Model Specification and Confidence Intervals for Voice Communication

There is an ongoing need for modeling voice communications in industrial applications, with system performance often depending on the accuracy of this information transfer. This article presents a case study using data from a human-in-the-loop experiment with a simulated flight environment conducted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality engineering 2015-10, Vol.27 (4), p.402-415
Hauptverfasser: Wilson, Sara R., Leonard, Robert D., Edwards, David J., Swieringa, Kurt A., Murdoch, Jennifer L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 415
container_issue 4
container_start_page 402
container_title Quality engineering
container_volume 27
creator Wilson, Sara R.
Leonard, Robert D.
Edwards, David J.
Swieringa, Kurt A.
Murdoch, Jennifer L.
description There is an ongoing need for modeling voice communications in industrial applications, with system performance often depending on the accuracy of this information transfer. This article presents a case study using data from a human-in-the-loop experiment with a simulated flight environment conducted by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to investigate airborne spacing procedures. The interval management procedures during approach to an airport required a complex voice clearance issued by Air Traffic Control to a flight crew using radio communications. The time required for voice communication transfers is modeled, as is the time required for flight crews to complete data entry tasks. Commonly used reliability distributions are fit to the data, and the lognormal and log-logistic distributions are found to model the data reasonably well. Two analytical methods for calculating the confidence intervals for the lognormal mean are compared, and bootstrapping is used for log-logistic mean confidence intervals. Extensive investigation of outliers was performed to identify procedural anomalies. These initial results lead to design guidance for the phraseology used in air/ground communications.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/08982112.2015.1023313
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1715924752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3816386761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fe7a43b1efe9060a4babace84b5f14e3f712bdf5bb6bb3c8b0e9d7f29c0796b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB8_QRhwPTWPSSezU8ZXoeLC4jYkmRtImUlqMlX6783QunV14dzvnMs9CN0QPCdY4DssGkEJoXOKCc8SZYywEzQjnNGyopSeotnElBN0ji5S2mBMhGjYDD2-hQ764mMLxlln1OiCL5TvijZ46zrwBoqlHyF-qz4VNsTiM7istWEYdv5ouEJnNq_h-jgv0fr5ad2-lqv3l2X7sCoNY2IsLdSqYpqAhQYvsKq00sqAqDS3pAJma0J1Z7nWC62ZERpD09WWNgbXzUKzS3R7iN3G8LWDNMpN2EWfL0pSE97QquY0U_xAmRhSimDlNrpBxb0kWE59yb--5NSXPPaVffcHn_P5zUH9hNh3clT7PkQblTcuSfZ_xC_2FXJO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1715924752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Model Specification and Confidence Intervals for Voice Communication</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Wilson, Sara R. ; Leonard, Robert D. ; Edwards, David J. ; Swieringa, Kurt A. ; Murdoch, Jennifer L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Sara R. ; Leonard, Robert D. ; Edwards, David J. ; Swieringa, Kurt A. ; Murdoch, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><description>There is an ongoing need for modeling voice communications in industrial applications, with system performance often depending on the accuracy of this information transfer. This article presents a case study using data from a human-in-the-loop experiment with a simulated flight environment conducted by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to investigate airborne spacing procedures. The interval management procedures during approach to an airport required a complex voice clearance issued by Air Traffic Control to a flight crew using radio communications. The time required for voice communication transfers is modeled, as is the time required for flight crews to complete data entry tasks. Commonly used reliability distributions are fit to the data, and the lognormal and log-logistic distributions are found to model the data reasonably well. Two analytical methods for calculating the confidence intervals for the lognormal mean are compared, and bootstrapping is used for log-logistic mean confidence intervals. Extensive investigation of outliers was performed to identify procedural anomalies. These initial results lead to design guidance for the phraseology used in air/ground communications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2015.1023313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milwaukee: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Aircraft accidents &amp; safety ; Bootstrap method ; bootstrap methods ; Confidence intervals ; Design specifications ; maximum likelihood estimation ; nonnormal data ; nonparametric methods ; probability distributions ; Radio communications ; Reliability engineering ; Studies ; Voice communication</subject><ispartof>Quality engineering, 2015-10, Vol.27 (4), p.402-415</ispartof><rights>This article not subject to US copyright law.</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fe7a43b1efe9060a4babace84b5f14e3f712bdf5bb6bb3c8b0e9d7f29c0796b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fe7a43b1efe9060a4babace84b5f14e3f712bdf5bb6bb3c8b0e9d7f29c0796b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Sara R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonard, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swieringa, Kurt A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murdoch, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><title>Model Specification and Confidence Intervals for Voice Communication</title><title>Quality engineering</title><description>There is an ongoing need for modeling voice communications in industrial applications, with system performance often depending on the accuracy of this information transfer. This article presents a case study using data from a human-in-the-loop experiment with a simulated flight environment conducted by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to investigate airborne spacing procedures. The interval management procedures during approach to an airport required a complex voice clearance issued by Air Traffic Control to a flight crew using radio communications. The time required for voice communication transfers is modeled, as is the time required for flight crews to complete data entry tasks. Commonly used reliability distributions are fit to the data, and the lognormal and log-logistic distributions are found to model the data reasonably well. Two analytical methods for calculating the confidence intervals for the lognormal mean are compared, and bootstrapping is used for log-logistic mean confidence intervals. Extensive investigation of outliers was performed to identify procedural anomalies. These initial results lead to design guidance for the phraseology used in air/ground communications.</description><subject>Aircraft accidents &amp; safety</subject><subject>Bootstrap method</subject><subject>bootstrap methods</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Design specifications</subject><subject>maximum likelihood estimation</subject><subject>nonnormal data</subject><subject>nonparametric methods</subject><subject>probability distributions</subject><subject>Radio communications</subject><subject>Reliability engineering</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Voice communication</subject><issn>0898-2112</issn><issn>1532-4222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB8_QRhwPTWPSSezU8ZXoeLC4jYkmRtImUlqMlX6783QunV14dzvnMs9CN0QPCdY4DssGkEJoXOKCc8SZYywEzQjnNGyopSeotnElBN0ji5S2mBMhGjYDD2-hQ764mMLxlln1OiCL5TvijZ46zrwBoqlHyF-qz4VNsTiM7istWEYdv5ouEJnNq_h-jgv0fr5ad2-lqv3l2X7sCoNY2IsLdSqYpqAhQYvsKq00sqAqDS3pAJma0J1Z7nWC62ZERpD09WWNgbXzUKzS3R7iN3G8LWDNMpN2EWfL0pSE97QquY0U_xAmRhSimDlNrpBxb0kWE59yb--5NSXPPaVffcHn_P5zUH9hNh3clT7PkQblTcuSfZ_xC_2FXJO</recordid><startdate>20151002</startdate><enddate>20151002</enddate><creator>Wilson, Sara R.</creator><creator>Leonard, Robert D.</creator><creator>Edwards, David J.</creator><creator>Swieringa, Kurt A.</creator><creator>Murdoch, Jennifer L.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151002</creationdate><title>Model Specification and Confidence Intervals for Voice Communication</title><author>Wilson, Sara R. ; Leonard, Robert D. ; Edwards, David J. ; Swieringa, Kurt A. ; Murdoch, Jennifer L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-fe7a43b1efe9060a4babace84b5f14e3f712bdf5bb6bb3c8b0e9d7f29c0796b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aircraft accidents &amp; safety</topic><topic>Bootstrap method</topic><topic>bootstrap methods</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Design specifications</topic><topic>maximum likelihood estimation</topic><topic>nonnormal data</topic><topic>nonparametric methods</topic><topic>probability distributions</topic><topic>Radio communications</topic><topic>Reliability engineering</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Voice communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Sara R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonard, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swieringa, Kurt A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murdoch, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Quality engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Sara R.</au><au>Leonard, Robert D.</au><au>Edwards, David J.</au><au>Swieringa, Kurt A.</au><au>Murdoch, Jennifer L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Model Specification and Confidence Intervals for Voice Communication</atitle><jtitle>Quality engineering</jtitle><date>2015-10-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>402</spage><epage>415</epage><pages>402-415</pages><issn>0898-2112</issn><eissn>1532-4222</eissn><abstract>There is an ongoing need for modeling voice communications in industrial applications, with system performance often depending on the accuracy of this information transfer. This article presents a case study using data from a human-in-the-loop experiment with a simulated flight environment conducted by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to investigate airborne spacing procedures. The interval management procedures during approach to an airport required a complex voice clearance issued by Air Traffic Control to a flight crew using radio communications. The time required for voice communication transfers is modeled, as is the time required for flight crews to complete data entry tasks. Commonly used reliability distributions are fit to the data, and the lognormal and log-logistic distributions are found to model the data reasonably well. Two analytical methods for calculating the confidence intervals for the lognormal mean are compared, and bootstrapping is used for log-logistic mean confidence intervals. Extensive investigation of outliers was performed to identify procedural anomalies. These initial results lead to design guidance for the phraseology used in air/ground communications.</abstract><cop>Milwaukee</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/08982112.2015.1023313</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2112
ispartof Quality engineering, 2015-10, Vol.27 (4), p.402-415
issn 0898-2112
1532-4222
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1715924752
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Aircraft accidents & safety
Bootstrap method
bootstrap methods
Confidence intervals
Design specifications
maximum likelihood estimation
nonnormal data
nonparametric methods
probability distributions
Radio communications
Reliability engineering
Studies
Voice communication
title Model Specification and Confidence Intervals for Voice Communication
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Model%20Specification%20and%20Confidence%20Intervals%20for%20Voice%20Communication&rft.jtitle=Quality%20engineering&rft.au=Wilson,%20Sara%20R.&rft.date=2015-10-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=402&rft.epage=415&rft.pages=402-415&rft.issn=0898-2112&rft.eissn=1532-4222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08982112.2015.1023313&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3816386761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1715924752&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true