Evaluating Psychological Aspects of Wood and Laminate Products in Indoor Settings with Pictures
Natural materials in indoor settings influence the human organism positively. Wood is a natural material and shows similar positive effects on the individual's well-being. Because of similar looks and functional properties, wood can be compared with laminate. However, when investigating psychol...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Forest products journal 2015-09, Vol.65 (5-6), p.263-271 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 271 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5-6 |
| container_start_page | 263 |
| container_title | Forest products journal |
| container_volume | 65 |
| creator | Jimenez, Paul Dunkl, Anita Eibel, Kerstin Denk, Elisabeth Grote, Vincent Kelz, Christina Moser, Maximilian |
| description | Natural materials in indoor settings influence the human organism positively. Wood is a natural material and shows similar positive effects on the individual's well-being. Because of similar looks and functional properties, wood can be compared with laminate. However, when investigating psychological differences, wood is usually compared with carpets, glass, leather, stone, or plastic, but not compared with a visually similar material such as laminate. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the different psychological perception of wood and laminate products in an indoor setting. This study further investigated what specific psychological aspects can differentiate wood from laminate products, and if wood is preferred over laminate and is more likely to be purchased. Different pictures that depict wood and laminate products in an indoor setting were used to evaluate the psychological perception. This evaluation included measuring 11 quality criteria, the perception of the environmental atmosphere, and the purchase decision. The experimental design was a 2 × 2 × 2 design with repeated measures for material and sequence. The sample consisted of 93 experts as well as nonexperts for wood. The result shows that wood products are rated higher than laminate products regarding several psychological aspects, such as health, physical and mental stimulation, and performance enhancement. In addition, wood products were rated significantly more warming and cozy, and the participants would recommend, purchase, and accept more deficiencies for purchasing wood products than for laminate products. Overall, the material wood was preferred over the material laminate. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00003 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1716291808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A430395311</galeid><sourcerecordid>A430395311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-bde5778ea7d3979d0835c9c97e57f40a0330d47d9c00397bea55a88b56f7eec33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkd1rHCEUxaU00G2a5z5W6Gsn0XUcZx6XfDQpC11IQh7lrjqzhlndep2W_Pc12RIaWAUv3Ps7R_QQ8pmzUy6YEmdXqx_VRcXripUl3pHZXKim6hqh3pMZY1xWqlbiA_mI-FgIJZv5jOjL3zBOkH0Y6AqfzCaOcfAGRrrAnTMZaezpQ4yWQrB0CVsfIDu6StFOz1Mf6E2wMSZ66_KzC9I_Pm_oyps8JYefyFEPI7qTf_WY3F9d3p1fV8uf32_OF8vK1ELmam2dVKp1oKzoVGdZK6TpTKdKu68ZMCGYrZXtTHlap9YOpIS2XcumV84ZIY7J173vLsVfk8OsH-OUQrlSc8Wbecfb4vlKDTA67UMfcwKz9Wj0ohbFWQrOC1UdoAYXXIIxBtf70n7Dnx7gy7Zu681Bwbf_BOsJfXBYDvTDJuMAE-Jb_GyPmxQRk-v1LvktpCfNmX7JXpfs9YXmtX7Jvii-7BU9RA1D8qjvb-eMN2UqVflx8RcMWKie</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1716291808</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating Psychological Aspects of Wood and Laminate Products in Indoor Settings with Pictures</title><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jimenez, Paul ; Dunkl, Anita ; Eibel, Kerstin ; Denk, Elisabeth ; Grote, Vincent ; Kelz, Christina ; Moser, Maximilian</creator><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, Paul ; Dunkl, Anita ; Eibel, Kerstin ; Denk, Elisabeth ; Grote, Vincent ; Kelz, Christina ; Moser, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><description>Natural materials in indoor settings influence the human organism positively. Wood is a natural material and shows similar positive effects on the individual's well-being. Because of similar looks and functional properties, wood can be compared with laminate. However, when investigating psychological differences, wood is usually compared with carpets, glass, leather, stone, or plastic, but not compared with a visually similar material such as laminate. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the different psychological perception of wood and laminate products in an indoor setting. This study further investigated what specific psychological aspects can differentiate wood from laminate products, and if wood is preferred over laminate and is more likely to be purchased. Different pictures that depict wood and laminate products in an indoor setting were used to evaluate the psychological perception. This evaluation included measuring 11 quality criteria, the perception of the environmental atmosphere, and the purchase decision. The experimental design was a 2 × 2 × 2 design with repeated measures for material and sequence. The sample consisted of 93 experts as well as nonexperts for wood. The result shows that wood products are rated higher than laminate products regarding several psychological aspects, such as health, physical and mental stimulation, and performance enhancement. In addition, wood products were rated significantly more warming and cozy, and the participants would recommend, purchase, and accept more deficiencies for purchasing wood products than for laminate products. Overall, the material wood was preferred over the material laminate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-7473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-9637</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FPJOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Forest Products Society, etc.</publisher><subject>Aesthetics ; Analysis ; Behavioral psychology ; Comparative analysis ; Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; experimental design ; experts ; Floor coverings ; Flooring ; Forest products industry ; functional properties ; glass ; humans ; Interior design ; Laminates ; leather ; Natural products ; Perceptions ; Properties ; Psychological aspects ; Purchasing ; Studies ; Wood ; Wood products</subject><ispartof>Forest products journal, 2015-09, Vol.65 (5-6), p.263-271</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Forest Products Society</rights><rights>Copyright Forest Products Society 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-bde5778ea7d3979d0835c9c97e57f40a0330d47d9c00397bea55a88b56f7eec33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunkl, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eibel, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denk, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grote, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelz, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moser, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating Psychological Aspects of Wood and Laminate Products in Indoor Settings with Pictures</title><title>Forest products journal</title><description>Natural materials in indoor settings influence the human organism positively. Wood is a natural material and shows similar positive effects on the individual's well-being. Because of similar looks and functional properties, wood can be compared with laminate. However, when investigating psychological differences, wood is usually compared with carpets, glass, leather, stone, or plastic, but not compared with a visually similar material such as laminate. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the different psychological perception of wood and laminate products in an indoor setting. This study further investigated what specific psychological aspects can differentiate wood from laminate products, and if wood is preferred over laminate and is more likely to be purchased. Different pictures that depict wood and laminate products in an indoor setting were used to evaluate the psychological perception. This evaluation included measuring 11 quality criteria, the perception of the environmental atmosphere, and the purchase decision. The experimental design was a 2 × 2 × 2 design with repeated measures for material and sequence. The sample consisted of 93 experts as well as nonexperts for wood. The result shows that wood products are rated higher than laminate products regarding several psychological aspects, such as health, physical and mental stimulation, and performance enhancement. In addition, wood products were rated significantly more warming and cozy, and the participants would recommend, purchase, and accept more deficiencies for purchasing wood products than for laminate products. Overall, the material wood was preferred over the material laminate.</description><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Behavioral psychology</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>experimental design</subject><subject>experts</subject><subject>Floor coverings</subject><subject>Flooring</subject><subject>Forest products industry</subject><subject>functional properties</subject><subject>glass</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>Interior design</subject><subject>Laminates</subject><subject>leather</subject><subject>Natural products</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wood</subject><subject>Wood products</subject><issn>0015-7473</issn><issn>2376-9637</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkd1rHCEUxaU00G2a5z5W6Gsn0XUcZx6XfDQpC11IQh7lrjqzhlndep2W_Pc12RIaWAUv3Ps7R_QQ8pmzUy6YEmdXqx_VRcXripUl3pHZXKim6hqh3pMZY1xWqlbiA_mI-FgIJZv5jOjL3zBOkH0Y6AqfzCaOcfAGRrrAnTMZaezpQ4yWQrB0CVsfIDu6StFOz1Mf6E2wMSZ66_KzC9I_Pm_oyps8JYefyFEPI7qTf_WY3F9d3p1fV8uf32_OF8vK1ELmam2dVKp1oKzoVGdZK6TpTKdKu68ZMCGYrZXtTHlap9YOpIS2XcumV84ZIY7J173vLsVfk8OsH-OUQrlSc8Wbecfb4vlKDTA67UMfcwKz9Wj0ohbFWQrOC1UdoAYXXIIxBtf70n7Dnx7gy7Zu681Bwbf_BOsJfXBYDvTDJuMAE-Jb_GyPmxQRk-v1LvktpCfNmX7JXpfs9YXmtX7Jvii-7BU9RA1D8qjvb-eMN2UqVflx8RcMWKie</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Jimenez, Paul</creator><creator>Dunkl, Anita</creator><creator>Eibel, Kerstin</creator><creator>Denk, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Grote, Vincent</creator><creator>Kelz, Christina</creator><creator>Moser, Maximilian</creator><general>Forest Products Society, etc.</general><general>Forest Products Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Evaluating Psychological Aspects of Wood and Laminate Products in Indoor Settings with Pictures</title><author>Jimenez, Paul ; Dunkl, Anita ; Eibel, Kerstin ; Denk, Elisabeth ; Grote, Vincent ; Kelz, Christina ; Moser, Maximilian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-bde5778ea7d3979d0835c9c97e57f40a0330d47d9c00397bea55a88b56f7eec33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Behavioral psychology</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>experimental design</topic><topic>experts</topic><topic>Floor coverings</topic><topic>Flooring</topic><topic>Forest products industry</topic><topic>functional properties</topic><topic>glass</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>Interior design</topic><topic>Laminates</topic><topic>leather</topic><topic>Natural products</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wood</topic><topic>Wood products</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunkl, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eibel, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denk, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grote, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelz, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moser, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest products journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jimenez, Paul</au><au>Dunkl, Anita</au><au>Eibel, Kerstin</au><au>Denk, Elisabeth</au><au>Grote, Vincent</au><au>Kelz, Christina</au><au>Moser, Maximilian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating Psychological Aspects of Wood and Laminate Products in Indoor Settings with Pictures</atitle><jtitle>Forest products journal</jtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>263-271</pages><issn>0015-7473</issn><eissn>2376-9637</eissn><coden>FPJOAB</coden><abstract>Natural materials in indoor settings influence the human organism positively. Wood is a natural material and shows similar positive effects on the individual's well-being. Because of similar looks and functional properties, wood can be compared with laminate. However, when investigating psychological differences, wood is usually compared with carpets, glass, leather, stone, or plastic, but not compared with a visually similar material such as laminate. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the different psychological perception of wood and laminate products in an indoor setting. This study further investigated what specific psychological aspects can differentiate wood from laminate products, and if wood is preferred over laminate and is more likely to be purchased. Different pictures that depict wood and laminate products in an indoor setting were used to evaluate the psychological perception. This evaluation included measuring 11 quality criteria, the perception of the environmental atmosphere, and the purchase decision. The experimental design was a 2 × 2 × 2 design with repeated measures for material and sequence. The sample consisted of 93 experts as well as nonexperts for wood. The result shows that wood products are rated higher than laminate products regarding several psychological aspects, such as health, physical and mental stimulation, and performance enhancement. In addition, wood products were rated significantly more warming and cozy, and the participants would recommend, purchase, and accept more deficiencies for purchasing wood products than for laminate products. Overall, the material wood was preferred over the material laminate.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Forest Products Society, etc.</pub><doi>10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00003</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0015-7473 |
| ispartof | Forest products journal, 2015-09, Vol.65 (5-6), p.263-271 |
| issn | 0015-7473 2376-9637 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1716291808 |
| source | Allen Press Journals; Business Source Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Aesthetics Analysis Behavioral psychology Comparative analysis Consumer behavior Consumers experimental design experts Floor coverings Flooring Forest products industry functional properties glass humans Interior design Laminates leather Natural products Perceptions Properties Psychological aspects Purchasing Studies Wood Wood products |
| title | Evaluating Psychological Aspects of Wood and Laminate Products in Indoor Settings with Pictures |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A32%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20Psychological%20Aspects%20of%20Wood%20and%20Laminate%20Products%20in%20Indoor%20Settings%20with%20Pictures&rft.jtitle=Forest%20products%20journal&rft.au=Jimenez,%20Paul&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=263-271&rft.issn=0015-7473&rft.eissn=2376-9637&rft.coden=FPJOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00003&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA430395311%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1716291808&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A430395311&rfr_iscdi=true |