Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland
Objectives This paper reports results from the Scottish Community Engagement Trial (ScotCET), devised to replicate the Queensland Community Trial (QCET). ScotCET was an RCT that tested the effects of ‘procedurally just’ policing on public trust and police legitimacy Methods A block-randomised (match...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental criminology 2015-09, Vol.11 (3), p.419-443 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 443 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 419 |
container_title | Journal of experimental criminology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | MacQueen, Sarah Bradford, Ben |
description | Objectives
This paper reports results from the Scottish Community Engagement Trial (ScotCET), devised to replicate the Queensland Community Trial (QCET). ScotCET was an RCT that tested the effects of ‘procedurally just’ policing on public trust and police legitimacy
Methods
A block-randomised (matched pairs) design, with pretest and posttest measures, was implemented in the context of road policing in Scotland. Participants were drivers stopped by police in December and January 2013/14 as part of Police Scotland’s ‘Festive Road Safety Campaign’. The experimental intervention comprised a checklist of key messages to include in routine roadside vehicle stops, and a leaflet for officers to give to drivers. Analysis proceeds via random effects regression models predicting latent variable measures of trust, satisfaction and legitimacy
Results
Contrary to expectations, the intervention did not improve trust and legitimacy; rather, trust in the officers who made the stop, and satisfaction with their conduct, fell in the test sites, relative to the controls, after implementation of the intervention. The intervention had no significant effect on general trust in the police, nor on police legitimacy
Conclusions
Results demonstrate the difficulty in translating experimental interventions across policing contexts, and challenge the notion that public perceptions may be improved through a simple, additive approach to the delivery and communication of procedural justice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1718125042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3823464181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-131a917b514764df253d40a851137cf85e9549d1ad3fbfc8faf3bda0a79de31f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhiMEEuXyAGyWmAM-dlwnbKgqF6kSAzBbji8lVWoH2xk68-I4hIGFycfS9_9H5yuKK8A3gDG_jQCkISUGVjakwiU-KhbAOClrCuz4Z6Yl5QyfFmcx7jCuSMXpovhauw_pVOe2aBjbvlMohTEmJJ1Gg89_g3qz7VK3l-qA9BgmMnipMyetzbxxyo8umRDvUDBx7FNENvg9kijkFr_votFIeZeC73szBTvZo86hV-VTn5GL4sTKPprL3_e8eH9Yv62eys3L4_PqflMqWi9TCRRkA7xlUPFlpS1hVFdY1gyAcmVrZhpWNRqkpra1qrbS0lZLLHmjDQVLz4vruXcI_nM0MYmdH4PLKwVwqIGwbCVTMFMq-BiDsWII-fpwEIDF5FrMrkV2LSbXAucMmTNxmASZ8Kf539A3e_WESQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718125042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>MacQueen, Sarah ; Bradford, Ben</creator><creatorcontrib>MacQueen, Sarah ; Bradford, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
This paper reports results from the Scottish Community Engagement Trial (ScotCET), devised to replicate the Queensland Community Trial (QCET). ScotCET was an RCT that tested the effects of ‘procedurally just’ policing on public trust and police legitimacy
Methods
A block-randomised (matched pairs) design, with pretest and posttest measures, was implemented in the context of road policing in Scotland. Participants were drivers stopped by police in December and January 2013/14 as part of Police Scotland’s ‘Festive Road Safety Campaign’. The experimental intervention comprised a checklist of key messages to include in routine roadside vehicle stops, and a leaflet for officers to give to drivers. Analysis proceeds via random effects regression models predicting latent variable measures of trust, satisfaction and legitimacy
Results
Contrary to expectations, the intervention did not improve trust and legitimacy; rather, trust in the officers who made the stop, and satisfaction with their conduct, fell in the test sites, relative to the controls, after implementation of the intervention. The intervention had no significant effect on general trust in the police, nor on police legitimacy
Conclusions
Results demonstrate the difficulty in translating experimental interventions across policing contexts, and challenge the notion that public perceptions may be improved through a simple, additive approach to the delivery and communication of procedural justice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-3750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Law and Criminology ; Police ; Political Science ; Roads & highways ; Social Sciences ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental criminology, 2015-09, Vol.11 (3), p.419-443</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-131a917b514764df253d40a851137cf85e9549d1ad3fbfc8faf3bda0a79de31f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-131a917b514764df253d40a851137cf85e9549d1ad3fbfc8faf3bda0a79de31f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacQueen, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Ben</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland</title><title>Journal of experimental criminology</title><addtitle>J Exp Criminol</addtitle><description>Objectives
This paper reports results from the Scottish Community Engagement Trial (ScotCET), devised to replicate the Queensland Community Trial (QCET). ScotCET was an RCT that tested the effects of ‘procedurally just’ policing on public trust and police legitimacy
Methods
A block-randomised (matched pairs) design, with pretest and posttest measures, was implemented in the context of road policing in Scotland. Participants were drivers stopped by police in December and January 2013/14 as part of Police Scotland’s ‘Festive Road Safety Campaign’. The experimental intervention comprised a checklist of key messages to include in routine roadside vehicle stops, and a leaflet for officers to give to drivers. Analysis proceeds via random effects regression models predicting latent variable measures of trust, satisfaction and legitimacy
Results
Contrary to expectations, the intervention did not improve trust and legitimacy; rather, trust in the officers who made the stop, and satisfaction with their conduct, fell in the test sites, relative to the controls, after implementation of the intervention. The intervention had no significant effect on general trust in the police, nor on police legitimacy
Conclusions
Results demonstrate the difficulty in translating experimental interventions across policing contexts, and challenge the notion that public perceptions may be improved through a simple, additive approach to the delivery and communication of procedural justice.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Law and Criminology</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Roads & highways</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>1573-3750</issn><issn>1572-8315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhiMEEuXyAGyWmAM-dlwnbKgqF6kSAzBbji8lVWoH2xk68-I4hIGFycfS9_9H5yuKK8A3gDG_jQCkISUGVjakwiU-KhbAOClrCuz4Z6Yl5QyfFmcx7jCuSMXpovhauw_pVOe2aBjbvlMohTEmJJ1Gg89_g3qz7VK3l-qA9BgmMnipMyetzbxxyo8umRDvUDBx7FNENvg9kijkFr_votFIeZeC73szBTvZo86hV-VTn5GL4sTKPprL3_e8eH9Yv62eys3L4_PqflMqWi9TCRRkA7xlUPFlpS1hVFdY1gyAcmVrZhpWNRqkpra1qrbS0lZLLHmjDQVLz4vruXcI_nM0MYmdH4PLKwVwqIGwbCVTMFMq-BiDsWII-fpwEIDF5FrMrkV2LSbXAucMmTNxmASZ8Kf539A3e_WESQ</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>MacQueen, Sarah</creator><creator>Bradford, Ben</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland</title><author>MacQueen, Sarah ; Bradford, Ben</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-131a917b514764df253d40a851137cf85e9549d1ad3fbfc8faf3bda0a79de31f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Law and Criminology</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Roads & highways</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacQueen, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Ben</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacQueen, Sarah</au><au>Bradford, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental criminology</jtitle><stitle>J Exp Criminol</stitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>443</epage><pages>419-443</pages><issn>1573-3750</issn><eissn>1572-8315</eissn><abstract>Objectives
This paper reports results from the Scottish Community Engagement Trial (ScotCET), devised to replicate the Queensland Community Trial (QCET). ScotCET was an RCT that tested the effects of ‘procedurally just’ policing on public trust and police legitimacy
Methods
A block-randomised (matched pairs) design, with pretest and posttest measures, was implemented in the context of road policing in Scotland. Participants were drivers stopped by police in December and January 2013/14 as part of Police Scotland’s ‘Festive Road Safety Campaign’. The experimental intervention comprised a checklist of key messages to include in routine roadside vehicle stops, and a leaflet for officers to give to drivers. Analysis proceeds via random effects regression models predicting latent variable measures of trust, satisfaction and legitimacy
Results
Contrary to expectations, the intervention did not improve trust and legitimacy; rather, trust in the officers who made the stop, and satisfaction with their conduct, fell in the test sites, relative to the controls, after implementation of the intervention. The intervention had no significant effect on general trust in the police, nor on police legitimacy
Conclusions
Results demonstrate the difficulty in translating experimental interventions across policing contexts, and challenge the notion that public perceptions may be improved through a simple, additive approach to the delivery and communication of procedural justice.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1573-3750 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental criminology, 2015-09, Vol.11 (3), p.419-443 |
issn | 1573-3750 1572-8315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1718125042 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Clinical trials Criminology and Criminal Justice Law and Criminology Police Political Science Roads & highways Social Sciences Trust |
title | Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A11%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20public%20trust%20and%20police%20legitimacy%20during%20road%20traffic%20encounters:%20results%20from%20a%20randomised%20controlled%20trial%20in%20Scotland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20criminology&rft.au=MacQueen,%20Sarah&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=443&rft.pages=419-443&rft.issn=1573-3750&rft.eissn=1572-8315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3823464181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718125042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |