculations and amniotic index showed variations in value in late pregnancy, there does not appear to be a linear relationship between ultrasound estimate of FW and amniotic index. The implication of this is that fetal size need not be taken into cognizance when alterations in amniotic fluid values are noted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-7514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-5597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/2156-7514.106614</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pittsford: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Age ; Birth weight ; Diabetes ; Fetuses ; Health aspects ; Health risk assessment ; Pregnancy ; Premature birth ; Prenatal development ; Studies ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical imaging science, 2013-01, Vol.3 (1), p.2</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd Jan-Mar 2013</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adeyekun, Ademola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awosanya, Gbolahan</creatorcontrib><title>Relationship Between Ultrasound Estimated Amniotic Fluid Index and Fetal Weight in Healthy Pregnant African Women</title><title>Journal of clinical imaging science</title><description>Introduction: Fetal weight (FW) estimation in late pregnancy is an important guide in obstetric care. Amniotic fluid protects the fetus against traumatic and infective insults. There possibly exists a relationship between FW and amniotic fluid index (AFI) that can be estimated by ultrasonography. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and fifty-eight low-risk pregnancies were prospectively studied by means of ultrasound over a 12-month period. FW was estimated using a combination of fetal parameters; bi-parietal diameter, fetal trunk cross sectional area, and femur length. AFI was assessed using the 4-quadrant method. Spearman's correlation was used to test possible relationship between amniotic fluid indices and estimated FW pairs. The level of statistical significance was set at P &lt; 0.05. Results: The mean AF1 and estimated fetal weight (EFW) pairs were as follows: at 27-29 weeks the values were 172.1 mm and 1,250.2 g; at 30-32 weeks AF1 and EFW values were 170.3 mm and 1,648.0 g; at 33-35 weeks values were 162.3 mm and 2,273.5 g; at 36-38 weeks values were 144.09 mm and 2,906.1 g; at 39-40 weeks AF1 and EFW values were 125.0 mm and 3,222.6 g. Overall, there was no statistically significant relationship between AFI and EFW ( P &gt; 0.05; r = 0.241). Conclusion: While FW calculations and amniotic index showed variations in value in late pregnancy, there does not appear to be a linear relationship between ultrasound estimate of FW and amniotic index. The implication of this is that fetal size need not be taken into cognizance when alterations in amniotic fluid values are noted.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Premature birth</subject><subject>Prenatal development</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>2156-7514</issn><issn>2156-5597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptj01Lw0AQhhdRsGjvHhc8t-5mP5IcY2ltoaCIpcewyc6mW5LdNtmg_ntTLejBmcMM7zzvDIPQHSVTTgl7iKiQk1hQPqVESsov0OhbEiKNL8_9aXyNxl23J0PwlEsiRuj4CrUK1rtuZw_4EcI7gMObOrSq873TeN4F26gAGmeNsz7YEi_q3mq8cho-sBqQBQRV4y3YahewdXgJqg67T_zSQuWUCzgzrS2Vw1vfgLtFV0bVHYzP9QZtFvO32XKyfn5azbL1pIoECZNSS1MUMqUpKShAxJUSlCmdRIQZzUnEVGIiKZXUVGgTp1EpwHAaMw3akILdoPufvYfWH3voQr73feuGkzmNJYkTkjDxS1Wqhtw644fPy8Z2ZZ4xnkrOUnGipv9QQ2pobOkdGDvofwxfwVl5UA</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Adeyekun, Ademola</creator><creator>Awosanya, Gbolahan</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Scientific Scholar</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Relationship Between Ultrasound Estimated Amniotic Fluid Index and Fetal Weight in Healthy Pregnant African Women</title><author>Adeyekun, Ademola ; Awosanya, Gbolahan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g250t-cd6fbb69190b1ee24aa513ad8203fd4023a8f266a6d15df792c5ef4173dedf0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Premature birth</topic><topic>Prenatal development</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adeyekun, Ademola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awosanya, Gbolahan</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical imaging science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adeyekun, Ademola</au><au>Awosanya, Gbolahan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationship Between Ultrasound Estimated Amniotic Fluid Index and Fetal Weight in Healthy Pregnant African Women</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical imaging science</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2</spage><pages>2-</pages><issn>2156-7514</issn><eissn>2156-5597</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Fetal weight (FW) estimation in late pregnancy is an important guide in obstetric care. Amniotic fluid protects the fetus against traumatic and infective insults. There possibly exists a relationship between FW and amniotic fluid index (AFI) that can be estimated by ultrasonography. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and fifty-eight low-risk pregnancies were prospectively studied by means of ultrasound over a 12-month period. FW was estimated using a combination of fetal parameters; bi-parietal diameter, fetal trunk cross sectional area, and femur length. AFI was assessed using the 4-quadrant method. Spearman's correlation was used to test possible relationship between amniotic fluid indices and estimated FW pairs. The level of statistical significance was set at P &lt; 0.05. Results: The mean AF1 and estimated fetal weight (EFW) pairs were as follows: at 27-29 weeks the values were 172.1 mm and 1,250.2 g; at 30-32 weeks AF1 and EFW values were 170.3 mm and 1,648.0 g; at 33-35 weeks values were 162.3 mm and 2,273.5 g; at 36-38 weeks values were 144.09 mm and 2,906.1 g; at 39-40 weeks AF1 and EFW values were 125.0 mm and 3,222.6 g. Overall, there was no statistically significant relationship between AFI and EFW ( P &gt; 0.05; r = 0.241). Conclusion: While FW calculations and amniotic index showed variations in value in late pregnancy, there does not appear to be a linear relationship between ultrasound estimate of FW and amniotic index. The implication of this is that fetal size need not be taken into cognizance when alterations in amniotic fluid values are noted.</abstract><cop>Pittsford</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/2156-7514.106614</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2156-7514
ispartof Journal of clinical imaging science, 2013-01, Vol.3 (1), p.2
issn 2156-7514
2156-5597
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1760780835
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Age
Birth weight
Diabetes
Fetuses
Health aspects
Health risk assessment
Pregnancy
Premature birth
Prenatal development
Studies
Ultrasonic imaging
Women
title Relationship Between Ultrasound Estimated Amniotic Fluid Index and Fetal Weight in Healthy Pregnant African Women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T14%3A32%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship%20Between%20Ultrasound%20Estimated%20Amniotic%20Fluid%20Index%20and%20Fetal%20Weight%20in%20Healthy%20Pregnant%20African%20Women&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20imaging%20science&rft.au=Adeyekun,%20Ademola&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft.pages=2-&rft.issn=2156-7514&rft.eissn=2156-5597&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/2156-7514.106614&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA349643955%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760780835&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A349643955&rfr_iscdi=true