Teacher Evaluation Reform: Principals' Beliefs about Newly Adopted Teacher Evaluation Systems
Principals in one Western state were surveyed about teacher evaluation systems commonly used across the state. Findings suggest that principals' beliefs about aligning practice to performance expectations, about how much the view of professional practice is growth-oriented, and the degree to wh...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Planning & changing 2015-04, Vol.46 (1-2), p.158 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 158 |
| container_title | Planning & changing |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | Young, Suzanne Range, Bret G Hvidston, David Mette, Ian M |
| description | Principals in one Western state were surveyed about teacher evaluation systems commonly used across the state. Findings suggest that principals' beliefs about aligning practice to performance expectations, about how much the view of professional practice is growth-oriented, and the degree to which systems use multiple measures are the variables that best measure teacher performance. Principals agreed the most important purpose for teacher evaluation is to provide formative feedback for teachers. Finally, principals reported they were able to assess teacher behaviors and strategies at least somewhat well, regardless of the model used. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1719448934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1145477</ericid><sourcerecordid>3828986381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e504-35115ae1e4a9f890a16a8083bd12c7631bf71c82902c271322650c20b01aef103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjTtLxEAURlMouK7-BGHAwipw7zySid26RFdZVDSthMnkBrPk5Uyi5N8bWEurrznfOSfBCkDwECItz4Jz7w8AoDgmq-AjI2M_ybH02zSTGeu-Y29U9a69Za-u7mw9mMbfsDtqaqo8M0U_jeyZfpqZbcp-GKlk_yjeZz9S6y-C02q50-XfroPsPs22u3D_8vC43exDUiBDoRCVISRpkkonYDAyGrQoSuQ2jgQWVYxW8wS45TEKziMFlkMBaKhCEOvg-qgdXP81kR_zQz-5binmGGMipU6EXKirI0Wutvng6ta4OU-fEKWScSx-AVKcVoc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1719448934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teacher Evaluation Reform: Principals' Beliefs about Newly Adopted Teacher Evaluation Systems</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Young, Suzanne ; Range, Bret G ; Hvidston, David ; Mette, Ian M</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, Suzanne ; Range, Bret G ; Hvidston, David ; Mette, Ian M</creatorcontrib><description>Principals in one Western state were surveyed about teacher evaluation systems commonly used across the state. Findings suggest that principals' beliefs about aligning practice to performance expectations, about how much the view of professional practice is growth-oriented, and the degree to which systems use multiple measures are the variables that best measure teacher performance. Principals agreed the most important purpose for teacher evaluation is to provide formative feedback for teachers. Finally, principals reported they were able to assess teacher behaviors and strategies at least somewhat well, regardless of the model used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Normal: Department of Educational Administration and Foundations</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Administrator Attitudes ; Administrator Surveys ; Educational Strategies ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Evaluation Methods ; Feedback (Response) ; Literature Reviews ; Objectives ; Outcomes of Education ; Predictor Variables ; Principals ; School principals ; Teacher Behavior ; Teacher Effectiveness ; Teacher Evaluation ; Teacher evaluations ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Planning & changing, 2015-04, Vol.46 (1-2), p.158</ispartof><rights>Copyright Illinois State University Spring 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1145477$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Range, Bret G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hvidston, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mette, Ian M</creatorcontrib><title>Teacher Evaluation Reform: Principals' Beliefs about Newly Adopted Teacher Evaluation Systems</title><title>Planning & changing</title><description>Principals in one Western state were surveyed about teacher evaluation systems commonly used across the state. Findings suggest that principals' beliefs about aligning practice to performance expectations, about how much the view of professional practice is growth-oriented, and the degree to which systems use multiple measures are the variables that best measure teacher performance. Principals agreed the most important purpose for teacher evaluation is to provide formative feedback for teachers. Finally, principals reported they were able to assess teacher behaviors and strategies at least somewhat well, regardless of the model used.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Administrator Attitudes</subject><subject>Administrator Surveys</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Principals</subject><subject>School principals</subject><subject>Teacher Behavior</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>Teacher Evaluation</subject><subject>Teacher evaluations</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0032-0684</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptjTtLxEAURlMouK7-BGHAwipw7zySid26RFdZVDSthMnkBrPk5Uyi5N8bWEurrznfOSfBCkDwECItz4Jz7w8AoDgmq-AjI2M_ybH02zSTGeu-Y29U9a69Za-u7mw9mMbfsDtqaqo8M0U_jeyZfpqZbcp-GKlk_yjeZz9S6y-C02q50-XfroPsPs22u3D_8vC43exDUiBDoRCVISRpkkonYDAyGrQoSuQ2jgQWVYxW8wS45TEKziMFlkMBaKhCEOvg-qgdXP81kR_zQz-5binmGGMipU6EXKirI0Wutvng6ta4OU-fEKWScSx-AVKcVoc</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Young, Suzanne</creator><creator>Range, Bret G</creator><creator>Hvidston, David</creator><creator>Mette, Ian M</creator><general>Department of Educational Administration and Foundations</general><general>Illinois State University</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Teacher Evaluation Reform: Principals' Beliefs about Newly Adopted Teacher Evaluation Systems</title><author>Young, Suzanne ; Range, Bret G ; Hvidston, David ; Mette, Ian M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e504-35115ae1e4a9f890a16a8083bd12c7631bf71c82902c271322650c20b01aef103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Administrator Attitudes</topic><topic>Administrator Surveys</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Principals</topic><topic>School principals</topic><topic>Teacher Behavior</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>Teacher Evaluation</topic><topic>Teacher evaluations</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Range, Bret G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hvidston, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mette, Ian M</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Planning & changing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Suzanne</au><au>Range, Bret G</au><au>Hvidston, David</au><au>Mette, Ian M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1145477</ericid><atitle>Teacher Evaluation Reform: Principals' Beliefs about Newly Adopted Teacher Evaluation Systems</atitle><jtitle>Planning & changing</jtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>158</spage><pages>158-</pages><issn>0032-0684</issn><abstract>Principals in one Western state were surveyed about teacher evaluation systems commonly used across the state. Findings suggest that principals' beliefs about aligning practice to performance expectations, about how much the view of professional practice is growth-oriented, and the degree to which systems use multiple measures are the variables that best measure teacher performance. Principals agreed the most important purpose for teacher evaluation is to provide formative feedback for teachers. Finally, principals reported they were able to assess teacher behaviors and strategies at least somewhat well, regardless of the model used.</abstract><cop>Normal</cop><pub>Department of Educational Administration and Foundations</pub><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0032-0684 |
| ispartof | Planning & changing, 2015-04, Vol.46 (1-2), p.158 |
| issn | 0032-0684 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1719448934 |
| source | Education Source |
| subjects | Accuracy Administrator Attitudes Administrator Surveys Educational Strategies Elementary Secondary Education Evaluation Methods Feedback (Response) Literature Reviews Objectives Outcomes of Education Predictor Variables Principals School principals Teacher Behavior Teacher Effectiveness Teacher Evaluation Teacher evaluations Teachers Teaching Methods |
| title | Teacher Evaluation Reform: Principals' Beliefs about Newly Adopted Teacher Evaluation Systems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A46%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teacher%20Evaluation%20Reform:%20Principals'%20Beliefs%20about%20Newly%20Adopted%20Teacher%20Evaluation%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Planning%20&%20changing&rft.au=Young,%20Suzanne&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=158&rft.pages=158-&rft.issn=0032-0684&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E3828986381%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1719448934&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1145477&rfr_iscdi=true |