Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis

The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem-solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, research...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intelligence (Norwood) 2015-11, Vol.53, p.92-101
Hauptverfasser: Stadler, Matthias, Becker, Nicolas, Gödker, Markus, Leutner, Detlev, Greiff, Samuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101
container_issue
container_start_page 92
container_title Intelligence (Norwood)
container_volume 53
creator Stadler, Matthias
Becker, Nicolas
Gödker, Markus
Leutner, Detlev
Greiff, Samuel
description The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem-solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, researchers have hypothesized the two constructs to be everything from completely separate to identical. Over the course of almost four decades, empirical studies yielded results in support of both arguments. Our meta-analysis of 47 studies containing 60 independent samples and a total sample size of 13,740 participants revealed a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433. In addition, we investigated whether the operationalization of CPS and intelligence moderated this correlation. Whereas there were no significant correlation differences considering the operationalization of intelligence, the approach used to measure CPS moderated the correlation of CPS and intelligence. Especially the most recent approach towards the assessment of CPS yielded the strongest associations between the two constructs. Implications for existing theories and future research are discussed. •We conducted a meta-analysis on the relation between complex problem solving (CPS) and intelligence.•Total sample size amounted to 13,740 participants from 47 studies and 60 independent samples.•Our meta-analysis demonstrated a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433.•The correlation of CPS and intelligence was moderated by the way CPS was operationalized.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1735911767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0160289615001294</els_id><sourcerecordid>3875914471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-23b244a1d740e96994d06136953ff444c48e612e01e3c6bcbf4c3a7af059ea1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAYhC0EEqXwDxgiMSf4jR07ZkCqKgpIlVhgthznTeUoH8VOK_rvcRVmplueO90dIfdAM6AgHtvMDRN2XZZTKDKqMkqLC7KAUrJUKlZckkXEaJqXSlyTmxBaGgng5YKo9djvO_xJ9n6sOuyTMHZHN-wSM9TJnOp2OFh8SlZJj5NJzWC6U3Dhllw1pgt496dL8rV5-Vy_pduP1_f1aptaxviU5qzKOTdQS05RCaV4TQUwoQrWNJxzy0sUkCMFZFZUtmq4ZUaahhYKDRi2JA9zbmz4fcAw6XY8-FgiaJCsUABSyEjxmbJ-DMFjo_fe9cafNFB9Pkm3ep6jzydpqnS8INqeZxvGBUeHXgfrznNr59FOuh7d_wG_flRw6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735911767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Stadler, Matthias ; Becker, Nicolas ; Gödker, Markus ; Leutner, Detlev ; Greiff, Samuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Matthias ; Becker, Nicolas ; Gödker, Markus ; Leutner, Detlev ; Greiff, Samuel</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem-solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, researchers have hypothesized the two constructs to be everything from completely separate to identical. Over the course of almost four decades, empirical studies yielded results in support of both arguments. Our meta-analysis of 47 studies containing 60 independent samples and a total sample size of 13,740 participants revealed a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433. In addition, we investigated whether the operationalization of CPS and intelligence moderated this correlation. Whereas there were no significant correlation differences considering the operationalization of intelligence, the approach used to measure CPS moderated the correlation of CPS and intelligence. Especially the most recent approach towards the assessment of CPS yielded the strongest associations between the two constructs. Implications for existing theories and future research are discussed. •We conducted a meta-analysis on the relation between complex problem solving (CPS) and intelligence.•Total sample size amounted to 13,740 participants from 47 studies and 60 independent samples.•Our meta-analysis demonstrated a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433.•The correlation of CPS and intelligence was moderated by the way CPS was operationalized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-2896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NTLLDT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Complex problem-solving ; Correlation analysis ; Decision making ; Dynamic decision making ; Intelligence ; Meta-analysis ; Moderated ; Multiple complex systems ; Problem solving ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Intelligence (Norwood), 2015-11, Vol.53, p.92-101</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Ablex Publishing Corporation Nov-Dec 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-23b244a1d740e96994d06136953ff444c48e612e01e3c6bcbf4c3a7af059ea1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-23b244a1d740e96994d06136953ff444c48e612e01e3c6bcbf4c3a7af059ea1a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8241-8723</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,30986,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gödker, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leutner, Detlev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiff, Samuel</creatorcontrib><title>Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis</title><title>Intelligence (Norwood)</title><description>The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem-solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, researchers have hypothesized the two constructs to be everything from completely separate to identical. Over the course of almost four decades, empirical studies yielded results in support of both arguments. Our meta-analysis of 47 studies containing 60 independent samples and a total sample size of 13,740 participants revealed a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433. In addition, we investigated whether the operationalization of CPS and intelligence moderated this correlation. Whereas there were no significant correlation differences considering the operationalization of intelligence, the approach used to measure CPS moderated the correlation of CPS and intelligence. Especially the most recent approach towards the assessment of CPS yielded the strongest associations between the two constructs. Implications for existing theories and future research are discussed. •We conducted a meta-analysis on the relation between complex problem solving (CPS) and intelligence.•Total sample size amounted to 13,740 participants from 47 studies and 60 independent samples.•Our meta-analysis demonstrated a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433.•The correlation of CPS and intelligence was moderated by the way CPS was operationalized.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Complex problem-solving</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dynamic decision making</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Moderated</subject><subject>Multiple complex systems</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0160-2896</issn><issn>1873-7935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAYhC0EEqXwDxgiMSf4jR07ZkCqKgpIlVhgthznTeUoH8VOK_rvcRVmplueO90dIfdAM6AgHtvMDRN2XZZTKDKqMkqLC7KAUrJUKlZckkXEaJqXSlyTmxBaGgng5YKo9djvO_xJ9n6sOuyTMHZHN-wSM9TJnOp2OFh8SlZJj5NJzWC6U3Dhllw1pgt496dL8rV5-Vy_pduP1_f1aptaxviU5qzKOTdQS05RCaV4TQUwoQrWNJxzy0sUkCMFZFZUtmq4ZUaahhYKDRi2JA9zbmz4fcAw6XY8-FgiaJCsUABSyEjxmbJ-DMFjo_fe9cafNFB9Pkm3ep6jzydpqnS8INqeZxvGBUeHXgfrznNr59FOuh7d_wG_flRw6g</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Stadler, Matthias</creator><creator>Becker, Nicolas</creator><creator>Gödker, Markus</creator><creator>Leutner, Detlev</creator><creator>Greiff, Samuel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8241-8723</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis</title><author>Stadler, Matthias ; Becker, Nicolas ; Gödker, Markus ; Leutner, Detlev ; Greiff, Samuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-23b244a1d740e96994d06136953ff444c48e612e01e3c6bcbf4c3a7af059ea1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Complex problem-solving</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dynamic decision making</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Moderated</topic><topic>Multiple complex systems</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gödker, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leutner, Detlev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiff, Samuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stadler, Matthias</au><au>Becker, Nicolas</au><au>Gödker, Markus</au><au>Leutner, Detlev</au><au>Greiff, Samuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Intelligence (Norwood)</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>92</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>92-101</pages><issn>0160-2896</issn><eissn>1873-7935</eissn><coden>NTLLDT</coden><abstract>The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relation between complex problem-solving skills (CPS) and intelligence, a topic that has been widely discussed and that has instigated a vast array of partially contradicting findings in the past. Theoretically, researchers have hypothesized the two constructs to be everything from completely separate to identical. Over the course of almost four decades, empirical studies yielded results in support of both arguments. Our meta-analysis of 47 studies containing 60 independent samples and a total sample size of 13,740 participants revealed a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433. In addition, we investigated whether the operationalization of CPS and intelligence moderated this correlation. Whereas there were no significant correlation differences considering the operationalization of intelligence, the approach used to measure CPS moderated the correlation of CPS and intelligence. Especially the most recent approach towards the assessment of CPS yielded the strongest associations between the two constructs. Implications for existing theories and future research are discussed. •We conducted a meta-analysis on the relation between complex problem solving (CPS) and intelligence.•Total sample size amounted to 13,740 participants from 47 studies and 60 independent samples.•Our meta-analysis demonstrated a substantial correlation of CPS and intelligence with an average effect size of M(g)=.433.•The correlation of CPS and intelligence was moderated by the way CPS was operationalized.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8241-8723</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-2896
ispartof Intelligence (Norwood), 2015-11, Vol.53, p.92-101
issn 0160-2896
1873-7935
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1735911767
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Analysis
Complex problem-solving
Correlation analysis
Decision making
Dynamic decision making
Intelligence
Meta-analysis
Moderated
Multiple complex systems
Problem solving
Systematic review
title Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A41%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complex%20problem%20solving%20and%20intelligence:%20A%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Intelligence%20(Norwood)&rft.au=Stadler,%20Matthias&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=92-101&rft.issn=0160-2896&rft.eissn=1873-7935&rft.coden=NTLLDT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3875914471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735911767&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0160289615001294&rfr_iscdi=true