Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland

Objectives This paper reports results from the Scottish Community Engagement Trial (ScotCET), devised to replicate the Queensland Community Trial (QCET). ScotCET was an RCT that tested the effects of ‘procedurally just’ policing on public trust and police legitimacy Methods A block-randomised (match...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental criminology 2015-09, Vol.11 (3), p.419-443
Hauptverfasser: MacQueen, Sarah, Bradford, Ben
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 443
container_issue 3
container_start_page 419
container_title Journal of experimental criminology
container_volume 11
creator MacQueen, Sarah
Bradford, Ben
description Objectives This paper reports results from the Scottish Community Engagement Trial (ScotCET), devised to replicate the Queensland Community Trial (QCET). ScotCET was an RCT that tested the effects of ‘procedurally just’ policing on public trust and police legitimacy Methods A block-randomised (matched pairs) design, with pretest and posttest measures, was implemented in the context of road policing in Scotland. Participants were drivers stopped by police in December and January 2013/14 as part of Police Scotland’s ‘Festive Road Safety Campaign’. The experimental intervention comprised a checklist of key messages to include in routine roadside vehicle stops, and a leaflet for officers to give to drivers. Analysis proceeds via random effects regression models predicting latent variable measures of trust, satisfaction and legitimacy Results Contrary to expectations, the intervention did not improve trust and legitimacy; rather, trust in the officers who made the stop, and satisfaction with their conduct, fell in the test sites, relative to the controls, after implementation of the intervention. The intervention had no significant effect on general trust in the police, nor on police legitimacy Conclusions Results demonstrate the difficulty in translating experimental interventions across policing contexts, and challenge the notion that public perceptions may be improved through a simple, additive approach to the delivery and communication of procedural justice.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1718125042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3823464181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-131a917b514764df253d40a851137cf85e9549d1ad3fbfc8faf3bda0a79de31f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhiMEEuXyAGyWmAM-dlwnbKgqF6kSAzBbji8lVWoH2xk68-I4hIGFycfS9_9H5yuKK8A3gDG_jQCkISUGVjakwiU-KhbAOClrCuz4Z6Yl5QyfFmcx7jCuSMXpovhauw_pVOe2aBjbvlMohTEmJJ1Gg89_g3qz7VK3l-qA9BgmMnipMyetzbxxyo8umRDvUDBx7FNENvg9kijkFr_votFIeZeC73szBTvZo86hV-VTn5GL4sTKPprL3_e8eH9Yv62eys3L4_PqflMqWi9TCRRkA7xlUPFlpS1hVFdY1gyAcmVrZhpWNRqkpra1qrbS0lZLLHmjDQVLz4vruXcI_nM0MYmdH4PLKwVwqIGwbCVTMFMq-BiDsWII-fpwEIDF5FrMrkV2LSbXAucMmTNxmASZ8Kf539A3e_WESQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718125042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>MacQueen, Sarah ; Bradford, Ben</creator><creatorcontrib>MacQueen, Sarah ; Bradford, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives This paper reports results from the Scottish Community Engagement Trial (ScotCET), devised to replicate the Queensland Community Trial (QCET). ScotCET was an RCT that tested the effects of ‘procedurally just’ policing on public trust and police legitimacy Methods A block-randomised (matched pairs) design, with pretest and posttest measures, was implemented in the context of road policing in Scotland. Participants were drivers stopped by police in December and January 2013/14 as part of Police Scotland’s ‘Festive Road Safety Campaign’. The experimental intervention comprised a checklist of key messages to include in routine roadside vehicle stops, and a leaflet for officers to give to drivers. Analysis proceeds via random effects regression models predicting latent variable measures of trust, satisfaction and legitimacy Results Contrary to expectations, the intervention did not improve trust and legitimacy; rather, trust in the officers who made the stop, and satisfaction with their conduct, fell in the test sites, relative to the controls, after implementation of the intervention. The intervention had no significant effect on general trust in the police, nor on police legitimacy Conclusions Results demonstrate the difficulty in translating experimental interventions across policing contexts, and challenge the notion that public perceptions may be improved through a simple, additive approach to the delivery and communication of procedural justice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-3750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Law and Criminology ; Police ; Political Science ; Roads &amp; highways ; Social Sciences ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental criminology, 2015-09, Vol.11 (3), p.419-443</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-131a917b514764df253d40a851137cf85e9549d1ad3fbfc8faf3bda0a79de31f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-131a917b514764df253d40a851137cf85e9549d1ad3fbfc8faf3bda0a79de31f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacQueen, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Ben</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland</title><title>Journal of experimental criminology</title><addtitle>J Exp Criminol</addtitle><description>Objectives This paper reports results from the Scottish Community Engagement Trial (ScotCET), devised to replicate the Queensland Community Trial (QCET). ScotCET was an RCT that tested the effects of ‘procedurally just’ policing on public trust and police legitimacy Methods A block-randomised (matched pairs) design, with pretest and posttest measures, was implemented in the context of road policing in Scotland. Participants were drivers stopped by police in December and January 2013/14 as part of Police Scotland’s ‘Festive Road Safety Campaign’. The experimental intervention comprised a checklist of key messages to include in routine roadside vehicle stops, and a leaflet for officers to give to drivers. Analysis proceeds via random effects regression models predicting latent variable measures of trust, satisfaction and legitimacy Results Contrary to expectations, the intervention did not improve trust and legitimacy; rather, trust in the officers who made the stop, and satisfaction with their conduct, fell in the test sites, relative to the controls, after implementation of the intervention. The intervention had no significant effect on general trust in the police, nor on police legitimacy Conclusions Results demonstrate the difficulty in translating experimental interventions across policing contexts, and challenge the notion that public perceptions may be improved through a simple, additive approach to the delivery and communication of procedural justice.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Law and Criminology</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Roads &amp; highways</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>1573-3750</issn><issn>1572-8315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhiMEEuXyAGyWmAM-dlwnbKgqF6kSAzBbji8lVWoH2xk68-I4hIGFycfS9_9H5yuKK8A3gDG_jQCkISUGVjakwiU-KhbAOClrCuz4Z6Yl5QyfFmcx7jCuSMXpovhauw_pVOe2aBjbvlMohTEmJJ1Gg89_g3qz7VK3l-qA9BgmMnipMyetzbxxyo8umRDvUDBx7FNENvg9kijkFr_votFIeZeC73szBTvZo86hV-VTn5GL4sTKPprL3_e8eH9Yv62eys3L4_PqflMqWi9TCRRkA7xlUPFlpS1hVFdY1gyAcmVrZhpWNRqkpra1qrbS0lZLLHmjDQVLz4vruXcI_nM0MYmdH4PLKwVwqIGwbCVTMFMq-BiDsWII-fpwEIDF5FrMrkV2LSbXAucMmTNxmASZ8Kf539A3e_WESQ</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>MacQueen, Sarah</creator><creator>Bradford, Ben</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland</title><author>MacQueen, Sarah ; Bradford, Ben</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-131a917b514764df253d40a851137cf85e9549d1ad3fbfc8faf3bda0a79de31f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Law and Criminology</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Roads &amp; highways</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacQueen, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Ben</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacQueen, Sarah</au><au>Bradford, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental criminology</jtitle><stitle>J Exp Criminol</stitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>443</epage><pages>419-443</pages><issn>1573-3750</issn><eissn>1572-8315</eissn><abstract>Objectives This paper reports results from the Scottish Community Engagement Trial (ScotCET), devised to replicate the Queensland Community Trial (QCET). ScotCET was an RCT that tested the effects of ‘procedurally just’ policing on public trust and police legitimacy Methods A block-randomised (matched pairs) design, with pretest and posttest measures, was implemented in the context of road policing in Scotland. Participants were drivers stopped by police in December and January 2013/14 as part of Police Scotland’s ‘Festive Road Safety Campaign’. The experimental intervention comprised a checklist of key messages to include in routine roadside vehicle stops, and a leaflet for officers to give to drivers. Analysis proceeds via random effects regression models predicting latent variable measures of trust, satisfaction and legitimacy Results Contrary to expectations, the intervention did not improve trust and legitimacy; rather, trust in the officers who made the stop, and satisfaction with their conduct, fell in the test sites, relative to the controls, after implementation of the intervention. The intervention had no significant effect on general trust in the police, nor on police legitimacy Conclusions Results demonstrate the difficulty in translating experimental interventions across policing contexts, and challenge the notion that public perceptions may be improved through a simple, additive approach to the delivery and communication of procedural justice.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1573-3750
ispartof Journal of experimental criminology, 2015-09, Vol.11 (3), p.419-443
issn 1573-3750
1572-8315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1718125042
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Clinical trials
Criminology and Criminal Justice
Law and Criminology
Police
Political Science
Roads & highways
Social Sciences
Trust
title Enhancing public trust and police legitimacy during road traffic encounters: results from a randomised controlled trial in Scotland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A11%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20public%20trust%20and%20police%20legitimacy%20during%20road%20traffic%20encounters:%20results%20from%20a%20randomised%20controlled%20trial%20in%20Scotland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20criminology&rft.au=MacQueen,%20Sarah&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=443&rft.pages=419-443&rft.issn=1573-3750&rft.eissn=1572-8315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11292-015-9240-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3823464181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718125042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true