Effects of planting methods on yield and morphological traits of three chickpea cultivars in rain fed conditions
In this study, effects of different planting methods on grain yield and other agronomic traits in three cultivars of pea (Hashem, Philip 9393 (Azad), and Gereet) which was based on randomized complete block design were studied. Experimental results showed that effect of cultivars on weight of 100 be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Russian agricultural sciences 2014-09, Vol.40 (5), p.339-343 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 343 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 339 |
container_title | Russian agricultural sciences |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Jafari, M. Sabzevari, A. Asefpour Vakilian, K. |
description | In this study, effects of different planting methods on grain yield and other agronomic traits in three cultivars of pea (Hashem, Philip 9393 (Azad), and Gereet) which was based on randomized complete block design were studied. Experimental results showed that effect of cultivars on weight of 100 beans and the plant height were significant at 1% and 5% level, respectively. Results also indicated that method of planting affected the number of pods per bush and biological yield at and yield (grain) and number of beans per bush and number of branches at 1% and 5% level, respectively. The interaction of cultivar planting methods and number of pods per bush was significant at 1% level. Two mechanized planting treatments (the grain drill planter and pneumatic row planter) increased the average crop yield from traditional values (1753 kg/ha) to 2486 and 2379 kg/ha, respectively. Plants which were grown from a row planter had the highest number of beans on bush (53 beans) for all of cultivars. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3103/S1068367414050115 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1751005818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3902083631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1135-43c7e363b3a864be1019a011e904f5b5fa7887f61af4f80b9427503a470d19ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA82qmSTa7Ryn1DxQ8qOclm026qdtkTVKh396U9SCIpxnmvd8M8xC6BnJLgdC7VyBlRUvBgBFOAPgJmkFNWVERKk5zn-XiqJ-jixi3hPBywegMjStjtEoRe4PHQbpk3QbvdOp9l2cOH6weOixdh3c-jL0f_MYqOeAUpJ2o1Aetseqt-hi1xGo_JPslQ8TW4Wxy2OgOK-86m6x38RKdGTlEffVT5-j9YfW2fCrWL4_Py_t1oQAoLxhVQtOStlRWJWs1EKhl_kvXhBneciNFVQlTgjTMVKSt2UJwQiUTpIPaGDpHN9PeMfjPvY6p2fp9cPlkA4JDDqCCKrtgcqngYwzaNGOwOxkODZDmGGzzJ9jMLCYmZq_b6PBr87_QN8haekc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1751005818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of planting methods on yield and morphological traits of three chickpea cultivars in rain fed conditions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Jafari, M. ; Sabzevari, A. ; Asefpour Vakilian, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jafari, M. ; Sabzevari, A. ; Asefpour Vakilian, K.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, effects of different planting methods on grain yield and other agronomic traits in three cultivars of pea (Hashem, Philip 9393 (Azad), and Gereet) which was based on randomized complete block design were studied. Experimental results showed that effect of cultivars on weight of 100 beans and the plant height were significant at 1% and 5% level, respectively. Results also indicated that method of planting affected the number of pods per bush and biological yield at and yield (grain) and number of beans per bush and number of branches at 1% and 5% level, respectively. The interaction of cultivar planting methods and number of pods per bush was significant at 1% level. Two mechanized planting treatments (the grain drill planter and pneumatic row planter) increased the average crop yield from traditional values (1753 kg/ha) to 2486 and 2379 kg/ha, respectively. Plants which were grown from a row planter had the highest number of beans on bush (53 beans) for all of cultivars.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-3674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3103/S1068367414050115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Allerton Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Analysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Cultivars ; Fodder Production ; Grain ; Life Sciences ; Methods ; Morphology ; Plant Biochemistry ; Plant growth ; Potassium ; Seeds ; Studies ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Russian agricultural sciences, 2014-09, Vol.40 (5), p.339-343</ispartof><rights>Allerton Press, Inc. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1135-43c7e363b3a864be1019a011e904f5b5fa7887f61af4f80b9427503a470d19ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3103/S1068367414050115$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3103/S1068367414050115$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jafari, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabzevari, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asefpour Vakilian, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of planting methods on yield and morphological traits of three chickpea cultivars in rain fed conditions</title><title>Russian agricultural sciences</title><addtitle>Russ. Agricult. Sci</addtitle><description>In this study, effects of different planting methods on grain yield and other agronomic traits in three cultivars of pea (Hashem, Philip 9393 (Azad), and Gereet) which was based on randomized complete block design were studied. Experimental results showed that effect of cultivars on weight of 100 beans and the plant height were significant at 1% and 5% level, respectively. Results also indicated that method of planting affected the number of pods per bush and biological yield at and yield (grain) and number of beans per bush and number of branches at 1% and 5% level, respectively. The interaction of cultivar planting methods and number of pods per bush was significant at 1% level. Two mechanized planting treatments (the grain drill planter and pneumatic row planter) increased the average crop yield from traditional values (1753 kg/ha) to 2486 and 2379 kg/ha, respectively. Plants which were grown from a row planter had the highest number of beans on bush (53 beans) for all of cultivars.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Fodder Production</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Plant Biochemistry</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Potassium</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1068-3674</issn><issn>1934-8037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvA82qmSTa7Ryn1DxQ8qOclm026qdtkTVKh396U9SCIpxnmvd8M8xC6BnJLgdC7VyBlRUvBgBFOAPgJmkFNWVERKk5zn-XiqJ-jixi3hPBywegMjStjtEoRe4PHQbpk3QbvdOp9l2cOH6weOixdh3c-jL0f_MYqOeAUpJ2o1Aetseqt-hi1xGo_JPslQ8TW4Wxy2OgOK-86m6x38RKdGTlEffVT5-j9YfW2fCrWL4_Py_t1oQAoLxhVQtOStlRWJWs1EKhl_kvXhBneciNFVQlTgjTMVKSt2UJwQiUTpIPaGDpHN9PeMfjPvY6p2fp9cPlkA4JDDqCCKrtgcqngYwzaNGOwOxkODZDmGGzzJ9jMLCYmZq_b6PBr87_QN8haekc</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Jafari, M.</creator><creator>Sabzevari, A.</creator><creator>Asefpour Vakilian, K.</creator><general>Allerton Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Effects of planting methods on yield and morphological traits of three chickpea cultivars in rain fed conditions</title><author>Jafari, M. ; Sabzevari, A. ; Asefpour Vakilian, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1135-43c7e363b3a864be1019a011e904f5b5fa7887f61af4f80b9427503a470d19ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Fodder Production</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Plant Biochemistry</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Potassium</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jafari, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabzevari, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asefpour Vakilian, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Russian agricultural sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jafari, M.</au><au>Sabzevari, A.</au><au>Asefpour Vakilian, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of planting methods on yield and morphological traits of three chickpea cultivars in rain fed conditions</atitle><jtitle>Russian agricultural sciences</jtitle><stitle>Russ. Agricult. Sci</stitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>339-343</pages><issn>1068-3674</issn><eissn>1934-8037</eissn><abstract>In this study, effects of different planting methods on grain yield and other agronomic traits in three cultivars of pea (Hashem, Philip 9393 (Azad), and Gereet) which was based on randomized complete block design were studied. Experimental results showed that effect of cultivars on weight of 100 beans and the plant height were significant at 1% and 5% level, respectively. Results also indicated that method of planting affected the number of pods per bush and biological yield at and yield (grain) and number of beans per bush and number of branches at 1% and 5% level, respectively. The interaction of cultivar planting methods and number of pods per bush was significant at 1% level. Two mechanized planting treatments (the grain drill planter and pneumatic row planter) increased the average crop yield from traditional values (1753 kg/ha) to 2486 and 2379 kg/ha, respectively. Plants which were grown from a row planter had the highest number of beans on bush (53 beans) for all of cultivars.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Allerton Press</pub><doi>10.3103/S1068367414050115</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-3674 |
ispartof | Russian agricultural sciences, 2014-09, Vol.40 (5), p.339-343 |
issn | 1068-3674 1934-8037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1751005818 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Agricultural production Agriculture Agronomy Analysis Biomedical and Life Sciences Crop yield Crops Cultivars Fodder Production Grain Life Sciences Methods Morphology Plant Biochemistry Plant growth Potassium Seeds Studies Variance analysis |
title | Effects of planting methods on yield and morphological traits of three chickpea cultivars in rain fed conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T00%3A58%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20planting%20methods%20on%20yield%20and%20morphological%20traits%20of%20three%20chickpea%20cultivars%20in%20rain%20fed%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Russian%20agricultural%20sciences&rft.au=Jafari,%20M.&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=339-343&rft.issn=1068-3674&rft.eissn=1934-8037&rft_id=info:doi/10.3103/S1068367414050115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3902083631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1751005818&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |