A Nordic survey of management practices and owners' attitudes towards keeping horses in groups 1
Keeping horses in groups is widely recommended but limited information is available about how this is implemented in practice. The aim of this survey was to describe how horses are kept in the Nordic countries in relation to sex, age, breed, and equestrian discipline and to assess owners' attit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2015-09, Vol.93 (9), p.4564 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 4564 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Hartmann, E Bøe, K E Christensen, J W Hyyppä, S Jansson, H Jørgensen, G H M Ladewig, J Mejdell, C M Norling, Y Rundgren, M Särkijärvi, S Søndergaard, E Keeling, L J |
description | Keeping horses in groups is widely recommended but limited information is available about how this is implemented in practice. The aim of this survey was to describe how horses are kept in the Nordic countries in relation to sex, age, breed, and equestrian discipline and to assess owners' attitudes toward keeping horses in groups. Horse owners in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden were approached using a web-based questionnaire, which was translated into 4 languages and distributed online via equestrian forums, organizations, and social media. The number of respondents was 3,229, taking care of 17,248 horses. Only 8% of horses were never kept in groups, 47% were permanently grouped for 24 h/d, and 45% were stabled singly but grouped during turnout. Yearlings were most often permanently kept in groups (75%), mares and geldings more commonly during parts of the day (50 and 51%, respectively), and stallions were often kept alone (38%). Icelandic horses were more likely to be permanently kept in groups (36%) than warmbloods (16%) and ponies (15%). Twice as many competition horses (51%) were never grouped compared with horses used for breeding (20%) or leisure purposes (15%). The majority of respondents (86%) strongly agreed that group housing benefits horse welfare and that it is important for horses to have the company of conspecifics (92%). Nevertheless, not all horses were kept in groups, showing that attitudes toward group housing may not necessarily reflect current management. The risk of injury was a concern of many respondents (45%), as was introducing unfamiliar horses into already established groups (40%) and challenges in relation to feeding in groups (44%). Safety of people (23%) and difficulties handling groupkept horses (19%) were regarded as less problematic. Results suggest that the majority of horses have the possibility to freely interact with other horses, either as fulltime members of a group during 24 h/d or during turnout. Future research should address the extent to which being a part-time member of a group affects horse welfare. For permanent group housing to become more widespread, such as it is the case for most farm animals, future research could focus on solving some of the reoccurring problems perceived with keeping horses in groups. The dissemination of evidence-based information on all aspects around keeping horses in groups can ultimately stimulate further positive changes in the management of group-kept horses. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1713931749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3812819341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_17139317493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiruOwjAQAC0EEuHxDytdQRUpGxNIyhMCXXXV9WAlSzAQO-zaoPv7S8EHXDXSzIxUgkVepBo3eqySLMsxLUvMp2omcs0yzIuqSNTpE749N7YGifykX_Bn6IwzLXXkAvRs6mBrEjCuAf9yxLICE4INsRls8C_DjcCNqLeuhYtnGbR10LKPvQAu1ORs7kLLN-fq47D_2X2lPftHJAnHq4_shnTELepK43Zd6f9df_0TRiU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1713931749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Nordic survey of management practices and owners' attitudes towards keeping horses in groups 1</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Hartmann, E ; Bøe, K E ; Christensen, J W ; Hyyppä, S ; Jansson, H ; Jørgensen, G H M ; Ladewig, J ; Mejdell, C M ; Norling, Y ; Rundgren, M ; Särkijärvi, S ; Søndergaard, E ; Keeling, L J</creator><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, E ; Bøe, K E ; Christensen, J W ; Hyyppä, S ; Jansson, H ; Jørgensen, G H M ; Ladewig, J ; Mejdell, C M ; Norling, Y ; Rundgren, M ; Särkijärvi, S ; Søndergaard, E ; Keeling, L J</creatorcontrib><description>Keeping horses in groups is widely recommended but limited information is available about how this is implemented in practice. The aim of this survey was to describe how horses are kept in the Nordic countries in relation to sex, age, breed, and equestrian discipline and to assess owners' attitudes toward keeping horses in groups. Horse owners in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden were approached using a web-based questionnaire, which was translated into 4 languages and distributed online via equestrian forums, organizations, and social media. The number of respondents was 3,229, taking care of 17,248 horses. Only 8% of horses were never kept in groups, 47% were permanently grouped for 24 h/d, and 45% were stabled singly but grouped during turnout. Yearlings were most often permanently kept in groups (75%), mares and geldings more commonly during parts of the day (50 and 51%, respectively), and stallions were often kept alone (38%). Icelandic horses were more likely to be permanently kept in groups (36%) than warmbloods (16%) and ponies (15%). Twice as many competition horses (51%) were never grouped compared with horses used for breeding (20%) or leisure purposes (15%). The majority of respondents (86%) strongly agreed that group housing benefits horse welfare and that it is important for horses to have the company of conspecifics (92%). Nevertheless, not all horses were kept in groups, showing that attitudes toward group housing may not necessarily reflect current management. The risk of injury was a concern of many respondents (45%), as was introducing unfamiliar horses into already established groups (40%) and challenges in relation to feeding in groups (44%). Safety of people (23%) and difficulties handling groupkept horses (19%) were regarded as less problematic. Results suggest that the majority of horses have the possibility to freely interact with other horses, either as fulltime members of a group during 24 h/d or during turnout. Future research should address the extent to which being a part-time member of a group affects horse welfare. For permanent group housing to become more widespread, such as it is the case for most farm animals, future research could focus on solving some of the reoccurring problems perceived with keeping horses in groups. The dissemination of evidence-based information on all aspects around keeping horses in groups can ultimately stimulate further positive changes in the management of group-kept horses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Horses ; Management ; Polls & surveys</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2015-09, Vol.93 (9), p.4564</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Sep 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bøe, K E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, J W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyyppä, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansson, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, G H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladewig, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mejdell, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norling, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rundgren, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Särkijärvi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Søndergaard, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeling, L J</creatorcontrib><title>A Nordic survey of management practices and owners' attitudes towards keeping horses in groups 1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Keeping horses in groups is widely recommended but limited information is available about how this is implemented in practice. The aim of this survey was to describe how horses are kept in the Nordic countries in relation to sex, age, breed, and equestrian discipline and to assess owners' attitudes toward keeping horses in groups. Horse owners in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden were approached using a web-based questionnaire, which was translated into 4 languages and distributed online via equestrian forums, organizations, and social media. The number of respondents was 3,229, taking care of 17,248 horses. Only 8% of horses were never kept in groups, 47% were permanently grouped for 24 h/d, and 45% were stabled singly but grouped during turnout. Yearlings were most often permanently kept in groups (75%), mares and geldings more commonly during parts of the day (50 and 51%, respectively), and stallions were often kept alone (38%). Icelandic horses were more likely to be permanently kept in groups (36%) than warmbloods (16%) and ponies (15%). Twice as many competition horses (51%) were never grouped compared with horses used for breeding (20%) or leisure purposes (15%). The majority of respondents (86%) strongly agreed that group housing benefits horse welfare and that it is important for horses to have the company of conspecifics (92%). Nevertheless, not all horses were kept in groups, showing that attitudes toward group housing may not necessarily reflect current management. The risk of injury was a concern of many respondents (45%), as was introducing unfamiliar horses into already established groups (40%) and challenges in relation to feeding in groups (44%). Safety of people (23%) and difficulties handling groupkept horses (19%) were regarded as less problematic. Results suggest that the majority of horses have the possibility to freely interact with other horses, either as fulltime members of a group during 24 h/d or during turnout. Future research should address the extent to which being a part-time member of a group affects horse welfare. For permanent group housing to become more widespread, such as it is the case for most farm animals, future research could focus on solving some of the reoccurring problems perceived with keeping horses in groups. The dissemination of evidence-based information on all aspects around keeping horses in groups can ultimately stimulate further positive changes in the management of group-kept horses.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiruOwjAQAC0EEuHxDytdQRUpGxNIyhMCXXXV9WAlSzAQO-zaoPv7S8EHXDXSzIxUgkVepBo3eqySLMsxLUvMp2omcs0yzIuqSNTpE749N7YGifykX_Bn6IwzLXXkAvRs6mBrEjCuAf9yxLICE4INsRls8C_DjcCNqLeuhYtnGbR10LKPvQAu1ORs7kLLN-fq47D_2X2lPftHJAnHq4_shnTELepK43Zd6f9df_0TRiU</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Hartmann, E</creator><creator>Bøe, K E</creator><creator>Christensen, J W</creator><creator>Hyyppä, S</creator><creator>Jansson, H</creator><creator>Jørgensen, G H M</creator><creator>Ladewig, J</creator><creator>Mejdell, C M</creator><creator>Norling, Y</creator><creator>Rundgren, M</creator><creator>Särkijärvi, S</creator><creator>Søndergaard, E</creator><creator>Keeling, L J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>A Nordic survey of management practices and owners' attitudes towards keeping horses in groups 1</title><author>Hartmann, E ; Bøe, K E ; Christensen, J W ; Hyyppä, S ; Jansson, H ; Jørgensen, G H M ; Ladewig, J ; Mejdell, C M ; Norling, Y ; Rundgren, M ; Särkijärvi, S ; Søndergaard, E ; Keeling, L J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_17139317493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bøe, K E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, J W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyyppä, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansson, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, G H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladewig, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mejdell, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norling, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rundgren, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Särkijärvi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Søndergaard, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeling, L J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartmann, E</au><au>Bøe, K E</au><au>Christensen, J W</au><au>Hyyppä, S</au><au>Jansson, H</au><au>Jørgensen, G H M</au><au>Ladewig, J</au><au>Mejdell, C M</au><au>Norling, Y</au><au>Rundgren, M</au><au>Särkijärvi, S</au><au>Søndergaard, E</au><au>Keeling, L J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Nordic survey of management practices and owners' attitudes towards keeping horses in groups 1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4564</spage><pages>4564-</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Keeping horses in groups is widely recommended but limited information is available about how this is implemented in practice. The aim of this survey was to describe how horses are kept in the Nordic countries in relation to sex, age, breed, and equestrian discipline and to assess owners' attitudes toward keeping horses in groups. Horse owners in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden were approached using a web-based questionnaire, which was translated into 4 languages and distributed online via equestrian forums, organizations, and social media. The number of respondents was 3,229, taking care of 17,248 horses. Only 8% of horses were never kept in groups, 47% were permanently grouped for 24 h/d, and 45% were stabled singly but grouped during turnout. Yearlings were most often permanently kept in groups (75%), mares and geldings more commonly during parts of the day (50 and 51%, respectively), and stallions were often kept alone (38%). Icelandic horses were more likely to be permanently kept in groups (36%) than warmbloods (16%) and ponies (15%). Twice as many competition horses (51%) were never grouped compared with horses used for breeding (20%) or leisure purposes (15%). The majority of respondents (86%) strongly agreed that group housing benefits horse welfare and that it is important for horses to have the company of conspecifics (92%). Nevertheless, not all horses were kept in groups, showing that attitudes toward group housing may not necessarily reflect current management. The risk of injury was a concern of many respondents (45%), as was introducing unfamiliar horses into already established groups (40%) and challenges in relation to feeding in groups (44%). Safety of people (23%) and difficulties handling groupkept horses (19%) were regarded as less problematic. Results suggest that the majority of horses have the possibility to freely interact with other horses, either as fulltime members of a group during 24 h/d or during turnout. Future research should address the extent to which being a part-time member of a group affects horse welfare. For permanent group housing to become more widespread, such as it is the case for most farm animals, future research could focus on solving some of the reoccurring problems perceived with keeping horses in groups. The dissemination of evidence-based information on all aspects around keeping horses in groups can ultimately stimulate further positive changes in the management of group-kept horses.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2015-09, Vol.93 (9), p.4564 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1713931749 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Attitudes Horses Management Polls & surveys |
title | A Nordic survey of management practices and owners' attitudes towards keeping horses in groups 1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T08%3A38%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Nordic%20survey%20of%20management%20practices%20and%20owners'%20attitudes%20towards%20keeping%20horses%20in%20groups%201&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Hartmann,%20E&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4564&rft.pages=4564-&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3812819341%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1713931749&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |