Water availability and vulnerability of 225 large cities in the United States

This study presents a quantitative national assessment of urban water availability and vulnerability for 225 U.S. cities with population greater than 100,000. Here, the urban assessments account for not only renewable water flows, but also the extracted, imported, and stored water that urban systems...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2012-12, Vol.48 (12), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Padowski, Julie C., Jawitz, James W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 12
container_start_page
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 48
creator Padowski, Julie C.
Jawitz, James W.
description This study presents a quantitative national assessment of urban water availability and vulnerability for 225 U.S. cities with population greater than 100,000. Here, the urban assessments account for not only renewable water flows, but also the extracted, imported, and stored water that urban systems access through constructed infrastructure. These sources represent important hydraulic components of the urban water supply, yet are typically excluded from water scarcity assessments. Results from this hydraulic‐based assessment were compared to those obtained using a more conventional method that estimates scarcity solely based on local renewable flows. The inclusion of hydraulic components increased the mean availability to cities, leading to a significantly lower portion of the total U.S. population considered “at risk” for water scarcity (17%) than that obtained from the runoff method (47%). Water vulnerability was determined based on low‐flow conditions, and smaller differences were found for this metric between at‐risk populations using the runoff (66%) and hydraulic‐based (54%) methods. The large increase in the susceptible population between the scarcity measures evaluated using the hydraulic method may better reconcile the seeming contradiction in the United States between perceptions of natural water abundance and widespread water scarcity. Additionally, urban vulnerability measures developed here were validated using a media text analysis. Vulnerability assessments that included hydraulic components were found to correlate with the frequency of urban water scarcity reports in the popular press while runoff‐based measures showed no significant correlation, suggesting that hydraulic‐based assessments provide better context for understanding the nature and severity of urban water scarcity issues. Key Points Traditional water availability assessments are inappropriate for urban areas Including urban hydraulic sources decreases the risk of water scarcity Hydraulic‐based vulnerability is correlated to scarcity reports in the press
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2012WR012335
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1721409938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3833674371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-bf6de0900d182da1029fc4f81d309b658b496420b94b439bc41810c734167a7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKd3_oCAt1bz1aS5lKmbMhXqxi5D0qaaWVtNsun-vR1V8cqbc-DwvB8cAI4xOsOIyHOCMFnk3aA03QEDLBlLhBR0FwwQYjTBVIp9cBDCEiHMUi4G4G6ho_VQr7WrtXG1ixuomxKuV3Vj_c-lrSAhKay1f7KwcNHZAF0D47OF88ZFW8LH2PmEQ7BX6TrYo-89BPPrq9lokkwfxjeji2lS0Czjial4aZFEqMQZKfW2e1WwKsMlRdLwNDNMckaQkcwwKk3BcIZRISjDXGhh6BCc9L5vvn1f2RDVsl35potUWBDMkJQ066jTnip8G4K3lXrz7lX7jcJIbUPV34d1OO3xD1fbzb-sWuSjHFPOeKdKepUL0X7-qrR_UVxQ0aH3Y3V7mYqUTHI1o1_q13k8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1721409938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Water availability and vulnerability of 225 large cities in the United States</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Padowski, Julie C. ; Jawitz, James W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Padowski, Julie C. ; Jawitz, James W.</creatorcontrib><description>This study presents a quantitative national assessment of urban water availability and vulnerability for 225 U.S. cities with population greater than 100,000. Here, the urban assessments account for not only renewable water flows, but also the extracted, imported, and stored water that urban systems access through constructed infrastructure. These sources represent important hydraulic components of the urban water supply, yet are typically excluded from water scarcity assessments. Results from this hydraulic‐based assessment were compared to those obtained using a more conventional method that estimates scarcity solely based on local renewable flows. The inclusion of hydraulic components increased the mean availability to cities, leading to a significantly lower portion of the total U.S. population considered “at risk” for water scarcity (17%) than that obtained from the runoff method (47%). Water vulnerability was determined based on low‐flow conditions, and smaller differences were found for this metric between at‐risk populations using the runoff (66%) and hydraulic‐based (54%) methods. The large increase in the susceptible population between the scarcity measures evaluated using the hydraulic method may better reconcile the seeming contradiction in the United States between perceptions of natural water abundance and widespread water scarcity. Additionally, urban vulnerability measures developed here were validated using a media text analysis. Vulnerability assessments that included hydraulic components were found to correlate with the frequency of urban water scarcity reports in the popular press while runoff‐based measures showed no significant correlation, suggesting that hydraulic‐based assessments provide better context for understanding the nature and severity of urban water scarcity issues. Key Points Traditional water availability assessments are inappropriate for urban areas Including urban hydraulic sources decreases the risk of water scarcity Hydraulic‐based vulnerability is correlated to scarcity reports in the press</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2012WR012335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>availability ; Cities ; hydraulic ; Hydraulics ; Low flow ; Runoff ; urban ; Urban areas ; vulnerability ; Water ; Water availability ; Water flow ; Water resources ; Water scarcity ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2012-12, Vol.48 (12), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2012. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-bf6de0900d182da1029fc4f81d309b658b496420b94b439bc41810c734167a7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-bf6de0900d182da1029fc4f81d309b658b496420b94b439bc41810c734167a7b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2012WR012335$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2012WR012335$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46443,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Padowski, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jawitz, James W.</creatorcontrib><title>Water availability and vulnerability of 225 large cities in the United States</title><title>Water resources research</title><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><description>This study presents a quantitative national assessment of urban water availability and vulnerability for 225 U.S. cities with population greater than 100,000. Here, the urban assessments account for not only renewable water flows, but also the extracted, imported, and stored water that urban systems access through constructed infrastructure. These sources represent important hydraulic components of the urban water supply, yet are typically excluded from water scarcity assessments. Results from this hydraulic‐based assessment were compared to those obtained using a more conventional method that estimates scarcity solely based on local renewable flows. The inclusion of hydraulic components increased the mean availability to cities, leading to a significantly lower portion of the total U.S. population considered “at risk” for water scarcity (17%) than that obtained from the runoff method (47%). Water vulnerability was determined based on low‐flow conditions, and smaller differences were found for this metric between at‐risk populations using the runoff (66%) and hydraulic‐based (54%) methods. The large increase in the susceptible population between the scarcity measures evaluated using the hydraulic method may better reconcile the seeming contradiction in the United States between perceptions of natural water abundance and widespread water scarcity. Additionally, urban vulnerability measures developed here were validated using a media text analysis. Vulnerability assessments that included hydraulic components were found to correlate with the frequency of urban water scarcity reports in the popular press while runoff‐based measures showed no significant correlation, suggesting that hydraulic‐based assessments provide better context for understanding the nature and severity of urban water scarcity issues. Key Points Traditional water availability assessments are inappropriate for urban areas Including urban hydraulic sources decreases the risk of water scarcity Hydraulic‐based vulnerability is correlated to scarcity reports in the press</description><subject>availability</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>hydraulic</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Low flow</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>urban</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>vulnerability</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water scarcity</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKd3_oCAt1bz1aS5lKmbMhXqxi5D0qaaWVtNsun-vR1V8cqbc-DwvB8cAI4xOsOIyHOCMFnk3aA03QEDLBlLhBR0FwwQYjTBVIp9cBDCEiHMUi4G4G6ho_VQr7WrtXG1ixuomxKuV3Vj_c-lrSAhKay1f7KwcNHZAF0D47OF88ZFW8LH2PmEQ7BX6TrYo-89BPPrq9lokkwfxjeji2lS0Czjial4aZFEqMQZKfW2e1WwKsMlRdLwNDNMckaQkcwwKk3BcIZRISjDXGhh6BCc9L5vvn1f2RDVsl35potUWBDMkJQ066jTnip8G4K3lXrz7lX7jcJIbUPV34d1OO3xD1fbzb-sWuSjHFPOeKdKepUL0X7-qrR_UVxQ0aH3Y3V7mYqUTHI1o1_q13k8</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Padowski, Julie C.</creator><creator>Jawitz, James W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Water availability and vulnerability of 225 large cities in the United States</title><author>Padowski, Julie C. ; Jawitz, James W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-bf6de0900d182da1029fc4f81d309b658b496420b94b439bc41810c734167a7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>availability</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>hydraulic</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Low flow</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>urban</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>vulnerability</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water scarcity</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Padowski, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jawitz, James W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Padowski, Julie C.</au><au>Jawitz, James W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Water availability and vulnerability of 225 large cities in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>12</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>This study presents a quantitative national assessment of urban water availability and vulnerability for 225 U.S. cities with population greater than 100,000. Here, the urban assessments account for not only renewable water flows, but also the extracted, imported, and stored water that urban systems access through constructed infrastructure. These sources represent important hydraulic components of the urban water supply, yet are typically excluded from water scarcity assessments. Results from this hydraulic‐based assessment were compared to those obtained using a more conventional method that estimates scarcity solely based on local renewable flows. The inclusion of hydraulic components increased the mean availability to cities, leading to a significantly lower portion of the total U.S. population considered “at risk” for water scarcity (17%) than that obtained from the runoff method (47%). Water vulnerability was determined based on low‐flow conditions, and smaller differences were found for this metric between at‐risk populations using the runoff (66%) and hydraulic‐based (54%) methods. The large increase in the susceptible population between the scarcity measures evaluated using the hydraulic method may better reconcile the seeming contradiction in the United States between perceptions of natural water abundance and widespread water scarcity. Additionally, urban vulnerability measures developed here were validated using a media text analysis. Vulnerability assessments that included hydraulic components were found to correlate with the frequency of urban water scarcity reports in the popular press while runoff‐based measures showed no significant correlation, suggesting that hydraulic‐based assessments provide better context for understanding the nature and severity of urban water scarcity issues. Key Points Traditional water availability assessments are inappropriate for urban areas Including urban hydraulic sources decreases the risk of water scarcity Hydraulic‐based vulnerability is correlated to scarcity reports in the press</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2012WR012335</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2012-12, Vol.48 (12), p.n/a
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1721409938
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects availability
Cities
hydraulic
Hydraulics
Low flow
Runoff
urban
Urban areas
vulnerability
Water
Water availability
Water flow
Water resources
Water scarcity
Water supply
title Water availability and vulnerability of 225 large cities in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T09%3A32%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Water%20availability%20and%20vulnerability%20of%20225%20large%20cities%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Padowski,%20Julie%20C.&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=12&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2012WR012335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3833674371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1721409938&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true