The Optimal Privatization Policies under an International Mixed Duopoly
This paper explores the socially optimal privatization policies under the setting of international mixed duopoly. We find that partial privatization is socially optimal under Cournot competition and private leadership competition, whereas full nationalization is socially optimal under public leaders...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Review of development economics 2016-02, Vol.20 (1), p.228-238 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 238 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 228 |
container_title | Review of development economics |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Ou, Ruiqiu Li, Jie Lu, Jing Guo, Chenxu |
description | This paper explores the socially optimal privatization policies under the setting of international mixed duopoly. We find that partial privatization is socially optimal under Cournot competition and private leadership competition, whereas full nationalization is socially optimal under public leadership competition. Moreover, the equilibrium social welfare under private leadership competition is higher than that observed under Cournot competition and that observed under private leadership competition, which differs from the findings of Matsumura (). We also show that the endogenous timing game has a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium outcome, under which the government chooses a partial privatization policy, and private leadership competition emerges as the optimal output decision sequence of firms. An important policy implication from this paper is that the government should partially privatize the public firm and facilitate the emergence of private leadership competition in an international mixed market. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/rode.12207 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1760722270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3934991211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4927-d04ac985ae7644e11000ca7873aed8e8d8bcff6b7042a78cfac56ee399ebacbf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhisEEmNw4RdU4obUkfQjaY5oH2XSYBMa4xilqSsySjOSFjZ-PdkKHIlkxbKf17Jfz7vEaIDduzG6gAEOQ0SPvB6OCQ1YRPCxyyMSBYQQduqdWbtGCDGMk56XLV_An28a9SYqf2HUh2jUlwtd-wtdKanA-m1dgPFF7U_rBkx96Dr6Xm2h8Eet3uhqd-6dlKKycPHz972nyXg5vAtm82w6vJ0FMmYhDQoUC8nSRAAlcQwYu0WkoCmNBBQppEWay7IkOUVx6MqyFDIhABFjkAuZl1Hfu-rmbox-b8E2fK1bt1NlOaYE0TAMKXLUdUdJo601UPKNcReaHceI743ie6P4wSgH4w7-VBXs_iH543w0_tUEnUbZBrZ_GmFeOaERTfjzQ8YnbLRcpauMs-gbRPh7CA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760722270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Optimal Privatization Policies under an International Mixed Duopoly</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Ou, Ruiqiu ; Li, Jie ; Lu, Jing ; Guo, Chenxu</creator><creatorcontrib>Ou, Ruiqiu ; Li, Jie ; Lu, Jing ; Guo, Chenxu</creatorcontrib><description>This paper explores the socially optimal privatization policies under the setting of international mixed duopoly. We find that partial privatization is socially optimal under Cournot competition and private leadership competition, whereas full nationalization is socially optimal under public leadership competition. Moreover, the equilibrium social welfare under private leadership competition is higher than that observed under Cournot competition and that observed under private leadership competition, which differs from the findings of Matsumura (). We also show that the endogenous timing game has a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium outcome, under which the government chooses a partial privatization policy, and private leadership competition emerges as the optimal output decision sequence of firms. An important policy implication from this paper is that the government should partially privatize the public firm and facilitate the emergence of private leadership competition in an international mixed market.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-6669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rode.12207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Competition ; Duopoly ; Game theory ; Privatization ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Review of development economics, 2016-02, Vol.20 (1), p.228-238</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4927-d04ac985ae7644e11000ca7873aed8e8d8bcff6b7042a78cfac56ee399ebacbf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4927-d04ac985ae7644e11000ca7873aed8e8d8bcff6b7042a78cfac56ee399ebacbf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frode.12207$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frode.12207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ou, Ruiqiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Chenxu</creatorcontrib><title>The Optimal Privatization Policies under an International Mixed Duopoly</title><title>Review of development economics</title><addtitle>Rev Dev Econ</addtitle><description>This paper explores the socially optimal privatization policies under the setting of international mixed duopoly. We find that partial privatization is socially optimal under Cournot competition and private leadership competition, whereas full nationalization is socially optimal under public leadership competition. Moreover, the equilibrium social welfare under private leadership competition is higher than that observed under Cournot competition and that observed under private leadership competition, which differs from the findings of Matsumura (). We also show that the endogenous timing game has a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium outcome, under which the government chooses a partial privatization policy, and private leadership competition emerges as the optimal output decision sequence of firms. An important policy implication from this paper is that the government should partially privatize the public firm and facilitate the emergence of private leadership competition in an international mixed market.</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Duopoly</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1363-6669</issn><issn>1467-9361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhisEEmNw4RdU4obUkfQjaY5oH2XSYBMa4xilqSsySjOSFjZ-PdkKHIlkxbKf17Jfz7vEaIDduzG6gAEOQ0SPvB6OCQ1YRPCxyyMSBYQQduqdWbtGCDGMk56XLV_An28a9SYqf2HUh2jUlwtd-wtdKanA-m1dgPFF7U_rBkx96Dr6Xm2h8Eet3uhqd-6dlKKycPHz972nyXg5vAtm82w6vJ0FMmYhDQoUC8nSRAAlcQwYu0WkoCmNBBQppEWay7IkOUVx6MqyFDIhABFjkAuZl1Hfu-rmbox-b8E2fK1bt1NlOaYE0TAMKXLUdUdJo601UPKNcReaHceI743ie6P4wSgH4w7-VBXs_iH543w0_tUEnUbZBrZ_GmFeOaERTfjzQ8YnbLRcpauMs-gbRPh7CA</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Ou, Ruiqiu</creator><creator>Li, Jie</creator><creator>Lu, Jing</creator><creator>Guo, Chenxu</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>The Optimal Privatization Policies under an International Mixed Duopoly</title><author>Ou, Ruiqiu ; Li, Jie ; Lu, Jing ; Guo, Chenxu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4927-d04ac985ae7644e11000ca7873aed8e8d8bcff6b7042a78cfac56ee399ebacbf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Duopoly</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ou, Ruiqiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Chenxu</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Review of development economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ou, Ruiqiu</au><au>Li, Jie</au><au>Lu, Jing</au><au>Guo, Chenxu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Optimal Privatization Policies under an International Mixed Duopoly</atitle><jtitle>Review of development economics</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Dev Econ</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>228</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>228-238</pages><issn>1363-6669</issn><eissn>1467-9361</eissn><abstract>This paper explores the socially optimal privatization policies under the setting of international mixed duopoly. We find that partial privatization is socially optimal under Cournot competition and private leadership competition, whereas full nationalization is socially optimal under public leadership competition. Moreover, the equilibrium social welfare under private leadership competition is higher than that observed under Cournot competition and that observed under private leadership competition, which differs from the findings of Matsumura (). We also show that the endogenous timing game has a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium outcome, under which the government chooses a partial privatization policy, and private leadership competition emerges as the optimal output decision sequence of firms. An important policy implication from this paper is that the government should partially privatize the public firm and facilitate the emergence of private leadership competition in an international mixed market.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/rode.12207</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1363-6669 |
ispartof | Review of development economics, 2016-02, Vol.20 (1), p.228-238 |
issn | 1363-6669 1467-9361 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1760722270 |
source | Wiley Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Competition Duopoly Game theory Privatization Studies |
title | The Optimal Privatization Policies under an International Mixed Duopoly |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A11%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Optimal%20Privatization%20Policies%20under%20an%20International%20Mixed%20Duopoly&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20development%20economics&rft.au=Ou,%20Ruiqiu&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=228&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=228-238&rft.issn=1363-6669&rft.eissn=1467-9361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rode.12207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3934991211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760722270&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |