Ubuntu Versus ubuntu: Finding a Philosophy of Justice Through Obligation

Leonhard Praeg's A Report on Ubuntu ( 2014 ) is a clever, if dense, treatise about the potential of Ubuntu as an emancipatory concept in the context of adjudication because of its function as a persistent demand to re-ask the question: 'what is justice?'. The book is a welcome defense...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Law and critique 2015-11, Vol.26 (3), p.305
1. Verfasser: Douglas, Stacy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 305
container_title Law and critique
container_volume 26
creator Douglas, Stacy
description Leonhard Praeg's A Report on Ubuntu ( 2014 ) is a clever, if dense, treatise about the potential of Ubuntu as an emancipatory concept in the context of adjudication because of its function as a persistent demand to re-ask the question: 'what is justice?'. The book is a welcome defense of Ubuntu (in the hopes of reuniting it more closely with ubuntu) and a mesmerizing synthesis of existing literatures that, in combination, point to the transformative potential of Ubuntu as it may be deployed in adjudication in South African court cases. However, the ultimate place and thrust of Ubuntu in this equation is not entirely apparent. While Praeg admits that this project is messy, some of the messiness, especially that brought about by material inequalities as opposed to epistemological differences, might be more helpfully brought to the fore.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10978-015-9167-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1722622093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3838757171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-123916ac0c75511adddbc403380b20141d68f7249ae59c14cfd5f7de00fc50383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjr1OwzAURi0EEqXwAGyWmA332nFss6GKtqBKZWhZK8d2fqooLnE88PZUwPTpLOd8hNwjPCKAekoIRmkGKJnBUjF1QWYoFWe6RHVJZmCkYlqK8prcpHQEAKOhmJH1vsrDlOlnGFNONP_SM112g--Ghlr60XZ9TPHUftNY0_ecps4FumvHmJuWbqu-a-zUxeGWXNW2T-Huf-dkv3zdLdZss129LV42zHE0E0Muzv-sA6ekRLTe-8oVIISGigMW6EtdK14YG6RxWLjay1r5AFA7CUKLOXn4857G-JVDmg7HmMfhnDyg4rzkHIwQP_YhTho</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1722622093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ubuntu Versus ubuntu: Finding a Philosophy of Justice Through Obligation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Douglas, Stacy</creator><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Stacy</creatorcontrib><description>Leonhard Praeg's A Report on Ubuntu ( 2014 ) is a clever, if dense, treatise about the potential of Ubuntu as an emancipatory concept in the context of adjudication because of its function as a persistent demand to re-ask the question: 'what is justice?'. The book is a welcome defense of Ubuntu (in the hopes of reuniting it more closely with ubuntu) and a mesmerizing synthesis of existing literatures that, in combination, point to the transformative potential of Ubuntu as it may be deployed in adjudication in South African court cases. However, the ultimate place and thrust of Ubuntu in this equation is not entirely apparent. While Praeg admits that this project is messy, some of the messiness, especially that brought about by material inequalities as opposed to epistemological differences, might be more helpfully brought to the fore.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-8536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8617</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10978-015-9167-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Epistemology ; Ethics ; Justice ; Nonfiction ; Philosophy ; Social philosophy</subject><ispartof>Law and critique, 2015-11, Vol.26 (3), p.305</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-123916ac0c75511adddbc403380b20141d68f7249ae59c14cfd5f7de00fc50383</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27344,27924,27925,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Stacy</creatorcontrib><title>Ubuntu Versus ubuntu: Finding a Philosophy of Justice Through Obligation</title><title>Law and critique</title><description>Leonhard Praeg's A Report on Ubuntu ( 2014 ) is a clever, if dense, treatise about the potential of Ubuntu as an emancipatory concept in the context of adjudication because of its function as a persistent demand to re-ask the question: 'what is justice?'. The book is a welcome defense of Ubuntu (in the hopes of reuniting it more closely with ubuntu) and a mesmerizing synthesis of existing literatures that, in combination, point to the transformative potential of Ubuntu as it may be deployed in adjudication in South African court cases. However, the ultimate place and thrust of Ubuntu in this equation is not entirely apparent. While Praeg admits that this project is messy, some of the messiness, especially that brought about by material inequalities as opposed to epistemological differences, might be more helpfully brought to the fore.</description><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Nonfiction</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Social philosophy</subject><issn>0957-8536</issn><issn>1572-8617</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjr1OwzAURi0EEqXwAGyWmA332nFss6GKtqBKZWhZK8d2fqooLnE88PZUwPTpLOd8hNwjPCKAekoIRmkGKJnBUjF1QWYoFWe6RHVJZmCkYlqK8prcpHQEAKOhmJH1vsrDlOlnGFNONP_SM112g--Ghlr60XZ9TPHUftNY0_ecps4FumvHmJuWbqu-a-zUxeGWXNW2T-Huf-dkv3zdLdZss129LV42zHE0E0Muzv-sA6ekRLTe-8oVIISGigMW6EtdK14YG6RxWLjay1r5AFA7CUKLOXn4857G-JVDmg7HmMfhnDyg4rzkHIwQP_YhTho</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Douglas, Stacy</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Ubuntu Versus ubuntu: Finding a Philosophy of Justice Through Obligation</title><author>Douglas, Stacy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-123916ac0c75511adddbc403380b20141d68f7249ae59c14cfd5f7de00fc50383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Nonfiction</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Social philosophy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Stacy</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Law and critique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Douglas, Stacy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ubuntu Versus ubuntu: Finding a Philosophy of Justice Through Obligation</atitle><jtitle>Law and critique</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>305</spage><pages>305-</pages><issn>0957-8536</issn><eissn>1572-8617</eissn><abstract>Leonhard Praeg's A Report on Ubuntu ( 2014 ) is a clever, if dense, treatise about the potential of Ubuntu as an emancipatory concept in the context of adjudication because of its function as a persistent demand to re-ask the question: 'what is justice?'. The book is a welcome defense of Ubuntu (in the hopes of reuniting it more closely with ubuntu) and a mesmerizing synthesis of existing literatures that, in combination, point to the transformative potential of Ubuntu as it may be deployed in adjudication in South African court cases. However, the ultimate place and thrust of Ubuntu in this equation is not entirely apparent. While Praeg admits that this project is messy, some of the messiness, especially that brought about by material inequalities as opposed to epistemological differences, might be more helpfully brought to the fore.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10978-015-9167-7</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-8536
ispartof Law and critique, 2015-11, Vol.26 (3), p.305
issn 0957-8536
1572-8617
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1722622093
source SpringerLink Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Epistemology
Ethics
Justice
Nonfiction
Philosophy
Social philosophy
title Ubuntu Versus ubuntu: Finding a Philosophy of Justice Through Obligation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A01%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ubuntu%20Versus%20ubuntu:%20Finding%20a%20Philosophy%20of%20Justice%20Through%20Obligation&rft.jtitle=Law%20and%20critique&rft.au=Douglas,%20Stacy&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=305&rft.pages=305-&rft.issn=0957-8536&rft.eissn=1572-8617&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10978-015-9167-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3838757171%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1722622093&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true