Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem-solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, research...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Intelligence (Norwood) 2015-11, Vol.53, p.92-101 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | Intelligence (Norwood) |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Stadler, Matthias Becker, Nicolas Gödker, Markus Leutner, Detlev Greiff, Samuel |
description | The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem-solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, researchers have hypothesized the two constructs to be everything from completely separate to identical. Over the course of almost four decades, empirical studies yielded results in support of both arguments. Our meta-analysis of 47 studies containing 60 independent samples and a total sample size of 13,740 participants revealed a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433. In addition, we investigated whether the operationalization of CPS and intelligence moderated this correlation. Whereas there were no significant correlation differences considering the operationalization of intelligence, the approach used to measure CPS moderated the correlation of CPS and intelligence. Especially the most recent approach towards the assessment of CPS yielded the strongest associations between the two constructs. Implications for existing theories and future research are discussed.
•We conducted a meta-analysis on the relation between complex problem solving (CPS) and intelligence.•Total sample size amounted to 13,740 participants from 47 studies and 60 independent samples.•Our meta-analysis demonstrated a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433.•The correlation of CPS and intelligence was moderated by the way CPS was operationalized. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1735911767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0160289615001294</els_id><sourcerecordid>3875914471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-23b244a1d740e96994d06136953ff444c48e612e01e3c6bcbf4c3a7af059ea1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAYhC0EEqXwDxgiMSf4jR07ZkCqKgpIlVhgthznTeUoH8VOK_rvcRVmplueO90dIfdAM6AgHtvMDRN2XZZTKDKqMkqLC7KAUrJUKlZckkXEaJqXSlyTmxBaGgng5YKo9djvO_xJ9n6sOuyTMHZHN-wSM9TJnOp2OFh8SlZJj5NJzWC6U3Dhllw1pgt496dL8rV5-Vy_pduP1_f1aptaxviU5qzKOTdQS05RCaV4TQUwoQrWNJxzy0sUkCMFZFZUtmq4ZUaahhYKDRi2JA9zbmz4fcAw6XY8-FgiaJCsUABSyEjxmbJ-DMFjo_fe9cafNFB9Pkm3ep6jzydpqnS8INqeZxvGBUeHXgfrznNr59FOuh7d_wG_flRw6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735911767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Stadler, Matthias ; Becker, Nicolas ; Gödker, Markus ; Leutner, Detlev ; Greiff, Samuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Matthias ; Becker, Nicolas ; Gödker, Markus ; Leutner, Detlev ; Greiff, Samuel</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem-solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, researchers have hypothesized the two constructs to be everything from completely separate to identical. Over the course of almost four decades, empirical studies yielded results in support of both arguments. Our meta-analysis of 47 studies containing 60 independent samples and a total sample size of 13,740 participants revealed a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433. In addition, we investigated whether the operationalization of CPS and intelligence moderated this correlation. Whereas there were no significant correlation differences considering the operationalization of intelligence, the approach used to measure CPS moderated the correlation of CPS and intelligence. Especially the most recent approach towards the assessment of CPS yielded the strongest associations between the two constructs. Implications for existing theories and future research are discussed.
•We conducted a meta-analysis on the relation between complex problem solving (CPS) and intelligence.•Total sample size amounted to 13,740 participants from 47 studies and 60 independent samples.•Our meta-analysis demonstrated a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433.•The correlation of CPS and intelligence was moderated by the way CPS was operationalized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-2896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NTLLDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Complex problem-solving ; Correlation analysis ; Decision making ; Dynamic decision making ; Intelligence ; Meta-analysis ; Moderated ; Multiple complex systems ; Problem solving ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Intelligence (Norwood), 2015-11, Vol.53, p.92-101</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Ablex Publishing Corporation Nov-Dec 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-23b244a1d740e96994d06136953ff444c48e612e01e3c6bcbf4c3a7af059ea1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-23b244a1d740e96994d06136953ff444c48e612e01e3c6bcbf4c3a7af059ea1a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8241-8723</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,30986,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gödker, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leutner, Detlev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiff, Samuel</creatorcontrib><title>Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis</title><title>Intelligence (Norwood)</title><description>The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem-solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, researchers have hypothesized the two constructs to be everything from completely separate to identical. Over the course of almost four decades, empirical studies yielded results in support of both arguments. Our meta-analysis of 47 studies containing 60 independent samples and a total sample size of 13,740 participants revealed a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433. In addition, we investigated whether the operationalization of CPS and intelligence moderated this correlation. Whereas there were no significant correlation differences considering the operationalization of intelligence, the approach used to measure CPS moderated the correlation of CPS and intelligence. Especially the most recent approach towards the assessment of CPS yielded the strongest associations between the two constructs. Implications for existing theories and future research are discussed.
•We conducted a meta-analysis on the relation between complex problem solving (CPS) and intelligence.•Total sample size amounted to 13,740 participants from 47 studies and 60 independent samples.•Our meta-analysis demonstrated a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433.•The correlation of CPS and intelligence was moderated by the way CPS was operationalized.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Complex problem-solving</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dynamic decision making</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Moderated</subject><subject>Multiple complex systems</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0160-2896</issn><issn>1873-7935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAYhC0EEqXwDxgiMSf4jR07ZkCqKgpIlVhgthznTeUoH8VOK_rvcRVmplueO90dIfdAM6AgHtvMDRN2XZZTKDKqMkqLC7KAUrJUKlZckkXEaJqXSlyTmxBaGgng5YKo9djvO_xJ9n6sOuyTMHZHN-wSM9TJnOp2OFh8SlZJj5NJzWC6U3Dhllw1pgt496dL8rV5-Vy_pduP1_f1aptaxviU5qzKOTdQS05RCaV4TQUwoQrWNJxzy0sUkCMFZFZUtmq4ZUaahhYKDRi2JA9zbmz4fcAw6XY8-FgiaJCsUABSyEjxmbJ-DMFjo_fe9cafNFB9Pkm3ep6jzydpqnS8INqeZxvGBUeHXgfrznNr59FOuh7d_wG_flRw6g</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Stadler, Matthias</creator><creator>Becker, Nicolas</creator><creator>Gödker, Markus</creator><creator>Leutner, Detlev</creator><creator>Greiff, Samuel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8241-8723</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis</title><author>Stadler, Matthias ; Becker, Nicolas ; Gödker, Markus ; Leutner, Detlev ; Greiff, Samuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-23b244a1d740e96994d06136953ff444c48e612e01e3c6bcbf4c3a7af059ea1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Complex problem-solving</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dynamic decision making</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Moderated</topic><topic>Multiple complex systems</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gödker, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leutner, Detlev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiff, Samuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stadler, Matthias</au><au>Becker, Nicolas</au><au>Gödker, Markus</au><au>Leutner, Detlev</au><au>Greiff, Samuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>92</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>92-101</pages><issn>0160-2896</issn><eissn>1873-7935</eissn><coden>NTLLDT</coden><abstract>The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem-solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, researchers have hypothesized the two constructs to be everything from completely separate to identical. Over the course of almost four decades, empirical studies yielded results in support of both arguments. Our meta-analysis of 47 studies containing 60 independent samples and a total sample size of 13,740 participants revealed a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433. In addition, we investigated whether the operationalization of CPS and intelligence moderated this correlation. Whereas there were no significant correlation differences considering the operationalization of intelligence, the approach used to measure CPS moderated the correlation of CPS and intelligence. Especially the most recent approach towards the assessment of CPS yielded the strongest associations between the two constructs. Implications for existing theories and future research are discussed.
•We conducted a meta-analysis on the relation between complex problem solving (CPS) and intelligence.•Total sample size amounted to 13,740 participants from 47 studies and 60 independent samples.•Our meta-analysis demonstrated a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433.•The correlation of CPS and intelligence was moderated by the way CPS was operationalized.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8241-8723</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0160-2896 |
ispartof | Intelligence (Norwood), 2015-11, Vol.53, p.92-101 |
issn | 0160-2896 1873-7935 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1735911767 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Analysis Complex problem-solving Correlation analysis Decision making Dynamic decision making Intelligence Meta-analysis Moderated Multiple complex systems Problem solving Systematic review |
title | Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A41%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complex%20problem%20solving%20and%20intelligence:%20A%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Intelligence%20(Norwood)&rft.au=Stadler,%20Matthias&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=92-101&rft.issn=0160-2896&rft.eissn=1873-7935&rft.coden=NTLLDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3875914471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735911767&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0160289615001294&rfr_iscdi=true |