Work–Family Enrichment and Satisfaction: Mediating Processes and Relative Impact of Originating and Receiving Domains

Previous research has been inconsistent in the prediction and empirical findings regarding work–family enrichment and satisfaction. The current research seeks to clarify this inconsistency by examining both directions of work–family enrichment (work-to-family enrichment and family-to-work enrichment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of management 2014-03, Vol.40 (3), p.845-865
Hauptverfasser: Carlson, Dawn S., Hunter, Emily M., Ferguson, Merideth, Whitten, Dwayne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 865
container_issue 3
container_start_page 845
container_title Journal of management
container_volume 40
creator Carlson, Dawn S.
Hunter, Emily M.
Ferguson, Merideth
Whitten, Dwayne
description Previous research has been inconsistent in the prediction and empirical findings regarding work–family enrichment and satisfaction. The current research seeks to clarify this inconsistency by examining both directions of work–family enrichment (work-to-family enrichment and family-to-work enrichment) with both job satisfaction and family satisfaction to determine if their effects are similar or diverse. Building on the theoretical foundation of Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build theory, the authors explore the mediating roles of psychological distress and positive mood in this process. Using a sample of 310 working respondents, the authors found that psychological distress was a mediator to both job satisfaction and family satisfaction, while positive mood was a mediator to job satisfaction but not family satisfaction. Further, the authors found that the direct effect of work-to-family enrichment was on job satisfaction, the originating domain. In addition, the total effect of enrichment to satisfaction (through the mediation mechanisms of distress and mood) was again in the pattern of the originating domain such that work-to-family enrichment more strongly influenced job satisfaction. However, family-to-work enrichment did not directly impact family satisfaction, nor was it significantly stronger than work-to-family in its total effect on family satisfaction.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0149206311414429
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1728718856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0149206311414429</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3853955221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-4a903974735e3f6f64e17677a6d77ae8d5bfe17dc836b0f1d4b01395f8c067b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRMFbvHgOePERnsn9zlNJWoeDBgsdls9nV1Capu-mhN7-D39BPYkI9iOBlBub93ht4hFwi3CBKeQvIihwERWTIWF4ckQQ5lxnmiMckGeVs1E_JWYxrAEAFLCHXz114-_r4nJum3uzTWRtq-9q4tk9NW6VPpq-jN7avu_acnHizie7iZ0_Iaj5bTe-z5ePiYXq3zGxe0D5jpgBaSCYpd9QLL5hDKaQ0ohqGUxUv_XCprKKiBI8VKwFpwb2yIGRJJ-TqELsN3fvOxV6vu11oh48aZa4kKsXFQMGBsqGLMTivt6FuTNhrBD32of_2MViygyWaF_cr9D_-G-AuXiI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1728718856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Work–Family Enrichment and Satisfaction: Mediating Processes and Relative Impact of Originating and Receiving Domains</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Carlson, Dawn S. ; Hunter, Emily M. ; Ferguson, Merideth ; Whitten, Dwayne</creator><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Dawn S. ; Hunter, Emily M. ; Ferguson, Merideth ; Whitten, Dwayne</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has been inconsistent in the prediction and empirical findings regarding work–family enrichment and satisfaction. The current research seeks to clarify this inconsistency by examining both directions of work–family enrichment (work-to-family enrichment and family-to-work enrichment) with both job satisfaction and family satisfaction to determine if their effects are similar or diverse. Building on the theoretical foundation of Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build theory, the authors explore the mediating roles of psychological distress and positive mood in this process. Using a sample of 310 working respondents, the authors found that psychological distress was a mediator to both job satisfaction and family satisfaction, while positive mood was a mediator to job satisfaction but not family satisfaction. Further, the authors found that the direct effect of work-to-family enrichment was on job satisfaction, the originating domain. In addition, the total effect of enrichment to satisfaction (through the mediation mechanisms of distress and mood) was again in the pattern of the originating domain such that work-to-family enrichment more strongly influenced job satisfaction. However, family-to-work enrichment did not directly impact family satisfaction, nor was it significantly stronger than work-to-family in its total effect on family satisfaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-1211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0149206311414429</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMADO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Families &amp; family life ; Job satisfaction ; Mediators ; Occupational stress ; Psychological aspects ; Studies ; Work life balance</subject><ispartof>Journal of management, 2014-03, Vol.40 (3), p.845-865</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Mar 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-4a903974735e3f6f64e17677a6d77ae8d5bfe17dc836b0f1d4b01395f8c067b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0149206311414429$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0149206311414429$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Dawn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Merideth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitten, Dwayne</creatorcontrib><title>Work–Family Enrichment and Satisfaction: Mediating Processes and Relative Impact of Originating and Receiving Domains</title><title>Journal of management</title><description>Previous research has been inconsistent in the prediction and empirical findings regarding work–family enrichment and satisfaction. The current research seeks to clarify this inconsistency by examining both directions of work–family enrichment (work-to-family enrichment and family-to-work enrichment) with both job satisfaction and family satisfaction to determine if their effects are similar or diverse. Building on the theoretical foundation of Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build theory, the authors explore the mediating roles of psychological distress and positive mood in this process. Using a sample of 310 working respondents, the authors found that psychological distress was a mediator to both job satisfaction and family satisfaction, while positive mood was a mediator to job satisfaction but not family satisfaction. Further, the authors found that the direct effect of work-to-family enrichment was on job satisfaction, the originating domain. In addition, the total effect of enrichment to satisfaction (through the mediation mechanisms of distress and mood) was again in the pattern of the originating domain such that work-to-family enrichment more strongly influenced job satisfaction. However, family-to-work enrichment did not directly impact family satisfaction, nor was it significantly stronger than work-to-family in its total effect on family satisfaction.</description><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Mediators</subject><subject>Occupational stress</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Work life balance</subject><issn>0149-2063</issn><issn>1557-1211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRMFbvHgOePERnsn9zlNJWoeDBgsdls9nV1Capu-mhN7-D39BPYkI9iOBlBub93ht4hFwi3CBKeQvIihwERWTIWF4ckQQ5lxnmiMckGeVs1E_JWYxrAEAFLCHXz114-_r4nJum3uzTWRtq-9q4tk9NW6VPpq-jN7avu_acnHizie7iZ0_Iaj5bTe-z5ePiYXq3zGxe0D5jpgBaSCYpd9QLL5hDKaQ0ohqGUxUv_XCprKKiBI8VKwFpwb2yIGRJJ-TqELsN3fvOxV6vu11oh48aZa4kKsXFQMGBsqGLMTivt6FuTNhrBD32of_2MViygyWaF_cr9D_-G-AuXiI</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Carlson, Dawn S.</creator><creator>Hunter, Emily M.</creator><creator>Ferguson, Merideth</creator><creator>Whitten, Dwayne</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Work–Family Enrichment and Satisfaction</title><author>Carlson, Dawn S. ; Hunter, Emily M. ; Ferguson, Merideth ; Whitten, Dwayne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-4a903974735e3f6f64e17677a6d77ae8d5bfe17dc836b0f1d4b01395f8c067b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Mediators</topic><topic>Occupational stress</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Work life balance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Dawn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Emily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Merideth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitten, Dwayne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carlson, Dawn S.</au><au>Hunter, Emily M.</au><au>Ferguson, Merideth</au><au>Whitten, Dwayne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Work–Family Enrichment and Satisfaction: Mediating Processes and Relative Impact of Originating and Receiving Domains</atitle><jtitle>Journal of management</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>845</spage><epage>865</epage><pages>845-865</pages><issn>0149-2063</issn><eissn>1557-1211</eissn><coden>JOMADO</coden><abstract>Previous research has been inconsistent in the prediction and empirical findings regarding work–family enrichment and satisfaction. The current research seeks to clarify this inconsistency by examining both directions of work–family enrichment (work-to-family enrichment and family-to-work enrichment) with both job satisfaction and family satisfaction to determine if their effects are similar or diverse. Building on the theoretical foundation of Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build theory, the authors explore the mediating roles of psychological distress and positive mood in this process. Using a sample of 310 working respondents, the authors found that psychological distress was a mediator to both job satisfaction and family satisfaction, while positive mood was a mediator to job satisfaction but not family satisfaction. Further, the authors found that the direct effect of work-to-family enrichment was on job satisfaction, the originating domain. In addition, the total effect of enrichment to satisfaction (through the mediation mechanisms of distress and mood) was again in the pattern of the originating domain such that work-to-family enrichment more strongly influenced job satisfaction. However, family-to-work enrichment did not directly impact family satisfaction, nor was it significantly stronger than work-to-family in its total effect on family satisfaction.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0149206311414429</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-2063
ispartof Journal of management, 2014-03, Vol.40 (3), p.845-865
issn 0149-2063
1557-1211
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1728718856
source Access via SAGE
subjects Families & family life
Job satisfaction
Mediators
Occupational stress
Psychological aspects
Studies
Work life balance
title Work–Family Enrichment and Satisfaction: Mediating Processes and Relative Impact of Originating and Receiving Domains
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T01%3A31%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Work%E2%80%93Family%20Enrichment%20and%20Satisfaction:%20Mediating%20Processes%20and%20Relative%20Impact%20of%20Originating%20and%20Receiving%20Domains&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20management&rft.au=Carlson,%20Dawn%20S.&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=845&rft.epage=865&rft.pages=845-865&rft.issn=0149-2063&rft.eissn=1557-1211&rft.coden=JOMADO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0149206311414429&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3853955221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1728718856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0149206311414429&rfr_iscdi=true