Neighborhood renewal: The decision to renovate or tear down
Renewal at the neighborhood level is the culmination of redevelopment decisions made at the property level. This study examines the decisions of whether to partially redevelop (renovate) or fully redevelop (tear down) existing improvements. Results from the study reveal the primary determinants of t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Regional science and urban economics 2015-09, Vol.54, p.99-115 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 115 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Regional science and urban economics |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Munneke, Henry J. Womack, Kiplan S. |
description | Renewal at the neighborhood level is the culmination of redevelopment decisions made at the property level. This study examines the decisions of whether to partially redevelop (renovate) or fully redevelop (tear down) existing improvements. Results from the study reveal the primary determinants of the decision, particularly highlighting the importance of structural attributes for renovations, land for teardowns, and location and prior redevelopment activity for both. Additionally, as a test of a proposition from prior studies, major renovations are found to be equivalent to teardown sales, where the property is valued only for the underlying land. The level of expected renovations is also shown to decrease the selling price of properties requiring renovations.
•Examines the decision to partially redevelop (renovate) or fully redevelop (tear down) single family residential housing.•Decision differences: structure is important to renovation decisions, tear down decisions focus on the lot.•Decision similarities: location and neighborhood redevelopment activity are important determinants of both decisions.•The level of expected renovations decreases the selling price of properties requiring renovations.•Major renovations are found to be equivalent to teardown sales, where the property is valued only for the underlying land. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.08.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1713973964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0166046215000654</els_id><sourcerecordid>3813022211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-8bc89f217af907569a970d24b2962b8ed86f567b26f57813863e9d8e5f12ccc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDxGsE_xI_CgrVJ5SBZuythJ70joqcbHTVvw9jsqCJatZzLl3NAeha4ILggm_7YoAq2jcLjRgfEExqQosC4zJCZoQKVROGZanaJJgnuOS03N0EWOHE8Epm6C7N3CrdePD2nubBejhUG9m2XINmQXjovN9Nvhx4ff1AJkP2QB1yKw_9JforK03Ea5-5xR9PD0u5y_54v35dX6_yE1J-JDLxkjVUiLqVmFRcVUrgS0tG6o4bSRYyduKi4amISRhkjNQVkLVEmqMoWyKbo692-C_dhAH3fld6NNJTQRhSjDFy0TNjpQJPsYArd4G91mHb02wHmXpTv-VpUdZGkudVKTwwzEM6Y-9g6ATB70B6wKYQVvv_lPzA8oFeLE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1713973964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neighborhood renewal: The decision to renovate or tear down</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Munneke, Henry J. ; Womack, Kiplan S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Munneke, Henry J. ; Womack, Kiplan S.</creatorcontrib><description>Renewal at the neighborhood level is the culmination of redevelopment decisions made at the property level. This study examines the decisions of whether to partially redevelop (renovate) or fully redevelop (tear down) existing improvements. Results from the study reveal the primary determinants of the decision, particularly highlighting the importance of structural attributes for renovations, land for teardowns, and location and prior redevelopment activity for both. Additionally, as a test of a proposition from prior studies, major renovations are found to be equivalent to teardown sales, where the property is valued only for the underlying land. The level of expected renovations is also shown to decrease the selling price of properties requiring renovations.
•Examines the decision to partially redevelop (renovate) or fully redevelop (tear down) single family residential housing.•Decision differences: structure is important to renovation decisions, tear down decisions focus on the lot.•Decision similarities: location and neighborhood redevelopment activity are important determinants of both decisions.•The level of expected renovations decreases the selling price of properties requiring renovations.•Major renovations are found to be equivalent to teardown sales, where the property is valued only for the underlying land.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-0462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.08.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RGUEA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Decision analysis ; Gentrification ; Neighborhood renewal ; Redevelopment ; Renovation ; Renovation & restoration ; Studies ; Tear down ; Urban renewal</subject><ispartof>Regional science and urban economics, 2015-09, Vol.54, p.99-115</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Sep 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-8bc89f217af907569a970d24b2962b8ed86f567b26f57813863e9d8e5f12ccc23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-8bc89f217af907569a970d24b2962b8ed86f567b26f57813863e9d8e5f12ccc23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.08.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munneke, Henry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Womack, Kiplan S.</creatorcontrib><title>Neighborhood renewal: The decision to renovate or tear down</title><title>Regional science and urban economics</title><description>Renewal at the neighborhood level is the culmination of redevelopment decisions made at the property level. This study examines the decisions of whether to partially redevelop (renovate) or fully redevelop (tear down) existing improvements. Results from the study reveal the primary determinants of the decision, particularly highlighting the importance of structural attributes for renovations, land for teardowns, and location and prior redevelopment activity for both. Additionally, as a test of a proposition from prior studies, major renovations are found to be equivalent to teardown sales, where the property is valued only for the underlying land. The level of expected renovations is also shown to decrease the selling price of properties requiring renovations.
•Examines the decision to partially redevelop (renovate) or fully redevelop (tear down) single family residential housing.•Decision differences: structure is important to renovation decisions, tear down decisions focus on the lot.•Decision similarities: location and neighborhood redevelopment activity are important determinants of both decisions.•The level of expected renovations decreases the selling price of properties requiring renovations.•Major renovations are found to be equivalent to teardown sales, where the property is valued only for the underlying land.</description><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Gentrification</subject><subject>Neighborhood renewal</subject><subject>Redevelopment</subject><subject>Renovation</subject><subject>Renovation & restoration</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tear down</subject><subject>Urban renewal</subject><issn>0166-0462</issn><issn>1879-2308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDxGsE_xI_CgrVJ5SBZuythJ70joqcbHTVvw9jsqCJatZzLl3NAeha4ILggm_7YoAq2jcLjRgfEExqQosC4zJCZoQKVROGZanaJJgnuOS03N0EWOHE8Epm6C7N3CrdePD2nubBejhUG9m2XINmQXjovN9Nvhx4ff1AJkP2QB1yKw_9JforK03Ea5-5xR9PD0u5y_54v35dX6_yE1J-JDLxkjVUiLqVmFRcVUrgS0tG6o4bSRYyduKi4amISRhkjNQVkLVEmqMoWyKbo692-C_dhAH3fld6NNJTQRhSjDFy0TNjpQJPsYArd4G91mHb02wHmXpTv-VpUdZGkudVKTwwzEM6Y-9g6ATB70B6wKYQVvv_lPzA8oFeLE</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Munneke, Henry J.</creator><creator>Womack, Kiplan S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Neighborhood renewal: The decision to renovate or tear down</title><author>Munneke, Henry J. ; Womack, Kiplan S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-8bc89f217af907569a970d24b2962b8ed86f567b26f57813863e9d8e5f12ccc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Gentrification</topic><topic>Neighborhood renewal</topic><topic>Redevelopment</topic><topic>Renovation</topic><topic>Renovation & restoration</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tear down</topic><topic>Urban renewal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munneke, Henry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Womack, Kiplan S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Regional science and urban economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munneke, Henry J.</au><au>Womack, Kiplan S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neighborhood renewal: The decision to renovate or tear down</atitle><jtitle>Regional science and urban economics</jtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>54</volume><spage>99</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>99-115</pages><issn>0166-0462</issn><eissn>1879-2308</eissn><coden>RGUEA3</coden><abstract>Renewal at the neighborhood level is the culmination of redevelopment decisions made at the property level. This study examines the decisions of whether to partially redevelop (renovate) or fully redevelop (tear down) existing improvements. Results from the study reveal the primary determinants of the decision, particularly highlighting the importance of structural attributes for renovations, land for teardowns, and location and prior redevelopment activity for both. Additionally, as a test of a proposition from prior studies, major renovations are found to be equivalent to teardown sales, where the property is valued only for the underlying land. The level of expected renovations is also shown to decrease the selling price of properties requiring renovations.
•Examines the decision to partially redevelop (renovate) or fully redevelop (tear down) single family residential housing.•Decision differences: structure is important to renovation decisions, tear down decisions focus on the lot.•Decision similarities: location and neighborhood redevelopment activity are important determinants of both decisions.•The level of expected renovations decreases the selling price of properties requiring renovations.•Major renovations are found to be equivalent to teardown sales, where the property is valued only for the underlying land.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.08.001</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0166-0462 |
ispartof | Regional science and urban economics, 2015-09, Vol.54, p.99-115 |
issn | 0166-0462 1879-2308 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1713973964 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Decision analysis Gentrification Neighborhood renewal Redevelopment Renovation Renovation & restoration Studies Tear down Urban renewal |
title | Neighborhood renewal: The decision to renovate or tear down |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A09%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neighborhood%20renewal:%20The%20decision%20to%20renovate%20or%20tear%20down&rft.jtitle=Regional%20science%20and%20urban%20economics&rft.au=Munneke,%20Henry%20J.&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=54&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=99-115&rft.issn=0166-0462&rft.eissn=1879-2308&rft.coden=RGUEA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.08.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3813022211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1713973964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0166046215000654&rfr_iscdi=true |