Ghosts of straw men: A reply to Lee and Martin

Ghosts of straw men: A reply to Lee and Martin

[...]interpretation will always be essential for sociologists interested in meaning-making, whereas counting and mapping are useful tools only in limited circumstances. [...]I argue that the problem of interpretive authority this technique is supposed to solve is vastly overstated, relying on an exa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of cultural sociology 2015-10, Vol.3 (3), p.365-379
1. Verfasser: Spillman, Lyn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Awards & honors
Cartography
Exegesis & hermeneutics
Labor relations
Media Sociology
Positivism
Public spaces
Qualitative research
Response
Social Sciences
Sociology
Sociology of Culture
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 379
container_issue 3
container_start_page 365
container_title American journal of cultural sociology
container_volume 3
creator Spillman, Lyn
description [...]interpretation will always be essential for sociologists interested in meaning-making, whereas counting and mapping are useful tools only in limited circumstances. [...]I argue that the problem of interpretive authority this technique is supposed to solve is vastly overstated, relying on an exaggerated dichotomy between 'humanism' and 'science' (where science is understood as counting words).
doi_str_mv 10.1057/ajcs.2015.5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1719884583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3829579221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2135-110db508921034f640ab88db69a6e84654538103d024b486cc5be3da1e49bec63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNSe_AMLHjVxJvuRjbdStAoRL3pedjcbbWiTupsi_fcmRMSDpxmY530HHkIuEVIEkd-axsU0AxSpOCGzDHiR5Jjh6e-O7JwsYmwAYAgwVsgZSdcfXewj7Woa-2C-6M63d3RJg99vj7TvaOk9NW1Fn03oN-0FOavNNvrFz5yTt4f719VjUr6sn1bLMnEZMpEgQmUFqCJDYLyWHIxVqrKyMNIrLgUXTA2nCjJuuZLOCetZZdDzwnon2ZxcTb370H0efOx10x1CO7zUmGOhFBeKDdT1RLnQxRh8rfdhszPhqBH06ESPTvToRIuBvpnoOFDtuw9_Ov_BvwFksl_M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1719884583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ghosts of straw men: A reply to Lee and Martin</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Spillman, Lyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Spillman, Lyn</creatorcontrib><description>[...]interpretation will always be essential for sociologists interested in meaning-making, whereas counting and mapping are useful tools only in limited circumstances. [...]I argue that the problem of interpretive authority this technique is supposed to solve is vastly overstated, relying on an exaggerated dichotomy between 'humanism' and 'science' (where science is understood as counting words).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-7113</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-7121</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/ajcs.2015.5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Awards &amp; honors ; Cartography ; Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics ; Labor relations ; Media Sociology ; Positivism ; Public spaces ; Qualitative research ; Response ; Social Sciences ; Sociology ; Sociology of Culture</subject><ispartof>American journal of cultural sociology, 2015-10, Vol.3 (3), p.365-379</ispartof><rights>Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2135-110db508921034f640ab88db69a6e84654538103d024b486cc5be3da1e49bec63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2135-110db508921034f640ab88db69a6e84654538103d024b486cc5be3da1e49bec63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/ajcs.2015.5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/ajcs.2015.5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,27321,27899,27901,27902,33751,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spillman, Lyn</creatorcontrib><title>Ghosts of straw men: A reply to Lee and Martin</title><title>American journal of cultural sociology</title><addtitle>Am J Cult Sociol</addtitle><description>[...]interpretation will always be essential for sociologists interested in meaning-making, whereas counting and mapping are useful tools only in limited circumstances. [...]I argue that the problem of interpretive authority this technique is supposed to solve is vastly overstated, relying on an exaggerated dichotomy between 'humanism' and 'science' (where science is understood as counting words).</description><subject>Awards &amp; honors</subject><subject>Cartography</subject><subject>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</subject><subject>Labor relations</subject><subject>Media Sociology</subject><subject>Positivism</subject><subject>Public spaces</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Response</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of Culture</subject><issn>2049-7113</issn><issn>2049-7121</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNSe_AMLHjVxJvuRjbdStAoRL3pedjcbbWiTupsi_fcmRMSDpxmY530HHkIuEVIEkd-axsU0AxSpOCGzDHiR5Jjh6e-O7JwsYmwAYAgwVsgZSdcfXewj7Woa-2C-6M63d3RJg99vj7TvaOk9NW1Fn03oN-0FOavNNvrFz5yTt4f719VjUr6sn1bLMnEZMpEgQmUFqCJDYLyWHIxVqrKyMNIrLgUXTA2nCjJuuZLOCetZZdDzwnon2ZxcTb370H0efOx10x1CO7zUmGOhFBeKDdT1RLnQxRh8rfdhszPhqBH06ESPTvToRIuBvpnoOFDtuw9_Ov_BvwFksl_M</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Spillman, Lyn</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Ghosts of straw men: A reply to Lee and Martin</title><author>Spillman, Lyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2135-110db508921034f640ab88db69a6e84654538103d024b486cc5be3da1e49bec63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Awards &amp; honors</topic><topic>Cartography</topic><topic>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</topic><topic>Labor relations</topic><topic>Media Sociology</topic><topic>Positivism</topic><topic>Public spaces</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Response</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of Culture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spillman, Lyn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>American journal of cultural sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spillman, Lyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ghosts of straw men: A reply to Lee and Martin</atitle><jtitle>American journal of cultural sociology</jtitle><stitle>Am J Cult Sociol</stitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>379</epage><pages>365-379</pages><issn>2049-7113</issn><eissn>2049-7121</eissn><abstract>[...]interpretation will always be essential for sociologists interested in meaning-making, whereas counting and mapping are useful tools only in limited circumstances. [...]I argue that the problem of interpretive authority this technique is supposed to solve is vastly overstated, relying on an exaggerated dichotomy between 'humanism' and 'science' (where science is understood as counting words).</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/ajcs.2015.5</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-7113
ispartof American journal of cultural sociology, 2015-10, Vol.3 (3), p.365-379
issn 2049-7113
2049-7121
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1719884583
source Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Awards & honors
Cartography
Exegesis & hermeneutics
Labor relations
Media Sociology
Positivism
Public spaces
Qualitative research
Response
Social Sciences
Sociology
Sociology of Culture
title Ghosts of straw men: A reply to Lee and Martin
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A45%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ghosts%20of%20straw%20men:%20A%20reply%20to%20Lee%20and%20Martin&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20cultural%20sociology&rft.au=Spillman,%20Lyn&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=379&rft.pages=365-379&rft.issn=2049-7113&rft.eissn=2049-7121&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/ajcs.2015.5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3829579221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1719884583&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true