Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity

There is an interesting and lively debate going on in the academic literature intersecting trade policy and entrepreneurship. Several studies have shown that inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) has a negative effect on rates of entrepreneurship, while others find the opposite - a higher rate of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Entrepreneurship and regional development 2015-05, Vol.27 (5-6), p.334-356
Hauptverfasser: Pathak, Saurav, Laplume, André, Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 356
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 334
container_title Entrepreneurship and regional development
container_volume 27
creator Pathak, Saurav
Laplume, André
Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel
description There is an interesting and lively debate going on in the academic literature intersecting trade policy and entrepreneurship. Several studies have shown that inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) has a negative effect on rates of entrepreneurship, while others find the opposite - a higher rate of new firm creation associated with increased inbound FDI. We study the phenomenon using a cross-country analysis of data on entrepreneurs from 38 countries and from 2001 to − 2008. Results indicate that inbound FDI has negative associations with five types of entrepreneurship (nascent, new, early-stage, established, and high-growth) measured by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor survey. In our discussion, we argue that our study supports the contention that studies counting new limited liability company registrations do not always measure the same thing as entrepreneurial entries (self-reports), leading to different, even opposite results when subjected to empirical analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/08985626.2015.1058424
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1721974686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3835664551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-fc275f5296aba6215c9c8ef64b40d20817a9060cda989d9d8e9a9fede700becb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BKHguWuSJmlyUxZdFxa86Dmk-SNZ2mRN25V-e1N2vXoaZua9N8MPgHsEVwhy-Ai54JRhtsIQ0TyinGByARaIMFJShMglWMyachZdg5u-30OIqoqxBdhsQxPHYAoXk_VfoTA-WT0UPhxtP3Q2DIXKWxO73Hpd5EGyh2SDHZNXbaH04I9-mG7BlVNtb-_OdQk-X18-1m_l7n2zXT_vSk0rPpRO45o6igVTjWIYUS00t46RhkCDIUe1EpBBbZTgwgjDrVDCWWNrCBurm2oJHk65hxS_x_yT3McxhXxSohojURPGWVbRk0qn2PfJOnlIvlNpkgjKmZn8YyZnZvLMLPueTj4fMo9O_cTUGjmoqY3JJRW072X1f8Qv2Xx0ag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1721974686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Online</source><source>Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Pathak, Saurav ; Laplume, André ; Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Pathak, Saurav ; Laplume, André ; Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><description>There is an interesting and lively debate going on in the academic literature intersecting trade policy and entrepreneurship. Several studies have shown that inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) has a negative effect on rates of entrepreneurship, while others find the opposite - a higher rate of new firm creation associated with increased inbound FDI. We study the phenomenon using a cross-country analysis of data on entrepreneurs from 38 countries and from 2001 to − 2008. Results indicate that inbound FDI has negative associations with five types of entrepreneurship (nascent, new, early-stage, established, and high-growth) measured by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor survey. In our discussion, we argue that our study supports the contention that studies counting new limited liability company registrations do not always measure the same thing as entrepreneurial entries (self-reports), leading to different, even opposite results when subjected to empirical analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-5626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2015.1058424</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>crowding effect ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; Foreign investment ; inbound FDI ; International comparisons ; knowledge spillovers ; Limited liability companies ; Studies ; trade ; Trade policy</subject><ispartof>Entrepreneurship and regional development, 2015-05, Vol.27 (5-6), p.334-356</ispartof><rights>2015 Taylor &amp; Francis 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-fc275f5296aba6215c9c8ef64b40d20817a9060cda989d9d8e9a9fede700becb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-fc275f5296aba6215c9c8ef64b40d20817a9060cda989d9d8e9a9fede700becb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/08985626.2015.1058424$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08985626.2015.1058424$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pathak, Saurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laplume, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><title>Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity</title><title>Entrepreneurship and regional development</title><description>There is an interesting and lively debate going on in the academic literature intersecting trade policy and entrepreneurship. Several studies have shown that inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) has a negative effect on rates of entrepreneurship, while others find the opposite - a higher rate of new firm creation associated with increased inbound FDI. We study the phenomenon using a cross-country analysis of data on entrepreneurs from 38 countries and from 2001 to − 2008. Results indicate that inbound FDI has negative associations with five types of entrepreneurship (nascent, new, early-stage, established, and high-growth) measured by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor survey. In our discussion, we argue that our study supports the contention that studies counting new limited liability company registrations do not always measure the same thing as entrepreneurial entries (self-reports), leading to different, even opposite results when subjected to empirical analysis.</description><subject>crowding effect</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Foreign investment</subject><subject>inbound FDI</subject><subject>International comparisons</subject><subject>knowledge spillovers</subject><subject>Limited liability companies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>trade</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><issn>0898-5626</issn><issn>1464-5114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BKHguWuSJmlyUxZdFxa86Dmk-SNZ2mRN25V-e1N2vXoaZua9N8MPgHsEVwhy-Ai54JRhtsIQ0TyinGByARaIMFJShMglWMyachZdg5u-30OIqoqxBdhsQxPHYAoXk_VfoTA-WT0UPhxtP3Q2DIXKWxO73Hpd5EGyh2SDHZNXbaH04I9-mG7BlVNtb-_OdQk-X18-1m_l7n2zXT_vSk0rPpRO45o6igVTjWIYUS00t46RhkCDIUe1EpBBbZTgwgjDrVDCWWNrCBurm2oJHk65hxS_x_yT3McxhXxSohojURPGWVbRk0qn2PfJOnlIvlNpkgjKmZn8YyZnZvLMLPueTj4fMo9O_cTUGjmoqY3JJRW072X1f8Qv2Xx0ag</recordid><startdate>20150527</startdate><enddate>20150527</enddate><creator>Pathak, Saurav</creator><creator>Laplume, André</creator><creator>Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150527</creationdate><title>Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity</title><author>Pathak, Saurav ; Laplume, André ; Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-fc275f5296aba6215c9c8ef64b40d20817a9060cda989d9d8e9a9fede700becb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>crowding effect</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Foreign investment</topic><topic>inbound FDI</topic><topic>International comparisons</topic><topic>knowledge spillovers</topic><topic>Limited liability companies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>trade</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pathak, Saurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laplume, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Entrepreneurship and regional development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pathak, Saurav</au><au>Laplume, André</au><au>Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity</atitle><jtitle>Entrepreneurship and regional development</jtitle><date>2015-05-27</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>334</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>334-356</pages><issn>0898-5626</issn><eissn>1464-5114</eissn><abstract>There is an interesting and lively debate going on in the academic literature intersecting trade policy and entrepreneurship. Several studies have shown that inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) has a negative effect on rates of entrepreneurship, while others find the opposite - a higher rate of new firm creation associated with increased inbound FDI. We study the phenomenon using a cross-country analysis of data on entrepreneurs from 38 countries and from 2001 to − 2008. Results indicate that inbound FDI has negative associations with five types of entrepreneurship (nascent, new, early-stage, established, and high-growth) measured by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor survey. In our discussion, we argue that our study supports the contention that studies counting new limited liability company registrations do not always measure the same thing as entrepreneurial entries (self-reports), leading to different, even opposite results when subjected to empirical analysis.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/08985626.2015.1058424</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-5626
ispartof Entrepreneurship and regional development, 2015-05, Vol.27 (5-6), p.334-356
issn 0898-5626
1464-5114
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1721974686
source Taylor & Francis Online; Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3)
subjects crowding effect
Entrepreneurs
Entrepreneurship
Foreign investment
inbound FDI
International comparisons
knowledge spillovers
Limited liability companies
Studies
trade
Trade policy
title Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T21%3A53%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inbound%20foreign%20direct%20investment%20and%20domestic%20entrepreneurial%20activity&rft.jtitle=Entrepreneurship%20and%20regional%20development&rft.au=Pathak,%20Saurav&rft.date=2015-05-27&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=334&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=334-356&rft.issn=0898-5626&rft.eissn=1464-5114&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08985626.2015.1058424&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3835664551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1721974686&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true