Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity
There is an interesting and lively debate going on in the academic literature intersecting trade policy and entrepreneurship. Several studies have shown that inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) has a negative effect on rates of entrepreneurship, while others find the opposite - a higher rate of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Entrepreneurship and regional development 2015-05, Vol.27 (5-6), p.334-356 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 356 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5-6 |
container_start_page | 334 |
container_title | Entrepreneurship and regional development |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Pathak, Saurav Laplume, André Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel |
description | There is an interesting and lively debate going on in the academic literature intersecting trade policy and entrepreneurship. Several studies have shown that inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) has a negative effect on rates of entrepreneurship, while others find the opposite - a higher rate of new firm creation associated with increased inbound FDI. We study the phenomenon using a cross-country analysis of data on entrepreneurs from 38 countries and from 2001 to − 2008. Results indicate that inbound FDI has negative associations with five types of entrepreneurship (nascent, new, early-stage, established, and high-growth) measured by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor survey. In our discussion, we argue that our study supports the contention that studies counting new limited liability company registrations do not always measure the same thing as entrepreneurial entries (self-reports), leading to different, even opposite results when subjected to empirical analysis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08985626.2015.1058424 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1721974686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3835664551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-fc275f5296aba6215c9c8ef64b40d20817a9060cda989d9d8e9a9fede700becb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BKHguWuSJmlyUxZdFxa86Dmk-SNZ2mRN25V-e1N2vXoaZua9N8MPgHsEVwhy-Ai54JRhtsIQ0TyinGByARaIMFJShMglWMyachZdg5u-30OIqoqxBdhsQxPHYAoXk_VfoTA-WT0UPhxtP3Q2DIXKWxO73Hpd5EGyh2SDHZNXbaH04I9-mG7BlVNtb-_OdQk-X18-1m_l7n2zXT_vSk0rPpRO45o6igVTjWIYUS00t46RhkCDIUe1EpBBbZTgwgjDrVDCWWNrCBurm2oJHk65hxS_x_yT3McxhXxSohojURPGWVbRk0qn2PfJOnlIvlNpkgjKmZn8YyZnZvLMLPueTj4fMo9O_cTUGjmoqY3JJRW072X1f8Qv2Xx0ag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1721974686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity</title><source>Taylor & Francis Online</source><source>Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Pathak, Saurav ; Laplume, André ; Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Pathak, Saurav ; Laplume, André ; Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><description>There is an interesting and lively debate going on in the academic literature intersecting trade policy and entrepreneurship. Several studies have shown that inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) has a negative effect on rates of entrepreneurship, while others find the opposite - a higher rate of new firm creation associated with increased inbound FDI. We study the phenomenon using a cross-country analysis of data on entrepreneurs from 38 countries and from 2001 to − 2008. Results indicate that inbound FDI has negative associations with five types of entrepreneurship (nascent, new, early-stage, established, and high-growth) measured by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor survey. In our discussion, we argue that our study supports the contention that studies counting new limited liability company registrations do not always measure the same thing as entrepreneurial entries (self-reports), leading to different, even opposite results when subjected to empirical analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-5626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2015.1058424</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>crowding effect ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; Foreign investment ; inbound FDI ; International comparisons ; knowledge spillovers ; Limited liability companies ; Studies ; trade ; Trade policy</subject><ispartof>Entrepreneurship and regional development, 2015-05, Vol.27 (5-6), p.334-356</ispartof><rights>2015 Taylor & Francis 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-fc275f5296aba6215c9c8ef64b40d20817a9060cda989d9d8e9a9fede700becb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-fc275f5296aba6215c9c8ef64b40d20817a9060cda989d9d8e9a9fede700becb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08985626.2015.1058424$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08985626.2015.1058424$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pathak, Saurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laplume, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><title>Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity</title><title>Entrepreneurship and regional development</title><description>There is an interesting and lively debate going on in the academic literature intersecting trade policy and entrepreneurship. Several studies have shown that inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) has a negative effect on rates of entrepreneurship, while others find the opposite - a higher rate of new firm creation associated with increased inbound FDI. We study the phenomenon using a cross-country analysis of data on entrepreneurs from 38 countries and from 2001 to − 2008. Results indicate that inbound FDI has negative associations with five types of entrepreneurship (nascent, new, early-stage, established, and high-growth) measured by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor survey. In our discussion, we argue that our study supports the contention that studies counting new limited liability company registrations do not always measure the same thing as entrepreneurial entries (self-reports), leading to different, even opposite results when subjected to empirical analysis.</description><subject>crowding effect</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Foreign investment</subject><subject>inbound FDI</subject><subject>International comparisons</subject><subject>knowledge spillovers</subject><subject>Limited liability companies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>trade</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><issn>0898-5626</issn><issn>1464-5114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BKHguWuSJmlyUxZdFxa86Dmk-SNZ2mRN25V-e1N2vXoaZua9N8MPgHsEVwhy-Ai54JRhtsIQ0TyinGByARaIMFJShMglWMyachZdg5u-30OIqoqxBdhsQxPHYAoXk_VfoTA-WT0UPhxtP3Q2DIXKWxO73Hpd5EGyh2SDHZNXbaH04I9-mG7BlVNtb-_OdQk-X18-1m_l7n2zXT_vSk0rPpRO45o6igVTjWIYUS00t46RhkCDIUe1EpBBbZTgwgjDrVDCWWNrCBurm2oJHk65hxS_x_yT3McxhXxSohojURPGWVbRk0qn2PfJOnlIvlNpkgjKmZn8YyZnZvLMLPueTj4fMo9O_cTUGjmoqY3JJRW072X1f8Qv2Xx0ag</recordid><startdate>20150527</startdate><enddate>20150527</enddate><creator>Pathak, Saurav</creator><creator>Laplume, André</creator><creator>Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150527</creationdate><title>Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity</title><author>Pathak, Saurav ; Laplume, André ; Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-fc275f5296aba6215c9c8ef64b40d20817a9060cda989d9d8e9a9fede700becb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>crowding effect</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Foreign investment</topic><topic>inbound FDI</topic><topic>International comparisons</topic><topic>knowledge spillovers</topic><topic>Limited liability companies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>trade</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pathak, Saurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laplume, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Entrepreneurship and regional development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pathak, Saurav</au><au>Laplume, André</au><au>Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity</atitle><jtitle>Entrepreneurship and regional development</jtitle><date>2015-05-27</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>334</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>334-356</pages><issn>0898-5626</issn><eissn>1464-5114</eissn><abstract>There is an interesting and lively debate going on in the academic literature intersecting trade policy and entrepreneurship. Several studies have shown that inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) has a negative effect on rates of entrepreneurship, while others find the opposite - a higher rate of new firm creation associated with increased inbound FDI. We study the phenomenon using a cross-country analysis of data on entrepreneurs from 38 countries and from 2001 to − 2008. Results indicate that inbound FDI has negative associations with five types of entrepreneurship (nascent, new, early-stage, established, and high-growth) measured by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor survey. In our discussion, we argue that our study supports the contention that studies counting new limited liability company registrations do not always measure the same thing as entrepreneurial entries (self-reports), leading to different, even opposite results when subjected to empirical analysis.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/08985626.2015.1058424</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-5626 |
ispartof | Entrepreneurship and regional development, 2015-05, Vol.27 (5-6), p.334-356 |
issn | 0898-5626 1464-5114 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1721974686 |
source | Taylor & Francis Online; Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3) |
subjects | crowding effect Entrepreneurs Entrepreneurship Foreign investment inbound FDI International comparisons knowledge spillovers Limited liability companies Studies trade Trade policy |
title | Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T21%3A53%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inbound%20foreign%20direct%20investment%20and%20domestic%20entrepreneurial%20activity&rft.jtitle=Entrepreneurship%20and%20regional%20development&rft.au=Pathak,%20Saurav&rft.date=2015-05-27&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=334&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=334-356&rft.issn=0898-5626&rft.eissn=1464-5114&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08985626.2015.1058424&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3835664551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1721974686&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |